RPS R217 990292 15P04066 20180305222212 10948141

KEMENTERIAN RISET, TEKNOLOGI DAN PENDIDIKAN TINGGI
UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SEMARANG (UNNES)

Kantor: Rektorat UNNES, Kampus Sekaran, Gunungpati, Semarang 50229
Rektor: (024)8508081, Fax (024)8508082, Purek I: (024) 8508001
Website: www.unnes.ac.id - E-mail: rektor@mail.unnes.ac.id
FORMULIR
RENCANA PEMBELAJARAN SEMESTER (RPS)
No. Dokumen No. Revisi Hal Tanggal Terbit
FM-01-AKD-05 04 1 dari 12 27 Februari 2017
Mata Kuliah : Pragmatics Semester : II SKS : 3 Kode MK : 15P04066

Dosen Koordinator Pengampu Mata Kuliah: Prof. Dr. Januarius Mujiyanto, M.Hum
Program Studi: S2 Pendidikan
Bahasa Inggris Dosen Pengampu Mata Kuliah: Prof. Dr. Januarius Mujiyanto, M.Hum dan Dr. Issy Yuliasri, M.Pd.
Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan (1) Able to internalize academic values, norms, and ethics based on conservation principles of
humanity, justice, responsibility, and honesty;
(2) Able to obtain the advanced knowledge about language skills and components, language teaching
theories and approaches, methods of teaching, assessment in ELT, English related cultures and
customs, translation studies, and research in ELT.
(3) Able to solve various problems in ELT as a foreign language by applying theories, approaches, and
principles about designs and models of learning of English language and literature;
(4) Able to jointly and severally plan, apply, manage, evaluate, and improve ELT based on the needs of
the students, teachers, and stakeholders;
(5) Able to conduct advanced research on ELT and report it as a thesis and to disseminate the
research findings for the development of ELT in schools and other educational institutions in a
national and international level.
Capaian Pembelajaran Matakuliah At the end of the course, students are able
(1) to develop a positive attitude toward language and language use;
(2) to obtain knowledge about pragmatics and its relationship to syntax and semantics, and various
concepts on pragmatic theories and principles;
(3) to develop the skill of reviewing studies on various topics within pragmatic fields;
(4) to analyze language use phenomena in a small-scale study on the language used in the pragmatic
field (mini research project);
(5) to relate the study of pragmatics to English language teaching.
Deskripsi Matakuliah This course is designed to provide students with insights, studies, and skills in reviewing various aspects
of pragmatics and their implications for language teaching and learning in a humanistic, fair, honest, and
responsible manner. The course will cover:
FORMULIR
(1) Basic concepts and theories of pragmatics

(2) Deixis
(3) Speech Acts
(4) Cooperative Principle and Conversational Implicature
(5) Conversational Structure
(6) Politeness
(7) Reviews of studies on pragmatic fields.
Mingg Kemampuan yang Metode Kriteria/

Bahan Kajian Waktu Evaluasi Bobot
u ke diharapkan Pembelajaran Indikator
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1-2  Explaining the - Basic concepts and theories of Lectures, 2x3 X 50 Structured  Ability to 15%
concepts and theories of Pragmatics Discussions, minutes and restate (in
Pragmatics group work, independe own words) at
 Reviewing each of the - Meaning in Pragmatics Student-Centered nt least two
concepts and theories of Learning (self- assignme concepts and
Pragmatics directed learning; nt theories of
contextual Pragmatics
instruction  Ability to
problem-based summarize
learning and concepts and
inquiry) theories of
Pragmatics
3  Describing the definition Deixis Lectures, 1x3 X 50 Structured  Ability to 5%
and types of Deixis Discussions, minutes and mention the
 Explaining how deictic group work, independe definition of
expressions indicate a Student-Centered nt Deixis from
various relationship Learning (self- assignme one author
between interlocutors, directed learning; nt and four types
intended meaning of contextual of Deixis
instruction
FORMULIR
referring expressions, problem-based  Ability to

and interpretation of learning and explain
deictic expressions inquiry) functions and
based on contexts interpretation
of deictic
expressions
based on
contexts
4  Describing the concepts Speech acts Lectures, 1x3 X 50 Structured  Ability to 5%

of speech acts Discussions, minutes and describe the
 Explaining types of group work, independe concepts of
speech acts Student-Centered nt speech acts
 Explaining felicity Learning (self- assignme  Ability to
conditions directed learning; nt explain types
 Interpreting speech acts contextual of speech acts
in contexts instruction  Ability to
problem-based explain felicity
learning and conditions
inquiry)
5  Explaining the concept Cooperative Principle and Lectures, 1x3 X 50 Structured  Ability to 5%
of implicature Conversational Implicatures Discussions, minutes and differentiate
 Describing the group work, independe conventional
cooperative principles Student-Centered nt from
 Explaining the Learning (self- assignme conversational
observance and directed learning; nt implicature
nonobservance of contextual  Ability to
maxims of cooperative instruction describe the
principles problem-based cooperative
FORMULIR
learning and principles

