Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
BOOK REVIEW
sensibility with regard to the milieu. Moreover, metaphors in nature, and that the cultural order
the laurel forest and its trees, which in Japan gives way to the natural order. He goes on to say
have both religious and nationalistic connota that FUJITANI's 'theory of the spirit of words'
tions, represent the matrix of the Japanese iden (Kotodama-ron) gives place to a deeper order,
tity and, even today, are referred to, at the time i.e., nature, by turning over the clear order just
of crisis involving the Japanese identity. as 'space' (ma) does. As indicated by the title of
Part II is entitled 'The reason of the Milieu' Chapter 5, 'The Gaps Where Nature En
and comprises Chapter 4, 'Wild Nature, Con croaches', alternate forms of nature/culture are
structed Nature'. The appendix attached to this vividly represented in a concrete milieu in
chapter presents the outline of a new science per Japanese landscape technology, which attempts
taining to the milieu, referred to as 'mesology', to have nature trajectively describe the land
by means of which the author proposes to revital scape. Apropos of this, the author refers to
ize geography. To put it more specifically, the Notes on Gardening (Sakuteiki, Heian Period)
author presents a persuasively-worded discourse and Oribe FURUTAas sources of further exam
to the end that mesology should not fall into the ples. Although he is often regarded as something
blind alley of positivistic dualism or imaginari of a mannerist, Oribe deserves appreciation as
ness. The author furthermore proposes the no an artist who truly recreated nature trajectively.
tion of 'trajectivity' as a central concept in The author refers to a slogan of the Edo period,
delineating the characteristics of the milieu. ' Return to Rikyu', and goes on to discover the
trajectivity falls in the halfway stage between the characteristics peculiar to Japanese society
subjective and the objective, and combines which, apart from the general argument that na
metaphor and causality. Thus, the milieu may ture is the paradigm for the social order, associ
be redefined as a trajective combination of places ates the group with nature and the individual
and extent. A number of terms familiar to ge with the artifact.
ographers such as 'milieu' which is a traditional Chapter 6 is titled 'To Live in, to Countrify'.
term utilized by the French school of geography, Here, the Japanese term for one's 'native place'
appear in the text. As the author himself asserts, or home town (furusato) is expressed in Japanese
however, these terms as well as the concepts in as matrie rather than the French patrie, thus in
troduced do not necessarily correspond to spa dicating the likeness of nature to a mother's
tial dimensions or realistic objects and, womb. This is close to the notion of the 'nostal
moreover, they are open to highly metaphysical gia for and the wish to return to a mother's
or philosophical interpretation. womb' and indicates that the fundamental land
In Part III, 'The Installation of the Real', the scape of nature is none other than a metaphor
concepts and the theoretical framework as of 'the envelopment and the inclusion of the
presented in Part II are developed through the matrix' for the Japanese. From the point of view
means of an examination of nature. In Chapter of mesology, this constitutes a factor that is es
5, which is found in this part, the traditional con sentially stabilizing, localizing and 'topical'.
ceptions of the Japanese with regard to nature Naturally, a pure topicality cannot exist in a real
are first analyzed. In Japan, nature is considered milieu. On the other hand, the mechanism in
essentially good, and is not separated from the volving 'countrification' is said to comprise a
human self; and, where Japanese culture is con process to delocalize and abstract what is local
cerned, it is the supreme referent. Examples of and topical, transfer the elements to what is 'cho
nature as it is seen at the end of the cultural retical' and to 'metaphorize' them. The author's
trajectory include the Taoistic naturalism of argument does not necessarily rank what is top
Norinaga MOTOORIand the ideal life as embod ical above what is 'choretical', but he is critical
ied in the travels of Basho. In what he refers to of the posture of power, typically represented by
as the 'reversal of words' (togo), after the dis the nation-state, by means of which the milieu
cussions by Mitsue FUJITANI,the author finds a is deprived of topicality, and also of the attempt
typical example of the point he is trying to make to replace the latter with 'choresy'. For instance,
in the fact that Japanese culture seeks to find the nationalism found in Japanese Landscape
250
here is not limited to its geographical meaning. ology discussed in this work is applicable in other
As seen in the last chapter, 'The Japanese Medi cultures. The author's choice of models to illus
ance', reference is made to the relationship be trate his theme, and his skilful approach to the
tween the linguistic structure of the Japanese development of his thought are clearly based on
language - particularly with regard to the com a European system of reasoning. Hence his criti
monly practiced ellipsis of the subject of a sen cism of the anti-scientific and anti-reasoning
tence - and the special characteristics of the posture adopted by the Japanese is worthy of
Japanese culture, in which individuality is bu note. Yet the question remains as to whether the
ried within collectivity, emotion is emphasized author is able to properly answer the criticism
over reason, and nature and being natural is ex that could be leveled at the arbitrariness of his
tolled. selection of models. Moreover, his propositions
But why does the author build up an argument display the danger of an ultra-historical treat
on what, in themselves, are not new? Should not ment of aspects of Japanese culture as if they
the book be considered a philosophical essay on comprised the true essence of Japanese culture
Japanese culture, incorporating nature only as when, in fact, they are isolated instances.
one among a number of points of discussion, by Nonetheless, we may say that the deep under
an author who is also a geographer? Moreover, standing of and affection for Japan on the part
should not the author's concept pertaining to the of the author is undeniable, if only for the rea
' milieu' have been developed with 'place' accord son that his book remains a work on a 'half
ing to NISHIDA as the starting point? These are forgotten' rather than a 'totally-forgotten'
the reviewer's major questions. While it is true landscape.
that the concepts proposed by the author are de
fined in a universal language, it is obvious that PS: This paper was submitted on the 12th of
they have been developed on the basis of an anal May. Therefore, the reviewer could not have the
opportunity to consult the Japanese translation
ysis of the Japanese view of nature. In fact, the
author states elsewhere that the term mediance of this book which appeared in September un
is a translation of the Japanese term fudosei der the title Fudo-no-Nippon (Chikuma-shobo,
(spiritual climate) utilized by WATSUJI. It is in Tokyo).
teresting, therefore, to speculate how far the mes Hitomi HARADA, Hitotsubashi University
252
CONTENTS
OF
GEOGRAPHICAL REVIEW OF JAPAN (Ser. A): Vol. 61, Nos. 1-6, 1988
(Mostly in Japanese with an English summary)