See

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292293453

GOOSE Message Based Multi Substation Overload

Shedding (OLS) Scheme using Ethernet over
Internet Protocol (EoIP...

Conference Paper · October 2014

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4892.5207

CITATIONS READS

0 35

5 authors, including:

Eko Prasetyo
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
4 PUBLICATIONS 1 CITATION

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Eko Prasetyo on 30 January 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document
and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.
 Presentation 5.1
GOOSE Message Based Multi Substation Overload Shedding (OLS)
Scheme using Ethernet over Internet Protocol (EoIP) Tunnelling
Eko Prasetyo, Erwin Dian Saputro, Inda Puspanugraha, Harrisa Yumawan, Iqbal Fadilah
PT. PLN (Persero), P3B Sumatera, UPT Tanjung Karang
e-mail : eko.prasetyo@pln.co.id
Abstract — Maintaining stability of the system in
a large scale electrical power grid is a highly
important thing. Several defence scheme methods
used for this purpose. Lampung 150 kV sub system
needs at least 120 - 300 MW transfer from South
Sumatra system on its backbone over head line
transmission (OHL). Each time any disturbance
happened on one of its backbone line or any power
generation loss happened on Lampung subsystem,
overloading could be occurred on this OHL.
Overload shedding (OLS) scheme has been used to
minimize outage and prevent any possibility of
system collapse or large scale blackout.
OLS scheme conventionally use power line
carrier (PLC) based teleprotection signal to spread
its trip signal to some transformers on several
substations in Lampung sub system. To increase
the dependability factor of this OLS scheme, GOOSE
message based trip signal spreading using ethernet
over internet protocol (EoIP) tunnelling has been
used. PLC based and GOOSE message based multi
substation OLS used redundantly each other so it
could increase OLS scheme performance and
dependability.
Keywords—system stability, defence scheme,
overload shedding, teleprotection, GOOSE message.
I. INTRODUCTION
Quality of electrical power system must be
maintained to fulfil its services continuity standard
[1]. One of the most influencing factors to services
continuity is the stability of the system. Stability is
the ability of an electrical power system to reach
new stable operating condition after experiencing
of disturbance [2]. Large scale blackouts will give
very big loss materially or immaterially [3].
The sudden increase in system load or losing
power generation may cause the fluctuation of line
frequency and voltage, and at the end the
unwanted overloading which in turn jeopardizes
the power system stability [4]. In this paper, multi
substation overload shedding (OLS) scheme with
GOOSE message using ethernet over internet
protocol (EoIP) tunnelling has been used to spread
the load shedding scheme to distribution
transformers in some substations on the system.
II. SUPPORTING THEORY
A. Load Shedding Topology
In power system terminology, when some
interdisturbances are leading the overall system
towards instability, the final unwanted solution is
load shedding [5]. During load shedding some
© OMICRON - Asia-Pacific Protection & Testing Conference 2014
loads from interconnected network are
disconnected for fast and quick recovery of an
overall system to its initial settling state. For good
management the power generation must be
greater than the power consumption then system
remains stable. Problems will occur if generation is
unable to meet the demands of loads. Then
substations are not able to provide energy to their
consumers and the only solution is load shedding,
to remove power supply from the loads for the
system stability [5].
Some load shedding methods were suggested
for transmission lines control operation [6].
1. Breaker Interlock Load Shedding
This is the simplest method of carrying out
load shedding. For this scheme, the circuit
breaker interdependencies are arranged to
operate based on hardwired trip signals from an
intertie circuit breaker or a generator trip. This
method is often used when the speed of the
load shedding is critical [6].
2. Under Frequency Relay (81U) Load Shedding
Guidelines for setting up a frequency load
shedding are common to both large and small
systems. The design methodology considers
fixed load reduction at fixed system frequency
levels. Upon reaching the frequency set point
and expiration of pre-specified time delay, the
frequency relay trips one or more load
breakers. This cycle is repeated until the
system frequency is recovered, e.g., 10% load
