Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
20
Final Feasibility Study Report - Volume 1: Executive Summary and Main Report Page 45
5 GEOLOGY
Corresponding Drawings
NE-FS-040-001 Geology, Project Area, Overview Map
NE-FS-040-002 Geology, Diversion Dam, Layout and Section
NE-FS-040-003 Geology, Conveyance Tunnel, Profile
NE-FS-040-004 Geology, Main Dam and Desander, Layout
NE-FS-040-005 Geology, Main Dam and Desander, Sections
NE-FS-040-006 Geology, Headrace Tunnel, Profile
NE-FS-040-007 Geology, Powerhouse, Layout
NE-FS-040-008 Geology, Powerhouse, Section
5.1 Introduction
This chapter is mainly a summary of the Geological Investigations Report [15], which
also contains the borehole logs and photos, laboratory test results and reports from
HEC. This chapter provides an interpretation of the geological conditions for the Nam
E-Moun HPP based on the visual observations made on site and the following
documents:
CGGC/GXED 2015: Feasibility Study on Nam E-Moun 3, 4 and 5 ([2], [3] and
[4])
Pöyry 2016: Alternatives Study Report [5]
Pöyry 2016: Project Alternatives Study Report [7]
Pöyry 2016: Project Optimisation Study Report [8]
5.2.1 General
The Chinese consortium proposed the development of three different hydropower
schemes:
Nam E-Moun 3
Nam E-Moun 4
Nam E-Moun 5
The location of the proposed schemes is shown in Figure 5-1.
During these studies a geological map at scale 1:50,000 of the whole project area was
realised. The selected dams and powerhouse sites were investigated by means of
detailed geological maps at scale 1:1,000, a total of 21 boreholes with a depth ranging
between 30 m and 70 m, test pits and related laboratory tests to characterise the soil and
the bedrock.
TK Group provided Pöyry with data from these studies ([1], [3] and [4]) which were
analysed to prepare an Alternatives Study and then the investigation programme for the
overall Basic Design services:
In particular the following documents were reviewed:
Geological chapters of the technical reports,
Geological map of the whole project area at scale 1:50,000.
Detail maps at scale 1:1,000 of the selected dams and powerhouse sites
Geological profiles along the dam axes and the tunnels.
The investigation programme carried out by the Chinese consultant also consisted of 6
boreholes and related tests with simplified logs and a summary table of the assigned
rocks parameters which were included in the quoted reports.
Figure 5-1: Location of the hydropower schemes proposed by the Chinese consultants
shown on geological map of the project area redrawn during the Alternatives
Study after [2], [3] and [4]
Table 5-1 through Table 5-4 provide detailed information about the type, location, scope
and quantities of the carried out investigation.
The 17 borehole locations and depths were selected to investigate the foundation
condition of the dams and powerhouse as well as the rock mass along the planned
tunnels.
Table 5-1: Depth, orientation, scope and location of the exploratory boreholes carried out
during the present study
Depth
Borehole Orientation Location - Scope UTM Coordinates
(m)
Original main dam
BH-NE1-01 30 Vertical 717202 E, 1720971 N
right abutment
Original main left
BH-NE1-02 30 Vertical 717215 E, 1720917 N
abutment
Headrace tunnel
BH-NE1-03 20 Vertical 717087 E, 1720871 N
intake
BH-NE1-04 120 Vertical Headrace tunnel 713450 E, 1720939 N
BH-NE1-05 30 Vertical Headrace tunnel 712184 E, 1721740 N
BH-NE1-07 45 Vertical Powerhouse 711220 E, 1722682 N
Diversion dam right
BH-NE1-08 25 Vertical 716303 E, 1708071 N
abutment
Diversion dam left
BH-NE1-09 25 Vertical 716245 E, 1708059 N
abutment
Conveyance tunnel
BH-NE1-10 20 Vertical 716334 E, 1708077 N
intake
BH-NE1-11 20 Vertical Conveyance tunnel 717273 E, 1720808 N
BH-NE1-12 100 Vertical Conveyance tunnel 717102 E, 1719748 N
BH-NE1-13 90 Vertical Conveyance tunnel 716614 E, 1708876 N
BH-NE1-14 110 Vertical Conveyance tunnel 716643 E, 1710022 N
Original conveyance
BH-NE1-15 30 Vertical 717331 E, 1720927 N
tunnel outlet
New main dam right
BH-NE1-16 25 Vertical 717371 E, 1720773 N
abutment
New main dam left
BH-NE1-17 25 Vertical 717339 E, 1720810 N
abutment
New main dam intake
BH-NE1-18 25 Vertical 717347 E, 1720825 N
structure
8 scan lines were also made in the project area to collect quantitative results about the
characteristic of the rock mass discontinuities at the different sites.
