Evaluation Assessment Report On Idris Point

EVALUATION & DESIGN REPORT ON SERCEABILITY AND FOUNDATION ADIQUCY CHECK OF (IDRIS POINT) SIX
STORIED COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH ONE BASEMENT AT MIDDLE BADDA , GULSAN, DHAKA.
EVALUATION & ASSESSMENT REPORT ON SERCEABILITY AND ADIQUCY CHECK OF STRUCTURAL

ELEMENTS OF (IDRIS POINT) SIX STORIED COMMERCIAL BUILDING (WITH ONE BASEMENT) AT
MIDDLE BADDA, GULSAN, DHAKA
Property Development Limited (PDL)

PRAN-RFL Group
Tel: 880-2-9881792 (Ext-312)
Fax: 880-2-8837464
Web: www.pranfoods.net; www.rflplastics.com
0 | Page
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Scope of work
3.0 Software used in Design
4.0 Design Philosophy & Approach
5.0 Description of Building
6.0 Materials
7.0 Loading Criteria
7.1 Load Combinations
8.0 Geo-technical Criteria
8.1 Checking adequacy of foundation
9.0 Check for Serviceability
9.1 Lateral deflection
 Maximum top deflection due to wind load
 Maximum inter story Drift due to earthquake load
9.2 Fundamental Frequency & Torsional behavior
 Modal Analysis due to Earthquake
10.0 Conclusion & Recommendation
11.0 Annexure (test result, related calculation etc.)
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to outline the design philosophy and loading that were consider for
designing the (Idris point) Six storied Commercial Building with one Basement. Construction
period is assumed around early in 2004 (as per signature date on photocopy drawing).
1 | Page
This project includes the construction of approximately 3454 sft (113 ft x 40 ft) which is used for
shops (GF), 1st Floor (Bank), 2 nd 3rd & 4th floor (offices) and roof top accommodation.
Basements floor is dedicated for store. There are one lift and two stairs in this building.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of the work is to evaluate the serviceability of the structure and foundation capacity of
the building as per loading of different floor according to BNBC. Checking of different structural
members will be done on the basis of concrete strength considered as per as supplied design
drawing.
3.0 SOFTWARE USED IN DESIGN
Computer Model was developed in ETABS which is based on supplied structural drawings and
practical measurement (due to unavailability of Architectural drawing from the owner) according
to Codes and Standard for carrying out complete analysis and design. Loading Values, load
combinations, design parameters, strength calculation are taken from the BNBC and design
parameters used in the design drawings. Calculation for wind load has been considered based on
UBC-94 Code with basic wind speed and Exposure A according to BNBC Standard. The result
obtained from computer model is checked against relevant specifications and hand calculations.
Finally, based on analytical results, structural and foundation safety and stability are
recommended.
2 | Page
4.0 DESIGN PHILOSOPHY AND APPROACH:
Superstructure: R.C.C Column, Beam, Slab was provided in this structure which we can says as
a Frame structure of category Intermediate Moment resisting frame as per BNBC.
Sub-Structure: Isolated foundation and combined foundation are used in this building.
5.0 DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING:
(Idris Point) Six storied Commercial Building with one Basement Design with the following
criteria:
• The building is rectangular in size with 133 ft length, 40 ft width and height 60’-0” (approx.)
• Basement floor height 8.5 ft, Ground floor height is 11 ft and typical floor height is 10ft.
• One OHWT placed on the roof of this building.
TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN
3 | Page
TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN (Office part)
4 | Page
6.0 MATERIALS
We did not receive any material test report for this building. Though this building was made with
brick chips, that’s why we considering the concrete strength f’c=2500 psi and from usual
practice rebar strength fy = 60 ksi (60,000 psi).
7.0 LOADING CRITERIA
The building was designed in accordance with the requirements of BNBC-2006, ACI 318-99 Code & UBC-
94.
Standards:
 Dead Load = Self weight + Floor finish (1.2 KN/m2(25psf);

 Live load on floor (Office) = 3 KN/m2( 60 psf.
 Live load on roof = 2.0 KN/m2( 40 psf
 5” thick brick wall load periphery = 5.84 KN/m
 Wind Load as Per BNBC Code 2006
5 | Page
Basic wind speed 210 KM/H (BNBC Table 6.2.8) Exposure Type-A
 Earthquake load as per BNBC Code 2006
V = ZIC*W/R
Z = Seismic zone co-efficient = 0.15 (BNBC FIG. 6.2.10, SEISMIC ZONNING MAP OF BANGLADESH)
C = Numerical Co-efficient as per equation BNBC 2.5.2
S = Site Coefficient = 1.5 (BNBC Table 6.2.25)
W = Total Dead load of Structure including self-weight
R = Response Modification factor = 8 (BNBC Table 6.2.24)
LOAD PLAN (OFFICE)
6 | Page
LOAD PLAN (ACCOMMODATION)
Floors Occupancy type Live Load (KN/m2) Comment

