Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
AND
POLICY
Edited by:
1
AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT AND POLICY
© OLATOMIDE W. OLOWA
TIMOTHY T. AWOYEMI (Ph.D)
ISBN 9788047102
2
Preface
Agricultural Development and Policy is a text borne out of the concern
to help students surmount the problems of non-availability of, or in-
accessibility to published materials and the rarity of scientific and
authoritative opinions on agricultural development and policy issues.
3
we prepare and recommend this text designed to make teaching more
meaningful and structure-conduct-performance of our Agriculture more
adapted to plans for modernization and accelerated growth.
The Editors
March, 2010.
4
CONTRIBUTORS
Ayodabo, Labaeka is a lecturer in the Department of Agricultural
Education, Federal College of Education (Technical) Akoka,
Lagos.
5
Sanyaolu,Adeniyi is a lecturer in the Department of Biological Sciences(Environmental
Biology Programme), Yaba College of Technology, Yaba, Lagos,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface
1. Meaning of Development and Growth
Ayodabo Labeaka-------------------------------
2. Livestock Policy in the National development Plan
A.Y.P. Ojelade-----------------------------------------
3. Problems of Livestock Production and Development in Nigeria.
E.O. Ibiyemi -------------------------------
4. Role of Government in the Development of Agriculture in Nigeria
John Issah Umaru----------------------------------------
5. Characteristics of Nigerian Agriculture.
Omowumi A. Olowa.---------------------------
6. Theories of Agricultural Development
Timothy T. Awoyemi (Ph.D)---------------------------------
7. Community Development Policy, Strategy and Models-
Olatomide W. Olowa --------------------------
6
A . Falade.---------------------------------------------------------
14. The Concept of Agricultural Fundamentalism as a Development
Policy.
O.W. Olowa.-------------------------------------------------------------------
7
MEANING OF DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH
LABAEKA, AYODABO
Highlights:
Introduction
Types of Development and Growth
Agricultural Development and Growth
Industrial Development and Growth
Educational Development and Growth.
Drive towards Development and Growth in Nigerian Economy
Revision Questions
Suggested further reading
Introduction
Development: Development generally means the improvement
of people’s life styles through improve education, Agricultural
development, incomes, skills development and employment.
Development also means that people should have decent
housing and that they should have security within those houses.
Development means too, that people should be able to read and
write and in Africa this is a problem as most people are still
illiterate. In order to develop or have better lives, people must
get a good education. Because illiterate people do not develop
as much as educated people do, it is therefore important that
people should get themselves a good education, or send their
children to school to get that education. The term development
has been used in variety of contexts, which imply social change,
evolution, progress, growth, modernization and advancement;
8
Fletcher (1974) says “development can mean the actualization of
an implicit potentiality”. Thus any change that promotes or
actualizes the physical health of the society represents
development.
9
examples during 1982 –86, agricultural production accounted for
over 40 percent of the GDP and rural activities absorbed over 60
percent of the nation’s labour force (Agbabiaje, 1988). With the
advent of crude oil, agriculture which was the nation’s foreign
exchange earning suffered severe neglect since the 1970, as a
result of which the nation started to import food and other
agricultural products that hitherto were produced in the country.
10
is adversely affected by environmental problem especially the
instability of rainfall. Incidence of pests and diseases, and low
soil fertility due to high population pressure.
11
In developing the agricultural sector within the Nigeria economic
there is a need to put in place the following strategies.
12
small-scale mechanical technologies that can serve the
needs of small-scale farmers. The development of on-farm
and off-farm storage system together with proper
disinfestations procedures for controlling storage pests will
reduce wastage on the farm, stabilize prices and encourage
farmers to venture into large scale farming. The cuts down
looses during storage, processing and transportation
ensures efficient distribution of farm produce and provide
the farmers with up-to-date market information. All these
assure the farmers of a dependable market where goods
can be sold at competitive prices and therefore encourage
the farmers to produce more.
13
farmers will be encouraged to invest more in agriculture, if
government could insure farmers up to certain percentage
of the average of their past yields. This will shift the major
risk in agricultural production from the farmers to the
government. Crops insurance instrument will ensure:-
a) Adequate and reliable food supplies.
b) Fair and reasonable producer income
c) Adoption of appropriate technology
d) Export of agricultural goods and
e) Development of the agricultural sector.
iv) Good and Stable Agricultural Policy:- Government of
Nigeria should provide the right incentives through
government policy reforms. This will help to overcome the
weakness in the agricultural sector of the economy.
Properly formulated agricultural policy, encourages foreign
exchange earning, provision of adequate food, provision of
raw materials for the country’s agro-allied industries, import
substitution, employment opportunities in the agricultural
sector, and consequently rapid development of the
agricultural sector within the Nigerian economy.
14
material producing area for Great Britain. Even at the eve or our
independent, there was virtually no effort to make industrialization a
national priority. The 1962 – 1968 National Development plan is
what can really be called the first national plan since it specified
target to be achieved. Government planned to invest 15% of the
GDP annually on the productive sector of the economy which was to
ensure an average growth rate of 4%. The commissioning of the
Kainji Dam and the Ughell Thermal plants marked the major
achievement of this plan by paving the way for the virtual
infrastructure needed for setting up of industries. An oil refinery, a
development Bank, a Mint and Security plant were established all of
which constituted a boost to the industrial take-off in Nigeria. For
the first time also trade and industry started receiving both the
Federal and Regional government attention. It should be noted
however that the attention was concentrated on large scale (Multi-
national) establishments to the utter neglect of small scale
enterprises, where existed the concentration of self-employed. Even
till this time, both the Federal and State Governments focused their
attention to the large scale companies.
Since the 1970s attention has shifted to the small and medium scale
industries in big way and was followed by the creation of financial
institutions to provide sources of institutional credit for Small and
Medium Scale Industries (SMES) e.g. Nigeria Industrial Bank (NIB),
Nigeria Bank for Commerce and Industry (NBIC), Nigeria Agricultural
and Cooperative Bank (NACB), people’s Bank, Community Banks and
15
so on. The Federal Government has since continued in its effort to
support small and Medium Scale Enterprises (MESs). Specialized
credit schemes were also set up to enhance the spread and
productive efficiency of small and Medium Scale Enterprises (SMEs).
Among such schemes are:-
a) The World Bank Assisted SME Schemes.
b) National Economic Reconstruction Fund (NERFUND).
c) The Export Stimulation Loan Scheme (ESLS).
d) The Rediscounting and Refinancing Facility (RRF).
16
The acquisition of relevant vocational technical and business skills is
generally regarded as one of the critical factors in the success of small,
micro and medium sized enterprises (SMME) especially in lifting them
from survivalist activities, to larger and better earning enterprises.
17
other sector of the economy will be equally affected and the Nigerian
economy may eventually die a natural death.
18
Revision Questions
19
Florence, O.A. (2004). Nigeria Educational Policy and
Entrepreneurship”. J. Soc. Sci. 9 (2): 75 – 83.
20
LIVESTOCK POLICY IN THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
BY
OJELADE, A. Y. P.
Department of Agricultural Education
Federal College of Education (Technical) Akoka,Lagos
Highlights
Introduction
Meaning and Scope of Livestock Production in Nigeria
Contribution of Livestock to Peasant Farmers
Problems and Strategies for improving Livestock Production in Nigeria
Functions and Objectives of Livestock Sub-sector in the National
Development Plan
Meaning of Livestock Policy
National Livestock Policy Objectives
The Importance of Policy Issues in Livestock Sub-Sectors
Policy Element and Processes in Livestock Sub-Sectors
Introduction
Nigeria’s agricultural policy is the synthesis of the framework and
action plans of government designed to achieve overall agricultural
growth and development. The policy aims at the attainment of self-
sustaining growth in all the sub-sector of agriculture and the structural
transformation necessary for the overall socio-economic development
of the country as well as the improvement in the quality of life of
Nigerians. Nigeria faces serious poverty challenges and it is estimated
21
that two-thirds of Nigerians now live below the poverty line of US$1 per
day, most of them in rural areas. Recognizing these challenges, the
Federal Government of Nigeria has identified investment in agriculture
and rural development as a major priority in the National Development
Plan.
In the past four years, various rural development strategies have been
formulated that offer a promising strategic direction to achieve poverty
reduction, food security, and accelerated economic development. Yet,
despite the articulation of these strategies and the commitment of
government to the broader framework of pro-poor rural development,
many complex issues remain to be resolved regarding the design;
implementation, and monitoring of the progress of the strategies as
they unfold. The National Development Plan provides an ideal for the
international community to support Nigeria’s effort to revitalize
agriculture as an engine for pro-poor growth and employment creation
in Nigeria. Livestock production is a sub-sector under agriculture that is
concerned with production of farm animal, such cattle, goat, sheep,
pig, poultry, rabbits, snail, fishes and their products. This chapter
discussed livestock policy in the National Development Plan.
22
(ii) Animal Nutrition.
(iii) Animal Physiology and Anatomy
(iv) Animal Breeding and Genetics
(v) Meat and By-product Processing, Preservation and Packaging.
(vi) Livestock Extension Service and Education.
(vii) Livestock Marketing; and
(viii) Animal Health.
23
commonly referred to as mixed farming is adjusted to be suitable for
peasant farmers i.e. crop-livestock integration. Animals like goat are
used for controlling bush encroachment through their destructive
eating habit.
By-product of livestock animals such as hides and skins, hooves, horns
are used as raw material by local industries for manufacturing of
leathers, button and gelatin, respectively. By-product of livestock
production such as bone meal, blood meal and tank age serve as
feedstuffs. Some farm animals supply labour on the farm such animals
include horse, donkey, oxen etc. These animals are either used for
drawing plough or as a means of transporting other farm produce from
one place to another.
24
meet with great failure as a result of differences in climatic
conditions.
2. Climatic Problem: The climate of Nigeria can be divided into:
(i) Tropical rain forest region
(ii) Savannah area and
(iii) Semi arid region. Each of these climatic zones has some
adverse
effect on livestock production and development.
The tropical rain forest even though contains adequate water and
feeding materials year round, is limited by the facts that it is conducive
for the multiplication of pest and disease organisms that destroy
livestock animals. For example, Tsetse fly which is a vector of
trypanosomiasis is prevalent in this zone of Nigeria. Also, the warmth
and humid conditions favours the development of Fungus, Bacteria and
other Pathogens.The Savannah area is limited by the fact that forage
availability is seasonal which expose the livestock to semi-starvations
during the dry season of the year. The animals thus have protracted
growth and take longer period to reach slaughter weight.The Semi arid
Region on the other hand is limited by both water and feed and
animals have to trek long distances in search of these vital and basic
needs of life.
3. System of Husbandry: The system of livestock husbandry that
is prevalent in Nigeria is extensive system of livestock management
and in the case of cattle and sheep; it is mostly in the hand of Fulani’s
which moves their stock in response to seasonal availability of grasses.
Under the extensive system of management grazing and watering of
animal pose a great problem. The animals depend mostly on the
natural grass land for the supply of required nutrients both for
maintenance and for production.
These grass species are mostly annual of very poor feeding quality and
is largely responsible for the poor performance of animals as measured
25
by growth rate and productivity. The poor condition of grassland is
further aggravated or compounded by the unusual drought which
occurs from time to time. The climatic conditions placed serious
limitations on both the quality and quantity of the available grazing to
the extents that most animals loose weight during period of scarcity
and some even die as a result of lack of adequate grazing pasture
lands.
4. Problems of Unreliable Data: Livestock census figures in
Nigeria have generally been based on various form of livestock
taxation figure or small sample count. The results have therefore been
variable and unreliable. The variation is even greater with other
species of livestock that are not subject to taxation and which are
uniformly distributed throughout the country. Nevertheless, adequate
statistics are required in order to be able to objectively assess the
present status and constructively plan for the future of livestock
development.
5. Feeding and Nutritional Problems: The problem of feeding is
one of the most serious one facing livestock farmers in the tropics.
Nutritional requirement for various classes of livestock have been well
documented in temperate region but little is known about the effect of
warm environment on nutrient requirement and utilization in the
tropics. The formulation of livestock ration in the tropics is therefore
based on the requirement data in the temperate region. The cost of
feeding is too high and has been estimated to account for more than
60% of the total cost of production.
6. Disease Problems: The tropical region to which Nigeria belong
is very conducive to pest and disease proliferation. The tropical rain
forest region of Nigeria is highly infested with tsetse fly vector of
Trypanosomiasis which almost makes cattle production impossible in
this region. Some other diseases like Rinder pest, foot and mouth
26
disease and pestesdepetit ruminae (PPR) are endemic to the tropical
countries of the world.
7. Marketing and Distribution: Most of the cattle, sheep and
goat that are produced in Nigeria are produced in the dry area of the
North. They are sold in urban areas of the South. Three types of
transportations are used such as trekking, trailers and rails. Movement
by trekking is slow, animals are exposed to disease and injury because
they trek for weeks also constitutes a severe constraint (limitation),
using trailers. is fast and reduces shrinkages losses but a lot of risk is
associated with it due mainly to frequent accident on the relatively
poor roads, bad driving habit by drivers and over-crowding coupled
with over-speeding.
27
prevalent in these areas. In Nigeria, land tenure by inheritance makes
it difficult to get large area of land.
11. Capital Problem: A lot of money is needed to build dam, roads
and to purchase foundation stock and to pay for personnel. This is
beyond the reach of most farmers in Nigeria. The loan facilities
available to farmers is limited due to the fact that the amount of
money that is voted for agriculture is small and further reduced for
livestock. Most of the farmers are not credit-worthy because of their
lack of collateral security.
28
of the country and how those systems are changing over time. It is
important to understand that expanding the output of one function
may double the output of another. There are several ways of
classifying livestock sector functions. The first step in the classification
process is to quantify the relative importance of different present
functions as a prelude to judging how much they may be disrupted by
new policy. However, two widely used classifications are
conventionalized in terms of:
(i) Kinds of output; and
(ii) Uses to which these outputs are put.
Among the kinds of outputs produce are: food (i.e. meat, milk, eggs);
inputs to croppy (i.e. manure and farm power in form of animal
traction); and raw materials (e.g. wool and skins to make other
goods).Among output uses are: subsistence consumption by the
livestock holder’s household; direct supply of inputs (e.g. tradition and
manure to crop production); cash income through sales of live animals
or their output; saving and investment through increasing the size and
quality of the herd; and social functions such as paying bride wealth,
helping destitute families by lending them livestock or providing
animals for communal feasts or sacrifices. Addis Anteneh et al (1988)
analyzed the relative importance of livestock sectors functions in the
sub-Saharan African. They reported the relative importance during the
late 1970’s of different kinds of outputs when these were calculated in
terms of monetary value. These authors reported that meat remains
the most valuable output accounting for 47% of the total of the meat,
beef accounts for 57%, and small ruminant meat for 22%. The second
most valuable output is animal traction accounting for 31%, milk, the
third most valuable output account for 15%. At the same time, regional
variation in terms of the relative contribution of output was noted.
Specifically, the functions of livestock sub-sectors include:
29
(i) Provision of balanced protein for human consumption in terms
of milk, meat and eggs.
(ii) Provision of horns, hooves for gelatin, comb, buttons, spoons,
handles etc, feed, manure and maggots for fish culture.
(iii) Provision of farm power for traction and transport.
(iv) Provision of feedstuffs for livestock e.g. bones meal, blood
meal, meat scraps and offal etc.
(v) Provision of employment for citizens.
(vi) For leisure and social entertainment.
The Specific Objectives of the Sub-Sector are:
1) To improve the nutritional status of Nigerians through the domestic
provision of high quality protein rich livestock products.
2) To make Nigerian self sufficient in the production of livestock.
3) To improve locally all necessary raw materials input for the
livestock industry.
4) To allow for a meaningful and efficient use of livestock by-product.
5) To improve and stabilize rural income emanating from livestock
production and processing.
6) To efficiently protect the rural livestock farmers from the
unpredictable changes and risks incidental to livestock production.
7) To provide rural employment opportunities through expanded
livestock production and processing.
8) To affect proper land use and maintenance of the ecological
system for expanded livestock production.
30
However, government does not intend to discourage anybody from
keeping animals of his own choice.
