Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Here we have the highly incompetent Australian government participating in an elaborate fraud
to blame the Russian Federation for something where even
http://truepublica.org.uk/united-kingdom/sergei-skripal-the-emerging-picture-of-a-desperate-government/
Sergei Skripal – The emerging picture of a desperate government
QUOTE
Theresa May herself has used her words carefully. The PM said it was “highly likely” Russia was responsible
for the Salisbury attack. She did not say, Russia was responsible. There’s a difference.
END QUOTE
I will not quote other parts as one can use the above link to read it all.
https://russia-insider.com/en/skripals-are-case-implausible-deniability-
brits/ri22949?ct=t(Russia_Insider_Daily_Headlines11_21_2014)&mc_cid=cf1da02293&mc_eid=2c57cd92c9
Skripals Are a Case of Implausible Deniability for the Brits
Peta Credlin in her 1-4-2018 article ‘CHEATERS NEVER PROSPER’ in the Sunday Herald
Sun appeared in my view (to put it in my own words) to make clear that Malcolm Turnbull is
rudderless and will end up shipwrecking the Coalition.
Let’s consider the uncalled added cost in regard of transport.
As per requirements of Section 101 (Inter-State Commission) of the Commonwealth of
Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK), our governing constitution, that there always "shall be"
an Inter-State Commission.
QUOTE Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)
101 Inter-State Commission
There shall be an Inter-State Commission, with such powers of adjudication and administration as the
Parliament deems necessary for the execution and maintenance, within the Commonwealth, of the provisions
of this Constitution relating to trade and commerce, and of all laws made thereunder.
END QUOTE (Bold and red colour added by writer)
While often there are statements as to the 3 branches of Government, in my view one ought to
speak of the 4 branched of the ‘political union’;
1. The Parliament
2. The Federal Executives
3. Judicature
4. Inter-State Commission.
Hansard 2-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE
Mr. BARTON.-We are about to say that an Inter-State Commission shall be appointed to execute and
maintain the Commonwealth provisions relating to trade and commerce. I understand that the general sense
of the Convention is that the restriction to railways and rivers should disappear; that the Inter-State
The Parliament shall make laws constituting an Inter-State Commission to execute and maintain within the
Commonwealth the provisions of this Constitution relating to commerce.[start page 1526] That seems to me
to be the charter of the Inter-State Commission.
Sir GEORGE TURNER.-Would you add "and the laws for the time being passed by the Parliament"?
Mr. BARTON.-I think that is un-necessary. They will have to maintain the constitutional provisions with
regard to trade and commerce. It is obvious that we must give a certain amount of discretion to Parliament,
and Parliament having a commission already in existence will not pass any laws relating to trade and
commerce without leaving the determination of those laws to the Inter State Commission. It may be only a
difference of form, but I think there would be no advantage in adding the words suggested. We are giving in
the Constitution power to the Inter-State Commission to execute and maintain within the
Commonwealth the provisions relating to trade and commerce. Then we have in Mr. Grant's amendment
the determination of certain other matters confided to the Inter-State Commission, and I understand that the
Right Hon. Sir George Turner consented yesterday to have similar words inserted in his clause. It is clear
then that the provisions we are inserting in the Constitution in relation to trade and commerce will be under
the jurisdiction of the Inter-State Commission, and that is really all we want. We might go further and make
some provision as to the laws, but that is unnecessary. It is inconceivable that Parliament would pass laws,
and take away from the Inter-State Commission the power of adjudicating on them. What I do want to
impress on honorable members is that there is no necessity to say that there shall be an Inter-State
Commission. If we say that Parliament shall constitute an Inter-State Commission, then we make it
clear that it is the Parliament, and not the Executive, that is deal with the commission in the first
instance and to define its powers. That is necessary, as we might otherwise find the Executive Government
taking this as a direction to appoint an Inter-State Commission before a statute had been passed, and then
there might be some trouble with the High Court.
END QUOTE
I in previous writings have indicated that what needs to be done is to ensure that the Section 101
of the constitution Inter-State Commission is dealing with trade and commerce, as is actually
constitutionally required. Instead of ad hoc infrastructure planning and to pay out $1.2 billion
As I stated previously:
Those who pursue disinformation to make a case for war and innocent people then are
killed as result should in my view if convicted serve imprisonment with hard labour, such
as breaking rocks, etc.
\If we had pragmatist in government who first of all are in government to serve the general
community interest and wellbeing above their own personal and party interest then we may just
have the Inter-State Commission, as is constitutionally required, address relevant issues. After all
the Federal government because of the provisions of Section 1010 of the constitution has no legal
authority to interfere with trade and commerce. The Federal Parliament legislates and the Inter-
State Commission then execute matters within its powers and only if they make an error in law
can an appeal lie to the High Court of Australia. As such the Inter-State Commission is free from
any political interference by the government of the day. It owns no responsibility to the
government of the day as it is responsible directly to the Federal Parliament (who may add or
reduce additional powers) and again only can be held accountable in the High Court of Australia
for any errors of law. Hence the past legislation regarding the Inter-State Commission to
purportedly give it powers as a court was in violation of the intentions of the Framers of the
Constitution. I understand that the High Court of Australia correctly struck down this part of the
legislation.