The following tests were then carried out to define the rock mass and soil properties and
correctly design the foreseen project structures.
Table 5-4: List of the executed laboratory tests and used standards
The investigation was constantly supervised by a Pöyry geologist on site including visits
to the laboratory to guarantee the quality and reliability of the results. Several site visits
of the Pöyry project geologist were organised to exactly locate the investigations, to
check the mapping results on site, to check the core samples and to select samples for
the laboratory tests.
5.5.1 General
The project area is located in the central part of the Indochina block which is, since the
Late Triassic, part of the Eurasian tectonic plate. During the Cenozoicum (65.5 Ma -
Present), after the collision with the rest of the Eurasian continent the Indochina block
underwent an extrusion towards the south-east related to the northward indentation of
the India Plate. This extrusion induced some limited deformation within the Indochina
block and is still responsible for some tectonic activity, especially in Northern Laos and
partly in Central Laos.
5.5.2 Lithologies
The formations outcropping in the project area consist of Palaeozoic sediments and
metasediments and late Palaeozoic early Mesozoic magmatic rocks which were formed
indeed before and during the collisional phase with the rest of the Euro Asiatic
continent.
After the collisional phase, during the Mesozoic Era (251 Ma - 65.5 Ma) these
formations were folded and thrusted over each other.
During this stage sedimentation continued in the Khoran Plateau west and northwest of
the project area also during the Mesozoicum as confirmed by the presence of large
amount of Cenozoic sediments, Jurassic (201 Ma - 145.5 Ma) and Cretaceous (145.5
Ma - 65.5 Ma) in age.
According to the 1:500,000 map of Southern Laos [1] from 2009, which is the most
recent and detailed map covering the area, the following formations are outcropping in
the project area (see Figure 5-2):
Mesozoicum
o γT1 - Early Triassic granitoid intrusions formed during two distinct phases
marked by the following lithologies. Phase 1: Biotite granite and two mica
granite Phase 2: light colour fine grained granite and aplite granite.
Figure 5-2: Extract of the Map of Geology and Mineral resources at scale 1:500,000 [1]
covering the the project area (square box); for the legend see Chapter 5.5.2
5.5.3 Tectonic
The major structural elements observed in the area, based on the 1:500,000 map, strike
NNW-SSE to NW-SE sub-parallel to the Triassic Song Ma suture zone bordering the
Indochina block at is northern margin. Parts of these faults were formed as normal faults
and controlled the sedimentation regime from the Devonian to the Late Triassic. During
and after the collisional phase of Indochina with the Chinese microplate, parts of these
faults were then reactivated as reversed faults consequently of compression-related
deformations and were active up to the Early Cenozoic.
These faults extend for more than 100 km and affect both the Palaeozoic sediments and
the late-Palaeozoic early Mesozoic granitoids.
Minor fault systems including a series of NE-SW and WNW-ESE trending faults also
affect the area (Figure 5-2). These faults are generally much shorter than the NW-SE
trending ones with a maximal length of about 20 km.
5.6.1 Findings
The study from CGGC/GXED [2] to [4] indicates that Palaeozoic metasediments are
intruded by a small granitoid batholith located at the confluence of the Nam E-Moun
and of the Houay Het Rivers. The sediments are characterised by a normal stratigraphic
series with the bedding plane striking N-S and dipping towards the west with the
younger strata outcropping in the western part and the older ones in the eastern part of
the area.
These sediments are, according to the Chinese studies [2], [3] and [4], attributed to the
Devonian and underwent contact metamorphism in the project area due to the vicinity
of the granitoid intrusion.
