Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Melissa Beleche
This study examines the effects of positive reinforcement in the classroom and how it
affects children who may have behavioral issues. Positive reinforcement is a classroom
management strategy that has been proven to be effective in improving students’ behavior. The
research done discusses a qualitative study which follows the way that teachers give positive or
negative feedback to students who are at low-risk for EBD and those at high-risk. The results
show that teachers tend to give more negative feedback to students at high-risk. This shows that
although research has proven positive reinforcement to be effective, many tend to unconsciously
give more negative reinforcement to students that need it the most. Further research is needed to
identify what may be needed to implement more positive reinforcement to help those students
thinking of classroom management strategies. Many teachers tend to focus on the negative
behaviors of the students. It is difficult not to notice when children are misbehaving or not acting
“properly” as they should. A strategy that is not used as much as it is mentioned by theorists, is
positive reinforcement. Positive reinforcement is when teachers put their attention towards the
positive behaviors of their students and reward them accordingly. Rewards could be anything
from stickers to lunch with the teacher, among many other. Teachers can also use praise and
words of encouragement rather than keep telling students what they should not be doing. Is
positive reinforcement a good alternative when working with students with behavior issues? Or
is it something that should only be used with students who are considered low-risk? If there are
so many theories about the effects of positive reinforcement, why is it not more used in the
classroom setting?
Burrhus Frederic Skinner’s theory Operant Conditioning says that desired behaviors can
be reinforced by using positive reinforcement. Skinner mentions the use of tickets, tokens, and
points among others, that should be giving to students when they are displaying the desired
behavior. His main idea was that positive rewards can be used to encourage a positive change in
behavior. Another theorist who supports the use of positive reinforcement is Fred Jones. Jones
not mean interacting in a hostile classroom environment. Instead, he focuses on the benefits of
positive discipline in the classroom. He mentions that positive reinforcement can be used to
achieve desired behavior. For instance, activities such as free time, computer time, etc., can be
Positive Reinforcement in the Classroom 4
used as incentives. Another option is to use rewards, these rewards may include prizes, points,
Many students with emotional or behavioral disorders, are exposed to the harsh realities
of schools. They are often being told what to do and what rules to follow. When they cannot do
as they are told, they are reprimanded. These students often have negative experiences, which
may lead them to dislike school and may lead them in a path towards academic failure. Teachers
assume the role of educators, educators that care about their students and encourages them to
succeed. If this is the case, then why do so many teachers continue to use negative
reinforcement? Negative reinforcement focuses on what the students are doing wrong, and often
it can influence the students’ thoughts and feelings towards school. On the other hand, positive
schools. It is often referred to as Positive Behavior intervention and Support (PBSI). Calderalla
et al., argue that “Instead of using coercion to modify behavior, PBIS seeks to restructure the
learning environment, including teacher behavior. Studies have shown PBIS to be effective in
improving individual student behavior as well as the behavior of whole classes” (Calderalla et
al., 2016). This practice is becoming more and more popular is because it has been researched
and it has been found that it is an effective strategy that encourages children to act in the desired
ways. As the authors mentioned, it is an effective strategy that not only helps one student, but
can get the whole class on board. It is a strategy that helps the students and the teachers work
together to achieve a positive learning environment where they can all feel safe. The researchers
Sprouls et al. mention, “Positive feedback that specifically identifies the desired behavior has
age students” (Sprouls et al., 2015). As mentioned, there has been various studies and they show
the importance of positive reinforcement in the classroom. “…teachers can initiate positive
exchanges by clearly communicating high expectations for student success to all students, and
providing frequent positive feedback to students, which allows them to recognize their
behavioral and academic success” (Sprouls et al,. 2015). Sprouls shares that positive
reinforcement does not have to be rewards and praise all the time. It starts with having a positive
attitude and showing the students that they are cared for and important. One way to do this is by
setting high expectations for them and never lowering those expectations, although it is
Method
The study was conducted in 56 K-5 elementary classrooms. The student teacher ratio was
21:1. Two schools were Title 1 schools. The total number of students was 786. The English
Participants
screening data and those that had two or more students who were in the high-and-low risk range
A feedback coding system was used to measure the way the teachers interacted with the
students. Each action was observed and given a code. For example, they were given points when
they would respond with a smile or when they said “I like your behavior when…”. Data was
Results
Data patterns revealed a significantly higher use of negative rather than positive feedback
toward the high-risk students, which yielded an average of two negative feedback to one positive
feedback occurrence. No significant differences between the high- and low-risk groups were
observed regarding positive feedback. A much more restricted range was observed among
teachers’ use of positive to negative feedback among the low-risk student group; for every three
positive feedback occurrences, there was one instance of negative feedback. Among all the
students in the study, those in the high-risk group received significantly more negative feedback
Discussion
Although there has been many research done about the benefits of positive reinforcement,
many teachers continue to use negative reinforcement in the classroom. Perhaps, it is because
they are subconsciously making more negative comments towards students who are at high-risk
for EBD. Working with students with EBD is a challenging job but, there are many ways that
teachers can employ positive reinforcement into their classroom. This will not only affect the
students’ individual behavior but it will also strengthen the student-teacher relationship as well
as encourage the whole class to positively change their behavior to match that of their peers.
