Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Pedro Rico
Perparim Gutaj
4/9/18
Education:
Corruption and Oppression Agents of Social Chaos
1. Introduction
I suppose when talking about education in these two nations we can not ignore the
prevailing issues of government and corruption. Although these nations might not share a history
of war, downfalls, or triumphs they do however collaborate intimately in the global commons in
addition to that, they also share a similar cultural problem that has impeded a common good, that
being their educational system. Like I have said these nations due partake in the global commons
in which they have immensely benefited from. For instance, Mexico ranks 15th in GDP (gross
domestic product) while India ranks number 7 (Statistics, 2018). According to research, India has
been performing well in governance and economic quality, the biggest change came from their
business environment which saw an exponential growth (Legatum, 2017). Whereas, Mexico
performed similarly with a slight variation, such as doing well in the business environment and
seeing positive changes in economic quality (Legatum, 2017). Regardless of all the positive
economic prosperity, they have been slow to invest in human capital. Of course there are several
facets of social welfare that is lacking in these two countries but education being the topic of this
paper is what I’ll be focusing on and any causal factors that will impede peoples accessibility to
quality education.
2. Theoretical Framework
Education has always been a big debate in the United States, always trying to find a way
programs or extracurricular activities but this isn’t a conversation about how to improve the
performance of our students so that we can final beat Finland. This conversation is about Mexico
Education
and India, and how come those nations who are excelling in GDP are failing to provide adequate
education to the masses. During this paper I would like to answer these questions: Why is it that
education in these countries are ranked low? Who are most affected by educational oversight?
3. Analysis
Diving into these countries we can see that both of them have established democratic
governance that are considered robust, they have also excelled in business, and economic quality.
They have also established and solidified diplomatic relations, that has given rise to several
bilateral agreements; all of which has resulted in high GDP for the two countries. Not only are
these countries sharing and enjoying economic prosperity they are also demonstrating their lack
of investment in the social welfare of their people; ergo quality education. Although these
countries share similar aspects in economic and social welfare, the mode in which education has
deteriorated looks different in each place. However, there seems to be a common theme
throughout these countries, which is government corruption. The institutions that were built to
better society have been powered by actors who have been susceptible to several forms of
corruption (i.e. dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power, typically involving bribery).
a. India
India’s case is that it lacks social welfare which has contributed to the poor quality of
education and a finite number of schools. The problem is that India continues to invest very little
back to the people, compared to other countries, the GDP per capita is $1,900, ranking them at
145 (Statistics, 2017). Now, what keeps India from investing back to its society? Well, there are
Education
two reasons that I have contributed to the lack of enthusiasm or impediment to education;
corruptions and the caste system that has influenced government institutions.
The case of India is an interesting one because the inequities were built on a foundation
known as the caste system, not to confuse this with a class system even though they do share the
same qualities of exclusion (ideally in modern-day socioeconomics people ideally can move
throughout the spectrum and are not limited by class). The issue with the caste system was that it
created a hierarchy in which people couldn’t escape from and was designed to target people who
were not Hindu. They were then categorized as the untouchables, which of course resulted in
them being ostracised by segregating them from the mainstream by social custom or legal
Although the caste system is no longer legally practiced in India it still plays a heavy role
in their society. Well, what does this have to do with education? Well everything apparently,
because of the history of oppression it has limited many people from obtaining economic and
social prosperity. As a result poverty is the highest among scheduled tribes at 49%, then
following suite are the scheduled castes at 29%, other backward castes at 21%, and finally, 12%
are others (India’s Poverty Profile, 2016). Another report also asserts that “about 60% of India's
nearly 1.3 billion people live on less than $3.10 a day, the World Bank's median poverty line.
And 21%, or more than 250 million people, survive on less than $2 a day” (CNN, 2015).
Now in addition to the poverty rate, 80% of India’s population live in rural areas (India’s
Poverty Profile, 2016), and with the richest 10% who now have control over 80% of India’s
wealth (CNN, 2015) government has had little want or incentive to invest in infrastructure in
these rural areas. Due to the lack of infrastructure and maintenance of public schools, this has
encouraged corruption among teachers, a study reveals that absenteeism among instructors is up
Education
by 25% compared to the global average of 20%(UNESCO, 2017). Not only does the practice of
ghosting result in poor quality education for the community but it has also cost the government
$1.5 billion a year (QUARTZ, 2014). To make matters worse these instructors have also
exploited the most vulnerable by offering private tutoring as a means to succeed in their
education, and the majority of instructors who are complicit in corruption are highly educated
(UNESCO, 2017).
Overall India’s governmental institutions have been susceptible to corruption due to lack
of rule of law, a poor judiciary system and the impunity towards violence against the most
vulnerable members of their community. India shows clears signs of economic division where
the top 1% owns half its wealth and politicians who cater to caste sentiments and or bribery
(CNN, 2015). In conclusion, because of these factors, government corruption and the cultural
acceptance of discrimination of the most vulnerable has resulted in producing 34% of its
population who can not read or write, with the second largest population following China. Means
that it houses a third of the world’s illiterates (The Times of India, 2017).
b. Mexico
The case of Mexico has followed the same trend of amassing high GDP which has placed
them at 15 among other countries, and controversy has ranked them low in GDP per capita
putting them at 73 on the list (Statistics Times, 2018). How is it that a country so rich in
resources continues to provide poor quality education to its people? Well from what I’ve been
reading there are two major themes in Mexico, corruption, and violence that has managed to
influence their government. Before I step into the themes of violence and corruption I want to
address their weak institutions; Mexico in the past has had several upheavals, 1910 being a
revolution. Mexico has seen many people trying to spread the wealth to the poor but in the end,
Education
the movement was hijacked by conservative actors that gave the impression of promoting social
change within their country. Inevitably clientelism was implemented by Lazaro Cardenas, who
claimed that this system would facilitate power-sharing and participation but this system simply
made it easier for private interest groups to exchange wealth. Conclusively, Cardenas system
expanded into an overlarge bureaucracy, that exacerbated the problem of income inequality.