reduction for every 0.5% frequency reduction.
Since this method of load shedding can be
totally independent of the system dynamics,
total loss of the system is an assumed
possibility [6].
3. Programmable Logic Controller Based Load
Shedding
With a Programmable Logic Controller
(PLC) scheme, load shedding is initiated based
on the total load versus the number of
generators online and/or detection of under-
frequency conditions. Each substation PLC is
programmed to initiate a trip signal to the
appropriate feeder breakers to shed a preset
sequence of loads. This static sequence is
continued until the frequency returns to a
normal, stable level [6].
 Presentation 5.2
B. IEC 61850 Protocol
The standard series IEC 61850
“Communication networks and systems in
substations” is the base standard for modelling of
meaningful power system information, real-time
and near real-time information exchange between
intelligent electronic devices (IEDs), and the
configuration of systems (e.g., substations, wind
power parks), devices, and the communication
networks for the whole electrical energy supply [7].
It is basically the main standard for communication
on substation automation system (SAS).
Figure 1. IEC 61850 interface model [8]
The devices of a substation automation system
maybe physically installed on different function
levels (station, bay, process) refer to Figure 1. All
devices on all levels could communicate each
other simultaneously using ethernet connection
within the same gateway.
The IEC 61850 standard allows for
communication between devices within a
substation where a peer-to-peer model for Generic
Substation Events (GSE) services is used for fast
and reliable communication between Intelligent
Electronic Devices (IEDs). The generic substation
event model is based on the concept of an
autonomous decentralization, providing an efficient
method allowing the simultaneous delivery of the
same generic substation event information to more
than one physical device through the use of
multicast / broadcast services [9].
One of the messages associated with the GSE
services is the Generic Object Oriented Substation
Event (GOOSE) message [10]. GOOSE message
Generic Substation State Events (GSSE) is a
control model defined as per IEC 61850 which
provides a fast and reliable mechanism of
transferring event data over entire substation
networks.
The GOOSE model uses data values to be
published grouped into data sets. Many data and
data attributes can be used to create data set.
GOOSE messages could be used to publish and
subscribe analogue, binary, or integer data values
between any IEC 61850 compliant devices within
© OMICRON - Asia-Pacific Protection & Testing Conference 2014
the same gateway. Later on these value can be
easily used as control command, metering, or any
protection scheme purposes on these devices.
C. Ethernet over Internet Protocol (EoIP)
Ethernet over internet protocol (EoIP) tunnelling
is a MikroTik RouterOS protocol that creates an
ethernet tunnel between two routers on top of an
IP connection [11]. When the bridging function of
the router is enabled, all ethernet traffic will be
bridged just as if there were a physical ethernet
interfaces (hardwired or wireless) between the two
routers.
Figure 2. EoIP tunnelling configuration model [11]
This EoIP tunnelling scheme configure ethernet
frames in generic routing encapsulation (GRE)
protocol which is designed to encapsulate various
type of network protocol inside virtual point to point
connection [12].
III. METHODOLOGY
Technically Lampung 150 kV sub system has
22 bus with peak load range from 780 MW to 880
MW which is occurred between 17.00 - 23.00
(05.00 PM - 11.00 PM) local time. Overload
shedding (OLS) scheme which is used on this
project has been configured based on the daily
load current profile on Lampung 150 kV sub
system. Several relatively high scale disturbance
cases applied on the Lampung 150 kV sub system
to define the OLS current setting and load
shedding spread configuration.
A. Disturbance Case 1, Generation Loss on
Lampung 150 kV Subsystem
In case both backbone over head line (OHL)
Bukit Asam Baturaja 1 - 2 normally operated and
power generation loss occurred due to internal
fault on its high capacity power plant on Lampung
150 kV sub system, overloading could be
happened on this backbone OHL.
TABLE I. Current Profile Case 1 on peak time
Time 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00
Set OCR (A) 1320 1320 1320 1320 1320 1320 1320
Set OLS (A) 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Load each OHL Case 1 (A) 808 958 1165 1145 1173 1149 985
OLS (A) 0 0 401 399 371 344 0
Load each OHL After OLS (A) 808 958 764 746 802 804 985
 Presentation 5.3