31
The word “policy is not a lightly defined concept but a highly flexible
one, used in different ways on different occasions. Webster’s
Dictionary has a number of closely related meanings. They are:
“A definite course or method of action selected (by government,
institution, group or individual) from among alternatives and in the
light of given conditions to guide and, usually to determine present
and future decision”.
“A specific decision or set of decisions designed to carry out such a
course of action”.
“Such a specific decision or set of decisions together with the related
action designed to implement them”.
“A projected programme consisting of desired objectives and the
means to achieve them”.
In English usage, policies are “made” and “implemented” in the same
way that decisions are made and implemented. Yet, it is possible to
have policies that are not or cannot be implemented, so that,
conceptually, action that implements policies need not necessarily be
part of policy itself. Although, a policy is a set of coherent decisions
with a common long-term purpose(s). When decisions are one-off,
incoherent or opportunistic, complaints are made that a government
“does not have a policy”. Government policies are often supported by
special legislation. The term “policy”, “plan”, “programme” and
“project” are progressively more specific in time and place. Policies are
usually national policies (not state or local government) and are not
normally limited in time: one does not usually speak in terms of 2-
years policies, as one does of 2-year programme or 5-year plans.
For the purpose of this chapter, livestock policy will be defined as:
“A coherent set of decisions with a common long-term objective(s)
affecting or relevant to the livestock sub-sector”.In the countries of
sub-Saharan Africa, livestock policy may mean either a complete
package of decisions covering all aspects of the livestock sub-sector or
32
a particular set of decisions dealing with a single aspect. Examples of
the former are the Livestock Policy of Tanzania (1983) and the National
Livestock Development Policy of Kenya (1980). Examples of the latter
are:
“Livestock-related land tenure policies, such as the Tribal Grazing Land
Policy of Botswana or the policies and related laws covering grazing
reserves in Nigeria or group ranches in Kenya”.
“Pricing policies, such as those embodied in the purchase prices
established by the Cold Storage Commission in Zimbabwe or the Meat
Commission in Kenya”.
Disease-control policies, as for foot-and-mouth-disease in
Bostwana,Zimbabwe and Kenya
National Livestock Policy Objectives
A key step in identifying the most important policy issues on which to
concentrate is to identify the government’s own policy objectives and
to gain some idea of the relative importance of each of these
objectives. While they are sometimes difficult to prioritize, a rough
ranking is both possible and essential if overall policy is to be effective
and not deflected by internal or external interest groups. Government
objectives for the livestock sub-sector are determined partly by an
overall political philosophy and partly through an assessment of the
direction and speed at which change in the current functions of the
sub-sector is desired. The terms in which governments state their
objectives vary in each country. However, most objectives can be
classified as falling into one of five broad groups:
independence objectives
economic efficiency objectives.
resource conservation objectives.
stability objectives.
33
equity objectives.
Independence Objectives
Independence objectives are concerned with obtaining and preserving
a satisfactory degree of political and economic autonomy.
Independence implies that a country neither depends on foreign aid to
meet the basic needs of its population nor is susceptible to external
political interference (the former is often linked to the latter). Meeting
the independence objective requires a high degree of self-reliance, in
the sense that a country will wish either to be entirely self-sufficient in
basic food commodities or to dispose of sufficient foreign exchange to
meet part of its demand through imports. “Self-sufficiency” in all basic
foodstuffs, meaning that the country produces domestically enough to
meet its entire demand, is sometimes advocated. But self-sufficiency
in this sense can involve very high costs if the country does not have
the natural or other resources to produce a particular food commodity
at low cost. It may be better to produce some other (e.g. non-food)
commodity for which it does have the appropriate resources and to sell
that to raise the foreign exchange to buy the food commodity.
Economic Efficiency
Economic efficiency objectives “Efficiency” are concerned with
increasing the level of real national income and its growth rate over
time. Economic efficiency is a very complex concept. Efficiency implies
that a country use existing, and generates new, technology to
minimize costs per unit of output, and seek a combination of outputs
consistent with its comparative advantage in the international market.
Efficiency will usually be closely related to the appropriateness of price
signals conveyed through the market mechanism. Government
intervention often distorts these signals, resulting in a mix-allocation of
resources within the economy. However, the market mechanism alone
34
will not necessarily lead to optimum long-term development. Carefully
thought out government interventions are often needed to ensure that
the conditions for long-term efficiency in livestock sub-sector are
fulfilled.
Resource Conservation Objectives
Resource conservation objectives are concerned with preserving the
natural resource base in order to ensure long-term efficiency and
independence. These objectives are of particular importance to
Nigerian livestock policy makers because of serious environmental
problems, such as overgrazing, often attributed to livestock.
Stability Objectives
Stability objectives are concerned with avoiding abrupt and large
changes in incomes, in the price and availability of domestically
produced basic commodities and inputs, and in the consequent need
for foreign exchange to buy essential imports. Since stability is rarely
secured without cost, absolute stability of prices and quantities should
not be the aim. Indeed, absolute price stability when production is
inherently unstable can worsen both supply problems and farmer
viability. Nor should food security be confused with self-sufficiency in
the production of all food types. Livestock markets, in particular, are
inherently unstable. As a result, livestock policy should be directed
towards achieving an adequate degree of stability.
Equity Objectives
Equity objectives are concerned with the fair distribution of income and
wealth within society. Important equity considerations in relation to
livestock include the distribution of income and assets among different
types of farms within and among regions, and the allocation of land
use rights between producers. The equity objective also concerns the
relative well-being of producers and consumers, the distribution of
purchasing power between different groups of consumers and the
35
availability of employment opportunities. The market process alone will
not normally lead to greater equity. Indeed, it may actually increase
inequity, especially when the status quo is already inequitable or when
economic power is becoming increasingly concentrated. Improving
equity is, ostensibly, considered essential to policy formulation.
36
Table1.1 The Performance of African’s livestock sub-sectors by
Total Output
Beef 1.5 2.7 2.7 0.9 0.2
All meat 2.5 3.9 1.7 1.8 1.3
Cow milk 3.1 1.5 1.3 3.7 3.0
Per Caput Consumption
Exports
Beef - - - - -
All meat -4.5 -22.2 -45.1 -14.3 -2.7
Source: ILCA (1993).
The causes of this poor performance are complex, and differ from
country to country. In general, four conditions are essential for
satisfactory progress in the livestock sub-sector:
(i) Adequate resources both physical (land, labour, good wealth)
and financial.
(ii) New technology to improve productivity.
(iii) Suitable institutions (for research, extension, marketing,
credit etc).
37
(iv) Appropriate policies, both in the economy as a whole and
in the livestock sub-sectors.
All or nearly all of the conditions have remained unfulfilled in most
countries of the region over the past two decades. This makes it
difficult to pinpoint exactly how important contributing factor poor
policies have been. Nevertheless, there is some evidence. A 1982
study of 30 livestock project is sub-Saharan Africa financed by a major
donor Over the previous 15 years showed that for more than 75
percent of the projects, policy issues external to them had been major
factors leading to poor performance. In addition, two arguments may
be adduced as follows;
(i) Policy issues and approaches tend to be very similar in the
livestock sub-sectors to those in other agricultural sub-sectors
(food and cash crops). There is now substantial body of evidence
to show that policies have been a major determinant of progress
or the lack of it in these other sub-sectors; it seem highly
probable that the same will be true for livestock.
(ii) An internal review by ILCA of the published evidence
throughout the world on the factors determining throughout
world on the factors determining progress in livestock production
indicated the every large influence of economics factors such as
prices (which are heavily influenced by policy) in comparison
with technology or other factors. What is time of the world in
general is possibly also time of Nigeria. In short, inappropriate
policy has not been the only cause of poor performance, but they
have been an important factor.
Policy Element and Processes in Livestock Sub-Sectors
When analyzing government policy, it is often helpful to distinguish
between two elements which are essential part of any policy. These
elements are:
38
(i) Policy Objections: These are the “end” of a policy and
reflect the overall purpose or long-term aim(s): (e.g. more beef
exports or farmer access to grazing land).
(ii) Policy Instruments: These are the “means” of a policy, the
action used to carry it out and the methods by which its
objectives are achieved (e.g. imports tariffs on dairy products or
a subsidy on an artificial insemination services). The distinction is
useful because the same objective can be served by several
alternative instruments. It is only by distinguishing between
objectives and instruments that one can begin to assess the
relative efficiency of different instruments. Conversely, a single
policy instrument may affect several policy objectives. For
example, an instrument used to raise dairy price will normally
welfare of the producers and consumers as the level of milk
production. In order to define the role of policy analysis, there is
the need to distinguish between two major policy processes.
These are:
(i) Policy Formulation: This is a process of considering
alternative policy option and deciding to implement one or
several of them.
(ii) Policy Implementation: This is a process of carrying out the
policy (or policies) decided on during the formulation stage.
39
the policy formulation stage, there is no point in proposing a policy
which is bound to be rejected for political reasons. Policy proposal will
not be accepted – and policies will not be effective, unless they have
the support of prominent politicians and interest groups. Policy
analysts must understand and take into account the concern of
politicians if viable policies are to be formulated. Politics and politicians
are in fact, central to policy issue and should not be viewed as
irritating side –issues, to be ignored whenever possible.
40
areas were established and five others were surveyed and
demarcated.
Under the national animal help programme about 4.5 million animals
were vaccinated against contagious Bovine pleuro - pneumonia
(CBPD).The various state governments embarked on the establishment
of various clinic investigating centre, control post and purchase of
equipment and drugs.
Major Area of Policy Emphasis
The major areas of policy emphasis of the government is to achieve
self sufficiency in poultry and pork production and substantial
improvement in the production of beef, sheep and goats as well as
encourage small scale livestock farmers all over the country. Others
are:
1. Establishment of large scale feed and livestock multiplication for the
production of parent stocks of poultry and pigs.
2. Subsidization of livestock inputs such as feeds, breeding stock drug,
and equipment etc. livestock producers.
3. Encouragement of private ranching of birds, sheep and goat through
the provision of improved pasture and fodder facilities for facilities for
the grazing. Improved breeding stock and settlement skills for the
nomadic herdsmen.
4. Intensification of veterinary and livestock production extension
services.
5. Provision of more intensive services -such as credit, processing,
storage and marketing facilities to stimulate increases in production.
6. Encouragement of livestock producer co-operative to be involved in
production, processing and market functions.
Under the beef production programme, the federal government would
make provision for the expansion of existing cattle ranching in the
country to accommodate a total of about 32,500 breeding stock by
1985. Four new ranches with a capacity of 60,000 heads of cattle
41
would also be established in different parts of the country for breeding
and fattening purposes. It was also planned that about 167,000 heads
of cattle would be breed and fattened in the cattle producing states
during the five year period. More livestock investigation and breeding
centre as well as artificial insemination centre and equipment will be
constructed and the existing ones be expanded to serve government
and private farms.
Diary Production
At state level attention will be focused on dairy production in 8 states
their activities would include establishment of new farm and
maintenance of the existing one. The new farm would be stocked with
about 2,292 improved local and exotic breeds with high milk yielding
traits. The offspring from these would also be located outside
government specifically directed at obtaining fresh milk from the local
herdsmen to be processed into pasteurized milk, ice cream, skim milk
and condensed milk.
At federal level branches at Kaduna and Minna diary farm would be
expanded in order to attain milk output of about 20,000 litres of milk
per plant annually; new breeds from each farm has a capacity of 600
litres e.g. Friesian cows would be established in four centres to provide
local source of raw materials for the dairy industry.
42
335,000 tons of supplementary feed were planned to be distributed at
state level, state efforts would be geared towards the establishment of
grazing reserves, production of supplementary feeds and settlement of
the nomadic herdsmen about 1,250,541 ha of new grazing reserves
would be established while the existing one would be maintained for
the supplementary feed programme. Feed mills would be established
to produce about 720,000 tonnes of feed annually while hay
production and forage improvement schemes would be undertaken.
Over 1 million ha of land had been earmarked for resettling the
nomadic herdsmen.
Poultry Production
The Federal Government programme on poultry included provision of
assistance to ten states for expansion of their hatcheries so as to
increase the national annual production of day old chicks to 5 million. A
poultry grand Poultry farming has also transformed from an
unorganized small scale business with low rate of return into a big
profitable industry operating on different scale throughout the country.
parent’s stock farm with a capacity of 20,000 layers would be
established in Jos to produce about 600,000 day old pullets annually.
Similarly, a grandparent farm with a capacity of 20,000 birds will be
established in Port Harcourt to provide 600,000 day old broilers parent
stock annually. Four satellite complexes would be established for
broilers and layers each possessing one parent stock and ten
commercial farms. To ensure readily available poultry and pigs feed
ingredient, the federal government would purchase large quantity of
grains and concentrates to be re-sold to the state to enable them
utilize a greater proportion of their feed capacities to support the
planned poultry and piggery deve1opment programme.The efforts of
local government were to supplement those of the various state
governments which will equally be geared towards the production of
43
more poultry products for the Nigeria markers. New poultry farms
would be established and existing ones expanded. Establishment of
poultry development centre, purchase and installation of feed mills and
incubators and the construction of feed stores would be pursued.
About 120 new poultry farm were to be established by LGA’s involved
in various poultry project.
Pig Production
Development activity were carried out in the Southern States where
efforts were directed towards the expansion of existing units and the
supply of breeding stock of existing units and the supply of breeding
stock to private farmers. The Federal Government planned to establish
two pigs breeding centre and special assistance would be provided to
ten states where pig production and consumption were widely
accepted to enable them execute their planned programme. The Minna
piggery would be re-activated to supply breeders to other parts of the
country, it would hold 1,300 sows to produce 15,000 gilt’s, meat and
bacons. Over 300 pure line sow and 30 boars parent stock would be
established. The Jebba piggery would produce about 150,000 sows
annually. It would have a pig farm feed processing, packaging and
marketing unit.
Sheep and Goat Production
The Federal Government planned centre would be established while
the existing centre at Tuma and Ladnaun would be expanded. The
centre would appropriate sheep and goat husbandry method for
maximum meat production. This programme would involve pasture
development, introduction of better management practice and superior
breed. The commercial ranges each will have a stock of 500 improved
sheep, goats units each. Exotic breed would be imported to cross-
breed the local breed for better quality meat or faster attainment of
slaughter weight while 2,100 hectares of land would be developed for
pastures.
44
Rabbit Production
Eight states had programmes for rabbit production to its advantage as
a prolific breeder and cheap source of animal protein, rabbit production
is giving more attention by a larger number of states during the
planned period than what obtained previously. Breeding, multiplication
and demonstration centres would be established in various locations to
produce more than 90,000 breeders annually for distribution to
interested farmers. In some states, rabbit production would be
established in farm centres under the animal production schemes for
demonstration purposes to indigenes.
Veterinary Services
At L. G. Level, the veterinary services programme includes campaign
aimed at the eradication of contagious bovine plueroneumonia (CBPP).
They would be increased from 40 - 60% of exposed cattle population
during the planned period under animal health programmes. Control of
other Bovine diseases including anthrax, Hermorahagic, black quarter
and Rinderpest would be undertaking. Feasibility study on foot and
mouth diseases control would also be carried out, about 3 - 5 million
small ruminants would be vaccinated against pleuroenthrities and
control measures for both external and internal parasite would be
undertaking. A compulsory vaccination would be administered against
new castle, fowl pox and fowls typhoid disease in poultry.
Quarantine Services
Facilities would be expanded at three international airports while new
ones would be established along Nigerian boarders; inter-state cattle
control posts and a holding centre. Due to the incidence of loses
caused by pests; a permanent control team would continue to be made
available on tsetse fly control through the various on going projects.
“Persistent insecticides would be applied on Glossina spp at their
resting places by the ground spay unit. Three new units will be
45
established in the middle belt and southern states to increase the total
number to eight and each will cover 1,500km annually.
The units would carry out spraying operation and protective measure
around ranches. Trypanosomiasis and tsetse survey would be
conducted in reclaimed area and in the southern part of the country. At
the state level, veterinary service would be given prominent attention.
