Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
In re: Chapter 11
I, XXXXXXXXX (insert your name here) residing at XXXXXX (insert your address
(collectively, the "Debtors") and hereby submit this Joinder to the Objection to the Debtors’
1. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and
1334. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409. This matter
The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are AbitiBowater, Inc.; AbitiBowater US Holding 1 Corp.;
AbitiBowater US Holding LLC; AbitiBowater Canada, Inc.; Abitibi-Consolidated Alabama Corp.; AbitibiConsolidated
Corp.; Abitibi-Consolidated Finance LP; Abitibi-Consolidated Sales Corp.; Alabama River Newsprint Co.; August
Woodlands, LLC; Bowater Alabama LLC; Bowater America, Inc.; Bowater Canada Finance Corp.; Bowater Canadian
Forest Products, Inc.; Bowater Canadian Holdings Inc.; Bowater Canadian Ltd.; Bowater Finance Company, Inc.;
Bowater Finance II LLC; Bowater, Inc.; Bowater LaHave Corp.; Bowater Maritimes, Inc.; Bowater Newsprint South
LLC; Bowater Newsprint South Operations LLC; Bowater Nuway, Inc.; Bowater Nuway MidSates, Inc.; Bowater
South American Holdings, Inc.; Bowater Ventures, Inc.; Catawba Property Holdings LLC; Coosa Pines Golf Club
Holdings LLC; Donohue Corp.; Lake Superior Forest Products, Inc.; and Tenex Data, Inc
.
BACKGROUND
2. On April 16, 2009 (the “Petition Date”), the Debtors filed voluntary petitions
for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors operate and maintain their
Code. Pursuant to Debtors’ voluntary petitions filed with this Court, the company listed
3. On April 17, 2009, certain of the Debtors (the “Canadian Debtors”), along
with non-debtor subsidiaries, sought protection from creditors under Canada’s Companies’
Creditors Arrangement Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36 (the “CCAA”), in the Superior Court,
Commercial Division, for the Judicial District of Montreal, Canada (the “Canadian
4. On April 28, 2009, the United States Trustee for the District of Delaware (the
5. On April 14, 2010, the Debtors filed their Third Motion for Order Extending
Their Exclusive Periods to File a Chapter 11 Plan and Solicit Acceptances (the “Third
Exclusivity Motion”). Pursuant to this Court’s order dated May 12, 2010 granting the Third
Exclusivity Motion (the “Order”), Debtors’ exclusivity for filing a plan of reorganization was
extended through and including July 21, 2010. Further, the Order extended exclusivity for
6. On May 24, 2010, Debtors filed their First Amended Joint Plan of
Reorganization (the “Plan”) and Disclosure Statement for First Amended Plan (the
“Disclosure Statement”) [D.I. 2199 and 2200]. On June 29, 2010, Aurelius Capital
.
Management, LP (“Aurelius”) filed an Objection to Disclosure Statement (the “Aurelius
7. The Shareholders filed a Joinder (the “Joinder”) [D.I. 2558] to the Aurelius
Objection as the Shareholders share many of the concerns raised by Aurelius. For example,
Aurelius objects to the Debtors’ Disclosure Statement as it lacks a liquidation analysis for
each Debtor, nor does it include a valuation of the reorganized Debtors. See Objection, at *3.
Aurelius also objects to the Disclosure Statement’s lack of explanation of how certain
intercompany claims are being treated under Debtors’ proposed plan. Id.
with its subsidiaries, affiliated debtors and debtors-in-possession (collectively the “Debtors”
amended joint plan of reorganization (the “Plan”) for acceptance by the court and all
creditors entitled to vote on the Plan. The Plan is to be considered with reference to the
JOINDER
10. I hereby join in the objection (Docket #3224) to the Debtor’s Plan of
Reorganization on the following bases: (1) Debtors have undervalued or failed to value
multiple assets; (2) Debtors are withholding recoveries until after Plan confirmation; (3)
Debtors’ subsidiaries have not been properly valued; and (4) Debtors’ put forward Plan
.
11. I reserve all rights to assert additional objections prior to or at the time of the
DATED: