Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PURPOSE
BACKGROUND
2. To meet the rising need of river trade to and from the Pearl River
Delta (“PRD”) region in the late 1980s and improve the overall efficiency of
the Hong Kong Port (“HKP”), the RTT, a privately-run terminal on reclaimed
land dedicated for river cargo, came into operation in 1998. Granted to the
current land owner by way of public tender, the RTT site occupies an area of
65 hectares (ha), providing 49 berths along 3,000 metres of quay front. The
facility primarily handles and consolidates container and break-bulk cargo
from the PRD region prior to despatch to the Kwai Tsing Container Terminals
(“KTCTs”) and other port facilities in Hong Kong for onward shipment and
vice versa. Under the lease, only vessels regularly travelled within the PRD
region are allowed to berth at the RTT. Annex 1 shows the location of the
RTT site.
1
Consolidation of cargo at the RTT before feeding to KTCTs entails extra handling cost and lead
time.
handling volume of RTT has been dwindling. The Study on the Strategic
Development Plan for Hong Kong Port 2030, commissioned by the Transport
and Housing Bureau and completed in 2014, recommended, amongst other
things, to allow the RTT to handle both ocean and river vessels so as to
improve the utilisation of the RTT and to provide additional ocean berth
capacity for HKP, thereby enhancing HKP’s role as a transhipment hub and its
competitiveness. We understand that the utilisation rate of the 49 berths of
the RTT was only 24% of its capacity in 2017.
DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS
4. The RTT is another example showing that as our city develops, the
original use of some sites may not be as much needed by society as before as
compared with other competing uses. This opens up the opportunity to
consider alternative use(s) for these sites that can better meet the prevailing
needs of the community. Key issues for consideration of this idea are set out
below.
Land Ownership
6. The RTT site was granted in 1996 at full market value premium to
the current land owner, and the existing lease term is up to 30 June 2047. If it
is considered that the function of the RTT is to be transferred to other terminals
–2–
or port facilities, we need to explore ways to secure a suitable arrangement to
enable the RTT site to be used alternatively.
Planning Context
10. In view of the existing and planned industrial uses in Tuen Mun
West, a logical option is to continue to use the RTT site for industrial purpose.
Not only is this compatible with surrounding land uses, there is also the
practical consideration that industrial uses generate less vehicular traffic than
2
There is another logistics site of 3.2 ha in Tuen Mun Area 49 right across Lung Mun Road.
Tender invitation will be issued for this site tentatively in March 2018.
–3–
non-industrial uses at peak hours and create less extra loading on the existing
congested road network in Tuen Mun. One idea that has been mooted is to
convert about 4 ha of the RTT site into off-airport air cargo screening and
consolidation facilities 3 to partly meet the demand for air cargo security
screening arising from a new requirement of the International Civil Aviation
Organisation (“ICAO”) 4. Such a proposed use may be warranted to help
enhance the utilisation of the RTT site in the short to medium term.
12. There are on-going proposals to increase the industrial and economic
land supply in Tuen Mun West. Besides the TM Areas 40 and 46 Study stated
above, the Civil Engineering and Development Department has recently
completed a Technical Study on Reclamation at Lung Kwu Tan. The
proposed Lung Kwu Tan reclamation at the coastal area to the north of CPPS
(see Annex 2) is expected to deliver 220 to 250 ha of land in phases between
2026 and 2030 for industrial and other uses subject to a detailed Planning and
Engineering Study to be conducted. With abundant supply of industrial land
in Tuen Mun West in near future, the possibility to use part or whole RTT site
for non-industrial purposes may also be considered.
3
This idea is being explored by relevant parties, and the feasibility of the proposed screening
facilities and the screening capacity that may be provided at the RTT site are being examined.
4
The ICAO’s new requirement, to be in force internationally from 1 July 2021, mandates that all
outbound cargo must be screened, or originate from an approved shipper. The proposed
screening and consolidation facility can be considered a “Cargo Handling and Forwarding
Facility” always permitted under the current “OU(RTT)” zoning, although the planning intention
of the zoning is to provide facilities mainly for river trade vessels from the PRD region.