inquiry)  Ability to
explain the
observance
and
nonobservanc
e of maxims of
cooperative
principles
6  Describing issues in the Conversational structure Lectures, 1x3 X 50 Structured  Ability to 5%
conversational analysis Discussions, minutes and describe
 Explaining the group work, independe issues in the
organization of Student-Centered nt conversational
conversation Learning (self- assignme analysis
 Explaining preference directed learning; nt  Ability to
structure contextual explain the
instruction organization of
problem-based conversation
learning and  Ability to
inquiry) explain
preference
structure
7  Defining the concepts of Politeness Lectures, 1x3 X 50 Structured  Ability to 5%

politeness Discussions, minutes and define the
 Explaining the group work, independe concepts of
politeness principles and Student-Centered nt politeness
maxims Learning (self- assignme  Ability to
 Explaining the directed learning; nt explain the
politeness strategies contextual politeness
 Explaining factors that instruction principles and
problem-based
FORMULIR
determine the choice of learning and maxims

politeness strategies to inquiry)  Ability to
be socially acceptable explain the
politeness
strategies
 Ability to
explain factors
that determine
the choice of
politeness
strategies to
be socially
acceptable
8 MID - SEMESTER TEST
9  Summarizing studies Review of studies on Deixis Group oral 1x3 X 50 Group oral  Ability to 10%
related to Deixis Presentation, minutes Presentati present one
 Reviewing studies discussion on study related
related to Deixis Summary to Deixis
of the  Ability to
materials compare the
study under
review with
other related
studies on
Deixis
10  Summarizing studies Review of studies on Speech acts Lectures, 1x3 X 50 Group oral  Ability to 10%
related to speech acts Discussions, minutes Presentati present one
 Reviewing studies Group oral on study related
related to speech acts Presentation, Summary to speech acts
discussion of the
FORMULIR
materials  Ability to
compare the
study under
review with
other related
studies on
speech acts
11  Summarizing studies Review of studies on Cooperative Group oral 1x3 X 50 Group oral  Ability to 10%
related to conversational Principle and Conversational Presentation, minutes Presentati present one
implicatures Implicatures discussion on study related
 Reviewing studies Summary to
related to conversational of the conversational
implicatures materials implicatures
 Ability to
compare the
study under
review with
other related
studies on
conversational
implicatures
12  Summarizing studies Review of studies on the Group oral 1x3 X 50 Group oral  Ability to 10%
related to the Conversational structure Presentation, minutes Presentati present one
conversational structure discussion on study related
 Reviewing studies Summary to politeness
related to the of the  Ability to
conversational structure materials compare the
study under
FORMULIR
review with
other related
studies on
politeness
13  Summarizing studies Review of studies on Politeness Group oral 1x3 X 50 Group oral  Ability to 10%
related to politeness Presentation, minutes Presentati present one
 Reviewing studies discussion on study related
related to politeness Summary to the
of the conversational
materials structure
 Ability to
compare the
study under
review with
other related
studies on the
conversational
structure
14  Describing methods of Data collection in pragmatic Lectures, 1x3 X 50 Structured  Ability to 5%

data collection in studies Discussions, minutes and describe
pragmatic studies group work, independe methods of
 Applying the methods Student-Centered nt data collection
for a small-scale study Learning (self- assignme in pragmatic
in pragmatics directed learning; nt studies
contextual  Ability to apply
instruction the methods
problem-based for a small-
learning and scale study in
FORMULIR
inquiry) pragmatics
15  Describing methods of Data analysis in pragmatic studies Lectures, 1x3 X 50 Structured  Ability to 5%
data analysis in Discussions, minutes and describe
pragmatic studies group work, independe methods of
 Applying the methods Student-Centered nt data analysis
for a small-scale study Learning (self- assignme in pragmatic
in pragmatics directed learning; nt studies
contextual  Ability to apply
instruction the methods
problem-based for a small-
learning and scale study in
inquiry) pragmatics
FINAL - SEMESTER TEST

16
Daftar Referensi:
Cruse, D. Alan. 2000. Meaning in Language. New York: Oxford.

Grundy, P. 1995. Doing Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.
Leech, G.N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. Essex: Longman
Levinson, S.C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP
Levinson, S.C. & Brown.1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. New York: CUP
Mey, Jacob L. 1993. Pragmatics. Oxford: OUP.
Nadar, FX. 2009. Pragmatik dan Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Thomas, J. 1995. Meaning in Interaction. Harlow: Longman.
FORMULIR
Yule, G. 2003. Pragmatics. Oxford: OUP
Tugas Mahasiswa dan Penilaiannya:

1. Tugas
Minggu Bahan Tugas Waktu Penilaian Indikator Bobot
ke Kajian/Matari
Pembelajaran
1-2 - Basic concepts Independent Review of the materials 1 and 2x3x60 Portofolio Classroom oral 20%
and theories of 2 participation in
Pragmatics
Structured Summary of the materials 1x3x60 Portfolio Written 80%
- Meaning in summary
Pragmatics submitted
3 Deixis Independent Review of the materials 3 1x3x60 Portofolio Classroom oral 20%
participation in
summary
submitted
4 Speech acts Independent Review of the materials 4 1x3x60 Portofolio Classroom oral 20%
participation in
summary
submitted
5 Cooperative Independent Review of the materials 5 1x3x60 Portofolio Classroom oral 20%
Principle and participation in
Conversational Structured Summary of the materials 1x3x60 Portofolio Written 80%
Implicatures summary
submitted
FORMULIR
6 Conversational Independent Review of the materials 6 1x3x60 Portofolio Classroom oral 20%
structure participation in
Structured Summary of the materials 1x3x60 Portofolio Written 80%

summary
submitted
7 Politeness Independent Review of the materials 7 1x3x60 Portofolio Classroom oral 20%
participation in
Structured Summary of the materials 1x3x60 Portofolio Written 80%

summary
submitted
9 Review of studies Independent Review of the materials 7 1x3x60 Portofolio Classroom oral 20%
on deixes participation in

summary
submitted
on speech acts participation in

summary
submitted
on Conversational participation in
Implicatures
summary
submitted
on the participation in
FORMULIR
Conversational Structured Summary of the materials 1x3x60 Portfolio Written 80%

structure summary
submitted
on Politeness participation in

summary
submitted
14 Data collection in Independent Review of the materials 7 1x3x60 Portfolio Mini project in 100%
pragmatic studies pragmatics
submitted
Structured Summary of the materials 1x3x60 Portfolio
15 Data analysis in Independent Review of the materials 7 1x3x60 Portfolio Mini project in 100%
pragmatic studies pragmatics
submitted
Structured Summary of the materials 1x3x60 Portfolio
2. Penilaian
a. Aspek penilaian:
1) Aspek pengetahuan melalui tes tertulis,
2) Aspek keterampilan dalam menyampaikan presentasi dan menyampaikan materi
3) Sikap dan perilaku selama mengikuti perkuliahan menjadi pertimbangan dalam penilaian.
b. Bobot penilaian
1) Bobot Nilai Harian (NH) : A (1)
2) Bobot Nilai Ujian Tengah Semester (UTS) : B (2)
3) Bobot Nilai Ujian Akhir Semester (UAS) : C (3)
4) Nilai Akhir : A NH + B UTS + C UAS
FORMULIR
A+B+C
Mengetahui Tim Penulis
Koordinator Program Studi Magister
Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Prof. Dr. Januarius Mujiyanto, M.Hum Dr. Issy Yuliasri, M.Pd.
NIP. 1952 NIP 196207131990032001

RPS R217 990292 15P04066 20180305222212 10948141

Încărcat de

Informații document

Descriere originală:

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

RPS R217 990292 15P04066 20180305222212 10948141

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

KEMENTERIAN RISET, TEKNOLOGI DAN PENDIDIKAN TINGGI

UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SEMARANG (UNNES)

Mata Kuliah : Pragmatics Semester : II SKS : 3 Kode MK : 15P04066

(1) Basic concepts and theories of pragmatics

Mingg Kemampuan yang Metode Kriteria/

referring expressions, problem-based  Ability to

4  Describing the concepts Speech acts Lectures, 1x3 X 50 Structured  Ability to 5%

learning and principles

7  Defining the concepts of Politeness Lectures, 1x3 X 50 Structured  Ability to 5%

determine the choice of learning and maxims

14  Describing methods of Data collection in pragmatic Lectures, 1x3 X 50 Structured  Ability to 5%

FINAL - SEMESTER TEST

Cruse, D. Alan. 2000. Meaning in Language. New York: Oxford.

Yule, G. 2003. Pragmatics. Oxford: OUP

Tugas Mahasiswa dan Penilaiannya:

Structured Summary of the materials 1x3x60 Portofolio Written 80%

Structured Summary of the materials 1x3x60 Portofolio Written 80%

Structured Summary of the materials 1x3x60 Portfolio Written 80%

Structured Summary of the materials 1x3x60 Portfolio Written 80%

Conversational Structured Summary of the materials 1x3x60 Portfolio Written 80%

Structured Summary of the materials 1x3x60 Portfolio Written 80%

Mengetahui Tim Penulis

Koordinator Program Studi Magister

Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

Prof. Dr. Januarius Mujiyanto, M.Hum Dr. Issy Yuliasri, M.Pd.

NIP. 1952 NIP 196207131990032001

S-ar putea să vă placă și