Clientelism is hard at work in Mexico and continues to widen the disparities, which
paints a stark contrast to the haves and have-nots. For instance, 1% of the richest people own
half of Mexico’s wealth (telesur, 2015), leaving 40% of its population to live in poverty
(childfund, 2013), this proliferation of wealth to the top has given rise to corrupted actors. One,
in particular, was the head of the teachers union Mexico who was incarcerated for embezzling $2
million dollars, she has since been released claiming that she is now working with the one who
put her behind bars President Enrique Peña Nieto (The Guardian, 2017). Their goal is simple, to
Of course, there has been a lot of opposition to the cuts or lack of funding to education,
which results in a violent confrontation with the state. One example of this was in Oaxaca,
Mexico, that sparked “a deadly police crackdown against teachers that left nine people dead and
more than 100 wounded” (Democracynow, 2016). This constant vilification of teachers by the
government only hurts the people of Mexico, especially considering that only 37% of adults
(ages 25-64) have completed secondary schools (OECD, 2017). Not only do teachers, students,
and protesters face violence from the government but they also contend the violence from
organized crime. Take for instance the case of the students that disappeared in 2014 from the
town of Iguala, Guerrero, Mexico, the students were all activists who were getting ready to ride
the bus to Mexico city to join in a protest but were then kidnaped by a syndicate (freedomhouse,
Education
2017). The government has done very little to pursue the case, which has given rise to protest
and distrust.
In conclusion, corruption and crime continue to weaken the institutions of Mexico, giving
rise to the excessive force by police, disregarding the rule of law, a judicial system that adheres
to money, and economic instability. Mexico's government claims that it want's to provide high-
quality education but it's hard to be optimistic about Mexico’s educational prosperity when their
institutions are susceptible to corruptions and are complicit/ignore the violence that is imposed
on its people.
c. Comparison
The comparison of the two nations are quite similar with a slight variation here and there,
one thing was clear though, each nation had institutions that were susceptible to corruption. For
India, corruption was aided by an oppressive caste system that explicitly didn’t exist but was
used as fodder to rally up votes and sentiments of division among the people, all in which
contributed to the lack of accessibility for many people to acquire an adequate education. As for
Mexico they to had a government that thrived on corruption which ensures business, as usual,
they were complicit in facilitating violence on the people who dissented, either through state
force or via organized crime, all of which has contributed in divesting from education. These
nations talk about improving the quality of education but it's obvious by their GDP per capita
4. Conclusion
Conclusively corruption and oppressive forces have contributed to the poor education in
Mexico and India. Another thing to mention is that these countries were built not with the
intention to better their society but reserve certain rights to an exclusive group. As education was
Education
social change. However, with a government that rises from a history of oppression, the people
will need to continue to strive hard to reform their institutions. From what I have read, education
is a common good (huffpost, 2012), for it is more than a means of a vocation, it is avocational as
well, providing the ability to better our lives and our communities. Knowledge raises our
consciousness and allows us to remove our chains in order to combat oppression, tyranny, and to
overthrow despots. Which is probably why corrupted oppressive governments fear its potency.
My final verdict is that education needs advocates, and we must defend it from those who want
Reference
What is India’s Caste System? (2017). In BBC. Retrieved April 13, 2018, from
http://www.bbc.com/news/
The Legatum Prosperity Index (2017). In prosperity.com. Retrieved April 13, 2018, from
http://www.prosperity.com/globe/india
Freedom in The World, India (2016). In freedomhouse.org. Retrieved April 13, 2018, from
https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2016/india
Basu, M (n.d.). In Seeing The New India Through The Eyes of an Invisible Woman Retrieved
April 13, 2018, from http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/10/world/i-on-india-income-gap/
Corruption in Education System in India (2017). In azadindia.org. Retrieved April 13, 2018,
from http://www.azadindia.org/social-issues/education-system-in-india.html
Sunil B.S. (August 17, 2014). In Teachers Who Don’t Show Up Cost . . . Retrieved April 13,
2018, from https://qz.com/247389/
India Has a Third of The World’s Illiterates (2017). In Times of India. Retrieved April 13, 2018,
from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/916814.cms
India’s Poverty Profile (2017). In worldbank.org. Retrieved April 13, 2018, from
http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/infographic/2016/05/27/india-s-poverty-profile
Statistics Times (2018). In statisticstimes. Retrieved April 13, 2018, from
http://statisticstimes.com/economy/countries-by-projected-gdp-capita.php
The Chance to Learn (2013). In childfund. Retrieved April 13, 2018, from
https://www.childfund.org/Content/NewsDetail/2147489378/
Huey, A (July 12, 2012). In Public Education Is for the Common Good. Retrieved April 13,
2018, from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/asher-huey/post_3528_b_1632897.html
Education