1400 TABLE III. Current Profile Case 3 on peak time

1200 Time 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00
Set OCR (A) Set OCR (A) 1320 1320 1320 1320 1320 1320 1320
1000
Set OLS (A) 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Set OLS (A)
800
Load each Normal OHL Case 3 (A) 1214 1511 1938 1898 1962 1908 1567
Ampere

Load Each OHL  OLS Stage 1 (A) 296 355 401 399 371 344 323

Case 1 (A)
600 OLS Stage 2 (A) 0 295 335 335 327 313 284
OLS (A)
OLS Stage 3 (A) 0 0 336 365 363 346 0
400
Load Each OHL  Load each OHL After OLS (A) 918 862 866 799 901 905 960
After OLS (A)
200
2500
0
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
0:00
Set OCR (A)

2000
Figure 3. Backbone OHL OLS current profile on disturbance Set OLS (A)

case 1
Load Each OHL 
1500 Case 3 (A)

Ampere
Each 100 MW generation loss occurred on OLS Stage 1 (A)

Lampung sub system, it will increase power 1000

OLS Stage 2 (A)

transfer at least ±480 A from South Sumatera

system. It will easily doubled in case several power 500
OLS Stage 3 (A)

generation loss occurred simultaneously. The first Load Each OHL 

case stand for any possibility of losing at least 200 0

After OLS (A)

01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
0:00
MW power generation on Lampung sub system.
Figure 5. Backbone OHL OLS current profile on disturbance
B. Disturbance Case 2, 1 Backbone OHL Trip case 3
In case any disturbance occurred on one circuit As mentioned before, each 100 MW generation
of the backbone OHL, overloading could be loss occurred on Lampung sub system, it will
happened on the other normal circuit. Each time increase power transfer at least ±480 A from South
one OHL tripped, it will double power transfer on Sumatera system. This third case stand for any
the normal OHL. This second case stand for any possibility of losing one high capacity power plant
possibility of overloading due to this one circuit when only one backbone OHL circuit operated.
losing case.
TABLE II. Current Profile Case 2 on peak time
D. Disturbance Case 4, 1 Backbone OHL Operate
and Generation Loss2nd Stage on Lampung
Time 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00
Set OCR (A) 1320 1320 1320 1320 1320 1320 1320 Subsystem
Set OLS (A) 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 This case similar with condition occurred on
Load each Normal OHL Case 2 (A) 765 1063 1492 1446 1509 1459 1116
case 3, the difference only the higher amount of
OLS Stage 1 (A) 0 355 401 399 371 344 323
OLS Stage 2 (A) 0 355 335 335 327 313 0 power generation loose on this case.
Load each OHL After OLS (A) 765 709 756 713 811 802 793 TABLE IV. Current Profile Case 4 on peak time
1600
Time 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00
Set OCR (A) 1320 1320 1320 1320 1320 1320 1320
1400 Set OCR (A) Set OLS (A) 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Load each Normal OHL Case 4 (A) 1662 1959 2383 2349 2415 2358 2019
1200
Set OLS (A) OLS Stage 1 (A) 296 355 401 399 371 344 323
1000
OLS Stage 2 (A) 237 295 335 335 327 313 284
Load Each OHL  OLS Stage 3 (A) 257 336 365 363 346 338 295
Ampere

800 Case 2 (A) OLS Stage 4 (A) 0 0 467 461 462 421 389

OLS Stage 1 (A) Load each OHL After OLS (A) 872 974 815 791 908 941 727
600

400 3000
OLS Stage 2 (A)
Set OCR (A)
200
Load Each OHL  2500
After OLS (A) Set OLS (A)
0
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
0:00

Load Each OHL 
2000 Case 4 (A)

Figure 4. Backbone OHL OLS current profile on disturbance OLS Stage 1 (A)

case 2
Ampere

1500
OLS Stage 2 (A)

C. Disturbance Case 3, 1 Backbone OHL Operate 1000

OLS Stage 3 (A)

and Generation Loss1st Stage on Lampung OLS Stage 4 (A)