–4–
Residential
14. While the external connectivity of Tuen Mun will be improved upon
completion of TM-CLKL and Tuen Mun Western Bypass (TMWB), one of the
major challenges to change the RTT site to residential use, other than land use
compatibility, is the capacity constraint of existing road network in Tuen Mun.
Currently a dual 2-lane carriageway, Lung Mun Road is one of the major roads
serving Tuen Mun West, which connects to Lung Fu Road and Wong Chu
Road within the town centre area and then Tuen Mun Road in the east to other
parts of the urban area. Annex 3 shows the existing road network in Tuen
Mun. Both Wong Chu Road and Tuen Mun Road are reaching their design
capacities. A detailed traffic and transport impact assessment is required to
5
Under the TCNTE, about 121 ha of land will be reclaimed in Tung Chung East for development
of about 40 800 housing units.
–5–
assess the additional traffic demand and the cumulative traffic impact on the
adjacent road network to identify enhancements to disperse the potentially
high traffic flows arising from the proposed residential development. While
the completion of the TM-CLKL may ease congestion at Tuen Mun Road 6,
more major improvements are only expected after the commissioning of Route
11 and TMWB, both of which are under planning 7. Subject to further studies,
there may be a case to time the population intake of the proposed development
at the RTT site, if taken forward, to be after the completion of Route 11 and/or
TMWB in order not to aggravate traffic congestion at Tuen Mun Road.
15. As for rail-based transport, the RTT site is about 4.5 km from the
existing Tuen Mun Station of the MTR West Rail Line (“WRL”) and about 2.5
km from the proposed station of Tuen Mun South (“TMS”) Extension
recommended under the Railway Development Strategy 2014 (“RDS-2014”).
Subject to the development scale, road-based feeders may be provided to carry
residents to and from the WRL. However, the WRL is approaching its
capacity and the traffic loading of WRL will further increase following the
implementation of other major developments in the NWNT such as the Hung
Shui Kiu NDA. The WRL will have little spare capacity to accommodate
new traffic demand from the proposed development at the RTT site.
6
TM-CLKL will provide the most direct route for vehicles commuting between North Lantau and
Northwest New Territories (NWNT). It will also provide an alternative route from NWNT to
urban areas via the Lantau Link.
7
Both Route 11 and TMWB form part of the strategic road network in the NWNT. Route 11
connects Yuen Long with North Lantau and relieves traffic bottlenecks along Tuen Mun Road
and Tai Lam Tunnel. Funding is being sought from the Legislative Council to conduct a
feasibility study on Route 11. TMWB links up Hung Shui Kiu NDA via Kong Sham Western
Highway in the north, and TM-CLKL in the south, with an intermediate connections to Tsing Tin
Road in Tuen Mun North. Upon agreeing with stakeholders on the latest proposed alignment,
the Government commissioned the investigation study and preliminary design last October for
completion in about two years’ time.
–6–
NWNT via the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Boundary Crossing Point.
This proposed railway extension to NWNT may serve the new development at
the RTT site. This rail loop is also strategically important by providing an
alternative railway route from NWNT to the Metro Area and can alleviate the
congestion along WRL, subject to more detailed technical assessments.
17. In gist, the suitability of the site for residential development has to
be established by further studies to address the land use interface and the
traffic/transport and infrastructure constraints as explained above. Subject to
such studies, and depending on the scale of the proposed residential
development, large-scale site formation works may not be required. Given
the lead time required for resolving land use compatibility and transport issues,
and other technical issues (e.g. provision of new infrastructure or upgrading of
existing utilities, and site decontamination) as well as the associated statutory
and administrative procedures required for residential development such as
rezoning, it appears that the RTT site may only become a source of land supply
in the medium to long term. If reclamation at the existing basin and
near-shore is proposed so as to provide more developable land for integrated
planning and better economy of scale in development, more time is required to
resolve additional issues.
18. Whether the alternative land uses along the Tuen Mun western
coastal area, including the RTT site, suggested above would deliver
community benefit is subject to a lot of factors, including negotiation with
existing land owners and operators, as well as the assessment of overall social
cost, economic and financial viability of the proposed options. In particular,
it would not be appropriate to come to a conclusion before detailed
assessments are conducted by relevant parties.
