Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Describe:
After reviewing last week’s vocabulary, I broke the class into centers. I placed my group on the
rug so I could be accessible to the whole class while I was working with students who need
additional assistance. I placed Rachel in a flexible group along with a few other students who
were having trouble retaining and identifying the computer parts vocabulary (Hall, 2002). The
students in the group were instructed to complete 3 vocabulary words at a time. After they
completed 3 vocabulary words using their visual aid worksheet, they checked in with me to
verify their answers (Alber, 2014). Rachel verified her answers with me twice. She had 5 out of
6 correct, which is a vast improvement from her previous score of 1 out of 6.
Synthesize: I saw enormous improvement from Rachel this week, but I am also aware that she
works well in groups and 1on1. Rachel’s performance drops off tremendously when she is
working independently. I am also cognizant that when I am in small group, a few of my other
students exhibit off task behavior. I utilized the Positive Behavior Intervention System (PBIS
color chart) we have in place throughout our school, but I recognize that it does not have the
same effect on all of the students (Reinke, Herman & Stormont 2013). As the class period
progressed, I became aware that I was focusing on the inappropriate behavior a couple of
students were displaying. However, after changing two student’s color, I knew I had to focus on
the positive. I tried to give the students who were doing the right thing ample praise and
informed the class that they could earn a prize by transitioning quickly and quietly. These
measures appeared successful.
It states in our text that for every 1 negative comment, you should say 4 positives (Reinke et al.,
2013). I don’t agree with this ratio. I feel positive and negative praise and/or attention should
be genuine and given when warranted. Generally, I take a moment to self-reflect and take the
temperature of my emotional state as well as the class. Sometimes, I walk into a class and I can
clearly tell the students have just been reprimanded by their homeroom teacher. I may give
them more positive praise than usual, because they are trying to work and participate even
though they are emotionally fragile. I am also aware of students who will take advantage of
kindness, and they need a stern redirection to produce successful behavior and work. These
two examples I wrote about could be used on the same kid during the same class period. We
shouldn’t respond to a child’s behavior using a quota system, and we also need to be aware of
our own emotional state.
Ultimately, I may incorporate heterogeneous grouping based on academics and behavior. The
class grouping set up by the homeroom teacher doesn’t work very well during my lessons.
However, when I am pulling small group I will be mindful to add J., who easily becomes off-
Hall_ Journal Assignment M4_Topic
task, into the group. When they are working in independent centers and I am floating around, I
will give J. and Rachel the option to spread out on the floor if they remain on task. I will also
provide Rachel with a timer so she can continue to check her progress with me. In addition to
that, I will continue to give her the feedback she requires while she works independently.
Overall, I think the class was productive, engaging, and challenging for the students.