The major programmes to be executed include, the construction of
about 115 veterinary clinics/sub-clinics and diagnostic laboratories
hospital complexes, rural treatment centre and control post and the
purchase of 17 mobile clinics. Attention would be given to massive
vaccination for protection against CBPP would be undertaken at Local
Government level, about 230 veterinary clinics and veterinary centres
and control post and cattle diseases would be constructed in strategic
areas. Stock routes would also be demarcated in a few states.
Fish Production
The development and modernization of the means of fishing,
processing, storage, marketing etc. by the adoption of improved
technology and management practices. The promotion of export trade
in shrimps, crabs, oysters, periwinkles, turtles etc. The improvement of
the quality of life in fishing villages through the provision of fisheries
infrastructure and basic utilities such as portable water, schools,
electricity, health centres, roads, market etc. The provision and
improvement of employment opportunities in the rural areas by
engaging the rural population and school leavers gainfully in fisheries
and ancillary functions. The acceleration of research on all aspects of
fisheries with a view to determining the potentials and parameters for
development and management. Consolidation and improvement in
existing training programmes designed for the development of the
manpower requirement to help meet the fish production target. The
promotion of fisheries curricula in the nation’s institution of higher
46
learning, ensuring the proper utilization of all agro-industrial by-
products of crops and animal residues which are found to be suitable
for cultivable fish species.
47
7. Discuss the major problems that militate against livestock
production in Nigeria
8. Discuss in details the contribution of livestock to peasant farmers
in Nigeria
9. State the six major livestock policy emphasis as contain in the
National Development Plan.
10. Discuss the following fields of livestock production with reference
to livestock policy in the National Development Plan:
(a) Diary production (b) Poultry production (c) Pig production (d) Sheep
and goat production (e) Rabbit production and (f) Fish production
11. What consideration does livestock policy gives to :
(a) Veterinary service (b) Quarantine service and (c) Grazing reserve,
Pasture development and Supplement feedstuff scheme.
12. Discuss livestock policy with reference to National Development
Plan .
13. In a broad sense, state the objective of new Nigeria livestock
policy .
14. Explain the key features of the new livestock policy in the National
Development Plan.
15. List the major content of livestock policy framework.
16. What are the new government policy direction for livestock
production ?
17. Critically discuss the roles of the following stakeholders in the new
livestock policy:
(a) Federal Government (b) State Government (c) Local Government
and (d) Private sector
18. Discuss the key livestock development support and service
programme of the Federal Government
19. Define and explain the term ‘Policy’ as it relate to livestock
production in Nigeria
20. Differentiate between ‘Policy objectives’ and ‘Policy instrument’
48
21. Explain what you understand by Policy processes.
22. Write notes on the following:
(a) Independence objectives (b) Economic efficiency objective (c)
Resource conservation objectives (d) Stability objectives and (e) Equity
objectives
49
(International Livestock Centre for Africa) Addis Ababa Ethiopia,
22 pp.
7. Sulter, J.W (1987) Cattle and inequality: herd size difference and
pastoral production among the Fulani’s of the north eastern
Senegal., Africa 57 (2)
50
ROLE OF AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION IN NIGERIAN
AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT.
AJIBADE A.S
Highlights:
Introduction
Revision Questions
INTRODUCTION
and animals for food and for sale. Before independent, agriculture was
51
raw materials for agro-based industries and export and earning a
the Niger Delta in the early sixties led to a shift from agriculture to
such effects is the pressure on the food sub sector to import food for
economy.
materials for export. Any effort made in this direction must involve the
who reside there can accept modernization and civilization. It has been
52
Modernization of agriculture must be rooted in an increase in the
living and uplifting the social and educational standard of rural life.
the farmers.
53
includes the additional functions of input supply and agric services.
management and decision making skills and also assist rural people in
own problems.
54
vein extension was used in connection with agriculture in the United
with the passing of Smith Lever Act in that same year the term came
to be used mainly for the non formal education for the farming
of introducing new crops from outside the country and for collecting
become an extension officer who had not done basic research nor
African Institute for Oil Palm Research (WIFOR) and the Cocoa
55
Research Institute (CRIN) also came on board. Up to independence,
cattle and expansion of cocoa, oil palm and groundnut. The major
the years beginning with the Ashby report of 1959. It was also further
emphasized that there was the need to train more extension agents
56
particularly the intermediate grade with the likely expansion of food
and cash crops and to meet the needs of the private sector.
new crops and/or even new farming systems. This process is the
1997).
57
uplifted, a functional agricultural extension must be provided. It is only
DEVELOPMENT
the high level of illiteracy among the farming population and liberate
how to use them. It enables the farmers specify their own needs
1983).
58
- Extension provides the link between farmers and
59
a variety of communication and training methods, encouraging
60
provides knowledge of pricing policies, use of standard weight,
information help farmers sell and get a good price for their
1984).
61
food to eat and other produce to sell and make money and
auxiliary programmes.
tradition bound and afraid to take risks that will involve them in
great financial loss. They will only accept and use an innovation
62
done involves developing the minds of people so that they can
This may account for the reason why many farmers have not
63
• Uncoordinated efforts by government agencies may lead to
of information to farmers.
do their work are grossly inadequate. The agents may also not
64
• Inadequate funding. This affects extension agent in his training
workers.
programmes
65
• Lack of supporting services. Extension services in developed
66
- Transformation of research findings into agricultural media
device;
67
make farmers develop interest and confidence in programmes
initiated by government.
required.
• Recruit and train subject matter specialist who can pass the
them to administration.
68
REVISION QUESTIONS
development in Nigeria.
Akande J.O and Osuntogan O.A (2000) Illiteracy Eradication among the
Nigerian farmers for Sustainable Agricultural Development;
Implications for Promoting Adult Education – International Journal
of Continuing and Non – Formal Education 1(1) pp 80 – 88
69
Mannder A.H (1973) Agricultural Extension: a reference manual
(abridge edition) Rome. Food and Agricultural Organization of the
United Nations
Saito, KA. And Weidman C.J (1990) Agricultural Extension for Women
Farmers. Washington D.C. World Bank discussion papers 103 PP 1-
3
OLADIPO, A.S.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION’
FEDERAL COLLEGE OF EDUCATION (TECH.), AKOKA
Highlights.
-Introduction
-Historical survey
-Present day agricultural policy
-Objectives of agricultural policy
-Features of agricultural policy
70
-Development programs in agricultural policy
-Revision Questions
Introduction
The rate of agricultural development in Nigeria has always been hinged
on the rate of development of the country’s agricultural technology.
Interestingly, since the country’s independence, her agricultural
development has undergone significant fundamental changes and
evolutionary processes that have not improved the sector’s
performance. These changes have been manifested in the significant
shift in emphasis from commercial agriculture in food crop production
(for domestic consumption) and tree crop production (for domestic)
during the early 1960s to food importation starting from late 1970s.
Development economists have always put the blame for this shift in
emphasis on the emergence of petroleum as the chief source of
foreign exchange for the country, and government’s resulting neglect
of the agriculture sector. Within the same period of time, the effect of
new and improved agricultural technologies that, in other countries,
had led to a green revolution has been negligible in Nigeria. Viewed in
retrospect, Nigeria’s agricultural development up to date can be seen
to have evolved in three distinct phases. The first phase covered the
colonial period (1914 – 1959) and the first post independence decade
(1960 – 1969); the second phase spanned the period 1970 – 1984; and
the third phase started from 1985 and has continued to our present
day.
HISTORICAL SURVEY
FIRST PHASE ERA: During the first phase, agricultural
development was almost entirely in the hands of millions of
private sector small scale farmers with minimum direct
government intervention in agriculture. Government support for
71
these farmers has, at the time, largely regional in scope and
character and came in the form of regional government enacting
policies and establishing institutions for research, extension and
crop export/marketing. The federal government contributed only
through agricultural research support. The attitude of
government during that first phase was regarded as a residual
sector in the economy. However, the sector performed well then,
and did not attract any government undue interference up till
1960 after which some regional government established farm
settlement scheme as a way of modernizing agriculture. Soon
after the country’s independence in the 1960, there appeared
sign that the agriculture sector was running into some difficulty.
Such signs included declining export crop production and food
shortage that were at first non-alarming. These signs were, at
the time largely believed to be transitory especially given the
Nigeria civil war that soon provided an acceptable excuse for
poor agricultural performance.
72
to tactfully withdraw from agriculture and leave the plaguing
problem on the sector to the farmers. These began the neglect
of the sector from the 1970’s. Later average attempts by
government through enacting generally ineffective and
unimplemented macro and micro policies did not help the
situation.
73
informed that SAP would provide the best basis for attaining self-
sufficiency food and raw material through increased domestic
production resulting in increased farm incomes of the rural poor.
Unfortunately, the structural adjustment program was not
allowed to run its full course before it was unwittingly terminated
by the Abacha regime. They left the agricultural sector high and
dry such that initial benefit like increased agricultural output,
higher agricultural produce prices, and reduced food prices for
consumers that has started showing quickly turned into hardship
for the ordinary farmers. Many of the farmer laudable policies
and programs that have been put in place to support agricultural
development were abandoned.
74
• agricultural research policy which concerned the
provision of institutional mechanism for coordinating
research and extension nationally,
• agricultural extension and technology transfer policy
which eradicated the former practice of state-based
agricultural extension and instituted a new country-wide
extension system in which extension personnel were
deployed to specific national programs and projects in
order to facilitate the adoption of new technologies by
farmers,
• agricultural mechanization policy which encouraged the
operation of tractor hiring units by state and substituted
the use of some appropriate forms of mechanical power
for human labour,
• agricultural cooperatives policy which mobilized rural
people for social and economic development through
membership in agriculture cooperatives,
• water resources and irrigation which established eleven
River Basin Development Authorities in 1977 with the
overriding responsibility for developing land and water
resources in the country for agriculture,
• establishment of government – owned companies in the
1970s for producing oil palm, cocoa, grains, roots and
tubers, fish, livestock, etc and
• launching of operation feed the nation (1976 – 1979) and
Green revolution programs (1980 – 1983) to spearhead
increase food production in the country.
75
The last agricultural policy document that was produced, adopted
and launched by the Babangida administration in 1988 for a
fifteen year implementation span has remained in the shelves of
officials of the federal ministry of agriculture without being used
as the agricultural development guide it is intended to be.
Administration after administration since Babangida has ignored
the policy document and the programs and strategies
recommended for achieving the stated policy objectives.
76
to year 2000.The new agricultural Policy came in 2001 during
Obasanjo regime.
77
vii) Establishment of appropriate institution and creation of
administrative organs to facilitate the integrated
development and realization of the country’s agricultural
potentials.
78
iv) Water Management:- The objective is shift to
development of small dams as a more cost effective way
of utilizing water resources for irrigation in the country.
The maintenance of the existing large dams will continue
to be the responsibility of the Federal Government.
Moreover, rain harvesting for irrigation, is to be promoted
where surface and underground water is not readily
available.
v) Adaptive Technology:- This is geared toward
improving the efficiency of production, a simple labour
and cost saving devices that are appropriate for the
current level of agricultural production and processing in
the country will be developed and mass produced. The
National Centre for Agricultural Mechanization (NCAM),
established for the purpose will be strengthened with
animal traction and hand tools technology development
encouraged.
vi) Agricultural Development Fund:- This is to provide
the necessary impetus for the sustainable development
of the agricultural sector with emphasis on all facets of
agricultural research, market development, extension
delivery, long-term credit, rural institutions development
and enterprise promotion.
Revisions Questions
1) Briefly trace the phases of agricultural
development’s policy in Nigeria.
79
2) Distinguish the essential features that differentiate
the respect levels.
3) Discuss the solutions to the neglect of agricultural
sector by the government in the second phase era.
4) What re the differences in the declaration made
between 1982 to 1986.
5) Enumerate the policies and programs to support
agricultural development that were abandoned.
6) What are the benefits of Agricultural Technology
Policy to National Development?
7) What are the benefits of the Agricultural
Development Programme (ADP) to the Agricultural
sector?
8) Discuss briefly the areas cover by the policy of
Agricultural Development.
9) How would the Development Programs revive
Agricultural Production?
80
Institute od social and Economic research (NISER), ibadan,
Nigeria.
81
PROBLEMS OF LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT IN
NIGERIA
IBIYEMI, E.O.
FEDERAL COLLEGE OF EDUCATION (TECHNICAL), AKOKA,
LAGOS.
Highlights:
• Introduction
• Problems of Livestock Production in Nigeria and Suggested
Solutions
• Review Questions
• Further Reading
INTRODUCTION
Since livestock are kept for their products, good husbandry demands
that they are cared for in such a manner that they will produce to the
highest possible level with the management available. This means
that the housing and feeds should be those that will provide for
optimum production. This in turn has necessitated sound knowledge
on basic principles and practices of livestock production so as to
achieve and maintain higher levels of productivity.
82
Many factors are responsible for low livestock production in Nigeria
that is characterized by poor weight gain of the animals, low
productivity of meat, eggs and milk and poor reproductive ability.
These factors include:
83
livestock have been well documented in the temperate
regions when compared to the tropical regions (developing
nations). Formulation of livestock ration is therefore based on
the nutrient requirement data from these regions
(temperate). Also, little work is done on the incor[poration of
locally available agricultural and industrial by-products into
livestock ration. There may also be the problem of
adulteration of feed by feed millers. The compounded feed is
very expensive and some of the ingredients used are difficult
to be sourced for. There is also the problem of grazing and
watering especially for ruminant animals. The animals
depend mostly on the natural grassland for the supply of
required nutrients for maintenance and production. The grass
species are mostly annuals of very poor feeding quality. This
low feeding quality is largely responsible for the poor
performance of the animals as measured by growth and
productivity. The poor condition of the grassland is further
aggravated by the unusal droughts, which occur from time to
time. The climatic conditions also place serious limitations on
both the quality and quantity of available grasses to the
extent that most animals lose weight during periods of
scarcity and some even die as a result of inadequate grazing.
Solution:
(i) Feeds should be compounded based on the nutrient
requirements of different classes of livestock in the tropics.
(ii) Locally available agricultural and industrial by-products should
be incorporated into livestock ration as substitute to
conventional feeds ingredients.
(iii) Well formulated and unadulterated concentrate feed should be
fed to farm animals to ensure increased production.
84
(iv) Establish and maintain a pasture.
(v) Government should also provide adequate grassland for farmers.
4. High Incidence of Diseases, Pests and Parasites:- There is
a high prevalence of infectious and parasitic diseases that affect
livestock resulting in their low productivity. Diseases such as
rinderpest and trypanosomiasis affect ruminant livestock while
Newcastle disease of poultry can wipe out the whole flock. The
nomadic system also offers opportunities for the spread of contagious
diseases such as rinderpest, contagious bovine pleuropneumonia
(CBPP), anthrax and foot and mouth disease (FMD).
Solution:
(i) Vaccination programme against diseases should be embarked
upon by the farmers. They must not skip any vaccination
schedule.
(ii) Ensure good sanitation and maintain hygienic conditions on the
farm.
(iii) The farmers should adopt an appropriate control measure
whenever there is an occurrence of pests and diseases.
(iv) The farmers should use animals that are tolerant to pests,
parasites and diseases.
(v) Effort should be geared towards the control and total eradication
of deadly diseases of livestock.
(vi) More vaccines production centers should be sited in the country
by the government.
(v) Manufacturers of drugs and vaccines from abroad should be
encouraged to site their manufacturing industries in Nigeria.
85
sale. Different means of transportation employed include
trekking and by trucks. The deplorable road condition in Nigeria
hinders transportation of livestock and products to the market.
This causes delay in arrival of the products to the market and at
times leads to wastage. Vehicles are also inadequate for use,
and when available, they may be in bad condition. Cost of
transportation is high, thus leading to high cost of production and
selling price, which eventually result into low demand of products
and consequently low profit margin.
Solution:
(1) Government should rehabilitate existing roads and construct new
ones linking the rural areas to the urban centers (i.e. the farm to
the market).
(ii) Spare parts must be readily available for the regular servicing
and maintenance of vehicles used in transportation of farm
produce.
(iii) More agro-based industries that use livestock products, as raw
materials should be sited so that livestock farmers will be rest
assured of immediate market for their products. This will
generate more employment opportunities and encourage many
people to invest in livestock production.
86
working together to ensure that the production, marketing and
distribution system operate efficiently. There is acute shortage
of qualified personnel and underutilization of qualified manpower
at all levels of livestock production in Nigeria.
