Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Publisher's Note
The publisher has gone to great lengths to ensure the quality of this reprint
but points out that some imperfections in the original may be apparent
To Shirley (Mum)
and Kevin (Dad)
for the best teaching I've ever had.
FIGURES
Page
1.1 A response-based model of stress 15
1.2 A stimulus-based model of stress 16
1.3 An interactive model of stress 17
2.1 The interactive nature of the symptoms of stress 22
2.2 The interactive nature of the symptoms of stress:
an example related to teachers 22
2.3 Path model of teacher turnover intentions 34
3.1 A model of occupational stress 37
3.2 The underload/overload inverted 'U' hypothesis 43
3.3 Mean monthly stress perceived by secondary and
elementary teachers and principals in Kamloops 44
5.1 Incidence of mental illness among school teachers 113
6.1 Sources of job pressure: male and female differences 140
6.2 Sources of job pressure: school type differences 141
6.3 Sources of job pressure: teaching grade differences 141
6.4 Sources of job pressure: Type A and Type B differences 142
TABLES
Page
3.1 Facets of the job stress-employee health research domain:
the personal facet 62
4.1 Sex of teachers 87
4.2 Age distribution of teachers 87
4.3 Marital status of teachers 87
4.4 Working pattern of teachers' partners 87
4.5 Number and age of children 88
4.6 Region in which they teach 89
Illustrations IX
The authors would like to express their thanks to the NASUWT for all their
help and support throughout the study, all the teachers who gave their time
and opinions to make the study possible, and Jenny Ellison for much
needed secretarial support.
Part I
Background to the study of
teacher stress
The end result [of teacher stress] is that many talented men and women with
high expectations of achievement are dispirited and disillusioned. Some leave
the profession, others stay but are plagued by a multitude of physical, emotional
and behavioural stress-related manifestations.
(Milstein and Golaszewski 1985)
The above comment outlines what happens as a response to teacher stress.
The picture created is not a pleasant one but has to be taken seriously. In
the last few years, the incidence of stress among teachers has received
a considerable amount of attention, particularly by the press, teacher unions
and academics (e.g. Phillips and Lee 1980). In an international review of
teacher stress and burnout, Kyriacou (1987) refers to the occurrence and
consequences of stress in the teaching profession in countries as widespread
as Great Britain, the United States, Israel, Canada and New Zealand. The
vast array of books, journal articles, newspaper reports and workshops has
lead to a multiplicity of approaches and a wide variety of opinions with very
little in the way of consensus. Due to the findings from these studies and the
public display by teachers and their unions, teaching has recently become
characterised as being among the league of traditionally viewed high-stress
occupations (e.g. Milstein and Golaszewski 1985). Teachers are reported
as being stressed by the workload, the behaviour of the pupils, lack of pro-
motion prospects, unsatisfactory working conditions, poor relationships
with colleagues, pupils and administrators and a host of other problems.
There are a multitude of studies that draw attention to the prevalence of the
perception of stress among school teachers (e.g. Kyriacou 1987).
Although there have been many attempts to investigate the real causes
and symptoms of teacher stress, often the findings of such studies have not
been consistent. A major problem has been the variety of ways in which
people have studied the phenomena of teacher stress, and also the fact that
teachers are often reluctant to admit the extent to which they experience
stress due to the fear that it may be seen as a weakness. However, over the
last 10 years there have been many changes that have resulted in disillu-
sioned teachers expressing their concerns, and bringing the issue of teacher
stress into the spotlight.
4 Background to the study of teacher stress
This book aims to explain and explore the causes and consequences of
teacher stress in more detail, and to present the results of a major nation-
wide UK study of stress among teachers. Comprising seven chapters, the
book is divided into three parts. In this chapter of Part I we shall provide
a backdrop to the study and outline the changes that teachers have been
experiencing. This chapter will also provide a working definition of stress
as used throughout the book and the research upon which it is based.
Chapters 2 and 3 will explore the consequences and sources of stress in the
teachers' environment. Part II will present the results of the study with
Chapter 4 describing the sample, Chapter 5 documenting how Britain's
teachers are responding to stress and Chapter 6 reporting on the sources
of pressure and their effects. Finally, Part III will make recommendations
as to some of the ways stress in Britain's schools may be alleviated.
