Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Pitfalls 1 Pitfalls
Communication: If the systems in an or- The second may be deliberate withholding
Is your organization ready? 2
ganization are to be effective, then evi- or distortion of the information by the per-
dently we must have clear and unambigu- son(s) delegated to communicate the in-
The Steering Committee 3
ous communication with our employees. formation as it is seen to be damaging to
Unfortunately extensive studies have themselves and their own promotional
Implementation 4
shown that often when we believe we are prospects. Apart from the more obvious
communicating effectively the reality is issues of not trusting the sender of the
The benefits to the organization 5
very different. There are a number of pos- communication, we have the impor-
sible reasons for this dilemma. One of the tant barrier of “information overload”
Conclusion 6
most important is called “perceptual
where there is just too much detailed
bias”; here the receiver selectively filters
CMS Implementation Flowchart 7 information to be taken in by the re-
or distorts the incoming information only
cipients.
hearing what they want to hear!
Page 2 How to successfully implement a Competence Management System and the
critical steps involved
Pitfalls (continued)
The communication has got to be clear and unambiguous and not “sent from on high”; that is, the com-
munication must be conveyed by someone who is very “visible” to the recipient, as research shows that
the effectiveness of communication is inversely proportional to the distance between the sender and the
receiver.
Buy-In: If the Competence Management System is going to deliver the results that you want it to you will
have to have the full support of the Senior Management Team. The commitment of the CEO has to be visi-
ble to all the workforce; and this might be accomplished through an official statement as well as the usual
meetings with the Senior Management Team. The “top down” approach has to be matched by an effective
program of gaining support from those at a lower level in the hierarchy. This has to be tackled in a num-
ber of ways and must be kept up until the communication is known to have been effective.
The SMT will be charged with drawing up the strategy for the project. It is imperative that everyone in the
team has a clear understanding of the “up-front” costs and the way in which the project will be “rolled
out” within the organisation. The SMT will require a full presentation of the project including the overall
project plan, timelines and milestones. The business case should also inform the SMT of the mainte-
nance costs for the CMS when it is embedded within the organisation.
At a very early stage, a Competence Management System Steering Committee needs to be established
within the organisation. This must be “headed up” by a SMT member such as the VP.
It is not recommended that any attempt is made to show all the employees within the organisation the
CMS overview at too early a stage. It is better to introduce the concept of competence and how it can be
developed within the organisation and the benefits to individuals through departmental meetings and
Newsletter Page 3
Implementation
There is often a temptation to take on too much too quickly, to try and cover as many jobs as possible,
but the best way is to launch a pilot instead. In this way the organisation has a chance to learn and be
successful with each of the jobs that form part of the project. The organization has the opportunity to
practice double loop learning; that is they learn what went well or not, and how long it really took. This
learning process is valuable because it is then possible to plan accurately and allot suitable and adequate
resources. The most important aspect of the learning process is the acceptance of the organisation that
the transition is not just desirable but achievable and readily understood. Following the successful pilot
the programme can be rolled out to the rest of the organisation. The success of the pilot will encourage
others who may have had their doubts about the efficacy of the project; in particular the heads of depart-
ments, managers and team leaders referred to earlier will feel empowered and confident.
Training and development that can be measured and meets Kirkpatrick‟s 4th
Level of evaluation of effectiveness (most training courses do not exceed the
2nd Level). With a system like Sentrico™ we are able to show the tangible bene-
fits of training and the impact on the “bottom line”.
Just-in–time or JIT delivery of the training intervention; all too often the training
is carried out without due regard to its timing and this reduces its impact as it
lacks relevance to the individual and more importantly they are unable to prac-
“With a system
tise the skills they have learnt about in a real work situation.
like Sentrico™
The elimination of all training that is not relevant to the organisation, and in-
we are able to
creased relevancy of the training carried out to the individual.
show the
Human Resource Planning and Recruitment – Recruiting people for an organi- tangible
sation means understanding the sort of person required for the job. By taking a
benefits of
competency based approach to HR planning, the exact competencies required
training and
can be analysed and matched with what is available within the organisation.
the impact on
Appraisal to Performance Management – A Competency Management System
the “bottom
like Sentrico™ can monitor employees‟ development throughout any given time
line”.
period and help to maintain a Performance Management system by emphasis-
ing formal and planned development.
Industry, for example, requires rigorous selection processes; a Competency Management System can as-
sess if an individual is capable of performing a specific job role.
External Influences – A Competency Management System can help to demonstrate the competence of in-
dividual employees and the overall competence of the workforce to „hallmarked‟ standards. It can also
assist with Quality Management standards eg. ISO9001 and 14001 or approval by an industry body such
as OPITO.
Conclusion
I have explained the pitfalls and the difficulties that can be anticipated in the process
of installing a Competence Development System into an organisation. I have also
described the very real and tangible benefits to those organisations that make the
successful transition. Perhaps it is time to ask a few pertinent questions at this
point, such as:
“If our competitors are more efficient and use more competent employees to
produce their products or provide their services will we survive?”
“Can we afford not to do anything about the competence of our employees, and
will delay prove to be an error of judgement with very serious consequence?”
As we have seen with Deepwater Horizon, Buncefield recently and Piper Alpha,
Flixborough and Bhopal in the past the competence and behaviour of the workforce
at all levels is of paramount importance to achieving safety; an effective CMS is a
major factor in achieving a safe working environment and zero “lost time injuries”.