Solution:
(i) More qualified personnel should be trained in our higher
institutions and research institutes.
(ii) Incentives should be given in form of scholarships to
encourage would-be animal scientists and veterinarians.
Solution:
(i) Government should provide adequate land for farmers to
practice.
(ii) The land use act should be well implemented so that individuals
will have access to land easily.
87
adequately with daily expenses on the farm. Would-be farmers
are also hindered due to inadequate capital, since livestock
production is highly capital intensive. The risk that is involved
hinder banks from granting loans to livestock farmers. High
interest rate charged by banks also discourage farmers from
requesting for loans.
Solution:
(i) Farmers should form cooperative society in other to pool
resources together for the benefit of members and to gain better
attention of banks and other credit-lending agencies.
(ii) Granting of loans /credit facilities to farmers with reduced
interest rate.
(iii) Farmers can also borrow money from friends, relatives and
money lenders.
Solution
(i) More extension workers must be trained and given adequate
incentives to be able to go to the farmers and demonstrate new
innovations and disseminate research findings to them promptly.
88
(ii) Seminars, workshops, summit and conferences can be organized
for farmers in collaboration with universities and research
institutes.
(iii) Government must adequately fund universities and research
institutes.
(iv) Livestock programmes can be sponsored on radio, television and
print media by individuals, government and non-governmental
organizations.
Solutions:
(i) Animal breeding programmes such as crossbreeding, upgrading
etc should be well planned and organized by animal breeders.
(ii) Government should support this programme by providing the
necessary facilities and funds.
Solution:
(i) Government should ensure the provision of these facilities in
all areas in Nigeria.
89
(ii) The farmers should construct boreholes and purchase
generator for use on the farm.
(iii) The Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM) should be
made readily affordable by the government.
Solution:
(i) Government must ensure political stability and prevent
unnecessary heat up of the polity in the country.
(ii) There must be commitment on the part of the government to
implement formulated policies concerning livestock
production.
90
(iii) Corrupt individuals who embezzle funds must be dealt with in
accordance with the law of the land.
Solution:
(i) Literacy programme (training) in livestock production should
be organized for the farmers.
(ii) They should be encouraged to attend seminars, workshops,
summit and conferences in livestock production.
91
Solution:
(i) Livestock should be kept at temperature and relative humity
optimum for production and avoidance of heat stress.
(ii) Consider the climatic condition of the place before embarking
on rearing a particular livestock because rainfall in particular
determines the vegetation types found in different parts of
Nigeria, which in turn determine the types of livestock that
can be raised in the different ecological zones. Much animal
rearing does not take place in heavy rainfall areas because of
high humidity and tsetse fly infestation.
(iii) Provide adequate ventilation for the comfort of farm animals.
REVISION QUESTIONS
1(a) List and explain ten (10) problems of livestock production in
Nigeria. (b) Suggest two (2) possible solutions to each problem.
3. Discuss ten (10) factors that are responsible for low livestock
production in Nigeria and suggest two (2) possible solutions to
each.
92
THEORIES OF GROWTH AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
T.T. AWOYEMI
Highlights:
• The Distinctions between Growth and Development
• Theories of Growth and Development
- The classical and New-Classical Theory
- The basic Resource Theory
- Internal combustion Theory
- The Dual Economy Theory
- The Export-led growth Theory
- The Urban Industrial Impact Theory
- The High Input pay off Theory
- Diffusion Theory of Rural Development
- Induced Development Theory.
93
• The contribution of the Theories to Agricultural Development.
• Revisions Questions.
Introduction
This Chapter draws extensively on the work of Essang (1975) on
Growth Models and Rural Development. In this chapter we shall
undertake a brief review of some of the economic growth theories
which are used to explain the process of economic and rural
development in the less developed world. The primary objective of
this review is to assess the extent to which these theories throw light
on the rural development problems faced by policy makers in the less
developed countries. Before discussing these models, however, it is
essential that we clarify the distinction between economic growth and
economic development since much of the confusion in academic
discussion and policy making circles is due, in a large measure, to the
failure to make a clear distinction between these concepts.
94
to sustained and cumulative growth. As such, it is a much broader
concept than economic growth.
95
• Increasing in population leading to decrease per capital income
• Export promotion drive to stimulate back exportation of
agricultural product.
Manifestations of Development:
• Infrastructural development and distribution
• Increase awareness of poverty reduction measures
• Some welfare indicators e.g. health facilities, electricity, access
to good motorable roads, availability of portable water etc.
• Quality initiatives foster even an equitable distribution of income.
The general awareness that income should be equitably
distributed is a mark of development.
• Appropriate records of factors production through market
liberalization for their worth.
• When productivity is matched with earning.
96
Nigeria where out-migration of labour and capital from agriculture is
usually attributed to much lower returns to these factors of production
in rural than in urban investments. Nevertheless, the model has a
number of limitations. First, it ignores the importance of improved
quality of labour as a factor in economic development. Yet it is a well
known fact that in both the developed and the less developed
countries, agricultural and economic development is positively related
to the quality of the labour force. Second, the model ignores the role
of communities services and infrastructure which by generating
external economics, account for high rates of return to capital
investments. Third, the classical and the non-classical model places an
exaggerated emphasis on factor and input prices as a determinant of
investment and growth, thereby ignoring the role of institutional and
organizational arrangements. Even if the prices of input and output
were to give perfectly accurate signals to entrepreneurs, it would still
be necessary to devise appropriate institutional frame work to facilitate
the mobility of resources and raise the incentives of entrepreneurs and
other productive factors. In practice, owing to market imperfection the
present of externalities and the magnitude of development efforts,
planning and organization are essential not only for resource
mobilization, but also for allocation of the resources in the interest of
greater efficiency and equity. Finally, the classical and neo-classical
model ignores the crucial role of technology which, by shifting the
production function to the right, tends to reduce cost and increase the
rate of return to capital investment.
The Basic Resource Theory: The basic resource theory states that
economic growth depends on (a) the presence, (b) the quality, and (c)
magnitude of basic natural resources within particular areas or
economic regions. The development of these resources attracts
97
investment capital to these areas, and increases income and
employment.
98
Another limitation of the basic resource theory is that it does not
sufficiently emphasize the operation of diminishing returns. This
failure is unfortunate since most natural resources are characterized
by diminishing returns to labour or capital in the face of rapid
population growth and essentially static production technology.
Besides, in many countries, the exploitation of basic resources is
undertaken without regulation and with no thought of conservation – a
circumstance which intensifies the operation of diminishing returns.
The third limitation of the basic resource theory is its abstraction from
technological change. In practice, the role of natural resources in
promoting development is a function of technological change. For
instance, much of the impact of petroleum production on economic
development owes a lot to petroleum technology, geology and
hydrology. The use of water for hydro electric power is purely a
function of technology – developments in the areas of hydro-statics
and dynamics. Similarly, the dramatic expansion in agricultural
exports is made possible by technological developments which reduce
transport cost and widens export market possibilities.
99
As a description of historical experience, the internal combustion
theory has several short-comings, however. It is only in exceptional
circumstances that, in the absence of basic resources, appreciable
economic growth occurs purely as a consequence of internal
processes. What usually happens in practice is that in the attempt to
exploit basic resources, entrepreneurs are compelled to become
creative and inventive. For example, in countries with plentiful supply
of land, the attempt to use the land fully encounters a bottleneck by
way of labour scarcity and high wages. To break this bottleneck,
entrepreneurs produce labour saving technology. It need not be
stressed that apability without opportunities is of little account.
Certain economies may have people of inborn entrepreneurial and
technological capacity. But these talents will avail nothing unless
opportunities for exercising them are available. A brilliant farm
manager will remain ineffective and unable to contribute to
development unless there is adequate land for commercial farming in
the region. Moreover, world economic history shows that though
internal forces are important, they are not always crucial. On the other
hand, external forces tend to exert a critical influence on the pace of
development. Among such forces are the emergence of foreign
demand for the products of the developing country, the influence of
externally created technological ability, government intervention which
comes outside the economic systems and industrial and technological
revolution. In any case, countries are so increasingly influenced by
external forces that development in any part of them cannot proceed
in isolation from external influences. This fact is acknowledged by the
external combustion theory according to which economic development
owes a lot of external influences.
The Dual Economy Theory: In the dual economy theory typical less
developed country is characterized by the existence of two distinct
100
sectors, namely, the modern sector and the subsistence (rural) sector.
While the modern sector is market oriented and uses considerable
capital equipments and technology, the subsistence sector produces
for family consumption and relies on non-purchased inputs such as
family labour and land for production. Unlike the modern sector, the
subsistence sector is characterized by absence of savings and capital
formation – a circumstance which, along with the virtual absence of
technology, largely explains why the productivity of labour is very low
and why resources are underutilized in this sector.
Given the above characteristics of the two sectors, the authors of the
dual economy theories had no difficulty in prescribing what to them
the most appropriate development strategy was. This strategy
consisted in concentration of resources from the subsistence sector for
this purpose. It was believed that this strategy would ensure
cumulative growth of incomes, employment and rapid structural
transformation of the underdeveloped economies. Indeed, Ranis and
Fei were at pains to emphasize that as development proceeded in the
modern sector, a time would arrive when surplus labour would cease to
exist in the subsistence sector. At this point, government was to
undertake measures to raise labour productivity in the subsistence
sector in an effort to prevent inflationary prices of farm products from
putting a damper on the process of industrialization of the urban areas.
101
There are no countries where the agricultural (subsistence) sector is
characterized to the small and fast growing industrial sector, the
savings and capital formation in the rural sector is quite small. But this
is not to say that there are no savings and capital formation. Second,
the authors of these theories have a very narrow conception of
development which they view as a process of concentrating resources
on already developed areas. As the experience of most developing
countries shows, such a strategy does not lead to development. This is
because the resulting neglect of the rural areas where the vast
majority of the population live crease a situation where food and raw
material shortages and low income and inflation of food prices
adversely affect both demand and cost structure and therefore impede
the process of industrial development. In addition, the concentration
of efforts on the dynamic sector in line with the prescriptions of the
dual economy models causes a gap in the earnings of urban and rural
resources and contributes to the outflow of the capital and labour
resources from the rural to the urban areas. The effect of all this is
massive unemployment in urban areas, tremendous demand for urban
social services and the diversion of scarce funds from productive
investments to the provision of costly social services. Third, the dual
economy theories assign a very restricted role to agriculture. In the
opinion of the authors of these models the role of agriculture is to
serve the ends of industrialization via the provision of cheap food,
cheap raw materials, and the release of labour and other resources. It
is not realized that a strategy of cheap food, cheap raw materials and
cheap labour has adverse effects on rural purchasing power and can
seriously undermine the capacity of agriculture to play the very limited
role prescribed for it. Fourth, the theories generally mislead policy
makers in the underdeveloped countries by emphasizing and even
exaggerating the capacity of urban industries for cumulative growth.
This emphasis rests on assumptions regarding entrepreneurial ability
102
of urban industrialists, the capacity of urban industrialists for savings
and investments of profits and the availability of worthwhile and
profitable investments projects in the urban areas of the
underdeveloped countries. However, the development experience of
most less developed countries bears ample testimony to (i) the
scarcity of real entrepreneurial talents in these countries (ii) the
inability of most urban industries to make substantial profits despite
their monopoly of the domestic markets (iii) the very small value
added in a number of manufacturing industries (iv) the tendency for
most of the profits to be sent away as dividends to foreign share
holders and (v) the failure of industries to train a sizeable number of
local skills and generate employment. Faced with this disappointing
record, policy makers in the less developed nations are now
employment in their economies. To carry out this task, what they need
is a model which accords a role to rural development in its own right
and not as an appendage of industrial development.
103
The export-led growth theory pretty well explains the process of
economic development in many African and Latin American countries,
at least in the early stages. In West Africa, economic growth was
closely associated with expansion of agricultural exports until the
middle of the sixties when petroleum assumed a dominant role in
Nigeria. Despite the oil boom, the Nigerian governments are alive to
the close association of agricultural exports with farm incomes and
employment in many Nigerian states. Accordingly agricultural strategy
still emphasizes export expansion in the country – in line with the
prescriptions of the export-led growth model.
104
land and rural labour. At present, if one were to be guided solely by
the rate of return criterion, there is no doubt that almost all the
investments in agricultural would be export oriented. But such a
strategy would worsen the land situation, aggravate inflationary
pressure and foster a risky reliance on imports. Further, the theory
offers no guide in an increasingly industrialized economy where there
is competition for agricultural raw materials between export market
and domestic agro-allied industries. As Nigerian policy makers have
since learnt, this competition places he decision makers are the fact a
dilemma. If the raw materials such as cotton, groundnuts and …….
Sold at world market prices, the country may achieve foreign exchange
increases at the cost of stifling the growth of domestic agro-allied
industries. If, on the other hand, the marketing boards were to
discriminate in favour of domestic agro-allied industries, the
governments of the states and the farmers would lose considerable
revenue which must be made up by the Federal Government – a
course of action fraught with complex political and constitutional
implications. Finally, the theory has nothing to offer policy makers
interested in finding the most appropriate strategy of promoting
agricultural production – whether for exports or for domestic
consumption.
105
and input and creates an expanded market for agricultural products,
thus encouraging specialization.
106
by T.W. Schultz to explain why traditional agriculture is characterized
by low incomes and low productivity despite its highly competitive
structure. In this theory, farmers in traditional agriculture are pictured
as rational, and positive responsive to price incentives. In addition,
they are efficient resources allocators under the constraints imposed
by static technology and the existing factor endowments. In spite of
all this, however, farmers in traditional agriculture remain poor
because they have exhausted all the profitable opportunities to invest
in the factors at their disposal. The operation of diminishing returns in
a situation of static technology ensures that hard-work and thrift do
not bring high rates of return. In this circumstance, and considering
that farmers have already allocated their resources efficiently, no
useful purpose is served by farm management and extension
programmes directed at a more efficient resource allocation in
traditional agriculture. To be worthwhile, such programmes must
include a package of high yielding and profitable new inputs on which
farmers can invest. And given the positive price response exhibited by
farmers Schultz argued that agricultural modernization strategy must
also emphasize a price policy which lowers input prices and raises
those of output in an effort to obtain favourable input-output price
ratio. More important, agricultural modernization cannot proceed far
unless there is investment in research to produce and disseminate
inputs embodying new technology and in the education of rural people
on whom rests the task of allocating the resources for development. In
Schultz’s opinion, such investments are associated with very high rates
of return compared to investments in alternative projects. So crucial
is the role of research, technology and education in this model that
Schultz regards differences in agricultural incomes and productivity
among countries as essentially a reflection of differences in the scope
and quality of investments in research, technology and education
among the countries concerned.
107
The high input-pay off theory has considerable relevance for
agricultural development in the less developed countries. First, it
provides a theoretical basis for a positive price policy in the context of
agricultural development. Second, the theory provides a justification
for government investment in agricultural research and the training of
agricultural scientists. By showing that investments in research and
education have higher social returns than comparable investments in
alternative projects, the model lends strong support to current efforts
to step up and intensify investments in agricultural education,
extension and research. Third, the model gives part of the explanation
for the observed failure of farm management and extension
programmes to increase productivity in agriculture. For until recently,
extension and farm management experts busied themselves with
resources allocation problems and ignored the critical questions of
price incentives, new technology and the opportunity cost of following
the extension agents advice. Fourth, the theory also provides strong
support for current efforts in boost export and food crop production
through subsidization of the purchase of pesticides, fungicides,
fertilizer and higher yielding seed varieties.
Nevertheless, the high input pay off model can be criticized on several
grounds. It can, for example, be criticized for assigning an
exaggerated role in market forces in the course of economic
development. Although market forces are important, it must be
conceded that for a number of reasons, they are not enough. It is
vitally necessary to devise arrangements to ensure first that the
educated people are properly deployed, second, that the new varieties
and chemical inputs get to farmers in time, and third, that access to
these new technology and other sources of income is not closed
against low income farmers with no political influence.
