Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Authors must
POLICY ON MISCONDUCT
Should any author be found to be in breach of this code of ethics or guilty of research
misconduct, the journal reserves the right to reject/retract or withdraw the paper, decline
further submissions from the offending authors for a period of up to five years and inform
all interested parties including relevant journal editors and authors, the author's
department head and/or institutional office of scientific misconduct.
The Editor of a peer-reviewed journal is solely and independently responsible for deciding
which articles should be accepted for publication. The Editor may be guided by the policies
of the editorial board and, while seeking guidance via peer review, may still reject a
manuscript without review if considered inappropriate for the journal.
Editors must
Evaluate each manuscript for its intellectual content without regard to race,
gender, age, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, political
philosophy, citizenship, domicile or institutional affiliation of the authors.
Not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other
than those involved in the publishing process as appropriate.
Disclose any potential conflict of interest.
Pass manuscripts in which they have potential conflicts of interests to
another member of the editorial board to review and consider.
Not use privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review for
personal advantage.
On receiving a challenge to the authenticity/integrity of an article, consult
the publisher and contribute to the investigation and responsive measures
which follow.
Where a member of the Editorial Board has submitted a manuscript to the journal, the peer
review process will be handled entirely independently from that Editor; they will not know
who the handling editorial board member or reviewers are. The Editor will declare their
membership of the board in the declaration of interest section for any published
manuscript.
Reviewers must
CONCLUSION
1. Editors may seek advice on submitted paper on ethical and security issue not only
from the technical reviewer but also from relevant expert.
2. Occasionally editor may find ethical issues or issues about data or materials which
raise concern. In such cases the issue will be resolved before paper accepted for
publication.
3. If concern are related to implication to the society or individual, in such cases advise
will be obtained from more than one reviewer and if needed from an Expert.
4. If the article has any threat to security of an organization, state or nation we may
seek advice of concerned expert before publication.
5. RDA/RDRF Journals will be published to promote the culture of meaningful
research among students, scholars, faculty members, researchers, scientists and
industry people.
6. Publishers, editors, contributors, subscribers and people related to the publication
will work for improving quality of research work in Science, Technology and
Management subjects.
7. Editors Advisors and Reviewers will be top professionals in their own field who
have taken up the assignment to contribute for quality research publication.
8. The publishers put the integrity of authors, reviewers and editors on very high
pedestal and believe that their commitment to produce original research work
in RDA/RDRF Journals is genuine.
9. Nobody in the publishing team will be paid any remuneration nor will they demand
any charge from the authors.
10. Articles published in RDA/RDRF Journals will be subjected to rigorous plagiarism
checks before publication and no cut-paste will be permitted.
11. Reviewers will apply themselves to review articles sent to them and ensure the
quality in format and content.
12. Authors will be black listed if he/she sends any articles which are not his/her own
work and picked up/copied from somewhere.
13. Publishers believe strongly on helping authors in improving their paper writing.
14. Publishers will give top honors to innovation and social empowerment in research
work.
15. Publishers have genuine faith on inclusive growth of the society through meaningful
research by all sections of the higher education and industry/corporate and want to
honestly promote it.
************