Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
io
Go Study’s
CFA Exam Level 3
®
by GoStudy™
www.gostudy.io
Everything you need to pass & nothing you don’t
1
www.gostudy.io
The “CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute. CFA
Institute does not endorse, promote, review, or warrant the accuracy of the products or services
offered by www.cfaexamlevel3.com.
Certain materials contained with this text are the copyrighted property of the CFA Institute. The
following is the copyright disclosure for those materials: “Copyright, 2016, CFA Institute.
Reproduced and republished from 2016 Learning Outcome Statements, Level III CFA® Program
Materials, CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct, and CFA Institute’s Global
Investment Performance Standards with permission from CFA Institute. All rights reserved.”
Disclaimer: These guided notes condense the original CFA Institute study material into 300
pages. It is not designed to replace those notes, but to be used in conjunction with them. While
we believe we cover all of the core concepts accurately we cannot guarantee nor warrant that this
is true. Use of these notes is not a guarantee of exam success (although we think it will help a
lot) and we cannot be held liable for your ultimate exam performance.
About gostudy.io
Along with these Guided Notes, GoStudy offers a suite of products for in-depth exam strategies
and comprehensive subject review to help candidates pass the final CFA exam.
We have hundreds of notecards and practice problems built into a mobile app for on-the-go
review, with detailed analytics (coming), and last-minute cram material such as equation lists
and “week before” summary sheets.
We also highly recommend candidates subscribe to our free newsletter for exclusive offers,
access to study tips, tricks, and in-depth discussions of the exam. We also periodically provide
bonus resources such as mock exams, practice problems, and more to our subscribers.
If you have any questions regarding this product, the exam, or how we can help please contact us
via the website. We strive to answer every question a candidate has and are always incorporating
Candidate feedback into what we build next.
2
www.gostudy.io
Contents
Behavioral Finance (Study Session 3) ............................................................................................ 3
Traditional versus Behavioral Finance (Reading 5) ................................................................... 4
The Rational Economic Man and Efficient Markets .............................................................. 5
The CAPM Model................................................................................................................... 6
Tweaks of the Efficient Market Hypothesis ........................................................................... 6
Utility Theory.......................................................................................................................... 7
Challenging EMH ................................................................................................................... 9
Behavioral Finance Frameworks .............................................................................................. 11
Summarizing the BF Frameworks ........................................................................................ 14
Take portfolio management for example. The core of L3 is knowing the basic stuff that goes into
managing someone else’s money. People aren’t robots after all! Thus to do a good job managing
money you have to be aware of your clients’ unique financial circumstances, knowledge of
finance, and their personality traits.
The overarching point of this section is that only by treating clients as unique individuals can
we, as portfolio managers, create tailored strategic asset allocation plans that also mitigate their
weird quirks or sub-optimal behaviors (through education or accommodation).
Bottom line: Knowing this section cold will let you score points and save valuable time.
3
www.gostudy.io
We spend a good deal of time in the beginning of this section because understanding the basic
tenants of BF will let you earn a lot of points on the test throughout seemingly unrelated subjects.
Specifically, as we move into the core L3 readings on Individual and Institutional Portfolio
Management, your ability to relate those sections to BF will let you score a lot of points. So bear
with us in the lengthy chapter. The payoff is worth it and we promise the notes get more concise
again after.
Contrast traditional finance with behavioral finance and how that impacts investor
decision making and portfolio construction
Compare and discuss the consequences of Weak, Semi-strong form, and strong form
modifications to EMH
Describe and compare utility and prospect theory
Talk about bounded rationality and cognitive limitations and its impact on investment
decision making (satisfice, AMH)
Describe the consumption and savings model, BAPM, and BPT and how they differ from
traditional finance
In order to set up the behavioral finance discussion it helps to take a step back and think about
what exactly it is that behavioral finance is modifying—traditional finance. Traditional finance,
which is what we’ve dealt with throughout L1 and L2, is built on the assumptions of:
Rational individuals
Perfect information
Efficient markets that quickly absorb new information
Another way to draw the distinction between traditional and behavioral finance lies in what each
tries to do. Traditional finance is normative in that it seeks to predict actions. It offers theoretical
models for how people and markets are supposed to behave in an ideal scenario.
4
www.gostudy.io
Again, the L3 curriculum is about the key principles of actually managing money. The ultimate
goal or application of behavioral finance is prescriptive, i.e. it can provide practical advice and
tools to achieve results that are as close to the normative ideal as possible. In other words, the
overarching message being conveyed here is that combining behavioral and traditional
approaches leads us to a better understanding of clients, and that makes us better portfolio
managers and financial advisors.
