Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Discussion
The purpose of this lab had been to calculate the rate of Crystal Violet dye by capturing
the absorbance vs time graph and creating a concentration vs time out of it since absorbance and
concentration are directly proportional. We were successful in doing so by determining the order
of reaction for CV+ to be first order and pseudo rate law to be Rate =k’[CV+] or
Rate=0.00133[CV+]. Our lab supported the hypothesis that order of reaction for Crystal Violet
can be determined by using concentration vs time graph which was determined from absorbance
vs time graph because of the direct relationship between concentration and absorbance. We
determined the order of reaction for Crystal Violet dye by comparing the linearized graphs for
zero, first and second order. We found out that the more linear or the more the least squares
regression approaches 1, the more it explain the concentration vs time graph, determining the
reaction order. Therefore, we found out the graph for first order (ln[A] vs time) was the one with
higher least squares regression which makes it a perfect choice for reaction order for Crystal
Violet dye. So CV+ underwent first order of reaction. We did not have so much sources of errors
when we did the lab but potential source of error arises from using the optimum wavelength from
the prelab which was 565 nm. We used the exact 565 nm which decreases the potential sources
of error but I have observed that the graph that was used to calculate concentration vs time graph
was not 100% linear which increases the percent of error. Since the graph of absorbance vs
concentration don’t have 100% direct or linear relationship, it would create possible errors to the
concentration vs time graph on the lab. If the least squares regression line for absorbance vs
concentration graph was 1 then our experiment did not have possible sources of error. Since we
used the exact optimum wavelength of 565 nm and cleaned the cuvettes before inserting into
calorimeter, the lab would be better if we had used an absorbance vs concentration graph with
regression of 1. If the least squares regression for absorbance vs concentration graph is 1, 100%
explains direct relationship between both variables which can be used to determine the
concentration vs time graph from absorbance vs time graph by just substituting the concentration
for the absorbance. Cleaning up the cuvette would also be some improvement for this lab for
preventing human error.
Conclusion
In this lab, I learned how to determine pseudo rate law of a reaction which is relevant
when computing two or more reactants that are not changing with time. I learned that Beer’s law
can be used to determine the rate law or reaction order of the reaction since concentration vs time
graph can be explained by using absorbance vs concentration of the Beer’s law. I learned
different factors can add up to create a faulty data. For example, the absorbance vs time graph
was the cause for most or all of our error in this lab. I learned that if the lab was 100% free of
error the least squares regression (r2) for first order would be 1. This direct proportionality of
absorbance vs concentration could be used to determine the rate law for many chemicals
experimentally.