Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Foods Co.
Case background
Hills Country Snack Foods is a fairly successful company, operating out of Austin,
Texas involved in manufacturing, marketing and distributing a variety of snacks
ranging from tortilla chips, salsa, pretzels, popcorn to crackers, pita chips and frozen
treats. We look at Hill Country in the context of January 2012, when the then-CEO
Howard Keener was about to retire.
Keener was a strong believer in the philosophy which stated that the management’s
job was to maximize shareholder value. This philosophy was applied at every level
of the organization and in all operating decisions. In competing with industry giants
like Pepsico and other smaller companies, Hill Country had maintained very lean
operating and capital projects and had brought down cost variances so that they could
keep all costs under control. Keener’s philosophy manifested in risk aversion in
financing decisions as well as product strategy. The balance sheet of the company
was strong with zero debt and a large cash balance ensuring safety and flexibility.
But the same philosophy which favoured equity completely over debt, was viewed
unfavourably by certain financial analysts within and outside the organization.
Ratios such as return on assets and return on equity suffered because of the large
cash balances and a total dependence upon equity for financing. At the time of the
writing of the case, Keener was about to retire and there was speculation about
changes in the capital structure of the company. The case presents us with pro-forma
prediction of the financial numbers in case the capital structure of the company was
to become more aggressive and favourable towards debt financing.
Choice between debt and equity is always confusing as both come with their
pros and cons. Thus, it becomes extremely critical for a firm to evaluate the
merits and demerits of both the methods of financing before concluding on
the method best suited for the organization.
Since the culture at Hill Foods is of risk aversion they have shied away from
debt financing till now. All of their expansions have been funded by internal
funds primarily by the huge cash pile that they have earned and saved over
the years. Cash pile can act as a war chest and signals safety and flexibility
but it is adversely affecting the key financial ratios such as return of equity
and return on assets which have been very low over the years.
3. How much debt percentage should Hill Country go for in case they go for
a restructure?
Since debt funding is less expensive than equity should the company go for a
highly aggressive capital structure or a moderate one where the proportion of
debt is lesser. The interest levels in 2012 were unprecedentedly low with the
10-year treasury bonds offering at 2% and the long-term corporate bonds with
“A” rating at 3.8% The various options available were-
Debt-Capital Ratio
20%
40%
60%
Debt is less expensive due to its contractual nature and due to the priority it
gets for recovering claims. Another advantage that debt has is the tax benefit
that is derived from the interest repayment of the debts.
4. Share repurchase
All the debt that is issued is added to the capital structure which is then
clubbed with the cash pile of $55 millions of excess cash to repurchase
common stock. Thus, it is important to evaluate the impact that the company
would have in case there is a share repurchase which is funded by debt.
The company is sitting at a huge amount of cash pile which is returning zero
interest value to it. This is adversely affecting key financial ratios such as
lower return on equity and lower return on assets. Therefore, options must be
explored to identify where this can be invested to give better return and in turn
offer better shareholder values.
Debt Financing:
debt. Until now, the upper management at Hill Country, and the CEO in particular
has been against leveraging debt for financing.
Equity Financing:
1. Contributed Capital - This is the money that was originally invested in the
business in exchange for shares of stock or ownership and
2. Retained earnings - This represents profits from past years that have been
kept by the company and used to strengthen the balance sheet or fund growth,
acquisitions, or expansion.
Currently, the firm has been operating at a 0-100 debt – equity structure
which means that all of its financing comes from the equity put up by its
shareholders. This is in stark contrast to Pepsico, a market leader which has a debt-
equity ratio of 0.496. Since Hill Country might want to move to a leveraged
capital structure it is important to evaluate merits and demerits of it. The various
capital structures are evaluated on the basis of the cost of capital(WACC).
Dividend discount model has been used to estimate WACC for all the 3
alternatives.
This is the average rate of return a company expects to compensate all its different
investors (Debt or Equity). The weights are the fraction of each financing source in
the company's target capital structure.
WACC is calculated by multiplying the cost of each capital source (debt and
equity) by its relevant weight, and then adding the products together to determine
the WACC value:
In order to calculate the WACC we employ the Dividend Discount Model in order
to predict the Cost of Equity and then the WACC subsequently.
The dividend discount model (DDM) is a procedure for valuing the price of a stock
by using the predicted dividends and discounting them back to the present value.
P0 $41.67
Payout ratio 30%
ROE 12.5%
Di+1 is calculated by multiplying the dividend growth rate to the previous year’s
dividend.
Di+1=Do(1+g)
Cost of Equity = (Dividends per share for next year / Current Market Value of
Stock) + Growth rate of dividends
After we get the cost of equity we use the formula for WACC to calculate the
WACC.
The cost of debt is assumed as follows-
At 20% debt-to-capital the assumed bond rating is AAA/AA and the interest rate is
2.85%, at 40% debt-to-capital the assumed bond rating is BBB and the interest rate
is 4.4%, and at 60% debt-to-capital the assumed bond rating is B and the interest
rate is 7.7%. The debt issued has a maturity of 10 years.
The corporate tax rate is 35.5%. Applying the Dividend Discount Model, Cost of
Equity and then WACC is calculated as shown in the table below.
Final recommendations
Considering the WACC calculated above for the three alternatives, the lowest
cost of capital comes to be 7.26% for the alternative of 60% of debt as
percentage of the capital. Adopting this alternative would mean that Hills
Country is able to decrease the cost of capital and give the most value to its
investors and shareholders, but at a higher risk of bankruptcy. Also, if Hill
Country takes 60 % debt to capital as its target, it would repurchase more
shares as compared to the 20% and 40% debt to capital alternatives.
Considering all factors, it appears that the 40% debt-capital alternative is the
best option for Hills Country. We also agree with the share repurchase
program as an action that adds value for the customer. The reasons are
summarized below –
o The Interest coverage ratio for the 40% alternative stands at 11.92
which is comparable to the market leader Pepsico at 11.25. This
alleviates the risk of bankruptcy that comes with the 60% alternative
while also leveraging a lower cost of capital than the 20% alternative.