The rational economic man acts in accordance with a few basic theories that try to define his
behaviors (derived from neoclassical economics). Basically a perfectly rational economic
human:
The result, as we see below, is that an REM will try to obtain the highest possible utility given
their budget constraints.
From a market-wide perspective, traditional finance assumes that since all of these individuals
base their decisions on perfect information (including past volume, price, and market/firm data)
markets as a whole are also efficient. Efficient here means two things:
1. The price is right: In other words, asset prices reflect all available information and prices
adjust instantaneously to incorporate that information
2. There is no free lunch: Since prices adjust immediately it is not possible to get an
informational advantage and therefore earn above-average returns. In other words no
alpha is consistently possible
The result is our good friend capital market theory as represented by the CAPM. This is where
there is a single efficient market frontier on which investors create their portfolio using expected
returns, standard deviations, and co-variances of their investments.
1
In the CFA curriculum this discussion is followed by a brief explanation of Bayes’ formula for revising
expectations given new information. While unlikely to be directly tested you should recognize the probability
P(B|A)
formula from L2 where: P(A|B) = ∗ P(A). Where the conditional probablities [P(A|B), P(B|A) use the new
P(B)
probabilities given the new information).
5
www.gostudy.io
Thus in perfectly efficient markets it is the job of an investment manager to ID portfolios on the
efficient frontier that meets the risk/reward profile of an investor.
In reality, even traditional finance acknowledges that markets are unlikely to be perfectly
efficient. Specifically, the assumption that all the relevant information is available and
incorporated into market prices instantly has been challenged. As a result there are three
modifications to completely efficient markets that have been proposed.
Charts/technical trading
Charts/technical trading
AND fundamental No excess returns
Implications will not lead to excess
analysis will not lead to possible
returns
excess returns
Challenges to these theories include fundamental anomalies (value investing, small-cap) which challenges semi-strong/strong) and technical
anomalies (calendar, moving average/momentum) which challenge the weak form.
2
An excellent recap of the CAPM model can be found here.
6
www.gostudy.io
Utility Theory
The concept of rational economic man and investing along a CAPM frontier should be very
familiar from previous levels. What hasn’t been covered before is that those concepts are
actually built on the economic theory of utility.
When you combine rational man with a few basic assumptions about the way he or she thinks
about maximizing their own self-interests you get something called Utility. Utility is just an
economic term describing how you measure your best possible outcome. Its official definition is
“the level of relative satisfaction received from the consumption of a good or service.” Utility
theory depends on four assumptions (which “won’t” be directly tested):3
Completeness: Individuals know their preferences and can choose between them
Transitivity: If A > B and B > C then, A > C
Independence: Rankings are additive. So assuming from above that B> C, the
following must be true: A + B > A +C
Continuity: Utility curves are continuous. If C> B > A then there is a combo of C
&A=B
To make the concept of Utility clearer let’s give a simple example.
3
Obviously I can’t guarantee that you won’t be tested on something like this, but it’s really in the weeds.
7
www.gostudy.io
Say you have a simple tradeoff to make between working and making money on the one hand
OR hanging out but having less money on the other. Obviously you need some money or
hanging out isn’t much fun. But if all you do is work, your money isn’t worth much either
because you have no time to use it.
The more of either leisure or work you have, the less valuable having a little bit more of that
becomes. Thus utility assumes diminishing marginal returns. As a consequence you maximize
your utility by choosing some combination of work and leisure that “works” for you according to
your preferences and your constraints.4
This works exactly the same in thinking about risk and reward tradeoffs in investing. The more
wealth you have the more the expected return of an investment must increase to offset risk.
That’s because each dollar you earn has less and less utility (The double-inflection utility
function).
Graphically, the fact that returns must increase at an increasing rate is represented by the shape
on the IC curve from the left of point A. The less leisure time you have, the more someone is
going to have to pay you to give it up.
From an investor’s perspective think of it this way. Since you’re already rich you care more
about keeping what you have versus getting more. Each additional dollar is subject to
diminishing returns. You are risk averse because you accept less risk per additional dollar
you earn.
Behavioral finance relaxes this assumption so that people can be risk-neutral or even risk-
seeking5 depending on their level of wealth. This leads to different types of behaviors in the
pursuit of wealth/investment returns.
The key takeaway from this entire section is summed up in the graphs below. If you know what
the graphs below are telling you and why, you know enough about this section.
4
Graph from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labour_economics.
5
We all have a casino-loving gambling friend after all.
8
www.gostudy.io
The Concave shape of the risk-averse investor's utility function indicates diminishing
marginal utility. Thus as the overall wealth increases, utility begins to increase at a
decreasing rate
The risk-neutral investor acts as if unaware of risk (considers only returns)
The utility function for the risk-seeking individual is convex, indicating increasing
marginal utility. Thus each additional unit of wealth provides more and more utility”
Challenging EMH
So far we’ve introduced traditional finance and explained some of its key implications for how
both individuals and markets behave. In this section we’re going to take a more specific look at
some of the alternative theories to efficient markets presented in the behavioral finance reading.