A pragmatist in action:
.
p4 2-4-2018 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
Trump puts the Needs of Rural Americans Front and Center
Gil May <gilmay97@gmail.com>
QUOTE
One in 12 jobs in the United States is dependent on agriculture, according to the Agriculture Council of
America (ACA). From farmers to processors to consumers, the fruits—pun intended—of U.S. agriculture
find their way into the home of every American.
National Agriculture Day, or “Ag Day,” is a moment to reflect on the essential role agriculture plays in our
society. This year’s celebration on March 20 marks the 45th anniversary of Ag Day and carries the theme of
“Agriculture: Food for Life.” The ACA started the Ag Day program in 1973 to teach more Americans about
how food and fiber products are produced, how they contribute to the economy, and what career
opportunities they afford.
President Donald J. Trump’s Secretary of Agriculture, Sonny Perdue, has been active in traveling the country
and hearing firsthand about how government decisions affect our farmers. The Administration is in the
process of considering legislative, regulatory, and other policy changes stemming from the Interagency Task
Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity, which Secretary Perdue chairs.
That task force has identified more than 100 recommendations, spanning across five key areas of need:
1. Achieving e-Connectivity for Rural America: Electronic connectivity is more than a matter of
convenience; it’s fundamental for economic development, innovation, and workforce readiness.
2. Improving Quality of Life: Economic indicators such as affordable housing and reliable employment
opportunities must be considered along with social indicators of well-being, such as measures of
community resilience.
3. Supporting a Rural Workforce: Just as every rural area needs jobs for its residents, every employer
needs qualified individuals to fill open positions. The government can help identify that gap, attract
available workers, and assist with workforce training.
4. Harnessing Technological Innovation: By 2050, experts predict the U.S. population will grow close
to 400 million. Better technology is needed to increase output across American farmlands.
5. Developing the Rural Economy: Investing in rural infrastructure will lead to more “Made in
America” products available both here and abroad, boosting U.S. global competitiveness in the process.
“No doubt, rural America has struggled under burdensome regulations with no voice in Washington,”
Secretary Perdue says. “But under President Trump’s leadership, and with the work of this task force, we can
turn that around and restore rural prosperity once and for all.”
In addition to assembling the rural prosperity task force, President Trump has made advancing the agriculture
sector a centerpiece of his Administration. His Executive Order on Streamlining and Expediting Requests to
Locate Broadband Facilities in Rural America, signed this January, outlines a system to bring broadband
infrastructure to overlooked rural communities.
Even sweeping reforms, such as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that President Trump signed in December, focus
on the particular needs of rural America. The tax cuts package allows American farmers to deduct 100
percent of the cost of new equipment in the year they make that investment.
“American farmers and ranchers are the heart and soul of America and they represent the determined, self-
reliant character of our Nation,” President Trump wrote in his Ag Day Proclamation last year. “We are proud
of American agriculture and we recognize agriculture’s critical role to our Nation’s bright future.”
END QUOTE
QUOTE
The next phase of America’s comeback
From The White House
To admin@inspector-rikati.com
Reply-To The White House
Date Today 02:56 (30-3-2018)
Today, the President travels to Ohio to make his case directly to the American people. He will visit an
expansive training site for members of the International Union of Operating Engineers, a diversified trade
union that includes heavy equipment operators, mechanics and surveyors, and stationary engineers.
The next phase of America’s economic comeback is to rebuild America’s crumbling infrastructure.
We will breathe new life into our run-down highways, railways, and waterways, and we will transform our
roads and bridges—all under budget and ahead of schedule.
END QUOTE
QUOTE
Another win on trade
From The White House
To admin@inspector-rikati.com
Reply-To The White House
Date Thu 02:53 (29-3-2018)
Yesterday, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer announced a new agreement with South
Korea that accomplishes exactly that:
“The improved KORUS agreement reflects the President’s leadership in delivering more reciprocal trade
outcomes benefiting U.S. workers, exporters, and businesses. The United States and Korea have
strengthened an important economic relationship by agreeing to substantial improvements to KORUS
that will help rebalance our trade, reduce our trade deficit, and expand U.S. export opportunities.”
News of the deal is earning the Administration widespread recognition. “The finalization of a trade
agreement with South Korea would hand Mr. Trump a victory in his ‘America First’ approach to trade,”
The New York Times reported.
Learn more about this important win for American workers and businesses.
Optimism abounds
Each week, the Administration is seeing more and more news that consumer and business confidence
continue to soar, particularly now that President Trump’s tax cuts are helping the U.S. economy take off
after eight years of stagnation.
President Trump’s work is only just beginning, but the early signs all show that smart policy is all it took
to unleash America’s economic power.
END QUOTE
While Malcolm Turnbull PM and other can have their usual mantra, the truth is that electors
want to see appropriate action from a pragmatist. If I were in power I would certainly be able to
implement what is required regarding the Inter-State Commission, this as it is constitutionally
obligated (shall be)!
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.