Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Math Deficiency 1
Logan W. Lantz
Introduction
In a 2004 Gallup poll, 37% of students said math is the the most difficult subject in
school (Saad, 2005). The goal of this research, to determine why math is so difficult whether it is
the fault of the school or the student. This is important because as of 2015, the US ranks 40th
globally in mathematical achievement. The United States can improve their schools as whole,
national curriculum, and the achievement of their students by decreasing the focus on grades and
increasing the focus on learning. Some students have difficulties due to their learning styles and
brain types. Left brain thinkers tend to see things in sequential pieces while right brain thinkers
see things more as a whole (Fleming, 2018). A solution of this well known issue is to look
towards other countries who are successful. In Finland schools, one of the most successful
countries academically in the world, teachers are selected from the top 10 percent of the nation’s
graduates and are given the same status as doctors and lawyers. There is no ranking system in
these schools and there is only one standardized test required for the students when they are a
senior in high school. There is no homework and students are put in the same classrooms, no
matter their level of achievement. The gap between the worst and best student is the smallest in
the world (Hancock, 2011). This brings up the questions: Why is math difficult for students?
Should the United States model math curriculum off of other countries?
Student opinion shows that math is the consensus favorite subject. In a 2004 Gallup poll,
24% of students said that math was their favorite subject, which was the highest ranking subject
(Saad, 2005). However, this preference displays conflict as 37% of students say that math is their
most difficult subject. Saad also highlights that 56% of adults say that basic math is required in
their job on a day to day basis. The lack of student mathematical achievement in the United
U.S. Math Deficiency 3
States is an issue due to the need of math later on in life. According to Achieve, Inc., 90% of
2010 college graduates believe that some form of education is required after high school,
students cannot understand math at a secondary education level, they will have trouble in higher
motivation and their teachers. The United States is ranked too low on a global scale in academic
Student Difficulties
Strauss argues that it is the slow progression of the approximate number system in the
early stages of development in young children (2013). This system allows people to estimate a
number for a group of similar objects, which is more important for younger children. This
irregular development causes delays to the comprehension of math as a whole and sets the child
back from their peers. Fleming takes a different approach and states that since math is a
cumulative subject, students who have “average” grades in elementary and middle school have
difficulty in high school and college because they have not mastered the foundation of
mathematics (2018). Teachers do not have the time to make sure every student knows every
topic so some students are left behind. Then, once students are behind, these “weaker performing
2003).
U.S. Math Deficiency 4
In 2014, 26% of 12th graders were proficient in math because they have been learning it
all wrong (“Math isn’t hard,” 2014). They have been taught that fractions are an impossible
concept to manage quickly and some high schoolers still have trouble with the idea. Randy
Polisac asserted that math needs to be taught as a language because that is what it was created to
be, as is was used to create structures and trade. Adding one apple to four apples should make
just as much sense to a student as adding one third to four thirds. Students should be able to
make the connection that five apples and five thirds are the sums for both problems. The same
In 1988, a study was conducted that examined the math anxiety in middle and high
school students (Wigfield & Meece). Typically, difficult math problems caused the students to
show either negative emotions or actions. A common response was for the students to worry
about whether they are getting the problem right or doing the correct processes. Another
response was for them to display nervous habits, such as tapping their fingers or shaking their
legs. “Highly anxious students are overly concerned with the possible consequences of failure.
The negative emotional states that these self-focused cognitions evoke can interfere with
attentional and learning processes so that test or task performance is impaired” (Wigfield &
Meece, 1988). One benefit of math anxiety is that it is positively correlated with the amount of
work students put towards math as well as the importance of math to students. Overall, Wigfield
and Meece discuss how math anxiety affects math performance in students and whether that
Posamentier argues that a large part of student success in the classroom is due to intrinsic
motivation. “Many students demonstrate intrinsic motivation in their desire to understand a topic
U.S. Math Deficiency 5
longitudinal study, students from 9 to 17 years old were examined and it was determined that
both achievement and motivation decline over time (2007). Gottfried analyzed her results and
determined that,
from childhood through adolescence, across varied populations, those with higher
academic intrinsic motivation have been found to be more competent in school,
generally evidencing significantly greater academic achievement, more positive
perceptions of their academic competency, lower academic anxiety, and less
extrinsic motivation.
