Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Φ = magnetic_flux Wb = 1 weber
E = induced_electromotive_force V = 1 volt
Φ = magnetic_flux Wb = 1 weber
1
n = rotation_speed rpm = 6.283 Wb⋅ rpm = 0.105 V
min
model motor as resistance in series with EMF generator (opposing applied voltage)
2
U = E + I⋅ R (9.3) P = E⋅ I + I ⋅R (9.4)
KE⋅Φ Km 2 KE⋅Km⋅Φ
KE⋅ Φ
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
to see an example of DC motor behavior assume a set of reasonable parameters. Not all are independent.
derived U = E + I⋅ R E E := Um − Im⋅R
E = 380 V
E⋅ Im = M m⋅n⋅ 2⋅ π M E⋅ Im
M m := M m = 57.753 N⋅ m assuming EMF*I converted
n ⋅ 2⋅ π into mechanical power
Mm 2 2
P = U⋅ I = E⋅ I + I ⋅R = M ⋅ n⋅ 2⋅ π + I ⋅R
M m = Km⋅Φ⋅Im Km Km := Km = 5.775
Φ⋅Im
E
KE := KE = 36.287
E = KE⋅Φ⋅n KE Φ⋅n
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
1
11/15/2006
2 2
Km⋅Φ KE⋅Km⋅Φ Km⋅Φ KE⋅Km⋅Φ
M = U⋅ − n⋅ Um⋅ − n⋅ = 57.753 N⋅ m
R R R R
2
Km⋅Φ Km KE⋅Φ
a := b := M ( U , n ) := ( U⋅ a − b ⋅ n) calculate M when U and n known ...
R R
U⋅ a − M
nn( U , M ) := calculate n when U and M known -
b useful at ends of torque range 0 - M m
M 0 := 0N⋅ m M m = 57.753 N⋅ m ( )
nn Um , M m = 100 rpm derived check ( )
nn Um , 0 = 105.26316 rpm
(
n11 := nn Um⋅0.25, M m n11 = 21.053 rpm ) maximum torque
(
n12 := nn Um⋅0.25, M 0 n12 = 26.316 rpm ) 0 torque
Mm
50 N⋅ m
plot M vs n for U = 0.25*U m
(
M U m⋅0.25, n1 )
N⋅ m
plot data
60
0.25 * Um
0.5 * Um
0.75 * Um
40
1.0 * Um
torque N*m
Mm max torque
20
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
rpm
2
11/15/2006
additional operating envelope is available beyond design rpm by reducing the field strength Φ. But the region is limited
3
beyond a M limited by Pmax Pmax := M m⋅ 2⋅ π⋅n Pmax = 3.8 × 10 W
above base sped and torque with power consatant at P max, torque is limited inversely with rpm
Pmax
M max⋅nn⋅ 2⋅ π = Pmax M max_n( nn) :=
nn⋅ 2⋅ π
nn1 := n , n + 1rpm .. 2 ⋅
n
60 Mm
using .. again
M max_n(nn1)
40
N⋅ m U M⋅ R
n= −
KE⋅Φ 2 (9.5)
KE⋅Km⋅Φ
20
100 150 200 250
nn1
rpm
Pmax Pmax
⋅R ⋅R
U M⋅ R U nn⋅ 2⋅ π 2 U 2⋅π
n= − nn = − nn = ⋅nn −
2 2 2
nnmax( Φ ) :=
1
⋅
⎝ ⎠
4⋅π⋅KE⋅Km Φ
calculate n when U and M known - useful at ends of torque range 0 - M m and in this application a and b are functions of Φ
Um⋅a( Φ ) − M
2
Km⋅Φ Km KE⋅Φ
a( Φ ) := b ( Φ ) := nn( Φ , M ) :=
R
R b(Φ )
(
n52 := nn 0.75⋅Φ , M 0 ) n52 = 140.351 rpm (
n62 := nn 0.6⋅Φ , M 0 )
n62 = 175.439 rpm
3
11/15/2006
60
0.25 * Um
0.5 * Um
50
0.75 * Um
1.0 * Um
40 Mm
torque N*m
FI = 0.75
30
FI = 0.6
Pmax
20
10
0
0 50 100 150 200 250
rpm
and superimpose a cubic load curve
now if we plot this data in terms of power, power = torque⋅ rpm⋅ 2 ⋅ π
reaching max power at 1.5 base rpm
3 ⎛ 0 0 ⎞
load( nrpm) := Pmax⋅ ⎛⎜
nrpm ⎞
⎟ Pmax_plot := ⎜ Pmax ⎟
⎝
1.5⋅ n ⎠
nrpm := 0rpm , 1rpm .. 1.5⋅ n ⎜ n ⎟
⎝
rpm W ⎠
4000
0.25 * Um
0.5 * Um
0.75 * Um
3000 1.0 * Um
M max
FI = 0.75
power (W)
FI = 0.6
2000
P max
load
1000
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220
rpm
So ... as observed in the text: "The operational envelopes show that a DC motor is very suited to drive a propeller for ship
propulsion."
