Name of Employee: ________________________

Position: ________________________
Review Period: APRIL 2014 - MARCH 2015
Division/School: ________________________

TO BE FILLED
Key Result Areas
Major Final Weight
Outputs (MFOs) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA
(KRAs)

1. Account learning
outcomes viz - a- viz 15%
goals and targets
LEARNERS’ June 2014 –
PERFORMANCE March 2015

2. Provide
opportunities for
learners to develop 5%
their skills , talents and
attitudes

3. Ensure that learners

attain the learning
standards for the grade 15%
level in learning areas
TEACHING- taught
June 2014 –
LEARNING March 2015
PROCESS

Prepare,submit and
keep accurate learners' 5%
records

5. Provide a child-
friendly, inspiring and
5%
motivating environment
LEARNING conducive to learning June 2014 –
ENVIRONMENT March 2015
 friendly, inspiring and
5%
motivating environment
LEARNING conducive to learning June 2014 –
ENVIRONMENT March 2015

6. Attain outstanding
result in Classroom 5%
Evaluation
 7. Gain a network of
support from parents 5%
and community

SCHOOL, HOME
June 2014 –
& COMMUNITY March 2015
INVOLVEMENT
8. Build strong
partnership with 10%
stakeholders

9. Develop one’s self

5%
professionally

PERSONAL
GROWTH & June 2014 –
PROFESSIONAL March 2015
DEVELOPMENT

10. Abide by the Code

of Ethics for 5%
Professional Teachers
 11. Assist school head
in instructional 5%
monitoring of teachers.

INSTRUCTIONAL June 2014 –

LEADERSHIP 12. Design March 2015
programs/activities to
5%
develop teacher’s
competence

13. Develop
program/materials/
research for 5%
instructional
innovation.

14. Perform
work/activities that June 2014 –
PLUS FACTOR contribute to teaching March 2015
10%
learning process
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

____________________________
RATEE
 Individual Performance Commitment and Review
Form
N
MASTER TEACHER SAMPLE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS SATISFACTORY
(Quality, Efficiency, Timelines) (3)
(5) (4)

75% MPS or above (Elem.) 70%-74% MPS 65%-69% MPS

* Average Achievement Rate ( DAT & NAT) 60% or above (Sec.) 55% – 59% MPS 50% – 54% MPS
* Non-Reader 0 0.1% – 1% 1.1% – 2%
* Drop-Out 0 0.1% – 1% 1.1% – 2%
* Promotion 100% 95 – 99% 90 – 94%
* Failure 0% 0.1%-0.5% 0.6%-1%
* Pre-Post Test Gain 50% or more 40 – 49% 30 – 39%
* Coach in Academic contests/competitions National Level Regional/Area Level Division Level
* Coach in non-academic contests/competitions National Level Regional /Area Level Division Level

* Participation in Other Activities (BSP/GSP,

National Level Regional/Area Level Division Level
Community Activities, etc)

0 instance found to have no 1-3 nstance found to have 4-6 nstance found to have
* Lesson Plan/Log Plan plan no plan no plan

* Instructional Materials 5 IM’s /subject/rating period 4 IM’s /subject/rating period 3 IM’s /subject/rating period

* Integration of ICT in the Classroom 21 & above/year 16-20/year 11-15/year

* Engage time on task/Utilize varied teaching

strategies/activities/materials/ Classroom Management & Based on the School Head's Obse
Interaction
* Assessment Tools Prepared 10 or more 8-9 6-7

* Preparation & submission of the ff. on time & free from 0 – 1 instance of late 2 – 3 instances of late 4-5 instance of late
errors: Class Records/ Form 137/138/SF 1/SF2/SF3/SF5/LIS submission per year submission per year submission per year

0 – 1 instance of late 2'2-3 instance of late 4-5 instance of late

* Submission of required school reports on time submission per year submission per year submission per year

* Safety, Cleanliness & Orderliness of the

0 – 2 instances/year 3-5 instances/year 6-8 instances/year
Classroom & Assigned Area
* Compliance to Child Protection Policy (Conflict
0 conflict 1 conflict 2 conflicts
elevated to the Principal’s Office)
 • Functional and Clean • Functional and clean • Functional
* Classroom Toilet • With water supply • With water supply • With water supply
• Tiled floors & walls • Tiled walls/floors • Clean

* Classroom Evaluation Average Result 4.500-5.000 3.500-4.499 2.500-3.499

* Parents’ Attendance in school meetings 75% 70 -74% 65 -69%

* Programs/ projects / activities undertaken

5/year 4/year 3/year
sponsored by the parents/community

Dialogue with parents (home visitation/ 1-on-1

10/year 8-9/year 6-7/year
conference in school)

* Initiate parents’ meeting with permission from

5/year 4/year 3/year
school head

* Relationship with stakeholders 0 conflict 1 conflict 2 conflicts

* Participation in school/division/community/city 0 instance of non- 1 instance of non- 2 instances of non-

activities participation participation participation

* Attendance to Required 0 instance of non-

1 instance 2 instances
Trainings/Seminars/Workshops attendance

* Attendance to Work-Related
Trainings/Seminars/Workshops at their own 5 or more trainings 4 trainings 3 trainings
expense