GF-5th floor Office 3.0
Roof Accommodation 2.0
Stair case 3.0
7.1 LOAD COMBINATION
Load combinations were considered for analyzing and designing the building according to
BNBC Codes (BNBC 2.7.5.1).
8.0 GEOTECHNICAL CRITERIA
7 | Page
We don’t have any soil test report from land owner. For design consideration we assumed the
bearing capacity of soil is 2 TSF = 4 KSF.
Fig: Column layout plan with Grid line
8.1 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF FOUNDATION
The adequacy of foundation is as follows:
Table 1: Load Table with foundation Capacity
Grid No Total Provided Ratio Ratio Remarks

Service Footing Allowable Actual
Load Size
(kip)
A1 170 6’-0”x6’-0” 4 4.7 Inadequate
D2 255 6’-0”x9’-0” 4 4.72 Inadequate
E2 211 6’-0”x8’-0” 4 4.39 Inadequate
F2 219 6’-0”x8’-0” 4 4.55 Inadequate
G2 224 6’-0”x8’-0” 4 4.68 Inadequate
I2 136 6’-0”x6’-0” 4 3.78 Adequate
A4 252 6’-0”x9’-0” 4 4.67 Inadequate
8 | Page
D4 347 9’-0”x9’-0” 4 4.28 Inadequate

E3 373 9’-0”x9’-0” 4 4.61 Inadequate
F3 381 9’-0”x9’-0” 4 4.703 Inadequate
G3 381 9’-0”x9’-0” 4 4.703 Inadequate
J3 191 6’-0”x8’-0” 4 3.97 Adequate
D6 187 6’-0”x8’-0” 4 3.89 Adequate
E7 307 6’-0”x8’-0” 4 6.39 Inadequate
F7 313 6’-0”x8’-0” 4 6.52 Inadequate
G7 270 6’-0”x8’-0” 4 5.625 Inadequate
K7 88 6’-0”x6’-0” 4 2.44 Adequate
A6 119
14’-0”x7’-0” 4 3.10 Adequate
B6 185
A9 74 4
12’-0” x 7’-0” 2.10 Adequate
B9 106
* For support reaction DL+0.7 LL load combination used.
8.2 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF COLUMN
Sl no. Grid id Re-bar area From analysis Remark

(provided in2) (required in2)
1 C-3 (10”X18”) 4.4 3.4 Adequate
2 D-2 (12”X18”) 4.4 2.4 Adequate
3 E-2 (12”X18”) 4.4 2.4 Adequate
4 F-2 (12”X18”) 4.4 2.4 Adequate
5 G-2 (12”X18”) 4.4 2.5 Adequate
6 I-2 (10”X15”) 1.86 2.33 Inadequate
7 A-4 (12”X18”) 4.4 2.6 Adequate
8 D-4 (d-18”) 6.16 4.53 Adequate
9 E-3 (d-18”) 6.16 4.53 Adequate
10 F-3 (d-18”) 6.16 5.04 Adequate
11 G-3 (d-18”) 6.16 4.98 Adequate
12 J-3(10”x15”) 1.86 5.30 Inadequate
13 A-6 (d-16”) 4.44 2.1 Adequate
14 B-6 (12”X18”) 4.44 2.4 Adequate
15 D-6 (10”X15”) 1.86 4.02 Inadequate
16 E-7 (12”X18”) 4.44 4.1 Adequate
17 F-7 (12”X18”) 4.44 4.4 Adequate
18 G-7 (12”X18”) 4.44 3.96 Adequate
19 K-7 (10”X15”) 1.86 1.5 Adequate
20 H-7 (10”X10”) 2.48 O/S section is Inadequate
21 I-7 (10”X10”) 2.48 O/S section is Inadequate
22 H-5 (10”X10”) 2.48 O/S section is Inadequate
23 I-5 (10”X10”) 2.48 O/S section is Inadequate
9 | Page
24 A-9 (10”X15”) 1.86 1.5 Adequate

25 B-9 (12”X15”) 4.44 1.8 Adequate
26 C-9 (10”X10”) 2.48 O/S section is Inadequate
27 D-9 (10”x10”) 2.48 3.16 Inadequate
28 C-8 (10”x10”) 2.48 3.94 Inadequate
29 D-8 (10”x10”) 2.48 O/S section is Inadequate
10 | Page
Fig: Column longitudinal re-bar area in grid-9
9.0 CHECK FOR SERVICEABILITY
The calculation of lateral defection due to wind and Earthquake load of (Idris Point) six storied
Commercial Building with one Basement as follows:
9.1 LATERAL DEFLECTION

