1/30/2018 State Supreme Court reverses lower ruling on education funding - Connecticut Post

https://www.ctpost.com/local/article/State-wins-school-funding-case-12505168.php

State Supreme Court reverses lower ruling on education funding
By Linda Conner Lambeck Updated 1:20 pm, Thursday, January 18, 2018

IMAGE 1 OF 8 Buy Photo

Hartford Superior Court Judge Thomas Moukawsher listens to an attorney for the plaintiffs question Sharon Locke, at right, about her experiences as a district
administrator in New Britain Public Schools. Locke ... more

HARTFORD — The state Supreme Court has reversed a lower court ruling that Connecticut’s distribution of education aid
violated the state constitution.

“It is not the function of the courts to eliminate all the societal deficiencies that continue to frustrate the state’s educational
efforts,” the court determined in a 53-page decision Wednesday.

The battle pitted a coalition including a dozen school districts and municipalities, including Bridgeport and Danbury, that claimed
insufficient funding and haphazard distribution were denying school children their constitutional rights to an adequate educational
opportunity.

“Although the plaintiffs have convincingly demonstrated that in this state there is a gap in educational achievement between the
poorest and neediest students and their more fortunate peers, disparities in educational achievement, standing alone, do not
constitute proof that our state constitution’s equal protection provisions have been violated,” read the decision, written by Chief
Justice Chase T. Rogers.

“The plaintiffs,” she said, “have not shown that this gap is the result of the state’s unlawful discrimination against poor and needy
students in its provision of educational resources as opposed to the complex web of disadvantaging societal conditions over
which the schools have no control.”

In fact, it was pointed out that the trial court found the state does provide significantly more resources to poor districts.

Related Stories
A constitutional matter

https://www.ctpost.com/local/article/State-wins-school-funding-case-12505168.php 1/3
1/30/2018 State Supreme Court reverses lower ruling on education funding - Connecticut Post

Union threatens court a
governor’s executive
budget order
During months of testimony in 2016, Superior Court Judge Thomas
Moukawsher heard of overcrowded classrooms in Bridgeport, a Danbury school
budget with no money for textbooks and teachers left without classroom aides.

Could school funding
case eclipse state
budget impasse?
State aid cut goes
deeper for Bridgeport
schools
Moukawsher eventually found no fault with the overall amount the state spends,
but he took particular issue with the rationality of the state’s Education Cost
Sharing formula. The judge also ordered the state to create standards for what
students should learn and know to graduate, to create a better teacher pay and
evaluation system and to restructure how special education is organized and
funded.
The Supreme Court concluded on a 4-3 vote that the lower court was right in
deciding the state was providing minimally adequate educational opportunities
but should not have gone on to apply a new constitutional test.

The high court was also not persuaded by stories of districts getting by with
substitutes instead of certified teachers, school years being shortened or classes of 29 students.

“(While it) might not be ideal for needier students, we are unable to say that classes of that size render a school inadequate as a
matter of law,” the high court ruled.

In a separate opinion, Justice Richard Palmer and two other justices said they agreed with the majority that the state trial court
overstepped its mandate.

“I would have remand the case for a new trial,” Palmer wrote.

That the majority did not send the case back deeply disappointed Jim Finley, a principal consultant to the Connecticut Coalition for
Justice in Education Funding, which brought the case 12 years ago.

“None of the issues were remanded back to the trial court for clarification,” Finley said. “The Supreme Court chose not to provide a
remedy but instead deferred to the legislative branch of state government to correct deficiencies.”

It the Legislature had done that to begin with, Finley said, a court case would not have been necessary.

“We were looking to state courts to be the ultimate backstop in protecting the state constitutional rights of our public school
students, particularly poor ones,” he said.

The coalition is filing a motion to have the decision reconsidered, Finley said, acknowledge its options are few.

The effort to ensure education adequacy and equity continues, he added.

Acknowledging problems

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy said in a written statement that the decision concludes the landmark case.

“We continue to believe that the state is obligated to ensure that funding is distributed in a rational manner based on student need,
reflecting student poverty and demographic shifts in our communities,” Malloy said.

Bridgeport Mayor Joe Ganim, said that while he was still reviewing the details, it appeared the court sided with the state and
against the coalition.

“This is a disappointing outcome,” Ganim said. “We strongly believe that Judge Moukawsher was right ... The way in which the
state has chosen to distribute these resources is irrational, and unconstitutionally disadvantages students from poor and
challenged districts such as Bridgeport.”

https://www.ctpost.com/local/article/State-wins-school-funding-case-12505168.php 2/3
1/30/2018 State Supreme Court reverses lower ruling on education funding - Connecticut Post

Ganim vowed the fight was not over.

Attorney General Jepsen, whose office represented the state, said he was grateful for what he called a careful and thoughtful
decision.

“The court correctly determined that Connecticut’s public education system and its public education funding do not violate
constitutional standards and that — absent such a constitutional deficiency — education policy decisions rest with the
representative branches of government,” Jepsen said.

Still, Jepsen acknowledged the trial court’s identification of profound educational challenges.

“Nothing about today’s ruling should alleviate any urgency on the part of state lawmakers to address these challenges,” said
Jepsen.

lclambeck@ctpost.com; twitter/lclambeck

© 2018 Hearst Communications, Inc.

https://www.ctpost.com/local/article/State-wins-school-funding-case-12505168.php 3/3