The geological situation described in this study is generally correct but several
discrepancies were found especially concerning the extension of the granitoid intrusion.
5.6.2 General
The site geology is strongly controlled by the granitic intrusion found at the confluence
of the Nam E-Moun and Houay Het Rivers and which intrudes the Palaeozoic
sediments.
In this chapter the nomenclature used in the previous investigations has been kept and
not the one from the official map of Laos. This because, despite several differences, it
better matches the data collected during the present study.
The actual age of both sedimentary rocks could not be proofed and a detailed
paleontological and petrographic study to solve the discrepancies between the available
data is beyond the scope of this study.
For this reason, the rocks and sediments outcropping in the project area were grouped in
two main formations, namely:
aQ - Alluvial quaternary deposits
edQ - Eluvial deluvial quaternary deposits
Figure 5-3: Simplified geological map of the project area showing the boundary of the
granitic intrusion and the major faults recognised in the project area redrawn
after [2], [3] and [4] according to 2016/2017 investigation results
5.6.3 Lithologies
Figure 5-4: Coarse grained alluvial deposit in the powerhouse area (left) and along the
Houay Het River close to the diversion dam site (right)
Figure 5-5: Example of reddish brown clay formed on top of magmatic rocks near Ban
Tambong village (left) and of brown clayey soil with boulders formed on top
of the metasediments close to the powerhouse area (right)
5.6.3.2 Bedrock
The following units were distinguished in the bedrock:
Figure 5-6: a, c- granodiorite in the E-Moun River near main dam site; b- weathered
granodiorite; d- grey blue skarn at the batholith contact along the inclined
pressure tunnel alignment (old penstock area); e- completely weathered
granodiorite
Figure 5-8: a, b- quartz and sericite schists with shales; c- quartz veins in Qz-schists
close to faults near the powerhouse area; d- Qz- sericite schists exposed
along a small river; e, f, g, h- examples of highly to completely weathered
metasediments grey-yellow, yellow-brown coloured
This generally simple monoclonal structure is complicated by small scale folds with a
wave length of a few metres or a few tens of a metre produced by the intrusion of the
granitoids and during thrusting of the units.
These small folds affect both bedding and foliation and have very unregular shape and
orientation. Towards the north, close to the contact with the magmatic intrusion the
orientation of the bedding planes can indeed strongly change from site to site.
5.6.4.1 Bedding
In the metasedimentary rocks bedding planes are commonly observed. In the schists and
shale the bedding is generally marked by a centimetre to decimetre thick bed of
different composition. In the diversion dam and powerhouse area where massive to
thick bedded sandstone is observed, the bedding planes are instead highly spaced and
not always visible on the outcrops.
Neither bedding nor foliation is present in the magmatic rocks.
5.6.4.3 Faults
None of major structural elements described in the area (1:500,000 map) which strike
NNW-SSE to NW-SE intersect the project area, while a few secondary small faults
belonging to this system were observed in the project area.
The orientation of the Houay Het River close to the project area is probably controlled
by structures belonging to this system.
The faults recognised in the project area are minor faults with an average length of 1 to
2 km. Most of these small faults belong to the secondary regional fault systems and
generally trend SW-NE.
The thickness of the fault zones affecting the project area is estimated, based on
topographic evidence and on the bathymetric sections, to range between 3-4 m and a
maximum of 10 m.
Borehole BH-NE1-14 intersected one of these faults at depth in the sedimentary rocks.
From the observation made in the outcrops and in the boreholes, the fault zone is
characterised by closely spaced joints and presence of breccia. No clayey fault gauges
were observed in the field and in the boreholes.
Deep weathering can be associated with the fault zone especially in the granitoid. The
borehole BH-NE1-05, located close to a possible fault zone affecting the contact
granodiorite/sediments, shows the presence of completely weathered rocks down to a
depth of 30 m below the surface. Deep weathering that can locally reach the tunnel level
can indeed not be excluded along the fault.
These small structures are not considered to represent a problem for the foundation of
the dams. Their impact on the underground excavation can however be larger depending
on the orientation of the fault zone with respect to the tunnel axis.