Conclusion
So, it would seem that the main reasons for a greater emphasis on the prob-
lems faced by the teaching profession and the resulting stress has been due
to the changes in their role and ways of working, but how widespread is
that stress?
Definitions of stress
One area in which, it appears, people are in agreement is with regard to
the definitions of the terms 'stressor' and 'strain' (Beehr and Franz 1986).
Introduction: why teacher stress? 13
A 'stressor' is something in the environment that acts as a stimulus, and is
either physical, psychological or behavioural in nature. A 'strain' response
is used as an indicator of ill health and/or well-being of the individual. Of
interest in this particular study are those stressors resulting from the job of
the teacher, occurring in the teaching environment, that may cause strain
to be subsequently experienced by the individual teacher.
When looking at the stress phenomenon, it can be seen that stress can
have both positive and negative consequences for the individual. It can,
up to a certain point, be a stimulant, and can have positive consequences
(e.g. a new coping skill or resource may be developed) (Hoover-Dempsey
and Kendall 1982), but it is important that individuals can find their
optimal stress levels. The important point to note is that an event will not
have the same stressful implications for all individuals. It may be a case of
'one man's meat is another man's poison'. Certain characteristics of the
individual (e.g. age, sex, education, personality characteristics, social situa-
tions and past experiences) can all lead to variations as to what constitutes
a stressful experience. This study therefore will aim to incorporate aspects
of individuals which may exacerbate their responses and experience of
stress.
Further confusion in conceptualising stress is derived from the multi-
plicity of methods employed to investigate its existence and nature. As
Payne et ale (1982) have expressed:
There have been problems in definitional and conceptual clarity, ques-
tionable causal inferences from self-report data correlating stress and
strain, and often untested action recommended.
This means that an understanding of the stress phenomenon is still limited.
Pearlin et ale (1981) claim that the methodology employed will dictate the
particular manifestation of stress that may be observed (e.g. what is the
focus), in the functioning of the individual, where the stress response is
most clearly reflected (e.g. physiological, behavioural or psychological).
Additional criticisms of stress research result from its heavy reliance
upon correlational data, which limits inferences about causality and does
not consider the role of intervening variables, the lack of adequate control
groups and the use of retrospective studies. Therefore, as Kasl (1983)
concludes, four main approaches to stress have emerged:
• as present in the environment;
• as an appraisal of that environment;
• as a response to conditions in the environment;
• as some form of interaction between the environmental demands and
the individual's ability to meet those demands.
The methodology which was employed in this particular study of stress
aims to gather data along the lines of the views expressed by Kasl outlined
above.
14 Background to the study of teacher stress
WAYS OF CONCEPTUALISING STRESS
In studying occupational stress, researchers have focused on one of the
following three approaches.
1 Stress as the dependent variable, i.e. the response. Here researchers have
focused on stress as a response to stimuli that may be a disturbing situa-
tion or environment, e.g. shift work, noxious environments. Responses
may be physiological, psychological or behavioural.
2 Stress as the independent variable, i.e. the stimulus. Researchers have
concentrated on stress as the phenomenon which is extraneous to the
individual, with no account taken of individual perceptions, experience,
etc. Stress is a disruptive environmental agent.
3 Stress as the intervening variable, i.e. the interactionist approach. This
approach emphasises the importance of the way individuals perceive and
react to situations which are forced upon them; it reflects therefore a
'lack of fit' between the individual and the environment, its antecedents
and effects - a stimulus-response approach (Fisher 1986).
The above three approaches do cover common ground, but mainly differ
in the definition they propose, and the methodologies they employ to
investigate the phenomena.
Stress as a response
This view of stress as expressed in the response-based model is one of a
dependent variable - that is, it is described in terms of the person's response
to some threatening or disturbing stimuli. As Fisher (1986) suggests: 'A
person can be deduced to have been exposed to stressful conditions if signs
of strain are present.'
Most people can readily sympathise with the plea of being 'under
pressure' as the most obvious tangible evidence we have of the effects on
an individual of stress is the symptoms that are exhibited. Other adjectives
that may be used synonymously with stress are tension, strain and pressure.