4
11/15/2006
practical aspects ...
IF
RA
operates same as separate excitation ...
field excitation constant Um shunt
field
E
E = KE⋅Φ⋅n (9.2)
Um
U = E + I⋅
R (9.3)
2 2
M := Km⋅Φ⋅I M → Km⋅KF⋅I M := Km⋅KF⋅I
U = E + I⋅ R I := I
→ I =
R R R
( )
U U
I⋅ R = U − KE⋅KF⋅I⋅n I⋅ R + KE⋅KF⋅n = U I= I :=
R + KE⋅KF⋅n R + KE⋅KF⋅n
2 2
2 U U
M := Km⋅KF⋅I M → Km⋅ KF⋅ M := Km⋅ KF⋅
(9.8)
(R + KE⋅KF⋅n) (R + KE⋅KF⋅n)
2 2
Wb
Um := 100V KE := 1 Km := 1 R := 4Ω KF := 1 Imax := 9A
A
2 2
M max := Km⋅KF⋅Imax
( )
U
M ( U , n ) := Km⋅KF⋅ M Um , 100rpm = 47.747 N⋅ m
(R + KE⋅KF⋅n)
2 M max = 81 N⋅
5
11/15/2006
100
Mmax
80
N⋅ m
Torque (N*m)
60
40
20
Um
0.5*Um
0
0 50 100 150 200 250
rpm
1 4⋅π
Induction motors (AC) IF := 1 ω := t := FRAME⋅ ⋅sec t to go from 0 to 4*π in
s 100 100 steps
⎛ π⎞
Ib ( t) := IF⋅ cos⎜ ω⋅t − 2 ⋅ ⎟
⎛ π⎞
Ic( t) := IF⋅ cos⎜ ω⋅t − 4 ⋅ ⎟
⎝ 3 ⎠
⎝ 3 ⎠
field vector displaced by 2*π/3 and 4*p/3, and current at appropriate phase shift applied
IF⋅ cos( ω⋅t)
= 1
Bza( t) := IF⋅ cos( ω⋅t)
⎛ π⎞ ⎛ ⎛ π⎞ ⎛ π⎞ ⎞
Bzb ( t) := IF⋅ cos⎜ ω⋅t − 2 ⋅ ⎟ ⋅ ⎜ cos⎜ 2 ⋅ ⎟ + sin⎜ 2 ⋅ ⎟ ⋅i⎟ ⎛ π⎞
IF⋅ cos⎜ ω⋅t − 2 ⋅ ⎟ = −0.5
⎝ 3 ⎠⎝ ⎝ ⎠ 3 ⎝ 3⎠ ⎠ ⎝ 3 ⎠
⎛ π⎞ ⎛ ⎛ π⎞ ⎛ π⎞ ⎞
Bzc( t) := IF⋅ cos⎜ ω⋅t − 4 ⋅ ⎟ ⋅ ⎜ cos⎜ 4 ⋅ ⎟ + sin⎜ 4 ⋅ ⎟ ⋅i⎟ ⎛ π⎞
IF⋅ cos⎜ ω⋅t − 4 ⋅ ⎟ = −0.5
⎝ 3⎠ ⎝ ⎝ 3⎠ ⎝ 3⎠ ⎠ ⎝ 3 ⎠
( ) (
Re_sum ( t) := Re Bza( t) + Re Bzb ( t) + Re Bzc( t) ) ( ) ( ) ( )
(
Im_sum( ) := Im Bza( t) + Im Bzb ( t) + Im Bzc( t) )
Re_sum ( t) = 1.5
Im_sum( t) = 0
2 2
Re_sum( t) + Im_sum( t) = 1.5
6
11/15/2006
1.5
⎛ 0 ⎞ 1
⎜Im Bz ( t) ⎟
⎝
( a )
⎠
0.5
⎛ 0 ⎞
⎜Im Bz ( t) ⎟
⎝
( b )
⎠
0
⎛ 0 ⎞
⎜Im Bz ( t) ⎟
⎝
( c )
⎠ 0.5
⎛ 0 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
⎝
Im_sum( t) ⎠ 1
1.5
1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
⎛ 0 ⎞ ⎛ 0 ⎞ ⎛ 0 ⎞ ⎛ 0 ⎞
⎜Re Bz ( t) ⎟ , ⎜Re Bz ( t) ⎟ , ⎜Re Bz ( t) ⎟ , ⎜ ⎟
⎝
( a )
⎠
⎝ ( b ) ⎠
⎝
( c )
⎠
⎝
Re_sum( t) ⎠
π
t1 :=
IF⋅ cos( ω⋅t1) = 0.5
sec
3
( ) ( )
2 2