No evidence of active faults was found in the project area.
5.6.4.4 Joints
The rock mass is intersected by different joint sets which present some common
characteristic through the area. The orientation of the joints slightly varies from location
to location depending on the lithology, vicinity of faults and bedding orientation.
Generally, three to four sets of joints were observed on the selected outcrops. All
observed joint sets are generally quite steep.
Two of these sets of joints dipping towards the ESE-SE and WSW-SW were observed
through the whole area.
Two other sets with similar strike orientation but dipping towards the SE and WNW-
NW were also observed on several outcrops. Locally joint sets dipping to the ENE or
NNE were observed.
The orientation of the major joint sets suggests that most of the joints have a tectonic
origin related to the observed fault systems.
The average orientations of the joint sets are summarised in Table 5-5. Joint sets are
named J1, J2, J3 and J4. The numbering is not the same through the whole area. J1 in
the Table 5-5 correspond to the most important/developed joint set at each outcrop,
while J4 correspond to the least important joint set. The importance of each joint set
with respect to the rock mass behaviour was defined based on the joint set
characteristics such as persistence and spacing.
A detailed description of the joint sets for the different project sites is given later in the
chapter.
Variations in the number and properties of the joint sets along the tunnels cannot be
excluded.
Foliation
Scan
Location Bedding - Shear J1 J2 J3 J4 Rock type
Line
Zone
Boundary
SL-NE1- Conveyance 130 / 223 / 252 /
285 / 20 51 / 73 Sediment /
01 tunnel 75 62 76
Magmatic
SL-NE1- Headrace 304 / 167 / 260 / 111 Metasediments
02 tunnel 69 81 65 /53 boundary
Headrace
SL-NE1- 119 / 258 / 323 / Metasediments
tunnel 67 / 78
03 74 80 59 / Schist(?)
(penstock)
SL-NE1- 315 / 117 / 167 / 259 /
Powerhouse Sandstone
04 66 63 67 60
SL-NE1- 111 / 138 / 83 / Granodiorite /
Main dam
05 73 66 57 Metasandstone
SL-NE1- Conveyance 268 / 24 / 85 / 212 / Granodiorite /
71 / 82
06 tunnel outlet 80 76 85 80 Metasandstone
SL-NE1- Diversion 319 / 179 / 32 /
247 / 41 Sandstone
07 dam 73 78 80
SL-NE1- Conveyance 80 / 193 / 114 /
281 / 70 Sandstone
08 tunnel portal 73 83 79
The average measured rock properties based on the interpretation of the available test
results are given in Table 5-7 and Table 5-8.
The available laboratory test results provide the intact rock parameters for the fresh
rocks. Due to the limited amount of laboratory tests and the variability observed within
some of the lithologies a range of values is provided, based on the laboratory test results
and their interpretation. The parameters of the weathered rocks were estimated based on
test results, the rock outcrop observations on site and the inspection of the rock cores
(Table 5-7 and Table 5-8).
The presence of lithologies (metasediments) along the tunnel with different properties
than the tested one cannot be excluded.
To define the rock mass properties the Geological Strength Index (GSI) values were
estimated based on the scan line outcrops and on other selected outcrops seen during the
numerous site visits organised to supervise the investigations. The rock mass
characteristics were calculated based on the Hoek and Brown criterion starting from the
laboratory tests results. The estimated rock mass properties are presented in Table 5-9.
Figure 5-10: View of the river bed at the diversion dam site
Figure 5-11: Detail of the sandstone outcropping in the river bed close to the diversion
dam site
Below the soil a layer of moderately weathered rock is found. This layer has a thickness
of 1 to 2 m in the river bed and about 5 to 10 m in the abutments. Here the rock mass is
locally highly fractured and joints surface weathered. Further below the rock mass is
fresh or slightly weathered and joints mainly closed. Locally the presence of open joints
with weathered surfaces was also observed in this layer (BH-NE1-08).
The bedding plane and foliation dip regularly to the west with dip angles varying
between 30° and 45° while up to 3 sets of discontinuities were recognise in the area
(Table 5-10).