108
Further, the theory ignores the fact that an agriculture which rests on
new technology must be served by new institutions which, in
conception and performance, are different from the old. For example,
it would be unrealistic to expect wide spread adoption of new
techniques where land tenure is archaic and imposes constraints on
labour and capital utilization. In other words, any technological
innovation in agriculture necessarily calls for parallel efforts directed
towards institutional innovation – no easy task. Finally, the theory ,
while emphasizing the role of technological change ignores the welfare
implications. That underdeveloped coutnri3es cannot afford to ignore
the welfare implications of technological change is evidence from the
experiences of India, Pakistan and some Latin American countries
where the Green revolution involves considerable economic gains and
political cost.
109
developing countries. In their search for the most effective method of
diffusion innovations, many policy makers and extension
administrators resort to a number of devices such as experimental
stations and demonstration farms, which are supposed to help in the
spread of new techniques through demonstration effects. In other
countries, emphasis is placed on ‘progressive’ farmers and local
leaders whose production techniques and farm organization are held
up as examples to be followed by farmers in the immediate locality.
The diffusion theory also gives impetus to national and international
efforts to transfer new technology from the advance to he less
developed countries.
110
shortage of funds presents no barrier to adoption. In many of those
less developed countries which have fervently embraced the diffusion
model, these organizational arrangements are either absent or grossly
inadequate. Third, the attempts to apply the strategies presecribed by
the diffusion model were not always accompanied with painstaking
collection and analysis of microeconomic data which would have
thrown light on the resource situation on different farms and how this
could affect the farmers response to innocations. Rather than try to
evaluate the adoption of new technology in terms of cost and returns,
many extension agents show considerable lack of understanding
whenever the farmers resist change, since, in their view, this is
evidence of the conservation of the traditional society. Fourth, it must
be admitted that the diffusion model works successfully where the
farming population is educated and where the change agents have a
thorough understanding of what they are trying to sell or explain to the
farmers. In most less developed nations, these conditions are absent.
The rural areas are characterized by mass illiteracy. The extension on
agents are usually men with very rudimentary knowledge of the basic
sciences, without which they cannot understand the properties of the
biological and chemical innovations they are supposed to explain to
the farmers. Fifth, there is widespread disappointment regarding the
role of international transfers of technology in agricultural and rural
development. Contrary to the idea fostered by the diffusion model,
many agricultural technologies are location specific and cannot be
adopted by farmers without considerable adaptation to the local
situation. Such adaptation, however, presupposes the existence of
research stations and applied agricultural scientists in the countries
using the innovations. While this condition is fulfilled in a few
countries, it is not a practical proposition in most developing countries.
The result is a tendency to wholesale transfer of new technique or
technology to areas with widely different ecological and economic
111
circumstances – an important explanation for the limited diffusion.
Finally, it has been argued that the diffusion models are plagued by
several theoretical and conceptual inadequacies such as lack of over-
all integrating frame-work, inadequate attention to developments in
information and decision theories, and inadequate attention to
institutional arrangements.
112
their cues from policy makers, re-order their research priorities and (d)
at the level of researchers and input suppliers in the private sector
where the new knowledge is tested and made commercially
worthwhile.
The hypotheses advanced in this theory are tested using the data and
experience of the U.S.A and Japan between 1880 and 1960. The
results of the analysis show that in Japan, increased agricultural
productivity was associated with a continuous stream of biological and
chemical innovations which, by increasing yield per unit, of land,
actually loosened the constraints imposed by the fixity of land and high
land prices. On the other hand, the dramatic increases in U.S.A.
agricultural productivity was a consequence of the introduction of
mechanical power, which being labour saving, loosened the constraint
imposed on agricultural development by labour scarcity and high
wages. The empirical evidence also suggests that the problems of
constraints imposed by the inelastic supply of productive factors does
not admit of a once and for all solution. The solution of one problem
crease a constraint in another sphere which must be removed. Thus,
the mechanization of harvesting the U.S.A., which solved the labour
problem, created the need for threshing machines. The implication is
that research administrators and scientists must be continually
engaged in the tasks of producing inputs and devices to ease the ever
increasing bottlenecks created by economic development.
113
The Contribution of the Growth Theories to Agricultural
Development.
In some respects, the theories reviewed in the previous pages have
influenced development strategies in many developing countries.
First, they identify for the attention of policy makers the critical
variations in agricultural development. Among such variables are
research, technological innovations, the growth of the urban industrial
sector and expansion of export opportunities.
114
Third, the ideas in these theories somehow filter through various
national and international reports, studies and papers prepared for the
consideration of policy makers in the less developed world. This is
because the generation of economists who write these reports and
conduct these studies necessarily absorb consciously or unconsciously
some of the postulates of these models. Besides, there are a number
of policy makers especially in young nations of Africa and Latin
America who received their training in American or European
Universities and have attachment to one or more of these models.
Such people are often sympathetic to policy suggestions based on
some of these models.
115
production in the third Nigerians plan derives from the current food
price inflation and the drought which afflicted the northern part of the
country. The relative absence of well thought out policy strategy is a
consequence partly, of political instability, unpredictable changes in
government and a consequent tendency to devote more energy to
devices for staying in power rather than on long term strategy for
development.
The limitations arising from the character of the theories are many.
Generally, these models pursue rigour, logical and consistency at the
cost of realism. For instance, all the models reviewed in this chapter
abstract from the influence of political and institutional arrangements
which, as is well known, have a profound impact on the course of
economic development in the less developed countries. Also,
reflecting the environment in which their authors operate, the theories
place overwhelming faith on the market solution of the development
problems. Thus Schultz’s models and that of Ruttan and Hayani
emphasize input prices as the chief factor in profitability and
innovations essential for agricultural development. The classical
theory emphasizes the rate of return based essentially on the
operation of market forces. Yet in practice, many countries are
compelled to look for non market solutions because of ideology,
imperfection in output and input markets, price distortion,
pervasiveness of externalities, the tendency for market solutions to
encourage income disparities and the need to use physical measures
where, as in the case of peasant farming, market solution is not always
practicable given the subsistence orientation of production/.
Furthermore, many of these models do not pay much attention to the
variations in factor endowments, institutional arrangements and other
peculiarities characteristic of individual less developed countries.
Consequently, there is a tendency for their authors to make
116
generalizations which they consider applicable to every
underdeveloped country. For instance, in the induced development
model, the impression is created that the American and Japanese
experience in promoting agricultural modernization through induced
innovations which broke the constraints imposed by the scarce factor
can be repeated in other less developed countries. Little account
seems to have been taken of the fact that there may be countries
lacking in strong agricultural lobbies and dedicated scientists who
could be relied upon to bring pressure on the policy makers and to
conduct research aimed at easing the supply constraints of strategic
inputs. Further, there are a number of cases where agricultural
modernization proceeds because policy makers had planned in
anticipation of bottlenecks rather than wait for such bottlenecks to
induce innovations. As the Nigerian experience shows, it is better to
anticipate these bottlenecks and plan for their removal before they
assume intractable dimensions.
Revision Questions
1. Distinguish between Economic Growth and Economic
Development and discuss the Implications of this distinction
for rural development.
2. To what extent would you consider Nigerian agricultural
development strategies in the 1970s as a response to crises
situations?
3. “The fundamental weakness of economic growth models is
their reliance on the market for the solution of development
117
problems”. Discuss with detailed reference to any two growth
models.
4. According to T.W. Schultz, farmers in traditional agriculture
are efficient but poor. Explain and discuss.
5. “The dual economy models of A.W. Lewis and his followers
have a pernicious influence on the course of agricultural
development in most less developed countries”. Explain and
examine this statement.
6. “The prescriptions of the export-led growth model are largely
irrelevant in the second half of the twentieth century”.
Evaluate this statement with reference to your country.
7. According to the induced development model, “failure to
choose a path which effectively loosens the constraints
imposed by resource endowments can depress the whole
process of agricultural.
118
CHARACTERISTICs OF NIGERIAN AGRICULTURE
O.A OLOWA
Department of Agricultural Education
Federal College of Education (tech), Akoka
Highlights
• Introduction
• Revision questions
Introduction
Nigeria covers 924000 kms on the west coast of Africa vegetation
ranges from tropical forest in the south to the Sahel savannah in the
north.
Nigeria’s land stretches from latitude 40N to 140N and from longitude
30E to 140N. 71 million ha (77 per cent) of this land area are considered
cultivable, about 32 million ha (45 percent) of the total cultivable land
area are actually cultivable.
Prior to the discovery of oil in the Nigeria in the 1970’s, agriculture was
the mainstay of the Nigerian economy accounting for about two-thirds
of the gross domestic product (GDP), with the 0il boom, agriculture’s
contribution to GDP declined to 25percent by 1980 and Nigeria moved
from being a large exporter to a major importer of agricultural
products. Since the mid-1980’s, as a result of a decline in oil revenue
and policy measure implemented under a structural adjustment
119
programme (SAP), agriculture’s contribution to GDP has risen to about
40 percent.
120
controlled. Consequently, unlike industries, agriculture
cannot adjust rapidly to changing conditions.
121
xvii.Farm animals are fed with fodder while kitchen
wastes provide food for the few ones kept in the
homestead;
Revision Questions
I. Mention ten (10) characteristics of Agriculture in
Nigeria.
122
OLATOMIDE W. OLOWA
Highlights
- Introduction
- Features of Community Development
- Aims and Objectrives of Community Development
- Community Development Policy
- Community Development Strategy
- Community Development Models
- Revision Questions
- References
INTRODUCTION
“Community development is a structured intervention that gives
communities greater control over the conditions that affect their lives.
123
This does not solve all the problems faced by a local community, but it
does build up confidence to tackle such problems as effectively as any
local action can.
124
based on the sharing of power, skills, knowledge and
experience.
• Community Development takes place both in neighborhoods
and within communities of interest, as people identity what is
relevant to them.
• The Community Development process is collective, but the
experience of the process enhances the integrity, skills,
knowledge and experience, as well as equality of power, for
each individual who is involved.
• Community Development seeks to enable individuals and
communities to grow and change according to their own
needs and priorities, and at their own pace, provided this does
not oppress other groups and communities, or damage the
environment.
• Where community Development takes place, there are certain
principles central to it i.e the first priority of the community.
125
Community Development Policy
In many projects there may be some objectives related to changing
the environments (political and administrative) within which
community development interventions are carried out. These may
include, for example, “leaders, technical experts, and civil servants
changing from a provision approach to a facilitating self-help
approach.” Other objectives may refer to developing and
institutionalizing programmes and actions of empowering low
income communities by the relevant ministries and departments,
and in guiding non-governmental organizations in carrying out this
work. To create a legal and institutional framework as well as to
allow Government to provide a leadership role in community
development, it is necessary to have an official policy paper,
approved by Government, which codifies its principles and policies
regarding community development.
126
Full participation by everybody (e.g. listed above) is impossible.
The practical alternative is to set up a procedure that allows
maximum input by stake holders. A small “task force” composed
of, say, four persons, should be assigned the job of co-ordinating
the creation and production of the document. The task force
should include at least one academic (knowledgeable about
community development), a professional community worker, and
an officer of an NGO. The job of the task force should be to
produce a rough first draft, circulate it to others for feedback,
and set up a series of workshops for editing and finalization, and
prepare a final copy to be presented to parliament.
127
not a university essay; descriptive and analytical material can be
put in an accompanying “profile” paper (perhaps to convince
members of parliament about the need for codified policy) but
should not be included in the policy paper itself.
128
professional, ethical, and development oriented will desire to be
an integral part of a country’s policy of poverty reduction,
community empowerment and democratization. They will see a
well formulated policy paper as a much needed clarification of
leadership and guidance for their work.
129
experiences shared by Local Government development officers
and NGOs.
Roles of Actors
A chapter of the policy paper or (better) an appendix should
define the roles of the key actors and stake holders. As each role
is identified and described, relations between actors also can be
sketched. The list should include, but not be limited to:
130
Community members, community leaders, coordinators, local
government or regional authorities, donor representatives,
executing agencies, implementation agencies, local authorities,
ministers, mobilizes /animators, NGO officers, Ngo boards, Ngo
country representatives, politicians, senior ministry officials,
department officials, steering committee, target (group or
individual) and others responsible for or participating in
community development. The list should encompass
governmental and non governmental actors and stake holders.
131
programmes of community empowerment, based on the
principles embodied in the policy.
Strategy Content
i) Key issues facing both geographical communities and
communities of interest, with examples of how community
development practices impact on these issues.
132
ii) Values and principles agreed by the Standing Committee
for Community Development – widely accepted as the
model for community development practitioners.
iii) Practical approaches used to deliver community
development work – including consultation, participation,
partnership working, volunteering, community assets and
sustainability.
iv) Action plan for the period. This work plan is linked to the
corporate plan and budget framework. The actions are
subject to existing budgets being continued.
133
how to bring in outside knowledge such as new government
regulations or activities in neighbouring communities.
• Talking /Working Together/Observing:- Practitioners learn
by working each other and community residents, working
together on projects, visiting other communities, and soliciting
ideas and suggestions from their peers.
• Literature-Based Theories:- Participants turned out to read
widely in business, environmental, policy studies, law,
psychology, agriculture, and adult education. A synthesis of
multiple theories is their guide rather than a single theory
derived from community development literature.
• Field Experience and Practices:- This is the central
component in reflective practice. It is through experience and
ongoing practice, in which a practitioner attempts to assist
communities, that a practitioner reflects on his/her work and
formulates his/her implicit practice-based theories. While
each element of the model is described separately, they do
not exist in isolation. Practitiopners are guided by a synthesis
of these elements to address needs in the community. What
links the different elements is constant reflection.
134
set of skills concerned with understanding and dealing with real,
complex, and difficult situations” (Bright, 1996, P. 167). For example,
Wellington and Austin’s (1996) model suggests that professional
efforts can be both domesticating and liberating, depending on the
value and belief systems of the professional.
135
development practitioners in their work. Several factors differentiate
the work of community development from other professions: 1) the
diversity of their work, (2) its location in the community, (3)
practitioners travel to the communities they work with but are usually
not members and (4) the situations they work with are complex
involving decision making, problem solving, and interacting with many
people.
Revision Questions
1. define Community Development
2. Mention two aims of Community Development
3. Enumerate Five features of community development.
4. Explain the Procedure for developing community policy.
5. What should be the context of a community development
policy paper.
6. Explain two elements of community development model.
7. What strategies are involved in carrying out community
development Activities.
8. What roles are government expected to play in a community
development.
136
Boud, D., & Walker, D. (1990). Making the most of Experience.
Studies
in Continuing Education, 12 (2), 61-80.
Highlights:
- Introduction
- Problems with Policy Alignment
- Nigerian Experience
- Need for Policy Alignment
- Revision Questions
INTRODUCTION
137
Nigerian Agriculture is bedeviled by poverty and many other ills. There
is an avalanche of writings chronicling the ills of the sector. The
following are the areas of emphasis for these writings:
a) General declining productivity of staple crops over the years
at 1.5% per annum.
b) A land tenure that is neither secure nor certain in its
constitution with a consequent multiplicity of ownership rights
and cultivation practices.
c) A large, untrained and poorly nourished labour force (70%) in
a national population (140million) growing at the rate of 2.5 –
3% per annum.
d) Unending, unfavourable term of trade; and
e) An ever-increasing pre-harvest, harvest and post-harvest food
losses (20-30%) due to microbial, physical and other factors.
All the above factors have been given as the root causes of the
country’s agricultural ills.
Efforts towards tackling this ill have generated various policies at the
three levels of government (local, state and federal). These policies
are most times overlapping, duplication or unnecessary competition at
one time or the other.
One notable factor that has received little if any attention is the
absence of a reliable co-ordinated policy or set of policies in Nigerian
agriculture from federal to the local government.
138
Problems With Policy Alignment
Given the characteristics of Nigeria Agriculture as seen in earlier
chapter with different operatives; a federal structure that gives virtual
autonomy to federal, state, local government, autonomous community
authority over agricultural occupation. In this situation, an effective
two-way communication from the farmer through the bureaucratic
hierarchy and vice versa becomes a dilemma. And worse still, policy
actions over research, education, marketing price and rural
development, become ineffective and confusing.
139
In the Fourth development plan, government laid maximum
weight on agriculture while some states laid it on education or
transportation. Also, owing to the non-cooperation of some
state agencies, such as banks, it was not possible for the
Federal Government to carry thought its fiscal and monetary
policies.