Re Bza( t1) + Im Bza( t1) = 0.5
⎛ π⎞
IF⋅ cos⎜ ω⋅t1 − 2 ⋅ ⎟ = 0.5
⎝ 3 ⎠
( ) ( )
2 2
Re Bzb ( t1) + Im Bzb ( t1) = 0.5
⎛ π⎞
( ) ( )
2 2
IF⋅ cos⎜ ω⋅t1 − 4 ⋅ ⎟ = −1 Re Bzc( t1) + Im Bzc( t1) =1
⎝ 3 ⎠
1 0 1
7
11/15/2006
speed of rotation of this machine = frequency of the supplied AC. as shown, there are two poles (one pair) N-S
with multiple pairs the speed of rotation is reduced proportional to the number of poles
ω
ns = f = n s = rotation_speed rpm
Hz = 1 Hz = 9.549 rpm
1 s
ω = frequency s
2⋅ f Hz assumes radians
for p poles ns = ( 9.10 )
p 2⋅π⋅Hz = 60 rpm
dt dt
small ...
Φ⋅f U
U = IF⋅R + E R<1 U=E= => Φ = KF⋅ KF = constant_for_given_motor
KF f
now consider the rotor,if it is turning at the same speed as the rotating magnetic field of the stator, there is no EMF
the current induced in the rotor is strongly dependent on the relative speed
n s − n
n
s
because the rotor induced current will be at slip frequency, EMF is low so reactance (L) will be low. I A depends
primarily (only) on rotor (armature) resistance R A and is in phase with the flux pattern. The net result is torque is ~
directly proportional to slip
M = K⋅ s (9.16)
8
11/15/2006
0 n ns 0 n ns
s 0 s 0
1 1
fig. 9.18 Torque - speed curve induction motor from Woud fig. 9.20A Torque - speed curve varying rotor resistance from Woud
I M Um
increasing
resistance
0.75*Um
0.25*Um
0 n ns 0 n ns
s 0 s 0
1 1
fig. 9.20B Current - speed curve varying rotor resistance from Woud fig. 9.21 Torque - speed curve induction motor
There is much more to this subject and text covers quite well. Next lecture will review ship applications.
One comment regarding opinion in text regarding DC motor drive. Dc drives not typical as commutation brushes require
significant maintenance. DDX motor has innovative new brush technology.
see: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/2002/mil-02-04-wavelengths02.htm
9
11/15/2006