–7–
Annex 5 for the proposed reclaimed area);
(c) the Tuen Mun Typhoon Shelter (“TMTS”) and Tuen Mun
PCWA (“TMPCWA”) be reprovisioned to the east of the
landfall of TM-CLKL in Tuen Mun Area 40.
21. As in the case of alternative uses of the RTT site, transport and
traffic remains the primary concern for the CPBR. The analysis for the RTT
case is applicable to the CPBR proposal as both have a similar development
scale. On the proposed TM-TWL, a preliminary conceptual scheme
comprising a railway station in Tuen Mun West and five intermediate stations
along the 20 km coastal corridor between Tuen Mun and Tsuen Wan was
examined when formulating the RDS-2014. It was noted that the catchment
population of the proposed link was mainly concentrated at the eastern and
western ends of the corridor, while the remaining population was scattered and
dispersed along the coast. The cost of the scheme was also expected to be
very high (in the region of $65 billion (in 2013 prices)) due to the technical
difficulties involved. The cost effectiveness of the proposed railway line
–8–
could hardly be established at the time of formulating the strategy. Moreover,
the implementation of the scheme would also create negative visual and
landscape impacts along the scenic coastal areas. The TM-TWL was
therefore not included in the RDS-2014.
ADVICE SOUGHT
22. Whether the RTT and/or CPBR proposals should be taken forward
are subject to further studies. The two proposals share some similarity as the
scale is broadly the same involving land of 65 ha or more. They are in the
same locality, hence subject to similar transport infrastructure constraint. We
welcome Members’ initial views on the proposals.
Development Bureau
Transport and Housing Bureau
2 March 2018
–9–
附 件 ANNEX 1
本摘要圖於2018年2月6日擬備,
所根據的資料為於2017年11月3日
香港內河碼頭
展示的分區計劃大綱圖編號 S/TM/34
EXTRACT PLAN PREPARED ON 6.2.2018
RIVER TRADE TERMINAL
BASED ON OUTLINE ZONING PLAN No.
S/TM/34 EXHIBITED ON 3.11.2017
SCALE 1 : 20 000 比 例 尺
參考編號 REFERENCE No. 附件1
米 米
200 0 200 400 600 800 1000
METRES METRES M/TM/18/14 ANNEX 1
附 件 ANNEX 2
ÀÀij¤Ùª
±µ»éÀG¹D(¦
