HUMAN BEHAVIOUR AT WORK

DIGITAL ASSIGNMENT-2

REG NO: 15BCC0030

NAME: M.S.BALAJI
SLOT: B1
TOPIC: Understanding Emotional Intelligence

1. Glimpses of any one Leader’s Emotional Strengths/Weakness

A Glimpse of the Great Leader of India, Swami Vivekananda

Vivekananda was born Narendranath Datta (shortened to Narendra or Naren) in

a kayastha family at his ancestral home at 3 Gourmohan Mukherjee Street in
Calcutta, the capital of British India, on 12 January 1863 during the Makar
Sankranti festival. He belonged to a traditional family and was one of nine
siblings. His father, Vishwanath Datta, was an attorney at the Calcutta High
Court. Durgacharan Datta, Narendra's grandfather was a Sanskrit and Persian
scholar who left his family and became a monk at age twenty-five. His mother,
Bhubaneswari Devi, was a devout housewife. The progressive, rational attitude of
Narendra's father and the religious temperament of his mother helped shape his
thinking and personality. In 1881 Narendra first met Ramakrishna, who became his
spiritual focus after his own father had died in 1884.

Narendra's first introduction to Ramakrishna occurred in a literature class at

General Assembly's Institution when he heard Professor William Hastie lecturing
on William Wordsworth's poem, The Excursion. While explaining the word
"trance" in the poem, Hastie suggested that his students visit Ramakrishna
of Dakshineswar to understand the true meaning of trance. This prompted some of
his students (including Narendra) to visit Ramakrishna.
In 1888, Narendra left the monastery as a Parivrâjaka— the Hindu religious life of
a wandering monk, "without fixed abode, without ties, independent and strangers
wherever they go". His sole possessions were a kamandalu (water pot), staff and
his two favourite books: the Bhagavad Geeta and The Imitation of
Christ. Narendra travelled extensively in India for five years, visiting centres of
learning and acquainting himself with diverse religious traditions and social
patterns. He developed sympathy for the suffering and poverty of the people, and
resolved to uplift the nation. Living primarily on bhiksha (alms), Narendra
travelled on foot and by railway (with tickets bought by admirers). During his
travels he met, and stayed with Indians from all religions and walks of life:
scholars, dewans, rajas, Hindus, Muslims, Christians, paraiyars (low-caste
workers) and government officials. Narendra left Bombay for Chicago on 31 May
1893 with the name "Vivekananda", as suggested by Ajit Singh of Khetri, which
means "the bliss of discerning wisdom"

Vivekananda started his journey to the West on 31 May 1893 and visited several
cities in Japan (including Nagasaki, Kobe, Yokohama, Osaka, Kyoto and
Tokyo), China and Canada en route to the United States, reaching Chicago on 30
July 1893, where the "Parliament of Religions" took place in September 1893. The
Congress was an initiative of the Swedenborgian layman, and judge of the Illinois
Supreme Court, Charles C. Bonney, to gather all the religions of the world, and
show "the substantial unity of many religions in the good deeds of the religious
life." It was one of the more than 200 adjunct gatherings and congresses of the
Chicago's World's Fair, and was "an avant-garde intellectual manifestation of cultic
milieus, East and West," with the Brahmo Samaj and the Theosophical
Society being invited as being representative of India.

The Parliament of the World's Religions opened on 11 September 1893 at the Art
Institute of Chicago as part of the World's Columbian Exposition. On this day,
Vivekananda gave a brief speech representing India and Hinduism. He was
initially nervous, bowed to Saraswati (the Hindu goddess of learning) and began
his speech with "Sisters and brothers of America!” At these words, Vivekananda
received a two-minute standing ovation from the crowd of seven
thousand. According to Sailendra Nath Dhar, when silence was restored he began
his address, greeting the youngest of the nations on behalf of "the most ancient
order of monks in the world, the Vedic order of sannyasins, a religion which has
taught the world both tolerance, of and universal acceptance". Vivekananda quoted
two illustrative passages from the "Shiva mahimna stotram": "As the different
streams having their sources in different places all mingle their water in the sea, so,
O Lord, the different paths which men take, through different tendencies, various
though they appear, crooked or straight, all lead to Thee!" and "Whosoever comes
to Me, through whatsoever form, I reach him; all men are struggling through paths
that in the end lead to Me." According to Sailendra Nath Dhar, "it was only a short
speech, but it voiced the spirit of the Parliament.
2. Your Emotional Real Time Experiences towards your
parents/Friends/Society

I have a lot of mixed feelings on Syrian civil war.

