Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Name
Institution
CASE STUDY ON INDIA 2
Sustainable growth of an economy depends on the ability to fulfill the needs of the present
emerging market in the world. The purchasing power of India has been increasing in a very
steady way. The resources generated by the recent growth have been invested in social welfare,
healthcare, and education. BRIC consists of Brazil, Russia, India, and China considered as the
India and Brazil both have a multi-trillion-dollar economy. It is very apparent that though Brazil
and India have an almost similar sized economy the economic fortunes of these two countries
appear to be on the divergent path. The aggregate gross domestic product (GDP) of India is
larger than Brazil’s. But Brazil is far richer than India on the estimated GDP per Capita. Where
Brazil had $12,200 India had $1542 GDP per Capita in 2015. The greater growth of India’s
growth is being driven by extensive foreign trade. In 2013 the contribution of foreign trade was
58% of total GDP. Brazil had only 25% in 2015. International investors are using the cheap labor
and producing export-oriented products, on the other hand, Brazil depends on Coco, Rubber as
their main product for export (Mishra, Ram & Pan, 2014). Apart from the foreign trade other
composition of both countries are almost similar. Both have highest private investment sector
India has maintained its productivity. It has moved from the rigid caste system to incorporate
more efficient growth system. Average GDP growth in India is 6.7%. The country depends on its
cheap labor high consumer market and garment to expedite the economic growth (Rao, 2015).
CASE STUDY ON INDIA 3
Since 2000s the credibility of Indian Government has been damaged greatly. Economic
efficiency has also been damaged by pervasive corruption. For the regulatory uncertainty and
corruption in doing business investors moved their capital elsewhere. FDI inflows remain low in
India at $24.6 billion comparing $106 billion in China and $41.2 in Russia. India lost estimated
40 billion tax revenue due to corruption in telecom licensing in 2008 (Mishra et al., 2014).
The scenario has been changing since 2011. Indian government took radical actions, arrested
many government officials for alleged corruption case. A very controversial decision to ban 500
and 1000 rupee note was taken by New Modi government to fight corruption. Its effect has been
found in CPI. India now stands in 94th position in 2010 it was in 137th position. But its effect on
economic growth is apparent. India has lost almost .5% GDP growth (Rao, 2015). Singapore is
very successful in eradicating corruption. The main advantage of Singapore is that it is a small
city country and it has inherited the British governing policy and procedures. It has zero
Like India Brazil is also fighting against corruption though Brazil Stands in a better position in
CPI index (42) many corruption scandals questioned the government policy against corruption.
Public protested against corruption in street and emboldened media to fight against it. As a result,
the authority has made 200 arrest and lower courts convicted 80 people including the conviction
of the CEO of the largest Latin American largest construction group. The Supreme Court fined
References
Mishra, Ram Kumar, & Pan Suk Kim. (2014). Major Challenges of Public Governance and
Public Affairs in India. The Korean Governance Review, 21(1), 97-122.
http://dx.doi.org/10.17089/kgr.2014.21.1.005
Rao, M. (2015). Political Economy of Government Finance in India. India Review, 14(1), 58-72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14736489.2015.1002300