This means that of most interest in this model of stress is the manifestation
of stress. Stress responses may occur at three levels: the psychological,
behavioural and physiological levels (see Figure 1.1). Although this model
creates the impression that the three types of response are discrete elements,
this is not so, as the three are interrelated, though the exact relationship
between them is not clear (Schuler 1980).
Stress as a stimulus
This is an approach to stress that links health and disease to certain condi-
tions in the individual's external environment. In the fifth century Be,
Hippocrates believed that the external environment conditioned charac-
teristics of health and disease (Goodell et ale 1986). This early approach to
Introduction: why teacher stress? 15
ENVIRONMENT PERSON
psychological
~ t
behavioural
*s = stimulus
*R = response
~l
*s
• *strain
person
tolerance level that may be exceeded, and this 'over-stepping' may result
in temporary or permanent damage. This also emphasises the fact that an
individual is exposed to a multitude of stressors all of the time and may cope
with these quite effectively, though it may just take a minor insignificant
event to 'tip the balance' between coping behaviour and potential total
breakdown.
A large emphasis on the approach was made with the rapid increase in
industrialisation and its subsequent relevance to the physical, working
environment (i.e. noise, heat) and to the task itself (e.g. work overload).
Selye (1980) has emphasised, importantly, that the word and concept
'stress' must not be assumed to be automatically negative, as it can be viewed
as a stimulant and is a feature of living. He divides stress into the positive
'eustress' (i.e. a motivator for growth, development and change) and the
negative 'distress', the unwanted, unmanageable and possibly damaging
type of stress. This is the central theme of the stimulus-based model (i.e. the
identification of potential sources of stress). He describes four types of stress
that may be experienced by the individual: overstress or Hyperstress; under
stress or Hypostress; bad stress or Distress; good stress or Eustress.
Stress as an interaction
For the majority of those working in the area of stress research today, stress
is no longer seen as a static phenomenon, as a response or a stimulus, but
Introduction: why teacher stress? 17
rather as a complex process, incorporating both of the previously mentioned
models. Pearlin et al. (1981) suggested that: 'Stress is not a happening,
instead it is a complex, varied and intellectually challenging process.' There
has therefore been a shift from viewing psychological stress as either an envi-
ronmental demand or as a response, to viewing it rather in relational terms
(e.g. McGrath 1974; Cox 1978; Cooper et ale 1988).
A large number of researchers working in terms of these relational
models conceptualise stress as an interaction or transaction between the
person and the environment (e.g. Cooper et al. 1988). These theorists
assume that people both influence and respond to their environments.
Therefore, stress is essentially the degree of fit between the person and
the environment. In other words, it is not the environment per se that is
stressful, but it is the relationship between the person and the environment
which may result in the experience of stress. Figure 1.3 provides a version
of an interactive model of stress. Stressful transactions are therefore seen
as a product of the two interacting systems. Stress occurs at the point at
which the magnitude of the stress stimuli exceeds the individual's capacity
to resist. In order to deal with the experience of stress, a person may
attempt either to alter his or her environment or to learn ways of trying
to change how he or she reacts to a particular situation. Therefore, coping
occurs in order to try and reach a state of fit between the person and
the environment. The transactional models have resulted in the increasing
recognition of the importance of mental actiyity as a crucial factor in
determining stress. For an event to be seen as a stress stimulus, it must be
phenomenologically interpreted by an individual (Lazarus 1966). From
a transactional perspective 'stress is defined as a cognitively mediated
relational concept' (Meichenbaum 1985). The assumption is made that
ATTITUDES, NEEDS,
VALUES, PAST
EXPERIENCE, PERSONALITY
TRAITS etc. * Imbalance - distress, pressure
or strain
- *actual demand +
JUDGEMENT OF THREAT +
overcome the +
symptoms of stress
i.e. cognitive appraisal problem
BACKGROUND AND SITUATIONAL - *perceived ability and physiological
FACTORS perceived demand psychological
behavioural
effects might be
short and/or
long term
Contents
Index viii Xl xiii 3 20 36 77 99 122 157 183 188 204 207 224
Bibliography