In the last week where the entire world has silently witnessed the massacred of 500
peoples in a single day out of which more than 150 were children below 15 years
and even the human rights comity and many more NGO has played a mute role in
this issue which made me to see sorrow because in the name of business and
commercial intention to sell weapons and earn profits they are killing the entire
humanity and the human concern in them which made them no difference with
animals in the wild life with growth of technology and commercial intention
human with power has moved the entire world to stone age where people used to
behave with the thirst of blood and flesh but now people used to behave as thirst of
money and power to control others.

I also do not think that Trump is doing this because he’s got a big heart for people
in Syria. Like so many presidents, when things get zesty at home, they look for
foreign affairs to get involved in to distract the public. I trust very little of what
Trump does and precisely ZERO of what he says (let’s face it, the man has the
verbal control of a 13-year-old).

Kids don’t ask to be killed. That’s the most important thing. Every war has child
fatalities and I hate that this is true. But there’s a terribleness that the Syrian
conflict has crossed. What lesson should we apply in this case? The Holocaust or
Vietnam?

Well, I fall cautiously on the side of “interfere”, but when I say that, I mean, “The
US better fix its sails to a certain wind and stick with it.” This means that the
current administration should bomb the fuck out of every government installation
and then put ground troops there. Then it should say, “We are here for 50 years.
You don’t get a choice.” And then drop the money and troops to stick around.
Then go back to NATO and say, “We’re billing you for half this.”

I hope humanity will reestablish in the earth and lets make the world a peaceful
place for humans and may love overtake violence.
3. Observation towards Friends and Family Members.

The First person I would check the personality is Mukunda Narayan, my friend.

1. EXTRAVERSION -31

2. AGREEABLENESS -33

3. CONSCIENTIOUSNESS -40

4. NEUROTISM -21

5. OPENESS -30

CONSCIENTIOUSNESS: The term Conscientious means wishing to do the work

or duty well and thoroughly. The tendency to be organized, dependable and shows
self-discipline, act dutifully, aim for achievement and prefer planned behavior
rather than spontaneous behavior. He can be classified as Low conscientiousness,
as he is Flexible in nature.

The Second Person I would check the personality is Raghavendra, my Brother.

1. EXTRAVERSION -24

2. AGREEABLENESS -34

3. CONSCIENTIOUSNESS -33

4. NEUROTISM -19

5. OPENESS -36

OPENNESS: Openness reflects the degree of intellectual curiosity, creativity and

preference for novelty and variety of person has. Moreover individuals with High
Openness are said to pursue self-actualization specifically by seeking out intense
Experience, ex: skydiving, living abroad etcetera. The Persons personality cannot
be determined between the Agreeableness and Openness, but almost both the
personality explains the openness of the Person.
4. View YouTube of current political situations, and write their Emotions

Seeman Speech https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2TMTRQyVqw

Seeman is very much known for his emotional speech with humor interlines in
between in his speech which makes his speech more attractive towards his content.
The body language and gesture which he use plays an important role in his speech,
stubborn movement will make more influence in the process of his presentation.
Rajinikanth https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2TMTRQyVqw

Rajinikanth is well known person in tamil nadu and almost entire nation knows
him very well for his style and dialog delivery manner, but now we are going to
see about his public interaction in the occasion of his political entry and also the
emotional equipments which used in the speech and that was actually inspiring to
the younger generation.