All core subject in school have had a progressive decline over the years in terms of intrinsic
Finland Schools
Hancock discusses an overview of the FInland school system. Teachers are selected from
the top 10 percent of the nation’s graduates, while there is no ranking system in these schools
and there is only one standardized test required for the students when they are a senior in high
school (Hancock, 2011). The gap between the worst and best student is the smallest in the world.
Students of all levels of achievement are put into the same classrooms and they are taught a third
language beginning at age 9 (Hancock, 2011). The New York Times presents the fact that all
high school students in Finland schools must take physics, chemistry, biology, philosophy, music
and at least two foreign languages, making it a very difficult curriculum (“Why other countries,”
2013).
Another source presents the reasoning behind Finland’s success in schools, since
“Finland showed the highest mathematical literacy performance in the OECD and the second
highest performance within all countries” (Välijärvi et al., 2003). Another interesting finding this
research brought about was that the gender gap between the performance of boys and girls in
U.S. Math Deficiency 6
Finland was smaller than other OECD countries; however, boys typically had a stronger self
concept of mathematics than girls (Välijärvi et al., 2003). Finland focus heavily on equity,
whether that is in the quality of education or socioeconomic status. Surprisingly, the more a
teacher was involved with students, the worse a student achieved, yet this can be explained by
the fact that lower performing schools reported more teacher support (Välijärvi et al., 2003).
Conclusion
Overall, the United States has a present issue at hand that needs to be solved, the lack of
have been found to affect student performance, including “students’ own interests, attitudes, and
learning strategies, learning opportunities offered by home and school, and parents’ and schools’
expectations” (Välijärvi et al., 2003). Also, students experience math anxiety which inhibits their
performance due to the expectations of them and their uncertainties. Considering the various
reasonings behind students’ difficulties with math, the United States should adopt similar
policies to Finland by eliminating the ranking system and making effective teaching decisions,
References
(2013, March). All students need advanced mathematics. Achieve, Inc. Retrieved from
https://eric.ed.gov/?q=math&ft=on&id=ED541644.
(2014, December 5). Math isn’t hard, it’s a language. Youtube. Retrieved from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6yixyiJcos.
(2013, December 17). Why other countries teach better. The New York Times. Retrieved from
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/18/opinion/why-students-do-better-overseas.html?page
U.S. Math Deficiency 7
wanted=all.
Fleming, G. (2018, January 18). Why math seems more difficult for some students. ThoughtCo.
some-students-1857216.
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0165025407077752.
successful-49859555/.
Posamentier, A. (2017, June 20). 9 Strategies for Motivating Students in Mathematics. Edutopia.
mathematics-alfred-posamentier.
Saad, L. (2005, May 17). Math problematic for U.S. teens. Gallup. Retrieved from
http://news.gallup.com/poll/16360/Math-Problematic-US-Teens.aspx.
Strauss, V. (2013, March 27). Why is math so hard for many? The Washington Post. Retrieved
from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2013/03/27/why-is-math-
so-hard-for-so-many/?utm_term=.e0a7a8516df1.
Välijärvi, J., Kupari, P., Linnakylä, P., Reinikainen, P., Sulkunen, S., Törnroos, J., & Arffman, I.
(2003). The Finnish success in PISA – and some reasons behind it. PISA. Retrieved from
https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/bitstream/handle/123456789/37478/978-951-39-3038-
7.pdf?sequence=1&origin=publication_detail.
U.S. Math Deficiency 8
Wigfield, A. & Meece J. (1988). Math anxiety in elementary and secondary school students.
academia.edu.documents/31145894/wigfield88.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYY
GZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1522264414&Signature=bABL%2Fuur1Atai0YjDnAXu3UAD
Og%3D&response-content-
disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DMath_anxiety_in_elementary_and_secondary.p
df.