PROPOSED SLIP TUNNELS OF
ÀÀij¤Ùªù¦è¶¹
TUEN MUN WESTERN BYPASS
PROPOSED TUEN MUN (SUBJECT TO REVIEW)
«C¤s¾Þ¬
WESTERN BYPASS
BOUNDARY OF TSING (SUBJECT TO REVIEW)
SHAN FIRING RANGE
¤Ùª
TUEN MUN
¤w-×´_±æ¦Z
STATION
Às¹ ¤w-×´_¤p§ RESTORED PILLAR POINT
LUNG KWU TAN RESTORED SIU LANG SHUI VALLEY LANDFILL
LANDFILL
¬
Às¹ªÅy¥i¦Ò¼ Ó
¯
POTENTIAL RECLAMATION ¤p§N¤ô¨ã¯S®í WONG
EXTENT AT LUNG KWU TAN SIU LANG SHUI SITE OF CHU ROAD
SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC INTEREST
ÀÀijª«¬y
¤ÙªùÁ
PROPOSED LOGISTICS
Tuen Mun
DEVELOPMENT SITE
Typhoon Shelter
AD
RO
FU
NG
LU
½¹ 邨
¤Ùª BUTTERFLY
´
«C¤sµ TUEN MUN ESTATE
s
WEST
À
CASTLE PEAK
POWER STATION
¤ôª
CEMENT PLANT
¦¬¶O «C¤
TOLL PLAZA ¤Ùªù CASTLE PEAK BAY
(TSING SHAN WAN)
L Às TUEN MUN
UN ª
G FERRY PIER
¿ûÅ MU
N
STEEL MILL RD
¤Ùªù40°Ï¤Î46°Ï©M¬s³s¦a°Ï³W¹º
POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AREAS UNDER THE
PLANNING AND ENGINEERING STUDY
Àô«
-»´ä¾÷³õºÞ²z§½ª FOR TUEN MUN AREAS 40 AND 46
ECOPARK
AIRPORT AUTHORITY HONG KONG'S AND THE ADJOINING AREAS
PERMANENT AVIATION FUEL FACILITY
¤½²³¶
PUBLIC FILL BANK
ÀÀijª«¬y
¤Ùªù¦Ü¨ªžP¨¤³s
PROPOSED LOGISTICS -»´ä¤º TUEN MUN -
DEVELOPMENT SITE CHEK LAP KOK LINK
¯]¦¿
RIVER TRADE ±æ¦Z¥Û¦Ã
(UNDER CONSTRUCTION)
CHU KONG WAREHOUSE
PILLAR POINT SEWAGE
TERMINAL
TREATMENT WORKS
Pi
pel
100
¤ ¸
i
ne
Æ 394
Z
10
¤ ®
0
0
30
¸
0
D
20
A
O 290
R
N
100
100 A
10
¤ô
W
0
20
AD
0
IM 100
ng
N
¿é
200
¥ü
Ho
O
u
ne
Si
i
l
281 pe
NR
188 Pi
¾ É
20
0
10
»´
0
É
MU
¾
173 137 268
°t¤
Pi
20
pel
Ser Res 0 °t¤
Ser Res
i
10
ne
0
TUE
100 200
30
200
135
10
0
0
00
1
AD
10
0 0 ¥
20
¥T SI C O
NG TIN «R
«C«C¥
TSI
C
NG TI
N RD 100
10
0
0
I
20
T RA
301
100
277
ªù
GH
300
10
163
LI
0
MI
0
¤Ù
10 C
NG KUM RO
TSUN
300
0
0
10
10
SHEK P AU RD
¥Û±Æ 10
0
»ïµ
AI T 200
WE
121 203 10
0
¤Ù
200
0
N
30
°t¤
0
RD
Ser Res
20
20
0
310 10
0
LU
TUEN MUN
GN
KW
100
AD
U
3 °t¤
¾
20 0
n
0 0 Ser Res
¾_
Mu
54 30
TAN
251
0
Tuen
300
2
ªM
400
00 PUI
RO
T
AD
O
´ RD
W UN ROAD
RO
AD
RD
¿é¤ô
¤Ù
PUI TO
TO
I
PU
ª ´¸
Às
°t¤
¿
Ser Res
¹ª
é
«C¶
«
197
W at
C
ô
400 400
er
s
100
539
Tunne
0
300 20 100
0
30
20
W
CAST
0
l
at
er
30
NG
0
Tu
LE
nn
0
20
el
9