This coverage will be picked up again in Reading 7 on behavioral finance and asset allocation.
Bounded Rationality
Bounded rationality is a key concept in understanding behavioral finance. Essentially, bounded
rationality states that it is impossible for every individual to have perfect information about every
possible outcome for every single decision. The result is that people practice satisfice.
Satisfice means getting to an acceptable outcome, even if that outcome isn’t optimal or return
maximizing. The idea of bounded rationality + satisfice is a key behavioral finance concept
because it recognizes that people:
Prospect Theory
This is the first modification to traditional finance presented in the curriculum. Prospect theory
relaxes the assumption of utility maximization and substitutes it with loss aversion (or risk
aversion). Loss aversion is an important concept in understanding how investors actually behave.
At its most basic it means that investors care more about a loss of a dollar than they do the gain
of a dollar (see more at Loss Aversion).
9
www.gostudy.io
More generally, prospect theory assumes investors aren’t thinking about total returns, instead
they are analyzing risk relative to possible gains and losses. Under prospect theory investors care
more about relative changes to wealth than about absolute changes.
Prospect Theory
What the above graph shows is that there may be levels of return at which an investor is a risk
seeker (in the convex area of losses) and levels where an investor is risk neutral or risk averse
(the concave positive gain area).6 In other words, if investors fear losses they may actually take
on greater risk in an attempt to reverse them.
The key testable takeaway here is that loss aversion can lead to investors selling winning
stocks too early (to lock in gains) and/or holding on or even doubling down on losers.
Decision making under prospect theory is a two-step process where we figure out our choices
(editing), and then evaluate those choices (evaluation phase).
The editing phase consists of an investor figuring out/clarifying the choices they can make. The
six steps in the editing phase are: Codification, Combination, Segregation, Cancellation,
Simplification, and Dominance.
6
People tend to be risk averse when there is moderate or high probability of gains or low probability of losses and
people are risk seeking when there is low probability of gains or high probability of losses
10
www.gostudy.io
The key takeaway is that the way options are framed matters for the choices an investor
makes (also see this concept at work in analyst errors). In the second, evaluation phase, investors
value their alternatives based on expected outcome. Prospect theory also introduces several
behavioral aspects including framing bias, isolation effect, and the tendency to overreact to low-
probability outcomes which we cover in greater detail later.
Again don’t spend too much time memorizing these steps. Just remember that investors use
heuristics and think about changes in wealth instead of absolute amounts of wealth.
You should be broadly familiar with these models and why they are sub-optimal, but the real key
for the exam will come in Reading 7. There we focus on how to actually decide, based on an
investor’s actual financial situation and behavioral profile, whether we can/should
accommodate their behavioral quirks based on how risky that would be.
7
Calculating probability under prospect theory has the following equation: subjective utility alternative =
wPxUx,i+ wPyUy,i+ wPzUz,i
11
www.gostudy.io
and bucketing current income, owned assets, and future savings, where an investor’s marginal
propensity to consume is highest for current income.
The way people save, invest, and think about their money is also different depending on their
stage of life.8 In this case, the consumption and savings model is almost like a form of mental
accounting, which is where someone places wealth into different buckets in order to meet
different goals. This is inefficient because it ignores the fungible nature of wealth.
Where:
Rf = The risk free interest rate
Re = The expected rate of return
The sentiment premium is an estimate derived from analyst forecasts. The greater the
dispersion of analysts’ predictions, i.e. the more they disagree, the larger the sentiment
premium.
For survival essentials an investor would hold risk free assets (treasuries). For their dream yacht
on the other hand they would hold riskier assets. Generally, an investor would build the risk free
layer up before taking on more risk and moving up the pyramid.
Think of it as mirroring Maslow’s hierarchy of needs where until you satisfy the first level you
aren’t moving up.
8
In fact, when we get to the IPS section, determining an investor’s ‘stage of life’ can be key to deciding what their
risk tolerance is.
12
www.gostudy.io
BPT is sub-optimal in a traditional sense because the portfolio is built with no thought to the
correlation between different asset classes. Still, the disciple of allocating in this way can help
investors stay calm and stick with their asset allocation strategy.
Put differently, it is easier to avoid making stupid irrational investment decisions (and therefore
avoiding catastrophic loss) when you know you can pay your rent next month.
13
www.gostudy.io
Want more notes? Get them plus a study app + mock exams
and more
www.gostudy.io
Questions?
Email vsowers@gostudy.io
14