Kamal haasan https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weMZ4IhGR9M

Kamal Hassan made his political entry in last week at Madurai, where we can see a
brave step taken by him as the meeting was held at Wednesday which a weekday
because we can only see less people attendance but this is a different in case of
kamal haasan we have witnessed a huge crowed, and now coming to the content he
made a beautiful speech and also it was emotional in nature. He also added the
bribery status in the tamil nadu and also made a promise to get water and blood
from the Karnataka it was well explained by him to counter the criticism and the
every word in his speech was really inspiring and much attractive, and we can
notice he has used the style of Obama in his presentation which was very attractive

5. Critically examine the process of evaluating the Emotional Intelligence.

Emotional intelligence (EI), also known as Emotional quotient (EQ)

and Emotional Intelligence Quotient(EIQ, is the capability of individuals to
recognize their own emotions and those of others, discern between different
feelings and label them appropriately, use emotional information to guide thinking
and behavior, and manage and/or adjust emotions to adapt to environments or
achieve one's goal(s).
Although the term first appeared in a 1964 paper by Michael Beldoch, it
gained popularity in the 1995 book by that title, written by the author, and science
journalist Daniel Goleman Since this time, Goleman's 1995 analysis of EI has been
criticized within the scientific community, despite prolific reports of its usefulness
in the popular press.
There are currently several models of EI. Goleman's original model may now be
considered a mixed model that combines what have subsequently been modeled
separately as ability EI and trait EI. Goleman defined EI as the array of skills and
characteristics that drive leaderships performance. The trait model was developed
by Konstantin Vasily Petrides in 2001. It "encompasses behavioral dispositions
and self perceived abilities and is measured through self report". The ability model,
developed by Peter Salovey and John Mayer in 2004, focuses on the individual's
ability to process emotional information and use it to navigate the social
environment.
Studies have shown that people with high EI have greater mental health, job
performance, and leadership skills although no causal relationships have been
shown and such findings are likely to be attributable to general intelligence and
specific personality traits rather than emotional intelligence as a construct. For
example, Goleman indicated that EI accounted for 67% of the abilities deemed
necessary for superior performance in leaders, and mattered twice as much as
technical expertise or IQ. Other research finds that the effect of EI on leadership
and managerial performance is non-significant when ability and personality are
controlled for, and that general intelligence correlates very closely with leadership
Markers of EI and methods of developing it have become more widely coveted in
the past decade. In addition, studies have begun to provide evidence to help
characterize the neural mechanisms of emotional intelligence.

Those were days when the preeminence of IQ as the standard of excellence in life
was unquestioned; a debate raged over whether it was set in our genes or due to
experience. But here, suddenly, was a new way of thinking about the ingredients of
life success. I was electrified by the notion, which I made the title of this book in
1995. Like Mayer and Salovey, I used the phrase to synthesize a broad range of
scientific findings, drawing together what had been separate strands of research –
reviewing not only their theory but a wide variety of other exciting scientific
developments, such as the first fruits of the nascent field of affective neuroscience,
which explores how emotions are regulated in the brain.

I remember having the thought, just before this book was published ten years ago,
that if one day I overheard a conversation in which two strangers used the
phrase emotional intelligence and both understood what it meant, I would have
succeeded in spreading the concept more widely into the culture.
And the concept has spread to the far corners of our planet. EQ has become a word
recognized, I’m told, in languages as diverse as German and Portuguese, Chinese,
Korean, and Malay. (Even so, I prefer EI as the English abbreviation for emotional
intelligence.) My e-mail inbox often contains queries, from, for example, a
doctoral student in Bulgaria, a school teacher in Poland, a college student in
Indonesia, a business consultant in South Africa, a management expert in the
Sultanate of Oman, an executive in Shanghai. Business students in India read about
EI and leadership; a CEO in Argentina recommends the book I later wrote on the
topic. I’ve also heard from religious scholars within Christianity, Judaism, Islam,
Hinduism, and Buddhism that the concept of EI resonates with outlooks in their
own faith.

Today companies worldwide routinely look through the lens of EI in hiring,

promoting, and developing their employees. For instance, Johnson and Johnson
(another CREIO member) found that in divisions around the world, those
identified at mid career as having high leadership potential were far stronger in EI
competencies than were their less-promising peers. CREIO continues to foster such
research, which can offer evidence-based guidelines for organizations seeking to
enhance their ability to achieve their business goals or fulfill a mission.