Students like knowing that they are important and they like knowing when they are doing
something right. In a research study done by Fefer et al., the authors mention, “Results suggest
that teacher praise may be a powerful motivator for adolescents. While many students indicated a
desire to receive more praise than what they currently receive, it is promising that the majority
reported receiving adequate praise for their schoolwork” (Fefer et al., 2016). In this study, it was
observed that praise is important to adolescents. They like knowing that their efforts are valued.
Positive Reinforcement in the Classroom 7
Part of the study also mentioned which type of praise students liked to receive from their
teachers. The results were quiet praise were teachers quietly approach the students and deliver
communicating with them. Some students may be too shy and may not feel comfortable
receiving praise from the teacher loudly in front of all their classmates.
Some people may argue that positive reinforcement is not an effective strategy because
they may think that when positive behavior occur, the students do not have consequences. That is
not true. There are consequences that will be applied whenever needed but when using PBIS, the
students have the ability to realize that their behavior is not appropriate. Authors, Helf and Leach
mention, “Punishment does not teach the student replacement behaviors or new skills that should
be demonstrated instead of the problem behavior” (Helf, et al., 2016). Punishment takes care of
the negative behavior as soon as it occurs. Unfortunately, in the long term, punishment does not
offer students an option to resolve the issue in a positive manner if it were to happen again which
means that they will probably make the same mistake again.
There is plenty of research which contributes to the growing use of PBIS in schools. This
research has proved that positive reinforcement is an effective strategy when dealing with
students that may have behavioral issues. As PBIS continues to expand in the education system,
there will be more research that may cover specific topics. For instance, why do many teachers
opt to point out the negatives instead of catching students being good. With time, there will be
answers to any unanswered questions. As of now, positive reinforcement is a strategy that has
more popularity in the school environments. There have been many studies that show the
Positive Reinforcement in the Classroom 8
benefits of managing a classroom with positive reinforcement rather than negative. Positive
reinforcement is a strategy that focuses on highlighting the best behavior of students and praising
them or giving them rewards to encourage to continue to demonstrate that desired behavior.
Research shows that students react positively and it can change their behavior as well as their
classmates’ behavior. Students like being praised, they like knowing what they are doing right
and it makes them feel good since it increases their self- esteem. Praise can help build strong
student-teacher relationships that can encourage students to try their best and demonstrate their
best behavior. One needs to keep in mind to use praise with caution and not praise everything the
student does, instead praise their efforts and when they genuinely deserve it. There are many
ways to bring positive reinforcement into the classroom, which may attribute to why it is
becoming a popular practice. Further research needs to be conducted to find out why there are
still many teachers that opt for negative reinforcement when positive reinforcement has been
proved to be effective.