Table 5-11: Lugeon values from the diversion dam foundation area measured in 5 m
intervals
BH-NE08 BH-NE09
Depth K (FHT) Lu Depth K (FHT) Lu
(m) (m/min) (l/min/m) (m) (m/min) (l/min/m)
4.5 - 9 3.95E-05 14.00 - 18.9 1.2
9.50 - 14.6 1.36 21.6 - 25 2.11
14.60 - 20.4 15.21 18.00 - 21.6 1.44
20.4 - 25 1.31
Figure 5-13: View of the river bed at the main dam area
The bedrock is made of diorite outcropping on both abutments and by large pegmatite
dykes, one of which, several metres wide and a few tens of metres long, outcrops on the
right abutment.
In the boreholes, a 2 to 4 m thick layer of moderately to highly weathered rock was
observed. Here the rock mass is highly fractured and joints surface weathered.
Figure 5-14: Examples of the residual soil and moderately weathered rocks from BH-NE1-
17 (5 m to 10 m depth)
Further below the rock mass is generally fresh or slightly weathered and joints mainly
closed (BH-NE1-16 and BH-NE1-18). In borehole BH-NE1-17 deeper weathering
down to a depth of about 20 m below the surface is observed. This weathering looks to
be related to sub-vertical joints intersected by the borehole.
Despite the heterogeneity of the rock no problems related to differential settings of the
foundation are expected due to the high strength of both lithologies.
Three main joint sets were observed on site. The main properties of these joints are
listed in Table 5-12.
Table 5-13: Lugeon values from the main dam foundation area measured in 5 m intervals
Figure 5-15: View of the powerhouse area (right side of the photograph) from the
downstream
The slopes are covered by a continuous layer of clayey residual soil whose thickness is
estimated to be 4-5 m (BH-NE1-05).
The bedrock here is made of a very strong quartz rich massive sandstone. First a layer
of moderately to highly weathered rock is found below the soil whose thickness is
estimated to range between 4 m in the lower part of the slopes and 8 m in the upper part.
Here the rock mass is locally highly fractured and joints surface weathered. Further
below the rock mass is fresh or slightly weathered and joints mainly closed but a few
weathered joints were observed down to a depth of 25 m below the surface (BH-NE1-
07).
Figure 5-16: Example of the sandstone cores from the borehole BH-NE1-07 drilled at the
powerhouse location (above cores from 5 to10 m, below from 25 to 30 m)
The bedding plane and foliation dip regularly to the E-NE with dip angles varying
between 70° and 80° while up to 4 sets of joints were recognised in the area (Table 5-
14).
5.7.4 Tunnels and Portals Conditions for Headrace Tunnel and Conveyance Tunnel
The tunnel alignments were adjusted during the Feasibility Study on the basis of the
boreholes results in order to minimise the geological risks.
In particular, because the boreholes (BH-NE1-05 and BH-NE1-11) indicate that the
thickness of the residual soil (completely weathered rocks) can reach a thickness of up
to 30 m (BH-NE1-05 and BH-NE1-11) where tectonically disturbed granite is present.
Below the residual soil a layer of weathered rocks, whose thickness can reach a few tens
of metres, was observed in all boreholes. This layer is characterised by weathered
discontinuity that can pose problems (wedge failures) during tunnelling.
For this reason, aside from the portal areas, the tunnel alignments were selected to
guarantee, where possible, at least 60 m of topographic cover above the tunnel crown.
Based on the geological mapping results the boundary between the magmatic intrusive
rocks and sedimentary rocks can be marked by a zone with skarn alteration, strong
fracturing and heterogeneous rock composition. These zones can lead to deep
weathering and unfavourable conditions for underground constructions.
The investigation studies allowed to locate with good approximation the contact zones
along the headrace tunnel and the conveyance tunnel, but not to investigate their
condition. Local deep weathering along the contact cannot be excluded.
A list of suggested investigations to be carried out during the tender phase or at the
beginning of the construction phase is listed in Chapter 5.8.