Subsystem 500
Load Each OHL 
In case ±100 MW power generation loss After OLS (A)

occurred when only one backbone OHL operated, 0

01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
0:00

overloading could be happened on the operating

backbone OHL. Figure 6. Backbone OHL OLS current profile on disturbance
case 4

© OMICRON - Asia-Pacific Protection & Testing Conference 2014

 Presentation 5.4
This fourth case stand for any possibility of
losing two high capacity power plant when only
one backbone OHL circuit operated.
The OLS spreading configuration defined from
the load priority factor, the least prioritized load will
be the first load that tripped during the first stage of
OLS.
Figure 7. Multi substation OLS spreading configuration
Multi substation OLS trip signal which is
previously use power line carrier (PLC) based
teleprotection signal only has been implemented
redundantly with the usage of GOOSE message.
On this project this redundant function
implemented on three substations which is
Baturaja (BTRJA) 150 kV substation, Bukit
Kemuning (BKMNG) 150 kV substation, and
Kotabumi (KTBMI) 150 kV substation. The OLS
spreading configuration can be seen on Figure 7.
The IEC 61850 standard basically used for
internal substation automation and
communications. It is originally designed not to
accommodate any outside substation
communications since it is designed to
communicate only on the same gateway. It will
need local area network (LAN) ethernet
communication over internet protocol (EoIP) to
accommodate communication between any IEC
61850 compliant devices on the corresponding
substations.
The EoIP communication makes virtual tunnel
between the corresponding substations so any
communication that is routed to use this tunnel will
detect that they are communicate each other inside
the same local area network.
This project use one Schneider MICOM P141
as GOOSE message publisher which is located on
Baturaja (BTRJA) 150 kV substation. It is
connected to ethernet switch which is later on
connected to MikroTik RB750 as a router. One port
on this router specially configured for the tunnelling
purpose.
The similar configuration applied on the other
two corresponding substation for subscribing
purpose of the GOOSE message. These
© OMICRON - Asia-Pacific Protection & Testing Conference 2014
subscriber IEDs located on Bukit Kemuning
(BKMNG) and Kotabumi (KTBMI) 150 kV
substation to spread the OLS trip signal.
Three IEDs on different substation are
connected using this EoIP tunnel for the
multisubstation OLS purpose. This multisubstation
OLS concept use overload pickup signal from the
publisher IED to be published over the network.
Communication topology which is used for this
purpose can be seen on Figure below.
Internet
EoIP EoIP
Tunnel EoIP Tunnel
Tunnel
BTRJA BKMNG KTBMI
150kV Subs 150kV Subs 150kV Subs
GOOSE GOOSE GOOSE
Publisher Subscriber Subscriber
Figure 8. Topology of GOOSE message communication applied
on project
When the publisher IED measure that current
transfer on the backbone OHL more than it is OLS
pickup limit, it will send signal simultaneously
through PLC teleprotection and GOOSE message.
Later on the subscriber IEDs will receive those
signal by PLC link and GOOSE in. These IEDs will
count the time delay and send trip signal to the
load transformers based on the OLS spreading
configuration.
IV. PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
Performance of the GOOSE message based
multi substation OLS scheme using EoIP tunnelling
evaluated based on the actual record of the used
IEDs on the network. Two test types has been used
to measure its performance.
A. GOOSE Message Point to Point Loop Test
Point to point loop test conducted using
publisher and subscriber IED sequentially from one
substation to the other one. The publisher IED send
GOOSE out signal to the network and at the time
the subscriber IED detect the GOOSE in signal, it
will send back to the publisher IED immediately.
This test use IED on BKMNG 150 kV substation
and BTRJA 150 kV substation as publisher and
subscriber sequentially.
The loop test result shows that the delay time
between the two IEDs to travel the loop signal are
30.2 ms. It means the signal need 15.1 ms to reach
the IED on the other substation.
 Presentation 5.5
Figure 9. Point to point loop test result
B. PLC Based Teleprotection and Multi Substation
GOOSE Message Comparation
Comparation between the two methods done by
measuring the difference between the PLC based
teleprotection and Multi substation GOOSE
message travelling time. This test use IED on
BTRJA 150 kV substation and BKMNG 150 kV
substation as publisher and subscriber sequentially.
TABLE V. Travelling time comparation
time delay (ms)
PLC based TP 21.00
GOOSE message 15.10