Positive Reinforcement in the Classroom 9
Annotated Bibliography
Caldarella, P., Howell, A., Korth, B., and Richard Young. (2014). Exploring the Social Validity
http://web.b.ebscohost.com.libproxy.csudh.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=4
a01eddc-387a-4212-b382-ca397e99733b%40sessionmgr104
The article focuses on the use of teacher-written praise notes and the positive impact that
it has on the students’ behavior in the classroom. A survey was conducted among
students, teachers, and parents at the end of the school year. The authors analyze the
importance of praise and how it can be important form of approval. They also discuss the
controversy of using praise in the classroom since it can be misused and students may be
praised on factors that they cannot control, such as intelligence, and they are more likely
to show the opposite behavior desired. This study demonstrates that teacher-written notes
can have a positive effect and improve student behavior, communication, and
relationships.
Coleman, J., Crosby, M., Irwin, H., Dennis, L., Simpson, C., and Chad A. Rose. (2012).
http://journals.sagepub.com.libproxy.csudh.edu/doi/pdf/10.1177/1096250612464641
The authors provide strategies and techniques that can be useful for early childhood
educators to manage behavior. The strategies and techniques explained fall under three
strategies that will help young children transition into their first schooling experience.
continue the desired behavior. The use of tangible is mentioned; it is said to be used with
caution to prevent the students becoming reliant on the items. Lastly, the authors mention
Fefer, S., DeMagistris, J., and Cynthia Shuttleton. (2016). Assessing Adolescent Praise and
http://psycnet.apa.org.libproxy.csudh.edu/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Ftps0000072
The authors focus on adolescents’ opinion on how much praise they should be receiving
to the amount that they currently get. They ask adolescents about their preferences
regarding praise and rewards. Many of the participants shared that they would like to
receive more praise than what they are currently receiving from their teachers. The
authors are pleased to know that the students are receive praise from their teachers but
they encourage more use of these positive reinforcements since they can have positive
Helf, S., and Debra Leach. (2016). Using a Hierarchy of Supportive Consequences to Address
http://journals.sagepub.com.libproxy.csudh.edu/doi/pdf/10.1177/1053451216630288
The authors discuss the trending implementation of positive behavioral interventions and
supports (PBIS). They mention how PBIS focuses on proactive and preventative
approaches to improve behavior and that the most essential element is the use of
Positive Reinforcement in the Classroom 11
responses although there are ways to give consequences that are supportive and redirect
students in a positive way to demonstrate desirable behavior. The authors focus on the
diminished the need for punitive consequences but it does not completely eliminate them.
Sprouls, K., Mathur, S., and Gita Upreti. (2015). Is Positive Feedback a Forgotten Classroom
http://web.a.ebscohost.com.libproxy.csudh.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=5
2efc1ad-bb1b-45ad-afc2-fd2faf32b68a%40sessionmgr4006
The article focuses on using positive feedback rather than negative feedback when
working with students who are at risk for developing emotional and behavioral disorders
(EBD). The study examined teachers’ use of Positive Behavior Intervention and Support
(PBSI) towards students identified as high-risk and low-risk for EBD. The results showed
a higher use of negative reinforcement with students at high-risk. There was no difference
found regarding the use of positive reinforcement between high-risk and low-risk
students. Teachers tend to use more negative reinforcement towards high-risk students. It
References
Caldarella, P., Howell, A., Korth, B., and Richard Young. (2014). Exploring the Social Validity
http://web.b.ebscohost.com.libproxy.csudh.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=4
a01eddc-387a-4212-b382-ca397e99733b%40sessionmgr104
Coleman, J., Crosby, M., Irwin, H., Dennis, L., Simpson, C., and Chad A. Rose. (2012).
http://journals.sagepub.com.libproxy.csudh.edu/doi/pdf/10.1177/1096250612464641
Fefer, S., DeMagistris, J., and Cynthia Shuttleton. (2016). Assessing Adolescent Praise and
http://psycnet.apa.org.libproxy.csudh.edu/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Ftps0000072
Helf, S., and Debra Leach. (2016). Using a Hierarchy of Supportive Consequences to Address
http://journals.sagepub.com.libproxy.csudh.edu/doi/pdf/10.1177/1053451216630288
Sprouls, K., Mathur, S., and Gita Upreti. (2015). Is Positive Feedback a Forgotten Classroom
http://web.a.ebscohost.com.libproxy.csudh.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=5
2efc1ad-bb1b-45ad-afc2-fd2faf32b68a%40sessionmgr4006