LAB ASSESSMENT (Design of Structures Lab)

Mark Distribution

Sr # Assessment Tool Quantity Weightage

1 Weekly Performance Evaluation Number of Designs 60 %

2 Written Assessment Flexible 16 %

3 Viva Flexible 24 %

4 Total 100

Performance Evaluation Criteria (For Each Lab Task):

Sr # Assessment Tool Maximum Score

1 Design Conduct 15

2 Design Report 10

Total 25
Outcomes Assessed:

PLO Description Assessment

3 Design Design Conduct
10 Communication Design Report
Note: CLOs should be as given in the Lab File.
Rubrics for Assessment of Design Conduct

Sr. Criteria Weightage 0 1 2 3 4 Score

No. Poor Not developed Developing Competent Excellent
1 Knowledge and 2 Task not Fails to apply Applies the Applies the relevant Applies the
application performed relevant knowledge relevant knowledge and concept appropriate
and concepts to the knowledge and to the problem, knowledge and
problem; concept to the understands the major concepts to the
misunderstands or problem, possibly points of the knowledge, problem with
fails to recall critical in a roundabout with possible accuracy and
points. way; do not misunderstanding or proficiency; shows
understands the failure to recall minor precise
major points of the points. understanding of
knowledge. these knowledge and
concepts.
2 Problem 2 Task not Unable to translate The problem is The problem is The problem is
formulation performed to an appropriate translated in a translated in a translated in a
mathematical mathematical or mathematical or other mathematical or
or other standard other standard standard form that may other standard form
form. form in a contain minor mistakes. readily amenable for
roundabout way; solution.
that may not easily
solved.
3 Use of modern 1 Task not Unable to use Enable to use Demonstrates awareness Demonstrates
engineering performed modern engineering modern of modern engineering knowledge and
software’s software to engineering software through mostly application of modern
develop or interpret software to correct development and engineering software
computer programs develop or interpretation of through accurate
to solve problems. interpret computer computer programs to development and
programs to solve solve problems but may interpretation of
problems and may contain minor mistakes computer programs
contain several or syntax errors. to solve problems.
mistakes.
Rubrics for Assessment of Ethics

Sr. Criteria Weightage 0 1 2 3 4 Score

No. Poor Not developed Developing Competent Excellent
1 Ethical 1 Inattentive No interaction with No interaction with Consult Instructor in Suggest new
Behavior/Learning during teacher and tries to teacher hence uses case of difficulty and approaches and
Approach demonstration copy from others wrong approaches help fellow students in improves on what
their problems has done before
Rubrics for Assessment of Design Report

Sr. Criteria Weightage 0 1 2 3 4 Score

No. Poor Not developed Developing Competent Excellent

1 Design 1 Task not Fails to use a valid Uses valid design Uses valid design Uses sound design
Strategy performed design strategy, strategy, albeit strategy, albeit maybe strategy, readily uses
haphazard haphazard approach roundabout and lacks alternative methods
approach alternatives when necessary
2. Design 2 Task not Selects Selects and applies Selects and applies the Selects and applies
Calculations performed inappropriate appropriate appropriate procedures appropriate procedures
procedures procedures required specific to the task specific to the task
required by the by the task, but without significant without error, and applies
task and makes makes a number of errors some in innovative ways
critical errors in non-critical errors in
applying them doing so
3. Results and 2 Task not Results are not Results are shown in Results are shown well in Results are clearly presented
Discussion performed shown in the the required format of the required format of in the required format of
required format of tables, graphs, tables, graphs, drawings or labeled tables, graphs,
tables, graphs, drawings or figures figures and an acceptable drawings or figures and well
figures or drawings but not properly interpretation is provided. interpreted.
neither interpreted. interpreted. Discussion of the results is Discussion of the results is
Discussion of the Discussion of the well done. done taking into account all
results is not results is not properly aspects.
included in the done.
report.
4. Clarity of 1 Task not Poor writing, Vague writing, Clarity in writing, sentence Clarity in writing, sentence
writing. performed sentence sentence construction construction is fairly construction is correct and
construction is is mostly incorrect and correct and occasional no mistakes of grammar,
incorrect with many major mistakes of mistakes of grammar, spellings or punctuation
mistakes of grammar, spellings or spellings or punctuation
grammar, spellings punctuation
and punctuation