PEAK
´
0
TS
¬
20
C
»
583
0
200
W
O
N Ó 10
0
G
¯
RO AD
30
C
100
H
U
0
50
RD
W
40
¬
O
G CHUROAD
300
¸N
0
30 ¯ D
ROA 345 400
WONG CHU
517
0
30
269
0
300
10
ª
20
0 2
AD
00
¤
200
AD
99
¸
0
RO
10
RO
C
100
T
A
40 U
E
T
N
N
©¹ªð
©¹ªð
©¹ªð
MU
U 10
0
R
M 0
U 10
E
N
N
LUN
C
FU
N
UIL
200
to/from
to/from
to/from the
the
the
RA
R C
O
M
M
A
T
D
GLIGH
´NG
U
20
Urban
Urban
Urban Areas
Areas
Areas
N
N
LU
R
ª
LU
s
O
s
À
A ¿
é
À
¤
100 D 100
200 ô
249 100
ª
Às
W
D
´
at
A
er
O
¤ª ¤¸ Tu
R
131 nn
s
el
FU
C
°t¤
À
G
N
Ser Res
LU
5
±½º
0
«C¤
30
«
C
Wat
erTunnel 344
¤
CASTLE PEAK SO KWUN WAT
s
C
¤ô ¤p
0
10
Às
ª Àsª LUNG
MUN
RO
AD
BAY ¿é
100 ¤jÆ
LU ¯B´
Floating Jetties SIU LAM
大 欖 涌
NG
MU
°t¤
Ser Res
141
TAI LAM CHUNG
N 77
RO C
A 223
AD 10
0
S
°t¤
T
L 0
E
¤ª Ser Res 20
°t¤
PEAK ROAD ¤ ¸ C Ser Res
10
0
¸
¤
Ù
C
¤
55
C
250
¹v
Firing
Range 200
0
D
10
A
O
R
C
N
U
M
T 10
U 0
EN 9
TUE
N
MU
NR
OAD
TU
EN (
¤Ùª
MU
UN
5
DER
N - C
ù¦Ü
CO NS
橋
HEK
大
門
un
¨ªú
水 M
汲5 i
huge
7
115
5 Si
rd
10
0 ap B
K
TRUC
LAP K
å¨ ¤ ³
>
TI
E
N
LI
O N)
O K LI
G
N 0
U
H 10
C
s
*
G :
: N
7
TU *
6
¹Ï LEGEND 5 東
涌
綫
2
0
0
NK
30
9 6
7
-»´ä¤º 273 9
7
y
a
River Trade Terminal
>
y
n
n
u
S
7
澳
186
欣
©¹ªð¥«°Ï 7
6
2
0
0
Major Route to/from the Urban Areas
10
0
路 187
東 7
¥»ºK-n¹Ï©ó2018¦~2
²{¦³¹D
EXTRACT PLAN PREPARED ON 22.2.2018 EXISTING ROAD NETWORK
°Ñ¦Ò REFERENCE No. ªþ¥ó
¦
SCALE 1 : 40 000 ¤ñ¨ ¦
METRES 500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 METRES
M/TM/18/14 ANNEX 3
附 件 ANNEX 4
Ex
pr
es
s
Ra
ilL
i
nk
un
i
de
M
a
W
KA
rCo
i
u
ns
h
S
®Ô
tru
®
ct
in
¤
FAN
ion
T
¸
D
Long Ping
A
·H PI O
84 NG R
100 § HA
19 ¤¸ Yuen Long
»
´ä²`¦è
´
HA
´
ä
TS
²
UE
RO AD
N
³
42
¤¸
R
¡
O 33
AD «C¤s CASTLE PEAK ROAD
¤
100
Æ
KONG SHAM 31
N
TI
Z 441
¸
¥Ð
G
WESTERN HIGHWAY
28
H UN
D L
·
A I
RA
N RO T
H
WA G
LI
YUEN LONG
M
«
¬¤ ¸
I C 91 °t¤
N 68
¤ ¤¸
Ser Res ¥ 40
s À 0
½ 149
10
m 10
129 ROAD
100
0
¹ KAM TIN 30
0
200
188
-x 112
Barracks
63
Y
42
23
NE
´
AY
» 21
LI
Ru 20
A
HW
nwa 0
y
IL
¶]
HIG
RA
¤¸
®Ô
Ka
Y
T
YUE A
À
RN
m
W ES
W
A
TE
H 81
G
HI
Sh
¤
NL H
YUE
W ES
N LONG 142
e
0
un
TIN
10
«
ONG
ew B
G
g
HI
0
C
10
Ro
AM
)
¸
RY
HA
ad
375
SH
DA
°t¤
Ô
¸
UN
