Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
For the best results these poroperm cross-plots should be constructed for
clearly defined lithologies or reservoir zones. If a cross-plot is constructed
for a whole well with widely varying lithologies, the result is often a
disappointing cloud of data in which the individual trends are not
apparent. Figure 3.6 shows a poroperm cross-plot for a clean sandstone
and a carbonate.
3
4
It is clear from this figure that the permeability of the
sandstone is extremely well controlled by the porosity
(although usually there is more scatter than in this figure),
whereas the carbonate has a more diffuse cloud indicating
that porosity has an influence, but there are other major
factors controlling the permeability. In the case of
carbonates (and some volcanic rocks such as pumice),
there can exist high porosities that do not give rise to high
permeabilities because the connectivity of the vugs that
make up the pore spaces are poorly connected.
5
POROPERM
RELATIONSHIPS
Poroperm trends for different lithologies can be plotted together, and
form a map of poroperm relationships, as shown in Fig. 3.7.
7
8
=ݕ0.0474݁^0.327ݔ
1000
ܴ^2=0.3514
100
Permeability (mD)
10
0.1
0.01
0.001
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Porosity (%)
From the graph, the linear regression for the porosity and permeability
correlation is expressed as the trendline and the associated equations.
=ݕ0.0474݁^0.327ݔ
This is the exponential equation of the trendline on the graph. For any given
porosity value (x-axis) the permeability (y-axis) can be determined and vice
versa.
ܴ2=0.3514
The R squared value obtained from the graph is called the coefficient of
determination. This R2 value is a correlation coefficient that indicates how
well data fits into a statistical model; the model in this case being that
porosity uniformly increases or decreases with permeability. The R2 value
usually ranges from 0 to 1 with 0 being no correlation and 1 being perfect
correlation between model and data. The R2 value obtained is 0.3514 which
is less than 0.5 meaning that the correlation is weak / poor.
13
Nelson 1994, Ehrenberg and Nadeau 2005, Saunders et al., 2012)
EXAMPLE OF POROPERM
ANALYSIS
The Figure 3.10 shows a plot of permeability versus porosity
data obtained from a large number of samples of a
sandstone formation. Even though this formation is generally
considered very uniform and homogeneous, there is not a
specifically defined trendline between permeability and
porosity values. In this case, the relationship between
permeability and porosity is qualitative and is not directly or
indirectly quantitative in any way. It is possible to have very
high porosity without having any permeability at all, as in the
case of pumice stone (where the effective porosity is nearly
zero), clays, and shales.
14
15
16
The reverse of high permeability with a low porosity might also be true,
such as in micro-fractured carbonates. In spite of this fundamental lack
of correspondence between these two properties, there often can be
found a very useful correlation between them within one formation, as
shown in Figure 3.11
17
Figure 3.13 shows typical permeability and porosity trends for various
rock types. Such a relationship is very useful in the understanding of
fluid flow through porous media. Many correlations relating
permeability, porosity, pore size, specific surface area, irreducible
fluid saturation, and other variables have been made. Some of these
relationships are presented here for the sole purpose of enabling the
reader to form a reasonable understanding of the interrelation of the
rock properties in petroleum reservoirs.
SUMMARY
In summary, permeability:
• Depends upon porosity.
• Depends upon the connectivity of the flow paths in the rock.
• Depends, therefore, in a complex way upon the pore
geometry of the rock.
• Is a directional quantity that can be affected by
heterogeneous or directional properties of the pore
geometry.
19
PERMEABILITY
RELATIONSHIPS EQUATIONS
The complexity of the relationship between permeability and
pore geometry has resulted in much research. No
fundamental law linking the two has been found. Instead, we
have a plethora of empirical approximations for calculating
permeability, some of which are given in Table 3.2.
20
21
22
TUTORIAL
23
REFERENCES & ADDITIONAL
MATERIALS
• Ehrenberg, S and Nadeau, P. (2005). Sandstone vs. carbonate
petroleum reservoirs: A global perspective on porosity-depth and
porosity-permeability relationships. AAPG Bulletin, 89, 435-445.
• Saunders, L.J., Russel, R.A. and Crabb, D.P. (2012) The Coefficient
of Determination: What determines a useful R2 Statistic?
Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.53. 6830-6832.
24