Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Facts:
Petitioners claim that the means adopted by the cybercrime law for regulating
undesirable cyberspace activities violate certain of their constitutional rights. The
government of course asserts that the law merely seeks to reasonably put order into
cyberspace activities, punish wrongdoings, and prevent hurtful attacks on the system.
Ruling:
The court declares some provisions of RA 10175 void for being unconstitutional,
namely:
a. Section 4(c)(3) of Republic Act 10175 that penalizes posting of unsolicited
commercial communications; - The government pointed out that unsolicited
commercial or SPAM messages/advertisements are nuisance, however it was ruled that
unsolicited advertisements are legitimate forms of expression and that the State cannot
rob him of this right without violating the constitutionally guaranteed freedom of
expression.