Figure 5-17: BH-NE1-14 65 m to 70 m fault zone marked by highly fractured rock and
partially cemented fault breccia
Figure 5-19: BH-NE1-14 example of schistosity surface (left; about 49 m depth) and of
talc-coated joints (right; about 70 m depth)
Due to the orientation of the strata that dips to the west and strikes subparallel to the
tunnel axis, these rocks are expected to be found along the tunnel up to chainage
4+200 m / 4+500 m.
After chainage 4+200 m / 4+500 m up to chainage 7+000 m / 7+300 a lithological
change is expected. On the surface, mainly schists and shales are outcropping in this
area. Due to the orientation of the strata and the locally complex folding and faulting
structures observed on the surface, and due to the limited number of outcrops present in
the area, the exact position of the contact between the two lithological units along the
tunnel and the type of rocks and their condition at tunnel level cannot be defined.
From this chainage, up to about chainage 12+000 m granodiorite and pegmatite are
expected, while based on the boreholes BH-NE1-11, BH-NE1-12 and BH-NE1-15 and
the geological mapping of the dam area, the final part of the tunnel up to the outlet is
expected to be mainly located in diorite.
Mainly good to fair rock conditions are expected along the tunnel both in the
sedimentary and in the magmatic rocks. Locally along the possible faults as well as at
the contact between sediments and magmatic rocks, deep weathering and poor rock
conditions are foreseen.
A maximum of five discontinuity sets affect contemporaneously the rock mass in the
project area. The orientation and properties of these discontinuities were measured on
selected outcrops (scan lines) and the tables below show a summary of the main
properties of these discontinuities and their possible presence along the tunnel.
At depth only one or two of these discontinuity sets are expected to affect
simultaneously the rock mass in good to very good rock conditions, while three to four
sets are expected in fair to poor rock conditions. Table 5-15, Table 5-16 and Table 5-17
show the type, number and orientation of the discontinuities expected along the
conveyance tunnel.
Table 5-15: Discontinuity set properties along the conveyance tunnel - chainage 0+000 m
to 5+000 m
Table 5-16: Discontinuity set properties along the conveyance tunnel - chainage 5+000 m
to 7+300 m
Table 5-17: Discontinuity set properties along the conveyance tunnel - chainage 7+300 m
to 12+000 m
Several minor faults intersect the tunnel alignment. The fault planes observed in the
fields and in the boreholes and inferred from the satellite photo analysis are generally
characterised by steep planes and intersect the tunnel at high angle. Due to the small
size of these faults and their orientation, their impact on the tunnel excavation is
expected to be low.
The analysis of the satellite photo in the conveyance tunnel area indicates the presence
of faults striking sub-parallel to the tunnel (Figure 5-3). One of these faults intersects
the tunnel alignment at about chainage 10+800 m. The exact nature, position and
thickness of this fault are unknown. Due to its orientation, this fault can impact the
tunnel excavation for several tens of metres, and its position and nature shall be further
investigated.
the contact with the metasediments is foreseen. The nature of this contact, primary or
tectonic, and the related rock conditions are not known.
Along the ridge located east of the powerhouse area schists and shales are outcropping.
These sediments lay on top of thick bedded quartz-rich sandstone exposed in the river
bed close to the powerhouse site.
From chainage 5+300 m to 5+600 m, the presence of shales and schists along the tunnel
is foreseen. After this zone to the end of the tunnel mainly quartz-rich thick bedded
metasandstone is expected instead. The rock conditions are expected to be mainly fair in
the shale/schist rich sediments and fair to good in the sandstone rich sediments.
The contact zone between the metasediments and magmatic intrusion and the faults
present along this section of the tunnel are striking nearly perpendicular to the tunnel
axis and are generally steep or sub-vertical. The complex geometry of the folds and the
presence of fault zones make it difficult to exactly predict the position of the contact
between the different rock types at tunnel level.
Further investigations are requested to define the nature and exact location at tunnel
level of the sediments and of the contact between the magmatic intrusion and the
sediments.
Table 5-18: Discontinuity set properties along the headrace tunnel in the magmatic rocks
Table 5-19: Discontinuity set properties along the headrace tunnel in the metasediments
More details about the tunnel portal conditions are provided in chapter 5.7.5
5.7.4.4 Rocks Mass Classes and Rock Support Classes for Underground Excavation
Five rock mass classes were defined to characterise the rocks and to design the tunnel
rock support. These classes are valid for all tunnels foreseen in the Nam E-Moun HPP.