21 & above with 16-20 with

* Engagement to Professional Learning Community 11-15 with evidences
evidences evidences

* Membership in professional organizations/

5 memberships 4 memberships 3 memberships
associations

* Punctuality in coming to school/activities/meetings 0-5 instance 6-10 instances 11-15 instances

0-1 instance of
* Attendance to school and in activities/meetings 2-3 absences 4-5 absences
absence

* Maintain a high regard as a teacher Based on school head’s/peers’ j

 0 instance of teachers having
*Checking of lesson /log plan no LP
1 – 3 instances 4 – 6 instances

* Observing classes 5 times or more per quarter 4 times 3 times

1 class per semester with

1 class per quarter with very 1 class per quarter with
* Conducting Oral Verification (MTB, Filipino, English significant improvements improvements
very significant
improvements

* Administering Spot tests (any grade level and 5 times or more per quarter 4 times per quarter 3 times per quarter
learning area)

2 times (HRDD standards 2 times (some HRDD Once (HRDD standards

followed) standards are not followed) followed)
* Planning and Managing INSET
OR based on the evaluation / assessment of the H

2 times (with complete 2 times (with incomplete Once (with complete

* Serving as Facilitator or Trainer documents e.g. SG, PPT & documents e.g. SG, PPT & documents e.g. SG, PPT &
handouts handouts handouts

2 times a year (with detailed 2 times (with brief lesson Once (with detailed lesson
* Conducting Demonstration Teaching lesson plan or session guide plan or session guide plan or session guide

* Leading or Managing PLC Activities 10 times or more a year 8 – 9 times 6 – 7 times

* Designing instructional intervention materials for 2 (functional and well 2 (functional but not well- 2 (well-designed but not
learners use designed) designed) functional)
1 1 1
* Conducting action research relevant to the (relevant and scholarly (relevant but not scholarly (irrelevant but scholarly
improvement teaching-learning outcomes written) written) written)

1. Conducted Remedial/Enrichment Activities (not

covered by service credit).
2. Acted as Grade/Year Leader/Subject lArea
Coordinator
3. Organized functional school clubs.
4. Utilized personal money for the improvement of
learning environment and instruction (at least P
10,000.00)
5. Spearheaded the organization of community
activities.
6. Served as writer in lesson exemplars/ guides/
workbooks (recognized by the Division)
5 or more activities
4 activities performed 3 activities performed
7. Organized academic contest at the District level performed

8. Elected as Officer in any District/Division

Organizations.
9. Designated as School Caretaker in the absence
of School Head (at least one week)
10. Mentored at least 5 teachers per year in other
schools
11. Prepared test item bank for at least 1 subject
area
12. Attained perfect attendance with no leave of
absence without pay for the SY
__________________________________________ ROSALIE M. PASAOL, Ed. D.
RATER Schools Division Superintendent
 Name of Rater : ______________________
Position : ______________________
Date of Review: ______________________

TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

POOR ACTUAL
UNSATISFACTORY (2) RESULTS RATING SCORE
(1)

60%-64% MPS 55%-59% or below

50% – 54% MPS 40% – 44% MPS
2.1% – 3% 3.1% & above
2.1% – 3% 3.1% & above
85 – 89% 84% & below
1.1 -1.5% 1.6% & above
20 – 29% 19% & below
District/Cluster Level School Level
District/Cluster Level School Level

District/Cluster Level School Level

7-9 nstance found to have no 10 times or more nstance

plan found to have no plan

2 IM’s /subject/rating period 1 IM /subject/rating period

6-10/year 5 & below/year

n the School Head's Observation

4-5 3 and below

6-7 instance of late 8 and above instance of late

submission per year submission per year

6-7 instance of late 8 and above instance of

submission per year late submission per year

12 & abovev
9-11 instances/year
instances/year

3 conflicts 4 or more conflicts

• Functional
• Clean Functional but not clean

1.500-2.499 below 1.499

 60 -64% 59%& below

2/year 1/year

4-5/year 3 & below/year

2/year 1/year

3 conflicts 4 or more conflicts

3 instances of non- 4 or more instance of

participation non-participation

3 instances 4 & above instances

2 training 1 training

4 and below with

5-10 with evidences
evidences

2 memberships 1 membership

16-20 instances 21 times or more

8 times or more
6-7 absences
absences

school head’s/peers’ judgment

 7 – 9 instances 10 or more instances

2 times 1 time

1 class per semester with 1 class per school year with

improvements improvements

2 times per quarter 1 time per quarter

Once (some HRDD standards With document/s but not

are not followed) implemented

aluation / assessment of the HRDD Chairperson

Once (with incomplete

With document/s but not
documents e.g. SG, PPT &
implemented
handouts

Once (with brief lesson plan or With document/s but not

session guide implemented

4 – 5 times 1 – 3 times

1 (well-designed and 1 (with the absence of any 1

functional) criterion)
1
1
(irrelevant and not scholarly
(started but not completed)
written)

2 activities performed 1 activity performed

 OVERALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISHME
NTS