 Maximum Top deflection Due To Wind Load
11 | Page
Wind Direction Column Designation Max. Actual Allowable Deflection Comments

Deflection (H/420)
(inch)
X C1 0.70 2.1 Adequate
Y C1 2.28 2.1 Inadequate
Fig: Top deflection

for Wind load (Y-
Direction) @ Grid F
Fig: Top deflection for Wind load (X-Direction) @ Grid 7
12 | Page
Maximum Inter Story Drift Due to Earth Quake load
Floor Level Max. Drift Index Max. Drift Index Allowable Drift Comments
(for EX) (for EY) Index
(0.03/R)
Roof Top 0.001506 0.00123 0.00375 Adequate
accommodation
5F 0.00125 0.00016 0.00375 Adequate
4F 0.001357 0.0015 0.00375 Adequate
3F 0.00142 0.00090 0.00375 Adequate
2F 0.00134 0.0012 0.00375 Adequate
1F 0.000869 0.00035 0.00375 Adequate
GF 0.00007 0.00032 0.00375 Adequate
Fig:
Maximum Inter
Story Drift due to
Earth Quake along
X axis @ Grid 7
13 | Page
Fig: Maximum Inter Story Drift due to Earth Quake along Y axis @ Grid A
14 | Page
Fig:
Demand-
Capacity
ratio for grid
-7.
15 | Page
Conclusion & recommendations:
As per check analysis results and from the above observation following recommendation are
given below:
 Serviceability check ratios are within allowable limit and hence satisfactory against
lateral load (like wind & seismic loading). Lateral deflection due to wind in Y direction
little bit higher then the limit.
 Physically slab and beam capacity looks satisfactory, but analysis could not be performed
due to lack of evidence.
 Although column capacity also looks adequate, three columns (grid I-2, J3 and D-6 in 1st
floor to 2nd floor) shows under reinforced.
 Lift core column is not adequate for this design. Its shows over stress.
 As per supplied drawing and site condition, foundation type is observed as Isolated and
combined foundation. As per supplied drawing the capacity of foundation is not
adequate.
Since number of observed columns are very few comprising the whole structure, engineering
summery in not only hard to comment but also may be misleading. Hence, it is strongly
recommended to conduct Detailed Engineering Assessment (DEA), by through checking, core
sample collection and testing to evaluate actual condition of the structure in as build condition.
16 | Page

Evaluation Assessment Report On Idris Point

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Evaluation Assessment Report On Idris Point

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

EVALUATION & DESIGN REPORT ON SERCEABILITY AND FOUNDATION ADIQUCY CHECK OF (IDRIS POINT) SIX

EVALUATION & ASSESSMENT REPORT ON SERCEABILITY AND ADIQUCY CHECK OF STRUCTURAL

Property Development Limited (PDL)

2.0 SCOPE OF WORK

3.0 SOFTWARE USED IN DESIGN

4.0 DESIGN PHILOSOPHY AND APPROACH:

5.0 DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING:

• One OHWT placed on the roof of this building.

TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN

TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN (Office part)

7.0 LOADING CRITERIA

 Dead Load = Self weight + Floor finish (1.2 KN/m2(25psf);

LOAD PLAN (OFFICE)

LOAD PLAN (ACCOMMODATION)

Floors Occupancy type Live Load (KN/m2) Comment

7.1 LOAD COMBINATION

8.0 GEOTECHNICAL CRITERIA

Fig: Column layout plan with Grid line

8.1 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF FOUNDATION

The adequacy of foundation is as follows:

Table 1: Load Table with foundation Capacity

Grid No Total Provided Ratio Ratio Remarks

D4 347 9’-0”x9’-0” 4 4.28 Inadequate

* For support reaction DL+0.7 LL load combination used.

8.2 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF COLUMN

Sl no. Grid id Re-bar area From analysis Remark

24 A-9 (10”X15”) 1.86 1.5 Adequate

Fig: Column longitudinal re-bar area in grid-9

9.0 CHECK FOR SERVICEABILITY

9.1 LATERAL DEFLECTION

Wind Direction Column Designation Max. Actual Allowable Deflection Comments

Fig: Top deflection

Fig: Top deflection for Wind load (X-Direction) @ Grid 7

Maximum Inter Story Drift Due to Earth Quake load

Conclusion & recommendations:

S-ar putea să vă placă și