Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
This will be a short introduction on how to model and design a U-boot slab with the SAFE FEA
software.
In these pages we want to summarize how to design a voided slab using the CSI SAFE program.
For the tutorial we will use a standard project, with the following characteristics:
• 3 x 3 bays
• 8 m x 8 m span
• 0,5 m x 0,5 m columns
• 0,52 m x 0,52 m x 0,16 m voids
1. Preparation of the .dxf file for the importation of the slab geometry in Safe
2. Preliminary slab and Void thickness
3. SAFE model generation
1. DXF import
2. Model proprieties definition
3. Model geometry creation
4. Voided slab proprieties assignation
5. Load definition and assignation
6. Load combination definition
4. Model run
5. Verification
1. Punching shear verification
2. Deflection verification
3. Shear verification
4. Flexural verification
For the creation of the SAFE model I suggest to use different layer for the different part of the
structures. For example, the columns in layer, the walls in others and so on. This will render the
geometry creation of the model faster and easier.
It’s important to use a layer to distinguish the voided slab from the full concrete slab.
Usually the thickness for a voided slab, with normal load between 5 and 10 kN/m2, is about:
1 1
𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 = ~ 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
25 30
In this example the span is 8 m so we will use a 28 cm thickness, which is equal to 1/28 of the span.
Usually the rib width should be reduced as possible to limit the weight of the voided slab.
To obtain the proprieties modifiers we input the Voided slab dimension here:
ss
Ht ha l l
si
bw
INPUT
OUTPUT
2
Voided slab Cross section area A 1147,85 cm
Full concrete slab Cross section area A 2800,00 cm2
Voided Slab Area for linear meter A 1739,17 cm2/m
2
Full concrete Slab Area for linear meter A 2800,00 cm /m
2
Voided Slab weight Ps ol 5,22 kN/m
Full concrete Slab weight Ps ol 7,00 kN/m2
Voided Slab concrete consumption Vs ol 0,21 m3/m
3
Full concrete Slab concrete consumption Vs ol 0,28 m /m
PROPRIETIES MODIFIERS
We shall input the code and the template, in this case we shall use Eurocode and blank,
respectively.
I usually chose to include a rigid zone area over the columns but I do not allow the wall to take Out-
of_plane Moment.
When we have finished to definition phase we can begin to create the model geometry.
Then we select all the voided area and we assign the modification factors:
When the loads are assigned we can proceed to define the load combination.
The ULS combo is used for the strength verification, the ELS are used for the deflection and
service verification.
This is because we need to calculate the creep deflection only on the quasi-permanent part of the
full load of the structure.
So we will make a load case with the Quasi-permanent part of the load for the calculation of the
long term deflection and two load case to obtain the deflection caused by the rest of the load.
This is the long term load case for the quasi permanent load part.
It’s the most important verification, because is the first and more dangerous breaking mode for the
slabs. If the punching shear verification is failed, we have only two ways to operate. We can choose
to raise the slab thickness (for all the slab or creating downstand drop) or choose to use a better
strength class for the concrete.
I personally suggest to check the worst case for the internal columns, the edge columns and the
corner columns. Corner and edge columns can be more difficult to verify than the internal column
even if their loads is smaller. Their verification perimeter is in fact smaller because of their position
and the unbalanced moment on them.
INPUT
FORCES
coefficiente k 1,923
Mean reinforcement ratio rl 0,014
coefficient (EC2) CRd,c 0,12
coefficient (EC2) k1 0,1
Minimum shear resistance vmin 0,466 N/mm2
INPUT
FORCES
coefficiente k 1,923
Mean reinforcement ratio rl 0,014
coefficient (EC2) CRd,c 0,12
coefficient (EC2) k1 0,1
Minimum shear resistance vmin 0,466 N/mm2
INPUT
FORCES
coefficiente k 1,923
Mean reinforcement ratio rl 0,014
coefficient (EC2) CRd,c 0,12
coefficient (EC2) k1 0,1
Minimum shear resistance vmin 0,466 N/mm2
It is the second verification that has to be check. This because if it is failed the only ways to satisfy it
is to raise the concrete class, raise the slab thickness or change the slab geometry, using downstand
beams or drops.
1
𝛿𝑞𝑝,𝑒𝑙𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐,𝑚𝑎𝑥 < 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
1000
If deflection can be a major problem we can proceed to check the long term deflection.
1
𝛿𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑒𝑑,𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝,𝑚𝑎𝑥 < 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
250
If there are vertical elements susceptible to deflection, like very rigid wall or glass façade, the
Eurocode provide a limit of the deflection after this element are placed, equal to:
1
𝛿𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑒𝑑,𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝,𝑚𝑎𝑥 − 𝛿𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑒𝑑,𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑑 < 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
500
For the ULS verification we can use the same tool we use for concrete construction.
There is a will have two different cross-sections. Where the slab is voided we shall have a I section
beam, instead where there are no voids, the section will be a full concrete cross section.
From the safe model we can get the bending moment value and check with a concrete software if
the reinforcement is adequate. I use an Italian free software, but any other similar software can be
used.
ss
Ht ha l l
si
bw
𝑘𝑁𝑚
𝑀11,𝑣𝑜𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑,𝑠𝑑,𝑝𝑜𝑠 = 𝑀22,𝑣𝑜𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑,𝑠𝑑,𝑝𝑜𝑠 = 75 ∗ 0.66𝑚 = 49.5 𝑘𝑁𝑚
𝑚
𝑘𝑁𝑚
𝑀11,𝑣𝑜𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑,𝑠𝑑,𝑛𝑒𝑔 = 𝑀22,𝑣𝑜𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑,𝑠𝑑,𝑛𝑒𝑔 = −80 ∗ 0.66𝑚 = 52.8 𝑘𝑁𝑚
𝑚
The negative bending moment must be lower of the resistant bending moment
From the SAFE result we can obtain the maximum value of shear for the voided slab
𝑘𝑁
𝑉13,𝑣𝑜𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑,𝑠𝑑,𝑝𝑜𝑠 = 𝑉23,𝑣𝑜𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑,𝑠𝑑,𝑝𝑜𝑠 = 85 ∗ 0.66𝑚 = 56.10 𝑘𝑁
𝑚
INPUT
Width b 140 mm
Heigth h 280 mm
cover c 33 mm
Depth d 247 mm
theta inclination Q 28 °
alfa inclination a 90 °
NO SHEAR REINFORCEMENT
Parameter k 1,900
Parameter vmin 0,458 N/mm2
𝑉𝑠 = 56.10 𝑘𝑁 ≤ 𝑉𝑅 = 88.46 𝑘𝑁 𝑜𝑘