0 Ser Res
ªÀ ¤
20 ROAD
ROAD
Ù
ev W
NG
BO
M
s KA
À
106
KO
®¤
¤ LAM
E
00
3
NG
C 43
TAI
RA
0 «
ne
30
i
TM
220
l
TS
¤
pe
i
NG
Pi
RI
ec SE Ý
ING
FI
303 200
TONG
AN
9 84
SH
Å
0
LONG
³
20
¥Û±
è
167
NG
¸
«
°t¤ 61
TSI
168 ¤ Shek Kong
¦
300
¤
100
AY
Ser Res À
R
0
Village
10
O
A
tt D
A
O
D
D
HIGHW AY
A
H
O 00
vi S
R 2
IG
¤
10
)
³
0 0
H
A
j
G 30
E
N
e L P
U
´
G
ct TU ( ¦
E
H
N
S
w
LE
o
LO M
u LI ¹ D ª
KA
T
À
R NE
0 84 ROUTE
S
N 10
e
(¦
E
TW
235
C
YU °t¤ D
ROA
ISK
Ser Res
G
Ù
EUN
ub O
H
to N
T
A
0
¥Û±
10
P
10
58
0
À ¤
P
Shek Kong
el
20
É
Village
nn
55 87
¾
C
Tu
¯þÀA
W SE é ³
er
O
0
20
t
¤K
0
Wa
0
10
20 297 ¶
(S S G
b P
°t¤
» Ä
Ser Res C
276
227
F O ±µ À
(S
0
0
je
62 1
245
200
200
300
¾É
À
300
Pi
B D
pel
100
¤ ¸
i
ne
Æ 30
394
Z
10
¤ ® 0
0
0
200
30
¸
0
D 0
10
20
A
O 290
R
C
T PO
N
100
100 A 3
10
¤ô
W
0
20
0
IM 00
0
100 2
g
N
¿é
30
Hon
200
¥ü
el
nn
u
0
C
rT
40
e
t
u
ne Wa 503
Si
i
l
pe
À
M
281 0
188 Pi 300 40
¾ É
20
R
0
10
20
»´
0
É
P
0
¾
¤ô 50
¿é
À
173 137 268 ¿é 600
00
5
¤j´U
¤ô
°t¤
Pi
20
°t¤
pel
Ser Res 0
(I
654
O
Ser Res
i
100
ne
100 2
PR I
0 0
Ä
0
20
30
200
135
10 C
0
ND
0 AD
RO
¤jÆ
00 T N
10 1 A A
I H
0 0 ¥
20 C MO
S
³
TSI «
C
NG TI
N RD 100
¥ 10 400
«C 0
O
L
500
0
RAI
20
301
100
277
GHT
400
¤
300
10
163
LI
CA
0
500
PO I
R
O
UT
0 E
10
¦
C
TSUN
0
¤jÆ
30
è
300
TW
Q
Å
0
10
10
¥Û± Æ 10 S
I
SHEK PAI TAU RD 2 0 K
00
VÀ
WE
203 10
T
121
V
0
¤Ù
SE A
200
0
N
30
°t¤
0
RD
Ser Res
20
20
0
310 10
0
LUN
VE
G
W
579
E
@¸
S
D LI
KW
100
T
400
R
U
°t¤ 0
A
3 50
¾
0
TUEN MUN
2
I
0
n Mun
L
0 0 Ser Res
¾_
54 30
TAN
251
LI
0
N
40
E
RO G N
TAI
0
¯
300
Tue
2
400
00 PUI þ
0
RO
TAI L
T 30 À
¹
O 432
RD A
4
AD
RD 0
¿é¤ô
¤Ù
LAM
0
TO
I
PU 200 400
ª ´¸
Às
30
0
TUN NEL
·
°t¤
30
¿
00
UT M E
Ser Res 4
¹ª
0
é
«
197
W at
C
ô
00
W at
4 400
er
391
er T
s
100
300
539 261
Tunne
AM
0
20
unn
300 100
0
30
20
E NT
W
CAST
0
l
at
el
er
30
½
0
Tu
LE
nn
0 359
20
el
9
PEA
´
11 )
C
0
20
C
»
583
K ROA
W 00 300
u
O 1 °t¤
200
N
TUNN
G Ser Res
30
CH 377
100
U
200
0
0
50
RD
D
40
451
¬
300
0
30 ¯
¸ ROAD 345 400
WONG CHU
517
0 C C
30
40
C
D
0
T
269 303
0
10
0
300
10
D
¤
O
´
20
EL
0 20
200 0
E
OA AD
R
99 408
0
°t¤
RO
10 Ser Res
ª UN
N