Figure 10. Subscriber IED receive pickup signal through GOOSE
message
CONCLUSION
Multi substation OLS trip signal which is
previously use power line carrier (PLC) based
teleprotection signal only has been implemented
successfully and functioned redundantly with the
usage of GOOSE message based OLS. The EoIP
communication makes virtual tunnel between the
corresponding substations so any communication
that is routed to use this tunnel will detect that they
are communicate each other inside the same local
area network. The loop test result shows that the
GOOSE message signal need 15.1 ms to reach
the IED on the other substation. The comparation
between the PLC based OLS & GOOSE message
based OLS shows that PLC based OLS needs
more time to travel the telesignal than GOOSE
message based OLS. These test result generally
shows that GOOSE message feasible and
dependable to be used for between substation
communication, especially for multi substation OLS
signal. The common issue for this GOOSE
message based OLS is the quality and
performance of ethernet network which is used for
© OMICRON - Asia-Pacific Protection & Testing Conference 2014
the communication. High quality ethernet network
needed to bring the best performance of the
GOOSE message based OLS.
REFERENCES
[1]. Eko Prasetyo and Boy Sandra, “Transient Stability
Assessment of Java Bali 500 kV Multi Machine Electrical
Power System Using Committee Neural Network,”
Conference on Information Technology and Electrical
Engineering, Yogyakarta, 2009.
[2]. Imam Robandi, Desain Sistem Tenaga Modern, Andi,
Yogyakarta, 2006.
[3]. Djiteng Marsudi, Pembangkitan Energi Listrik, Erlangga,
Jakarta, 2005.
[4]. J. Kaewmanee, S. Sirisumrannukul, T. Menaneanatra,
“Optimal Load Shedding in Power System using Fuzzy
Decision Algorithm,” AORC-CIGRE Technical Meeting,
CIGRE, Guangzhou, 2013.
[5]. M. Qamar Raza, M. Ali, N. Tareen, W.U. Rehman, A.
Khan, A.U. Asar, “Intelligent Load Shedding Using TCP/IP
for Smart Grids,” Energy and Power Engineering 4 (398-
403), SciRes, 2012.
[6]. F. Shookh and J. J. Dai, “An ILS System Application in
Large Industrial Facility,” Industry Applications Conference,
2-6 October 2005, pp. 417-425.
[7]. Karlheinz Schwarz, “IEC 61850 Beyond Substations - The
Standard for The Whole Energy Supply System,” CEPSI,
Macau, 2008.
[8]. Communication Networks and Systems in Substation -
Part 1 : Introduction and Overview, IEC 61850-1, 2003.
[9]. Communication Networks and Systems in Substation -
Part 7-2 : Basic Communication Structure for Substation
and Feeder Equipment - Abstract Communication Service
Interface, IEC 61850-7-2, 2003.
[10]. C. Kriger, S. Behardien, J. Retonda-Modiya, “A Detailed
Analysis of the GOOSE Message Structure in an
IEC61850 Standard-Based Substation Automation
System,” International Journal of Computers
Communications & Control, October 2013, 8(5):708-721,
ISSN 1841-9836.
[11]. MikroTik (2013, December 22). Manual: Interface/EoIP
[Online]. Available :
http://wiki.MikroTik.com/wiki/Manual:Interface/EoIP.
[12]. S. Hanks, T. Li, D. Farinacci, and P. Traina (1994,
October). Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) [Online].
Available : http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1701.
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
Eko Prasetyo received B.Eng degree in Electrical Engineering
from Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology in Surabaya,
Indonesia. From 2009-11 he was Electrical and Instrument
Production Engineer on ESSO KTT Phase 2 Gas Platform
Project in Mc. Dermott International. Later on he worked as
Assistant Engineer on Electrical Protection, Meter, and
Automation O&M at PT. PLN (Persero) P3BS UPT Tanjung
Karang until today.
Erwin Dian Saputro received Diploma degree in Electrical
Engineering from Semarang State Polytechnique and B.Eng
degree in Electrical Engineering from Muhammadiyah
University in Bandar Lampung, Indonesia. He began his journey
on PT. PLN (Persero) P3BS UPT Tanjung Karang since 2009
as Junior Engineer on Electrical Protection, Meter, and
Automation O&M.
Inda Puspanugraha received his B.Eng degree in Electrical
Engineering from Diponegoro University in Semarang,
Indonesia. He began his career in 2006 as Assistant Engineer
on Electrical Protection and SCADAtel O&M at PT. PLN
(Persero) P3BS UPT Tanjung Karang. As of today, he is
Assistant Manager on Company Planning and Evaluation at
UPT Tanjung Karang.
 Introduction
GOOSE Message Based
Multi Substation Load shedding used widely to prevent large scale
blackout.
Overload Shedding (OLS) Scheme Overload shedding (OLS) known to prevent
using Ethernet over IP (EoIP) Tunnelling overloading on power station, transmission line, or
© OMICRON - Asia-Pacific Protection & Testing Conference 2014

