Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Anthropology: ru
m
rg Fo
.o l
m ica
ru og
An Introduction
lfo ol
ca e
gi Th
lo st
eo we
.th id
w ©M
ht
w
ig
yr
w
op
C
1 Chapter 1:
Philosophical Anthropology, or the Philosophy of Man
1 1. Philosophical Reflection on the Human Person
m
3 2. The Method of Philosophical Anthropology
ru
rg Fo
4 3. Philosophical Anthropology as It Relates to Other Fields
of Philosophy and Theology
.o l
m ica
ru og
lfo ol
8 2.1. Immanence
w ©M
9 2.2. Transcendence
ht
w
ig
11 3.1.1. Unity
12 3.1.2. Organicity
12 3.2. Dynamic, or Operational, Characteristics
12 3.2.1. Self-movement
13 3.2.2. Adaptation
14 4. Degrees of Life and Operations of Life
14 4.1. Vegetative Life
15 4.2. Sensory Life
15 4.3. Intellective Life
16 4.4. Conclusion: The Degrees of Life Are Characterized
by “Cumulativeness,” Depending on the Operations of Life
vi Philosophical Anthropology: An Introduction
m
29 2.1. The Animate Body at the Structural Level: “Organicity”
ru
rg Fo
30 2.2. The Animate Body at the Dynamic Level: “Intentionality”
.o l
m ica
43 Chapter 5:
ht
w
ig
m
ru
63 3.4. Hearing rg Fo
64 3.5. Sight
.o l
m ica
73 3. Imagination
ht
w
76 4. Cogitative Power
ig
yr
w
77 5. Memory
op
C
m
ru
107 5. The Dynamism of the Feelings rg Fo
108 5.1. The Affections as Immanent Sensory Actions
.o l
m ica
m
ru
150 4. Historical Explanation of How rg Fo
the Metaphysical Notion of Person Developed
.o l
m ica
150 4.1. The Greek and Latin Notion of Person Before Christianity
ru og
m
ru
199 1.1. Cultivation, Formation, and Cultrg Fo
200 1.2. Culture and Human Existence
.o l
m ica
m
ru
244 3.2. Haste, Preoccupation, and the Life Project
rg Fo
245 3.3. Hope and the Desire for Eternity
.o l
m ica
ru og
lfo ol
249 Bibliography
ca e
gi Th
lo st
eo we
m
in etymological terms, a discourse or a treatise about man. But in
ru
each of these areas a “sectorial” approach is used, in that one or
rg Fo
another aspect of human existence is examined, and hence the noun
.o l
m ica
ru og
m
aforementioned scientific disciplines are more concerned with, How
ru
rg Fo
does he act? How does he evolve? and, How does he interact with oth-
.o l
m ica
ers? This does not mean that the two sectors cannot communicate
ru og
with one another; quite the opposite: Philosophy must take the
lfo ol
ca e
results of science into account, for they will often stimulate further
gi Th