s
C
100
T
40 U 474
E
M UN
50 N
0
U
10
¤ R
M 0
NR
À
20 U 10
C
G
N
LUN
C
IL
200 315
RA
R C
¸ OA
74 O
A
T
D C
30
H
400
0
G
LI
20 100
0
20
´
N
U
ª
s
s
À
¿
é
À
LU
¤
M
10
100 0
200 ô
20 0
100
0
259 30 00
249 nel 2 CASTLE PEAK ROAD
Wae
trTun
W ¿é¤ô C
D
¤jÆ
at
A
er «
G
O
C
D
¤ª ¤¸ Tu
R
131 nn ¤
UN
el s
FU
20
C
°t¤
L
0
N
Ser Res 20 SHA
226
LU
5 TS
0
30
«
UI
C
RD
¤p
Wat
erT °t¤ 5
unnel 344 100 ¨
¤
Ser Res D
68
9 F R
¼
s
O
C
C
¤ ¸ I
H
0
ª
10
Às
s ¿é
MUN
RO
¤
ª LUNG AD
«C¤
100
¿U®
ª SO KWUN ¯B´
Floating Jetties
SIU LAM
TU
EN YE
ù
Fuel Tank UN
°t¤
¤
G
Ser Res
141
MU
N
T
s
¯ ¯ UK
u þ þ
ªù AD
RO
RO AD e Æ Æ AD
WAT
n
CASTLE PEAK
77
C 223 W
A ¾ô a T
0 n S
10
¤Ù
S
°t¤ Bridge Tower W U
T
L 0 E
E Ser Res 20 e N
®ü´ä
O °t¤ 100 s
t
NR
W
¾
PEAK ROAD C Ser Res
¥
BAY
A
É
N
Å
10
s
S
MU
¤
¤ R
T
C O
LE
Pi
« A
¸
pe
D
¤ PE
l
EN
i
ne
A 3
Ù
C K
¾ô
¤
TU
55
C RO
AD Bridge Tower
250
Ti
ng
¾
t
Ka
mi
¹v
u Br
bour Li
Firing
Range 200
idge
T
Har
¯
0
D
10
A ¤½ C
¤
TSING YI NORTH COASTAL RD
«C¥_
O «
R
C
¾ô OAD
N R
ª SUE
Bridge Tower
T
NG
E
TSI
ÀÀij¤Ùª ¤ G
LNE
I
«C
N
N UN
U CH
M G Tsi
ng
10 TUN
¸
Yi
M
0
Pi
pel
10
0
i
9 «C
¯
ne
PROPOSED UN TUE
N
ªF
°t¤
Tsi
¯
ngL
aiBr
idg
ROAD
200 e
TUEN
Ser Res °t¤
218 Ser Res
¤Ùª
UNDE
ÀÀij
M UN -
PROPOSED
ù¦Ü
STATION
R CO N
CHEK
¨ªú
STRUC
LAP K
å¨ ¤ ³
TI
¹Ï LEGEND
O K LI
O N)
-»´ä¤º
NK
ÀÀij¤Q¤@¸¹·F½u
¤jÀ
Proposed Route 11 (Indicative Alignment)
LANTAU ISLAND
ÀÀij¤Ùªù¦è¶¹ ¨ªú
Proposed Tuen Mun Western Bypass (TMWB) CHEK LAP KOK
(Subject to Review)
ÀÀij¤Ùª
Proposed Tuen Mun South Extension
¡m-»´ä2030+: ¸ó¶V2030¦~ªº³
«Øijªº·s¬É¦è¥_-¤jÀ¬
(¦³«Ý¶i¤@
NWNT - Lantau - Metro Transport Corridor ªF
Proposed in "Hong Kong 2030+:
Towards a Planning Vision and Strategy TUNG CHUNG ©¹ªð³
Transcending 2030" (Subject to Further Study) to/from
Metro Area
ÀÀij
Proposed Station
¥»ºK-n¹Ï©ó2018¦~2
¥¼¨Ó·s¬É¦è¥
EXTRACT PLAN PREPARED ON 26.2.2018 FUTURE TRANSPORT NETWORK IN NORTHWEST NEW TERRITORIES
°Ñ¦Ò REFERENCE No. ªþ¥ó
¦
SCALE 1 : 80 000 ¤ñ¨ ¦
METRES 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 METRES
M/TM/18/14 ANNEX 4
附 件 ANNEX 5
6
來源:梁焯輝教授的建議書
Source: Professor Jimmy Leung's Proposal