(b) Another examples is the question of retail prices. The price
control board (PCB) failed because it could not adequately
control the rise in prices due to a protracted shortage in most
consumer goods. Its successor, the Resale Price maintenance
scheme did not fair better. It allowed the manufacturers to
supervise or police the distribution of all their commodities, to
ensure that retailers and consumers were not cheated. But,
as it happened, not all state governments then cooperated in
this.
(c) The abandonment of Agro-Service centres by the states to the
Federal government in the third development plan is another
example. Less than 15% of those earmarked in 1976 had
been completed by 1978; and only less than 30% had been
completed ever since. On the other hand, various states
embarked on their own projects rather than see to the
completion of the federal schemes.
(d) Delivery of input services such as fertilizers, pesticides,
insecticides, tractors, seeds, and poultry product. State
governments would rather be the agencies for the above than
allow the federal government to distribute them directly.
Early in 1980, for example, the Federal ministry of Agriculture
through the Federal Department of Agricultural Cooperatives
delivered some quantities of tractors and farm inputs. They
were rejected or abandoned by some states on the grounds
140
that they were handled by the presidential advisers or
members of opposing political parties.
(e) Land acquisition for Agricultural Projects: The land use
Decree is inoperative in some states and made a mockery in
others. Even the High Courts of some states are giving
conflicting interpretations as to its meaning. In practical
terms, it is not easy for federal authorities to find land for
housing, and agricultural projects, to name a few. At the best,
considerable delay is occasioned, that the project is launched
far believed schedule.
(f) Integrated Rural Development that was ushered in by the 3rd
National Development plan had the Objective: to increase
rural productivity and income, diversify rural economy and
generally enhance the quality of life in the rural areas”.
141
then Anambra State was pre-occupied with its food for the
people programme. Similarly, every other State has its own
particular mass movement, with limited attention to the
federal.
(h) Finally, we discuss the coordination of cooperatives society in
the various ministries. Examples of these conflicts and
problems in coordination are the following:
1) Cooperatives located not in one but in different types of
ministries (Agriculture, rural development, community
development, trades etc)
2) No central leadership in cooperative matters till 1975 with the
birth of the Federal Ministry of Cooperatives and Supply.
3) The unexpected dissolution of the same ministry in 1979.
4) Absence of a National Cooperative Education Programmes,
thus creating disparities in Standards and Certificates.
142
5. The creation of a healthy two-way system of communication
and responsibilities from the federal to the local government
areas and vice –versa.
6. Greater responsibility of data collection, analysis and
publication.
7. Ease in monitoring, follow-up, evaluations and alignment.
Revision Questions.
1. What do you understand by term Policy alignment?
2. Justify the need for Policy alignment in the development of
Agriculture in Nigeria.
3. Discuss Four examples of emphasis or priorities in the past
that shows the need for policy alignment in Nigerian
Agricultural development.
143
ADMINSITRATIVE AND POLITICAL FACTORS IN AGRICULTURAL
DEVELOPMENT POLICY
Highlights:
- Introductions
- Nature/Uniquenes of Agriculture and its policy implications.
- Structure and operation of Administrative and political factors.
- Guidelines for future Agricultural Development.
- Revision questions.
INTRODUCTION
144
The Agricultural development strategy of any nation should be the
outcome of the cooperative undertaking of theoreticians, bureaucrats,
political leaders and farmers. The extent to which each group is
prepared to compromise in areas of conflict and to pull resources for
the common goal will determine the level of success possible.
This chapter will take a closer study of the structure and operation of
administrative and political factors affecting policy. As a prelude, we
shall look at the nature of the agricultural industry and the policy
implications.
145
incentives, and extension services, each having
implications for the organization of programmes for
promoting agricultural productivity.
iii) Large number and dispersion in decision –making units
whose behaviour must be changed if the agricultural
sector is to be modernized. Farmers are widely
geographically scattered, vary in economic status and
potential, cover a broad political spectrum, and exhibit
varying pattern of attitudes and motivations. In
contrast, it is easier to organize an industrial labour
force managerial controls industry are highly
concentrated.
iv) The need for effective two-way communication in the
administrative process as a result of the variations in
factors and the dispersion and number of farmers. This
is however easier to achieve in industry than in
agriculture because of the decentralization and
variability of the local circumstances of farming.
v) Sustained growth in agricultural output requires
technical, economic, attitudinal and political
transformations of the whole structure or rural society
and cannot be brought about quickly. If we compare
this with industry, in which a simple decision can, with
appropriate outside help lead to the building of a dam,
rradway or factory. We find that agricultural
transformation requires a series of interlocking changes
in some many different aspects of rural life, that a
perspective of decades is required.
vi) Finally, agriculture in under-developed countries is
conceived of as a low-status occupation. This attitude
influences the manpower employed in all aspects of the
146
agricultural industry. It also affects the amount of
money budgeted for it.
(b) Policy Implications of the Nature of Agriculture.
1. The Need for Adaptation:- As a result of the variations in
physical, economic institutional and motivational factors,
compounded, by the all-embracing interdependent of agricultural
productions, no meaningful rule of thumb can be applied to the
generality of agricultural problems. No matter how successful a
breeding technique is, we cannot reasonably apply it to all
situations irrespective of time, place and other local conditions.
In short, our innovation must be adapted to the area under
consideration. If there is no such adaptation, the new idea may
become foreign body and will be thrown out.
ii. Policy decisions must be carried out with minimum delay in clear
unambiguous directives and executed with maximum efficiency.
Consider what would happen if yams and maize were supplied or
planted either too early or too late as consequences of
bureaucratic protocols. That will mean loss of revenue and food
of a high magnitude.
iii) The manpower to carry out the various stages of activities in
agriculture must possess a minimum of administrative and
organizational talent and competence. Action programmes in
agriculture are bound to fail in a country without at least a small
group of indigenous professionals trained in agriculture.
iv) Balancing considerations of productivity and of equity is another
area of agricultural development policy. Policy makers in
agriculture are constantly confronted by the dilemma of
achieving maximum pay-offs in investments and ensuring at the
same time an equitable redistribution of resources particularly to
the under-privileged. If we concentrate resources on the more
promising regions for example, we shall be meeting the principle
147
of productivity, but will it satisfy that of equity? In reality, it may
widen the gulf between the more and less privileged in the
society. We find that administrators are generally attracted to
the principle of productivity.
148
President Kwame Nkrumah, it abolish its ministry of Agriculture,
though it later reintroduced it in a modified forms
149
Political considerations are more dominant than the economic.
Politicians are usually their own economic advisers. And their
impact is greatest in the agricultural sector because of their need
for agricultural resources and the farming population for their
retention of power. The operation of political factors in
Agricultural development can be illustrated with a few examples.
150
employment in areas away from their states. Such serving youth
should be accepted in the State of posting and made to feel as
citizens of the same country and not as expatriates on contract.
1) Administrative Arrangements:_
Changes in the present administrative set-up are desirable if
agricultural development policies are to be achieved. An
Institutional arrangement where the personnel are observers and
not actors and which is distantly connected with the “patient”
(the farmer) only be remote control is inimical. The following
suggestions are made for improvement:-
151
(a) The administrative class should have more freedom to take
responsibilities and be accountable for them. In short, there
should be levels of competence and each officer should be
praised or blamed for the way he carries out his own assignment.
(b) New schemes of work incentives other than seniority should be
introduced to get out the best in administrators. These are
honourable mentions, certificates for meritorious service, paid
token holiday and salary increments.
(c) The agricultural ministry should be, as far as possible
decentralized. Agricultural personnel should operate from rural
areas as teachers, pastors and medicos do.
(d) Finally, ministries of agriculture are due for change. They have
outlined their usefulness. As constituted they are two or more
decades behind time. As it were they can not be a veritable tool
of achieving the millennium development goal of halving hunger
and poverty by 2015.
152
agricultural researchers and experts is inevitable to avoid
moribund and white –elephant projects, wastages and to as far
as possible put the interest of productivity before that of equity
(federal character /quota system) in economic matters.
3) Formulation of Agricultural Policy.
It will be wrong if we gave the impression that the fault for
agricultural ills lies only with administrators and politicians.
Perhaps, it is right to say that in developing countries policy-
makers are equally to blame for the many failures in agriculture.
(a) Planning is fundamental to agricultural development. In times
past anthropologists parade the view that what was needed in
Nigerian agriculture was to sow seeds, relax and let nature
provide an abundance harvest. This ldylic picture of the “noble
savage” cannot be taken seriously today” the truth is that
agricultural development requires planning in order to define
problems, establish goals and evolve suitable policies.
(b) Many agricultural development planners ignore the fact that
planning requires proper emphasis on administrative and
organizational aspects of government which have political and
social implications. Since administration is important to
agricultural development any policy for the attainment of the
latter must take into account the strengths and weakness of
administrative machinery and its possible reforms if the policies
are to be fully implemented.
(c) Another weakness in agricultural planning is the creation by
planners of administrative bottle-necks and lags between
promises and performance by the inclusion of a series of
improvisations calculated to be self –executory. If a plan is to be
implemented it should be formulated realistically taking into
consideration the limitations imposed by the economy, the
political and social systems, and the capacities of administration.
153
(d) Another weakness in policy formulation according to Meier
(1965) is the high degree of sophistication and econometric
models in formulation of plans. This tendency to bookishness is
popular among researchers, consultants and PhD student and it
is also styled as “Documentation – orientation” as against” action
–orientation”. In other words, the over-riding objectives of
planning technicians is a neat and elegantly written plan and not
the implementation.
Revision Questions
1. Explain Six Uniqueness of agriculture that distinguish it from
industry or manufacturing sector.
2. Highlight Five administrative challenges in Agricultural
development policy.
3. explain two policy implications of the uniqueness of agriculture
discussed above.
4. Suggest two measures each as remedies to flaws in
administrative, political and policy factors in agricultural
development policy.
5. Who is to blame – politicians or administrators for the ills in the
agricultural development of Nigeria.
6. With the trends in global agricultural development, do you think
ministries of Agriculture are still relevant in Nigerian System.
154
7. Which is better in Agricultural development administration – the
colonial regime or post independent governments.
OLATOMIDE W. OLOWA
Department of Agricultural Education
Federal College of Education (tech), Akoka
Highlights;-
- The Policy Thrust
- The Strategies and Implementation
- Summary
- Revision Questions.
155
Introduction and Policy Thrust.
In 1926, Sir Clifford who was the governor at that time clarified the
colonial policy as follows: “Great Britain is a manufacturing country
which depends very largely for is new products upon other countries
and largely upon tropical countries. It is important that the tropical
countries within the British Empire should produce these products in
ever – increasing quantities of the highest quality. It is important that
Nigeria should be able to produce, and not Nigeria (only) but other
colonies, the maximum of raw materials”.
156
conditions – political, moral and material – upon which the success or
failure of such enterprises in a very large measure depends.
157
Secondly, there was to be no manufacture of cotton textiles in Nigeria.
The United African Company (UAC), for example, was discouraged from
starting a spinning and weaving mill near the cotton area in Nigeria. In
1934 the government enacted an imported textiles ordinance which
diverted the sources of supplies for manufactured commodities.
Finally a high export duty was imposed on palm product extraction.
The government was determined to do everything in its power to
promote peasant agriculture for the export sector.
158
Growing Corporation with the establishment of three agricultural
stations in the North (Ilorin, Margaina and Kaduna) and Four in the
South (Agege, Calabar, Ibadan and Onitsha). These stations also serve
as research centre.
Summary
In summary, there was no consistent plan or blue print by Colonial
administrators for Nigerian agriculture, but there was nonetheless a
clear – cut policy of what role agriculture was expected to play in the
economy. First, agriculture was to serve as the major for the
satisfaction of the economic needs of the mother country, providing
159
raw materials and offering a training ground for British experts
experimenting a tropical agriculture.
Revision Questions
160
STATE PLANNING OF AGRICULTURE – NIGERIA EXPERIENCE
B.T. OMONONA
Department of Agricultural Economics.
University of Ibadan, Ibadan
HIGHLIGHTS:-
- Introduction
- Capital Investment
- The World Bank and Development Plans
- The Post – Independence Experience
- Some Lessons of Agricultural Planning
161
- Revision Questions.
INTRODUCTION
State planning for Agriculture in Nigeria started with Colonial
administration and is best studied as part of planning of the general
economy of which agriculture forms a part. Looking at the whole
scene, we shall be able to see state action as it affected agriculture in
a better light.
Capital Investment
The first capital investments in Nigeria were undertaken by the British
government and foreign commercial and trading companies. Amount
invested in Nigeria between 1870 – 1937 amounted roughly 77.087
million pounds; 25 million pounds of which came from foreign private
enterprises (Frankel 1955). These investments were done with other
aims, which though not coordinated were nevertheless part of the
colonial interest. For example, for creation of trading relations and
connections the suppression of slave trading relations and pacification
of the country. A proper development programme however demands
that capital should not only be invested, but be employed according
as the needs of the people demand it. In other words, it should be
done according to a definite plan.
162
however noted to have driven British interest to provide themselves
materials and food from their colonies. When it was realized that to
get these services based upon improved economic efficiency and
increased production was needful, A new commonwealth Development
and And Welfare Act 1945 was enacted. The Act made provision for a
sum of 120 million pounds for the period 1945 – 1956. The sum was
meant to form the nucleus of colonial development finance and the
allocations were to give a valuable impetus to the planning of
development. The fund was for the purpose of raising standard of
health, education social welfare and general well being of the people in
the colonies who were the perceived tools in the realization of their
goals.
The post colonial era witnessed large capital investment by all levels of
government. A number of irrigation dam were constructed with
northern part of the country’s, while Research Institutes were
established. In the Southwest farm settlement stations were
established with adequate provision of infrastructure to attract youngs
hands unto the business of farming. Programmes such as operation
feed the Nation (OFN), Green Revolution (GR) Back to land, National
Agricultural Land Development (NALDA) were also capital intensive
163
ones meant to develop agriculture and farm-families by various civilian
and military regime in Nigeria.
The Development plan for the year 1955-60, which was based on the
report of the World Bank already mentioned, aimed at the promotion
above all, of education and health, agriculture, urban and rural water
supply and road construction.
164
milk production. The Eastern region established experimented stations
and agricultural mechanization where possible. The Southern
Cameroon’s emphasis on the control of cocoa pod disease,
improvement, of plantations and cultivation.
In addition, regional government (in 1954) undertook the resettlement
of over populated regions. Hand in hand with resettlement projects
were the partnership schemes which were most note worthy in
Western Nigeria. Regional production Development Boards were set
up to provide the capital and trained personnel while the people
supplied labour, so that the population first of all learned, and in the
end was in the position to take over the administration and
management of the farms.
Since the fields in agriculture are dependent not only on the basic
production requirements, but also considerably on the knowledge and
efficiency of the farmer, the development Boards later the
Development corporations which either instruct the farmers in their
farms or which themselves establish farm estates, new and better
techniques were discovered and introduced into agriculture.
165
In the estimates of the World Bank:
16.3% was for road
15.3% was for health
8.7% was for Public works
8.1% was for education
2.3% was for agriculture
The aims of the Agricultural divisions had not been the same
throughout the years and regions. At the initial stages, the aim was to
set up a few plantations in various parts of the regions so that the local
community could copy from them. This meant that a great emphasis
was placed more on demonstration than on profit.
166
feasibility studies and lacking in qualitative and quantitative guide
lines.
The following are the National plans and Rolling Plans. The country
have had since independence till date:
First National Development Plan 1962 – 1968
Second National Development Plan 1970 – 1974
Third National Development Plan 1975 – 1980
Fourth National Development Plan 1981 – 1985
First National Rolling Plan 1990 – 1992
Second National Rolling Plan 1991 – 1993
Third National Rolling Plan 1992 – 1994
Fourth National Rolling Plan 1993 – 1995
167
dictated by a number serious problems facing the country such as high
rate of illiteracy, low per capita income, low purchasing power
inadequate infrastructures, and very few modern industries. The
foreign exchange base of the country was very narrow comprising
mainly of agricultural commodities which were vulnerable to economic
cycles of the Industrialized nations. Among those Crop that were
reknown then were cocoa, palm produce, groundnut, cotton and
rubber. The first development plan covered the period 1962 to 1968
but its implementation was interrupted by the Civil War from 1967 to
1969. This was followed the Second National Plan (1970 – 1974), third
development 1975 to 1980 and the rest of them.
