Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Concerned voters across the nation are nervously watching SB403 because of its likely impact
on other states’ consideration of new election technology. SB403 would permit Georgia to
become the first state to accept statewide use of unsafe barcode technology for official vote
counting. Just as Georgia had an impact on other states as an early adopter of paperless
electronic machines in 2002, we wish to weigh in to discourage a repeat of early adoption of the
latest unverifiable voting technology using barcodes.
We urge you not to pass voting system bill SB403 in haste as the session comes to a close.
SB403 fails to mandate verifiable auditable elections using hand-marked paper ballots counted
by scanners and manually audited—the most secure and accurate balloting method. Instead,
we ask that you support HR1699 for a Voting System Study Committee to permit state officials
to better assess voting system security requirements.
Please protect the voting rights of Georgia voters, including the right to have their votes counted
as cast and secured against malicious interference.
We seek your commitment to oppose SB403 because it contains undemocratic principles and
reckless security practices:
• SB403 permits vulnerable voting machines that use barcodes to record and tabulate the
official ballot. Current law does not permit insecure barcode balloting. The law should not
be changed to permit high-risk technology. Computer scientists agree that barcodes
have no business tabulating Georgia’s elections, likening ballot barcodes to the ability to
attach a keyboard to the tabulation scanner.
• Barcode ballots cannot be audited or manually recounted as claimed.
• Federal EAC system certification is not required in SB403.
• Deadlines for election certifications preclude meaningful post-election audits.
• SB403 mandates a schedule of rapid implementation that is recklessly unrealistic,
building in a likely security failure in the 2020 elections.
• Basic ballot security and chain-of-custody controls are absent.
• SB403 mandates centralizing all election programming in the Secretary of State’s office
without proper checks and balances. Single point of failure risk is high.
• SB403 mandates a single source supplier for the system, counter to good business,
cybersecurity, and financial principles.
• SB403 permits cities, including Atlanta, to continue to run municipal elections on the un-
auditable paperless touchscreen ballots.
• Unverifiable barcode balloting systems can cost more than three times the cost of hand-
marked paper ballots counted by optical scanning equipment.
Events of the last several weeks have occurred at the federal level that should also be factored
into any voting system legislation. We ask you to avoid enacting new voting system statutes
until the following considerations can be taken into account, preferably through the proposed
Study Committee:
• Approximately $10.6 million in new federal funding can be granted to Georgia for
enhancing voting system security if requirements are met.
• New voting system standards will be determined by the federal Election Assistance
Commission on April 20, 2018.
• On March 20, 2018, the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee issued basic
recommendations for voting system security. SB403 violates those standards.
Leading election integrity organizations have publicly stated their opposition to SB403 for its
failure to mandate secure, auditable, and verified elections. Such organizations include Verified
Voting, Common Cause Georgia, Georgians for Verified Voting, and National Election Defense
Coalition. There is no known citizen support for SB403.
SB403 as constructed degrades election security while promoting the interest of certain vendors
to legally permit the purchase of their new insecure vulnerable technology. Voters, not vendors,
should be the beneficiaries of all new election legislation.
In summary, we support Georgia voters who want hand-marked paper ballots counted by
tabulating scanners and manually audited in statistically valid audits. Please avoid degrading
the election statutes through SB403 to permit vulnerable new technology to be acquired. Please
insist that any new voting system legislation include basic security requirements, mandatory
post-election audits, and transparent processes permitting full public oversight of its elections.
Respectfully submitted,
Out-of-state voter signers listed below, starting with election-integrity leaders. (Full addresses to
be filed with Clerk of the House of Representatives)
Philip B. Stark, Ph.D., Dept. of Jonathan D. Simon, Executive Susan Pynchon, Director, Florida
Statistics, University of California, Director, Election Defense Fair Elections Coalition, De Leon
Berkeley, CA Alliance, Arlington, MA Springs, FL
Virginia Martin, Commissioner, Karen McKim, Coordinator, Mimi Kennedy, Advisory Board
Columbia County Board of Wisconsin Election Integrity, Chair, Progressive Democrats of
Elections, Hudson, NY Waunakee, WI America, Encino, CA
Al Kolwicz, Trustee, Colorado Judy Alter, Director, Protect John Roberts Brakey, Co-Founder
Voter Group, Boulder, CO California Ballots, Los Angeles, and Director, AUDIT-USA,
CA Tucson, AZ
Harvie Branscomb, Election
Quality, Carbondale, CO Paul Thomas, Ph.D., Voter Choice Emily Levy, Communications
Massachusetts, Boston, MA Director, AUDIT-USA, Pacifica,
Tim White, San Juan County CA
Citizens for Fair Elections, Friday George Ripley, Audit DC,
Harbor, WA Washington, DC