Table 5-20 provides a description of these rock classes and Table 5-21 lists the needed
rock support for the classes.
Poor rock conditions Presence of small fault zones Locally unstable roof
Slightly to moderately and hydrothermally altered and side walls
weathered rocks with possible zones Unstable areas due to
presence of lithologies subject Erodible fault gouge (width < local closely jointed
to ravelling under atmospheric 0.5 m) rock mass
conditions. Closely jointed rock mass Presence of loose
40 MPa > UCS > 50 MPa in Very unfavourable orientation erodible gouge or
III magmatic rocks and of discontinuities other lithologies prone
25 MPa > UCS > 50 MPa in Low rock cover < 50 m in to slake under
sedimentary rocks magmatic rocks and atmospheric
Joints with weathered < 25 m in sedimentary rocks condition.
surfaces, possible clay-talc Spalling/deformation
coating along open joints due to low cover
Water can affect stability
Erosion potential
Poor to very poor rock Portal areas and area with Unstable roof and side
conditions rock cover < 30/40 m walls with short stand-
Moderately to highly Fault zones with erodible up time
weathered rocks gauge (dip < 20° or 0.5 < width Presence of loose
UCS < 40 MPa in magmatic < 2 m) erodible gouge or
rocks and Closely jointed rock mass with other lithologies prone
< 25 MPa in sedimentary rocks. weak joint surfaces to slake under
IV Presence of lithologies subject Very unfavourable orientation atmospheric condition
to ravelling under atmospheric of discontinuities Spalling/deformation
conditions. Very blocky to sheared rock due to low cover
Joints generally characterised mass High tunnel
by weathered surfaces, with Large fault zone, convergence due to
clay-talc coating along open hydrothermally altered zones high cover
joints with weak rock mass and low Tunnel instability due
Water affects stability rock cover < 25 m to large water inflow
Erosion potential
Very poor rock conditions Portal areas and area with Unstable roof and side
Highly weathered to rock cover < 15 m walls with very short
disintegrated rocks Fault zones with erodible stand-up time
UCS < 25 MPa in magmatic gauge (dip < 20° or width > 2 Presence of loose
rocks and m) highly fractured rock, erodible gouge or
<10 MPa in sedimentary rocks extensive fault breccia, wider other lithologies prone
Presence of lithologies subject fault zones with gouge infilling to slake under
V to ravelling under atmospheric Faulted zones, hydrothermally atmospheric condition
conditions altered zones with weak rock Spalling/deformation
Joints generally open with mass, disintegrated rock mass due to low cover
highly weathered surfaces, or kakirite of granular Squeezing due to high
possible clay-talc coating along occurrence, very unfavourable cover
open joints orientation and large extent Tunnel instability due
Water affects stability of weakness zones and low to large water inflow
Erosion potential rock cover (< 25 m)
Table 5-21: Rock support for the different rock mass classes (for all details see
Feasibility Study drawings for the tunnels)
Table 5-24: Laboratory tests results for concrete aggregates on magmatic rocks
Table 5-25: Laboratory tests results for concrete aggregates on alluvial deposits
The laboratory test results indicate that both the granodiorite and diorite forming the
largest portion of the intrusion represent a good source to produce concrete aggregates.
The rocks are strong, show strong resistance against abrasion and do not show any
alkali-silica reaction.
The results of the alluvial deposits are however less good. In particular the sediments
show much higher abrasion losses compared to the tested granitoids. Furthermore a
possible alkali-silica reaction is observed on the tested coarse aggregates (TP08).
The igneous rocks are indeed the best aggregate source on site due to their good
properties and large availability.
The suitability of the alluvial material is however unclear due to limited numbers of
tests and their results. The presence of alluvial sediments suitable to produce aggregate
is still considered probable but more test pits and tests are needed in case it is the
intention to use alluvial sediments to produce concrete aggregates.
Boreholes and tests pits to define thickness of the soil and rock conditions
Quarry - borrow areas:
Boreholes and tests pits to define thickness of the overburden and rock
properties