168
Some Lessons of Agricultural Planning
There was no doubt that Nigerian Colonial administration regarded
agriculture as crucial. When critically examined the investments in
agriculture do not justify the acclaimed high place given to it by the
colonial regime. The same is true when again we find agriculture
claiming the lowest per cent of the budget in the 1955 -60
Development plan as also it did in that of the World Bank Report.
The period after the Independence also revealed that with various
plans and rolling plans plus various policy instruments utilized
agriculture continues to decline in its contribution to the economy and
gross domestic product (GDP), when it declines from nearly 60% of
GDP and 80% of export earnings to a negative agriculture is still in it
state of commatus as the state planning instrument is bedeviled by
politicking.
Revisions Questions
1. Draw an assessment of colonial Administration planning for state
as it affect agricultural development in Nigeria.
2. What the lessons to be learnt from the World bank
recommendations and colonial administration budget of 1955 to
1960 in Nigeria.
3. In your own view, How has Nigeria fair so far in terms of planning
for Agriculture.
169
Federal Republic of Nigeria 0 First National Development Plan 1962 –
68 Lagos.
OLATOMIDE W. OLOWA
170
FEDERAL COLLEGE OF EDUCATION (TECH), AKOKA
HIGHLIGHTS:-
- Introduction
- Dimensions in Agricultural Fundamentalism
- Limitations in Agricultural Fundamentalism
- The Farmer’s Rightful place.
- Revision Questions.
INTRODUCTION
Agricultural fundamentalism argues that agriculture is the most
important and bedrock of other Industries (in terms of development),
and that farmers are Kings and livewire of a society and as such
deserve special consideration. This believe has inadvertently moulded
policies, affected national budgets and influenced resource allocation
in many countries. To Neglect or allow indifference on the other hand
is regarded as unpatriotic and a misplacement of priorities.
171
We shall now do a survey of agricultural fundamentalism in its
historical perspective under the above- mention sub-divisions.
172
agriculture is the source of the bulk of the resources needed for
educating the young, for health and other forms of social service”.
All these bear witness to the widespread conviction that the prosperity
of the nation depends on agriculture.
An extreme form of the concern for rural life is the nostalgia for
primitivism. Adherents of primitivism engage in reconstructing the
past, and demonstrating that primitive man was better than
contemporary man. To the proponent the nearer we are to nature the
better for society.
173
animal science are essential. To them there should be nothing like
agricultural economics and extension.
174
is nothing but words and promises, without the desire to implement
them.
175
3. Alternatives measures to increase food production have been
established. For example, there is the addition of food
supplements from chemists in the form of iron tablets, protein
capsules and vitamin pills.
4. There are countries where the farmers’ part in producing food is
not the largest fraction of the production process. It more often
goes into transportation, processing and merchandising for
example, than in actual production. What the consumer often
gets is different from what the farmer sells. Take the case of
akara balls, for example, the farmer’s share of the consumer’s
Naira has declined because an increased share of that Naira has
been earned by others who have contributed to the final product.
5. Then, not all farmers are essential to production. The aggregate
importance of farm products is very great, but not their marginal
importance. The elimination of farmer is unthinkable. But the real
questions concern the importance of the moderate additions or
reductions in the number of farmers and the supply of farm products.
With air and water relatively abundant, we properly regard those who
provide us water and air-conditioners as essential; but we do not
magnify their importance simply because air and water are initially
necessary. The two situations are essentially similar, except in regard
to the number of persons involved.
176
From the economic tendencies discussed above, it is pertinent to say
that there is little basis for fears about food shortage if the number in
agriculture is reduced. Efforts to ensure an adequate food supply
persist but they are not necessarily dependent on the efforts of
farmers. It is therefore not justified to increase the number of people
in agriculture vis “back-to-land”, farm settlement scheme
programmes.
177
on the economic sector or the size of the group, but largely on his
efficiency.
Revision Questions
1. What do you understand by the concept of Agricultural
fundamentalism.
2. Mention Four other dimensions in Agricultural Fundamentalism.
3. Summarize the argument of Agricultural Fundamentalist of
Universities.
4. Who are the Culprits in Pseudo-agricultural Fundamentalism and
Why?
5. State the Limitations of Agricultural Fundamentalism.
6. Is it justifiable to send more people into the farm in the modern
Nigeria?
178
1. Greg, R.B. (1930). Report of the 97th meeting of the British
Association of the Advancement of Science, London, P. 231.
2. Oyenuga, V. A. (1967). Agriculture in Nigeria. FAO/UN, Rome
P.1.
3. Ijere, M.O. (1983) Reading in Nigerian Agricultural Policy and
Planning Port – Harcourt.
179
INSTITUTIONS AND PROGRAMMES FOR AGRICULTURAL
DEVELOPMENT IN NIGERIA (1959-2006)
A.A FALADE
Department of Agricultural Education
Federal College of Education (Technical)
Akoka, Lagos.
INTRODUCTION
Before the discovery of crude oil, Agriculture has been the main
source of sustenance of Nigerian economy by providing food, raw
materials, employment opportunity and foreign exchange
earnings.
As a result of the importance of Agriculture to National
development, successive Nigerian governments brought about
different forms of agricultural programmes for the purpose of
facilitating improved production in the sector. Some of the
programmes and institutions are listed and discussed in this
chapter. These include:
1. Farm settlement scheme
2. Commodity Boards
3. National Accelerated food production programme (NAFPP)
4. Agricultural Development Projects (ADP)
5. Operation feed the Nation (OFN)
6. River Basin Development Authorities (RBDA)
7. Agricultural Credit Guarantees Scheme (ACGS)
8. National Agricultural Insurance Scheme (NAIS)
9. Green Revolution Programme (GRP)
180
10. Strategic Grain Reserve Programme (SGRP)
11. Directorate of food, Road and Rural Infrastructure (DIFRRI)
12. National Directorate of employment (NDE)
13. National Agricultural Land Development Authority (NALDA)
14. Better life for Rural Women programme (BLP)
15. Family support programme (FSP)
16. Family Economic Advancement programme (FEAP)
181
programme was established in 1973. The programme aimed at
raising the production of arable crops such as cassava, rice,
maize, guinea corn, millet and wheat by providing relevant
inputs, processing and storage facilities.
182
The main objective of launching this programme in 1976, among
others was to explore the water resources and enhance
agricultural and rural development. The government embarked
on irrigation projects to guard against the negative experience
brought about by drought in the 1970swhen the nation lost about
40-60 percent of the grain crops to drought.
183
Nation (OFON). It was meant to adequately meet the needs of
peasant farmers and generally enhance the development of rural
areas so as to boost food supply in Nigeria.
Although this programme (GRP) has been phased out, the
purpose has been incorporated into the ADPs.
184
National Directorate Of Employment (NDE)
This scheme was launched in late 1986. The aim was to increase
food production, reduce poverty and create employment for the
unemployed. The programme emphasized the provision of
adequate training in agriculture in all the states of the federation.
Youths who were interested in farming were trained, given land
and loans to take off in farming business.
185
Family Support Programme (FSP)
This programme was launched in 1994 to enhance the beginning
of supportive programmes that will also help the craving of
Nigerian families to be better prepared to deal with the
challenges of living useful life in an increasingly complex world.
The programme was sectionalized into different groups such as;
education, Agriculture, child welfare and youth development,
disability and destitution, income generation and shelter. The
agricultural section of the FSP emphasized on increasing small
holder production of livestock, improving the diet and source of
income of the family, procurement and installation of low-cost
agro-processing and packaging equipment, providing credit
facilities for homestead fish production.
186
project must be viable and capable of generating revenues for
repayment of the granted fund.
Cassava Drive for Export: This is a recent policy of the
federal government it was commenced in 2003 during the
second term of the Obasanjo administration.
Nigerian is the leading producer of cassava in Africa
(43.09MT). Cassava to be exported must be processed into dry
chips. Exportations are done to Thailand and Europe which are
the major end users. This major impediment to the success of
this policy is that most Nigerian farmers are not
knowledgeable as to the processing standard and there are
inadequate processing mills. It has also been speculated that
continuous export of cassava chips will make the product
expensive to consumers at home because few farmers that are
producing for local consumption will take advantage of the
excess demand to like the prices of cassava products.
187
raise cocoa production by providing cocoa seedlings to new
entrants and existing cocoa farmers. The program is also
expected to provide loans and incentives to farmers so as to
boast cocoa production and exportation.
188
Source: Nigeria Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy (NEEDS), 2004
189
or two state government agencies, according to need. The program
would help build the capacity of relevant institution to fulfill this role.
Revision Questions
1.Mention the various efforts of different governments in
agricultural development in Nigeria since 1960
2. Give the full meaning of the following Acronyms ADP, OFN
GRP, FSP,NALDA,DFRRI,FEAP,BLRW
190
The New Nigerian Agricultural Development Policy
O.A. Olowa
Department Of Agricultural Education
Federal College Of Education (Tech), Akoka
Introduction
The previous agricultural policy document was finalized in 1988 and was
supposed to remain operative until the year 2000. Hence, in year 2001, a
new policy document was launched. The new policy document bears most of
the features of the old one, but with more focused direction and better
articulation.
Objectives of New Agricultural Policy
In a broad sense, the objectives of the new agricultural policy (as stated in
the document) are very similar to those of the old one. They include:
(i) The achievement of self-sufficiency in basic food supply and the
attainment of food security;
(2) Increased production of agricultural raw materials for industries;
(3) Increased production and processing of export crops, using improved
production and processing technologies;
(4) Generating gainful employment;
(5) Rational utilization of agricultural resources, improved protection of
agricultural land resources from drought, desert encroachment, soil erosion
191
and flood, and the general preservation of the environment for the
sustainability of agricultural production;
(6) Promotion of the increased application of modern technology to
agricultural production; and,
(7) Improvement in the quality of life of rural dwellers.
192
(i) agricultural resources (land, labor, capital, seeds, fertilizer, etc) whose
supply and prices affect the profitability of agricultural business,
(ii) crops, livestock, fisheries and agro-forestry production,
(iii) pest control,
(iv) mechanization,
(v) water resources and irrigation,
(vi) rural infrastructure,
(vii) agricultural extension and technology transfer,
(viii) research and development (R&D),
(ix) agricultural commodity storage, processing and marketing,
(x) credit supply,
(xi) insurance,
(xii) agricultural cooperatives,
(xiii) training and manpower development, and
(xiv) agricultural statistics and information management.
The successful implementation of the agricultural policy is, however,
contingent upon the existence of appropriate macroeconomic policies that
provide the enabling environment for agriculture to grow in equilibrium with
other sectors. They affect profitability of agricultural enterprises and the
welfare of farmers through their effects on the flow of credit and investment
funds, taxes, tariffs, subsidies, budgetary allocation, etc.
The New Policy Direction
According to the document, the new agricultural policy will herald in a new
policy direction via new policy strategies that will lay the foundation for
sustained improvement in agricultural productivity and output. The new
strategies involve:
(1) Creating a more conducive macro-environment to stimulate greater
private sector investment in agriculture;
193
(2) Rationalizing the roles of the tiers of government and the private sector
in their promotional and supportive efforts to stimulate agricultural growth;
(3) Reorganizing the institutional framework for government intervention in
the agricultural sector to facilitate the smooth and integrated development of
the sector;
(4) Articulating and implementing integrated rural development programs to
raise the quality of life of the rural people;
(5 Increasing budgetary allocation and other fiscal incentives to agriculture
and promoting the necessary developmental, supportive and service-oriented
activities to enhance agricultural productivity, production and market
opportunities; and
(6). Rectifying import tariff anomalies in respect of agricultural products
and promoting the increased use of agricultural machinery and inputs
through favourable tariff policy.
The new agricultural policy has spelt out definitive roles and responsibilities
for the federal, state and local governments as well as the private sector in
order to remove role duplication and overlapping functions among them.
The revised roles and responsibilities are outlined as follows:
Under the new policy regime, the Federal Government shall be responsible
for:
194
(iv) research and development of appropriate technology for agriculture,
including biotechnology;
(v) seed industry development, seed law enforcement and seed quality
control;
(vi) support for input supply and distribution, including seeds, seedlings,
brood stock and fingerlings;
(vii) continued support for agricultural extension services;
(viii)management of impounded water, supervision of large dams and
irrigation canals and maintenance of pumping facilities;
(ix) control of pests and diseases of national and international significance
and the promotion of integrated disease and pest management;
(x) establishment and maintenance of virile national and international animal
and plant quarantine services;
(xi) maintenance of favourable tariff regime for agricultural commodities;
(xii) promotion of the export of agricultural commodities through, among
others, the Export Processing Zones (EPZs); (xiii) establishment of an
agricultural insurance scheme; (xiv) maintenance of a Strategic National
Grain Reserve for national food security;
(xv) coordination of agricultural data and information management systems;
(xvi) inventorization of land resources and control of land use and land
degradation;
(xvii) training and manpower development;
(xviii) participation in the mapping and development of interstate cattle and
grazing routes and watering points; (xix) promotion of micro-and rural credit
institutions;
(xx) promotion of agricultural commodity development and marketing
institutions;
(xxi) maintenance of fishing terminals and other fisheries infrastructure,
including cold rooms;
(xxii) promotion of trawling, artisanal and aquaculture fisheries;
(xxiii) promotion of fish feed production;
(xxiv) protection of Nigeria's Exclusive Economic Zone for fisheries
resources; and
(xxv) periodic review of agreements on international agricultural trade.
The State Governments:
The state governments will be primarily responsible for:
(i) the promotion of the primary production of all agricultural commodities
through the provision of a virile and effective extension service;
195
(ii) promotion of the production of inputs for crops, livestock, fish and
forestry;
(iii) ensuring access to land for all those wishing to engage in farming;
(iv) development and management of irrigation facilities and dams;
(v) grazing reserve development and creation of water access for livestock;
(vi) training and manpower development;
(vii) control of plant and animal pests and diseases;
(viii) promotion of appropriate institutions for administering credit to
smallholder farmers;
(ix) maintenance of buffer stocks of agricultural commodities;
(x) investment in rural infrastructure, including rural roads and water supply
in collaboration with federal and local governments; and,
(xi) ownership, management and control of forest estates held in trust for
local communities.
Local Governments:
The local governments will be expected to take over progressively the
responsibilities of state governments with respect to:
(i) the provision of effective extension service;
(ii) provision of rural infrastructure to complement federal and state
governments' efforts;
(iii) management of irrigation areas of dams;
(iv) mobilization of farmers for accelerated agricultural and rural
development through cooperative organizations, local institutions and
communities;
(v) provision of land for new entrants into farming in accordance with the
provision of the Land Use Act; and,
(vi) coordination of data collection at primary levels.
196
investment. In particular, the public sector is expected to play a leading role
with respect to:
(i) investment in all aspects of upstream and downstream agricultural
enterprises and agribusinesses, including agricultural commodity storage,
processing and marketing;
(ii) agricultural input supply and distribution;
(iii) the production of commercial seeds, seedlings, brood stock and
fingerlings under government certification and quality control;
(iv) agricultural mechanization;
(v) provision of enterprise-specific rural infrastructure; and, (vi) support for
research in all aspects of agriculture.
(a) Research and development, including biotechnology: The effort in this direction
is
to finance agricultural research, including biotechnology and the breeding
of predators for the biological control of crop pests which the private
sector may not be willing to invest in due to the high capital outlay and a
relatively low return from agricultural investments. The output of the
research system will be disseminated by the extension services of the states
and local governments to farmers, ranging from small-scale to large-scale
farmers.
197
sub-region, will be strengthened, enlarged and modernized in order to
raise the level of vaccine production in Nigeria to a self-sufficiency level
and also to cater for the
entire West Africa sub-region.
198
production, therefore, simple labor -and cost-saving devices that are
appropriate for the current level of agricultural production and
processing in the country will be developed and mass-produced. The
National Centre for
Agricultural Mechanisation (NCAM), the institution established for
this purpose, will be strengthened. Other initiatives in this direction,
such as animal traction and hand tools technology development, will
be encouraged.