transformers.
Teleprotection (TP) used to spread load shedding
Eko Prasetyo – 87112313Z scheme on many substations.
Erwin Dian Saputro – 8609536Z
Singapore, October 15‐16th 2014
Presently GOOSE message facility available on modern
IEDs.
To have redundant TP system, GOOSE message has
been combined with PLC based TP for OLS scheme.

Presentation 5.6
Power Grid Config OLS Cases
120–300MW+
transfer
Case 1, 2 BKSAM‐BTRJA OHL circuit operate, ±100MW
power generation loss
Case 2, 1 BKSAM‐BTRJA OHL circuit TRIP
Case 3, 1 BKSAM‐BTRJA OHL circuit operate, ±100MW
power generation loss
Case 4, 1 BKSAM‐BTRJA OHL circuit operate, ±200MW
power generation loss

 Peak load 780‐880 MW (05 ‐ 11 PM) local time

 120 – 300MW+ transfer from SS System
 OLS Scheme PLC Based TP
Sometimes occured PLC (carrier channel) trouble
© OMICRON - Asia-Pacific Protection & Testing Conference 2014

Presentation 5.7
What We Need? IEC 61850
Dependable TP The IEC 61850 standard allows for communication
Easy to adopt between IEDs within a substation (GOOSE & GSSE).
Easy to operate & maintenance
Low cost
Can be used redundantly

GOOSE Message 
Based TP
 Between Subs GOOSE
The GOOSE message re‐routed using ethernet router to
allow broadcast communication between IEDs between
substations. EoIP Tunneling
© OMICRON - Asia-Pacific Protection & Testing Conference 2014
GOOSE Performance
Point to point loop test using publisher and subscriber
IED between BTRJA and BKMNG 150 kV subs.

for GOOSE
Message Total : 30.2 ms
Halfway : 15.1 ms

Presentation 5.8
GOOSE Performance EoIP Performance
Travelling time  EoIP performance 
comparation with PLC  considered from 
based TP between its bandwidth 
BTRJA and BKMNG 150  usage
kV subs 
1.5 – 1.7 kbps
time delay (ms)
PLC based TP 21.00
GOOSE message 15.10
0.44% of 3G 
data rate
IEC 60834‐1
2 ‐ 70 ms
 Conclusion
PLC and GOOSE message based TP for OLS can be
operated at the same time redundantly.
The EoIP communication makes virtual tunnel
between the corresponding substations so any
© OMICRON - Asia-Pacific Protection & Testing Conference 2014

communication that is routed to use this tunnel will

detect that they are communicate each other inside
the same local area network.
Travelling time for TP using GOOSE message comply
IEC 60834‐1 standard ©IEC :1999.

Presentation 5.9
IED Config (Publish) IED Config (Publish)
1. Set pickup curent 2. Set output 
for OLS contact for PLC & 
virtual output for 
GOOSE on PSL
 IED Config (Publish) IED Config (Publish)
3. Set comms parameter 4. Set dataset
© OMICRON - Asia-Pacific Protection & Testing Conference 2014

Presentation 5.10
IED Config (Publish) IED Config (Subscribe)
5. Set used  1. Set comms parameter
GOOSE 
publish 
channel
 IED Config (Subscribe) IED Config (Subscribe)
2. Set GOOSE  3. Set input contact for PLC & virtual input for GOOSE on PSL
subscribe  Virtual Input 1 2000

channel 1
DDB #832 LED 8
Pick-Up Latching DDB #071
0

Input L1
DDB #032
© OMICRON - Asia-Pacific Protection & Testing Conference 2014

0
7.N/A
Straight DDB #006
0

Output to Rele OLS

Presentation 5.11
Router Config Router Config
Server side Server side
1. Create PPTP Server 2. Create EoIP Tunnel
View publication stats

Router Config Router Config
Server side Server side
3. Create IP Address 4. Create Bridge
© OMICRON - Asia-Pacific Protection & Testing Conference 2014

Presentation 5.12
Router Config Router Config
Client side Client side
1. Create PPTP  2. Create EoIP 
Client tunnel

Next steps similar 
with server side