Supportive Activities
These will comprise input incentive support and commodity marketing and
export activities.
199
(v) vaccines
(vi) veterinary drugs, and
(vii) agricultural credit. State and local governments are also to be
encouraged to subsidize these inputs, as an additional incentive for
agriculture.
200
private sector will be mobilized, encouraged and given incentives to
actively participate in the production of seeds, seedlings, brood stock,
fingerlings, etc, and also to be involved in out-growers mobilization.
(b) Agricultural extension : Agricultural extension is essentially an activity
that should be carried out by the lower tiers of government. But given
the overriding importance of technology dissemination, all the three
tiers of government in Nigeria will be involved in jointly financing
agricultural extension delivery and monitoring its impact. Also,
extension service delivery will be streamlined through the integration
of ADP and state extension services for greater effectiveness.
201
(e) Processing, storage, agro-allied industry and rural enterprise
development: The use of simple but effective on-farm and off-farm
storage facilities and agro-processing technology will be promoted to
add value to products and increase their shelf life. The Strategic Grain
Reserve Scheme will be modernized, strengthened and upgraded to a
National Food Reserve Program, which will enable it to handle all
staples and essential food products. This will be the launch pad for the
accelerated attainment of Nigeria’s national food security goal. The
Buffer Sock Food Storage Scheme of the states will incorporate the
use of private storage facilities to maintain a national strategic stock of
food that will be needed in times of national food emergencies. It is
also crucial to promote and develop agro-processing in the country for
the evolution of virile agro-allied industries and rural micro-
enterprises.
202
support not only the implementation of macroeconomic policies but also that
of agricultural sector policies. Then, there is a set of national and
international legal framework, including bilateral and multilateral
agreements and treaties that provide the enabling environment for foreign
and domestic private investment, promote international trade and, therefore,
promote economic growth.
Environmental concern has increasingly come into focus in the design of
policies for sustainable growth and development in Nigeria, as elsewhere in
the world. Hence, Nigeria has now put together a set of environmental
policies and strategies that are of important relevance to agriculture.
Macroeconomic Policies
203
induces substitution between domestic and foreign assets (foreign
currencies, bonds, securities real estate, etc) as well as domestic and foreign
goods and services (CBN, 1997). Since 1986, the main instruments of
market-based monetary policies have included the open market operations
(OMO), changes in reserve requirements and discount policy. Open market
operations involve the discretionary power of the CBN to purchase or sell
securities in the financial markets in order to influence the volume of
liquidity and levels of interest rates that ultimately affect money supply.
The sale of financial instruments by the CBN restricts the capacity of banks
to extend credit, thereby affecting inflation and interest rates. The reverse is
the case when financial instruments are purchased.
204
areas of business are open to foreign participation? How easy is it to bring
capital into the country and repatriate profits and capital from the country?
What legal mechanisms exist to protect the investor's personal business
interest? These questions underscore the importance of investment legal
framework. Some of the important domestic investment legislations and
international legal arrangements governing foreign private investment are as
contained in the NIPC Act 16 of 1997
Environmental Policies
205
(v) encouraging and involving the private sectors, NGOs and the public in
the implementation of strategies and actions aimed at achieving stated goals;
206
reduction (which are indeed offshoot of domestic agricultural production),
other policies and regulations associated with improved human welfare
ranked very low. But overall, policies on foreign investment ranked lowest.
From the foregoing, it can be seen that current policies are more effective in
the primary production subsector of agriculture than in the downstream
subsector. Impact of policies on the welfare status of the people and on the
environment remains weak. In general, the thrust of the effective policies is
on food self-sufficiency as most of these policies have bearing on boosting
agricultural production for food self-sufficiency.
Revision Questions
1. Mention five objectives of the new Nigerian agricultural polices
2. Who are the stakeholders and what roles are specified for them in the new
policy?
3what are the contents of the new policy
4. Explain the new policy direction
5. In what way is it different from the former agricultural policy?
207
THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF
AGRICULTURE IN NIGERIA.
UMORU, J.I.A.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION,
FEDERAL COLLEGE OF EDUCATION (TECH) AKOKA
Introduction.
208
Every government has agricultural policies that regulates
the practice of agriculture in the nation. Agricultural
policies therefore vary from one nation to another but the
most important thing is that such policies are normally
directed towards increased food production.
209
The Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria (CRIN), the Nigerian
Institute for Oil Palm Research, (NIFOR), and the Rubber
Research Institute of Nigeria (RRIN) e.t.c. These research
agencies carry out various researches in different aspect of
agriculture and relay such research findings through
agricultural extension workers.
210
machineries such as tractors, ploughing/ harrowing
machines.
211
Agricultural Development Project (ADP) of the each state
which is an arm of the Ministry of Agriculture. Money is also
raised for the government through these farms.
Revision Questions
1) List Five (5) Intervention roles of government in the
development of agriculture in Nigeria.
2) Discuss Four (4) important roles of any government in
the development of agriculture in the country.
212
Adeyeye, V.A. (1991). Group taking in Oyo State, Nigeia. A
Comparison of
Male and Female Participants. NISER Monograph Series No.
5. Ibadan, NISER.
Highlights:
INTRODUCTION.
213
AGRICULTURE AND CLIMATE CHANGE: SOME MITIGATIVE
MEASURES.
The Role of Stakeholders in mitigating emissions.
Sustainable livestock management and the reduction of Green House
Gas Emissions.
Strategies for adapting to the effect of climate change on agriculture.
INTRODUCTION.
The effect of Major Environmental problems such as ozone layer
depletion, Global warming, Land degradation, Erosion of Biodiversity,
deforestation, desertification, Acid rain and Environmental Pollution
cannot be over emphasized. Each of these problems is intricately
connected to the other, thus creating a major upheaval in the global
climatic conditions.
One major cause of climate change is the problem of Global Warming
or Green house effect (this is the increase in the average temperature
of the Earth's near-surface air and oceans since the mid-20th century
and its projected continuation) and this caused as a result of the
continued build- up of green house gases in the atmosphere. These
gases which include Carbon-dioxide, methane, nitrous oxides and
Chloroflourocarbons (CFCs) - some of which are naturally occurring in
the course of natural events such as volcanic eruptions, forest fires,
and decaying vegetation and animals. When naturally occurring, these
gases do not normally cause a disequilibrium in the biosphere. Climate
change therefore can be referred to as any long-term change in the
statistics of weather over periods of time that range from decades to
millions of years. Climate change may occur in a specific region, or
across the whole Earth. In recent usage, especially in the context of
environmental policy, climate change usually refers to changes in
modern climate. The build-up of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse
gases in the atmosphere is known to be changing air and sea surface
temperatures, rainfall and wind patterns, ocean acidity, sea levels and
the intensity of tropical cyclones. Research has found that climate
214
change is already modifying the distribution and productivity of marine
and freshwater species, affecting biological processes, and altering
food webs.
The sun is the Earth’s primary energy source. Its rays enter our
atmosphere and shower upon on our planet. About one third of this
solar energy is reflected back into the universe by shimmering
glaciers, water and other bright surfaces. Two thirds, however, are
absorbed by the Earth, warming land, oceans, and atmosphere.
Much of this heat radiates back out into space as albedo, but some of it
is stored in the atmosphere. This process is called the greenhouse
effect. Without it, the Earth’s average temperature would be a chilling
-18 degrees Celsius, even despite the sun’s constant energy supply.
However, heat emitted from the Earth is trapped in the atmosphere,
providing us with a comfortable average temperature of 14 degrees.
Sunrays enter the glass roof and walls of a greenhouse. But once they
heat up the ground, which, in turn, heats up the air inside the
greenhouse, the glass panels trap that warm air and temperatures
increase. But our planet has no glass walls; the only thing that comes
close to acting as such is our atmosphere. But unfortunately, in here,
processes are way more complicated. Only about half of all solar
energy that reaches the Earth is infrared radiation and causes
immediate warming when passing the atmosphere. The other half is of
a higher frequency, and only translates into heat once it hits Earth and
is later reflected back into space as waves of infrared radiation.
This transformation of solar radiation into infrared radiation is crucial,
because infrared radiation can be absorbed by the atmosphere.
Nitrogen, oxygen, and argon make up 98 percent of the Earth’s
atmosphere. But they do not absorb significant amounts of infrared
radiation, and thus do not contribute to the greenhouse effect. It is the
more exotic components like water vapour, carbon dioxide, ozone,
methane, nitrous oxide, and chlorofluorocarbons that absorb heat and
thus increase atmospheric temperatures. But while we are still far from
seeing major concentrations of CO2 in our atmosphere, slight changes
already alter the way the planet’s heating system works.
Measurements of carbon dioxide amounts from Mauna Loa
Observatory in Hawaii show that CO2 has increased from about 313
ppm in 1960 to about 375 ppm in 2005. That means for every million
particles in our atmosphere, there are now 62 CO2-particles more than
in 1960. Even if this does not seem like much, scientists say this
increase – most probably caused by human activities – is mainly
responsible for rising global temperatures throughout the last decades.
215
Figure 1: Illustration Of the Green House Effect.
216
FOOD SECURITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE.
217
questions that producers and leadership will have on the extent to
which certain practices affect greenhouse gases and global warming.
All the above notwithstanding, it may be safe to conclude that climate
change is likely to have a significant impact on farming whether people
accept that or not at present. It is important to improve our
understanding of the issue even if we are not completely sure of the
agricultural implications or recommendations.
218
communities to continue to make a living from fish or to provide fish
for feeding their families. Coastal communities may also be displaced
by rising sea levels and will be forced to find new places to live and
new ways to earn a living.
Electricity
LULUCF Gen. Gas Flaring
39% 3% 30%
Industrial Transport
Processes 20%
1% Other Energy
7%
Figure 2: Carbon emission scenarios in Nigeria. Source: PICCDM, 2008.
LULUCF (Land Use and Land Use Conversion Forestry).
219
Globally, agriculture is responsible for 20% of the greenhouse gas
emissions. In the United
States, the national average from agriculture is 8%, a figure much
lesser than Nigeria’s 39%.
220
AGRICULTURE AND CLIMATE CHANGE: SOME MITIGATIVE
MEASURES.
Some actions that address climate change are simply good
management practices such as: efficient Nitrogen fertilizer and manure
use, farm energy efficiency, cover cropping, and development of local
markets. Innovative farming practices that may address climate
change can also enhance
profitability and/or air or soil quality (such as use of bio-diesel and
alternative fuels, on-farm energy generation, and reduced tillage
systems).
According to CAST (the Council on Agricultural Science and
Technology), agriculture has a role to play in the broader effort to
reduce greenhouse gas concentrations by:
• Taking CO2 from the atmosphere and sequestering it in biomass
and soils;
• Decreasing the rate of land clearing for agriculture and taking
marginal lands out of production;
• Changing agricultural practices on productive, established
agricultural lands;
• Increasing efficiency of farm inputs such as fuel, fertilizers, and
pesticides;
• Increasing production of agricultural biofuels (renewable
biological-based energy
fuels) to replace fossil energy emissions;
• Improving N-use efficiency as the primary means of decreasing
N2O emissions;
• Decreasing methane emissions by capturing or preventing
emissions from animal manure storage and by increasing
livestock production efficiency.
The scientific evidence leaves little room for doubt that our climate is
changing, and that
agriculture will be affected. The sooner Extension and other service
providers become
familiar with the issue and with the range of possible responses, the
sooner we will be able
to integrate climate change into our programming, as one of the many
factors that farmers
should consider when making management decisions.
221
The stakeholders includes the farmer, various government agencies
the FAO and The UN.
In the words of Peter Holmgren, the FAO spokeman for the UN climate
change negotiations, Millions of poor farmers around the globe could
help in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, but this requires massive
investments and information — to change unsustainable farming
methods and to train farmers in mitigation practices. Concluding,
Holmgren noted that current global funding arrangements such as the
Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism are not reaching
farmers in poor countries. New and more flexible financing
mechanisms are needed that offer incentives to farmers, including
smallholders, so that they may participate in greenhouse gas emission
reductions and removals. If agriculture in developing countries
becomes more sustainable, if it increases its productivity and becomes
more resilient against the impact of climate change, this should help to
reduce the number of around one billion hungry people and offer
better income and job opportunities. The scope of the Clean
Development Mechanism, for example, could be expanded in order to
include reduction of emissions from deforestation and forest
degradation, wetlands, croplands and grasslands, in order to realize
the high potential for sequestering carbon in soils and above ground
biomass.In addition to all the above, it must be noted that reducing
nitrogen and energy use is the greatest way to save money and also
mitigate climate change. Improving dairy cow diet will also improve
methane and nitrous oxide emissions. Capturing and destroying
methane created in manure lagoons would also reduce emissions.
However, the greatest opportunity may be to farm for biofuels and
displace the emissions from fossil fuel used by other sectors of society.
222
Strategies for adapting to the effect of climate change on
agriculture.
Disruption or decline in global and local food supplies due to climate
change can be avoided
through more efficient irrigation and watershed management,
improved crop varieties, improved
land cultivation, farm and livestock management and the development
of crop varieties and
breeds that are adapted to changing climatic conditions. An effective
use of climate data and forecasts, through early warning systems, can
assist in analysing the impacts of climate change
on agricultural production and the entire food chain.
Water management.
Raised productivity from improved agricultural water management will
be essential to buffer
the anticipated volatility of rainfed production. Managing the
production risk in the face of increasing aridity and more variable
rainfall events will require both rainfed and irrigated
agricultural systems to become much more responsive and flexible in
approach. Progressive
adjustment of large-scale irrigation schemes will be essential to
maintain and grow output
in line with demand and improved local water management practices
will allow vulnerable groups to adapt livelihoods.
Proper management Of Soils.
The global soil carbon pool exceeds biomass pools by a factor of four
or five, without taking into account that recent soil degradation has led
to losses of between 30 percent and 75 percent of their antecedent soil
organic carbon. Globally, therefore, a soil carbon increase offers great
mitigation potential. The restoration of wastelands,
degraded/desertified soils and ecosystems (e.g. forest restoration,
improved pastures) and adoption of improved farm management
practices, can enhance and restore soil organic carbon, control and
reduce GHG emissions, and improve soil quality and soil health. Such
management practices can at the same time improve food security as
well as soil-related environmental services.
The role Of agricultural biodiversity.
Agricultural biodiversity will be an important element in the
development of production strategies to meet the challenges of
climate change, by increasing resilience to changing environmental
conditions and stress (drought, salinity, flooding). Ecosystem services
(such as genetic resources, soil formation or nutrient cycling) build
important measures of resilience and risk mitigation into agriculture –
elements that are increasingly important under changing climates.
Adaptation and mitigation through sustainable forest
management
223
Around 13 million hectares of forests are lost annually due to
deforestation. Sustainable management of forests, reducing emissions
from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD),
afforestation/reforestation and forest restoration, as well as sustainably
produced wood products that replace more carbon-intensive materials
and fuels, are important mitigation options. Climate change is affecting
the health of forests through an increase of forest fires, pests and
diseases. Adaptation measures not only reduce the vulnerability of the
world’s forests and forest dependent people, but can help to protect
water and soil resources and biodiversity. Without economic or other
incentives and without political will, however, it will be difficult to
reduce deforestation and forest degradation and achieve long-lasting
adaptation and mitigation measures.
224
in the poorest regions of developing nations that are already most
affected by such diseases. Changing rainfall patterns could devastate
rain-fed agriculture on which so much of the population in developing
countries depends to survive. In Africa, for example, only 4% of all
cropped land is irrigated.
What Must Be Done:
Rich Countries
Whilst rich countries are most responsible for climate change, it is poor
countries that are paying the price. Rich countries must therefore
assume first responsibility and:
Immediately implement deep emission cuts
Meet their aid commitments to achieve the Millennium Goals
Provide additional aid for adaptation measures for dealing with climate
change
Transfer existing and new adaptation technology measures
Create incentives for poor countries to limit their emissions while
safeguarding their right to development
Poor Countries
Ensure rights to land, forests, water, energy and livelihood for their
poorest people
Integrate climate change initiatives into national MDG-based
sustainable development plans as part of their contribution to global
mitigation
Prioritize renewable energy resources, where possible
Revision Questions
225
226