40-F191005-SC-001 R2

CLIENT : PROJECT MANAGER : CONTRACTOR :
DOCUMENT TITLE : DOCUMENT NO. :

REVISION . : 2
DESIGN CALCULATION FOR CRUDE OIL STORAGE
TANKS 801 to 805 BASED ON API650 12ED, 40-F191005-SC-001
SHEET NO.: 2 OF 29
MARCH2013
CONTENTS
SECTION SHEET NO.
1 Tank Design Data 3
2 Summary of Calculation Result 4
3 Shell Plate Design 5
4 Top angle, Bottom Plate, Annular Plate 6
5 Top Wind Girder 6
6 Stability Check of Shell Against Wind and Vacuum Pressure 7
7 Overturning Stability Check 8
8 Summary of tank erection weight 10
9 Stability of Shell Against Earth Quake Load (API 650 Appendix E) 10
10 Loads on foundations 12
11 Foam system 13
12 Water Spray System 14
13 Carbon Steel Internal Floating Roof Design 16
14 Automatic Bleeder Vent 17
15 Nozzle Load Calculation 19
16 ATTACHMENT-1 STRESS CHECKING ON TOP WIND GIRDER WHEN AS WALKWAY 22
17 ATTACHMENT-2 STRESS CHECKING ON TOP WIND GIRDE (WHEN PAINTING TROLLEY USED) 26
PROJECT TITLE :VOPAK HORIZON FUJAIRAH LTD-EPC OF CRUDE STORAGE HANDLING FACILITIES(BLACK PEARL PROJECT) PHASE 1
DOC. NO. :40-F191005-SC-001
1 Tank Design Data

1.1 Tank No. TK-801-805
1.2 Type of Tank AL Dome roof w/CS single deck IFR
1.3 Service Crude Oil
1.4 Design condition

1.4.1 Max Capacity 98,152.00 m3
1.4.2 Working Capacity 96,152.00 m3
1.4.3 Gross Capacity 101,687.07 m3
1.4.4 Tank Inside Diameter 68.00 m
1.4.5 Height 28.00 m
(Maximum working level) 26.80 m
1.4.6 Filling In Rate 6,000.00 m3 / hr
1.4.7 Emptying Out Rate 6,000.00 m3 / hr
1.4.8 Corrosion Allowance Shell 1.50 mm
Internal floating Roof 1.00 mm
Bottom 2.00 mm
Structural (Total ) 0.00 mm
Bottom annular 3.00 mm
Bottom Sump 4.00 mm
1.4.9 Design Specific Gravity 1.00
Product Specific Gravity 0.88
1.4.10 Design Pressure (Pressure) 0.0 mbar 0.00 mmWC
(Vacuum) 0.0 mbar 0.00 mmWC
1.4.11 Operating Temperature AMB oC
1.4.12 Design Temperature 90.00 oC
1.4.13 Design flash Point - oC
1.4.14 Design wind velocity 45.00 m/sec 162.0 km/hr
1.4.15 Design rainfall 50.0 mm/hr
1.4.16 Design live load 1,000.00 Pa
1.4.17 Seismic factor Zone 2A, Site Class D 0.15
1.4.18 Snow Load Balance Load Sb 0.00 kPa
Unbalance Load Su 0.00 kPa
1.4.19 Insulation 0.00 mm
1.4.20 Roof Radius, Rr = D 68.0 mm
1.4.20 Roof Slope angle θ 30.00 deg
1.4.21 Bottom Slope: Cone Down to Tank Centre 1:50
1.5 Material
1.5.1 Shell Plate A537-2/A573-70
1.5.2 Annular Bottom Plate A537-2
1.5.3 Bottom Plate A283-C
1.5.4 Roof Plate / Roof Manhole Neck / Flange AL/AL/AL
1.5.5 Nozzle Neck (for DIA.>24") A537-2
1.5.6 Nozzle Neck Pipe A106 Gr.B
1.5.7 Nozzle Flange / Blind (EXT.) A105
1.5.8 Shell Manhole Neck /Flange A537-2/A537-2
1.5.9 Nozzle Fittings A234 Gr.WPB
1.5.10 Stiffening Ring / Wind Girder -
1.5.11 Structure for Roof -
1.5.12 Deck and Pontoon Plate A283-C / -
1.5.13 Internal Floating Roof /External Floating Roof A283-C / -
1.5.14 Boltings A193-B7 /A 307 Gr.B
Nuts A1943-2H /A 307 Gr.B
1.5.15 Insulation / Insulation Support (Ring) -/-
1.5.16 Anchor Chairs -
1.5.17 Lifting lug -
1.5.18 Jackup Bracket -
1.6 Design code

1.6.1 API 650 Twelfth Edition, March 2013
PROJECT TITLE :VOPAK HORIZON FUJAIRAH LTD- EPC OF

CRUDE STORAGE HANDLING FACILITIES
(BLACK PEARL PROJECT) PHASE 1 PAGE 3 OF 29 REV: 2
DOC. NO. :40-F191005-SC-001
2 Summary of Calculation Results
2.1 Shell plate thickness
No. of Used Thickness

Material
Course (mm)
1 A537 -2 43.50
2 A537 -2 39.20
3 A537 -2 36.90
4 A573-70 36.90
5 A573-70 28.60
6 A573-70 24.20
7 A573-70 19.50
8 A573-70 14.80
9 A573-70 12.00
10 A573-70 12.00
2.2 Top angle size: L150x150x12 x27.2 kg/m
2.3 Bottom plate thickness: 8 mm

Annular plate thickness: 19 mm
2.4 Top wind girder

Wedth: 1,300 mm
Elevation: 1,100 mm below the top of top angle
2.5 Intermediate wind girder

Allowable height of given unstiffened shell: 8.3 m
Total transposed height: 8.02 m
Thus, the Intermediate wind girder is not required.
2.6 Overturning stability check

Since, 0.6*Mw+Mpi < MDL/1.5+MDLR
Mw + 0.4*Mpi < (MDL + MF)/2+MDLR Tank is stable, Anchor Bolts are Not Required
Mws + 0.4*Mpi < MDL/1.5+MDLR
Ff = Maximum allowable sliding friction

< Fw = Wind load on tank No Anchorage Needed to Resist Sliding .
2.7 Stability of Shell Against Earth Quake Load (API 650 Appendix E)
Anchorage ratio J= 0.52 < 0.785, Tank is Self Anchored
Sliding Resistance
Since, Friction between tank bottom and foundation or subgrade Vs = 365,767,328.87
> V = Total design base shear 47,250,816.07V, Tank is stable
2.8 Foam System

Number of foam chambers 9
Proposed foam Chamber model ANGUS TPS50 (2"/4")
Foam solution application rate 12.20 l/min/m2
Outlet working pressure 3.5 Barg
Foam riser size/qty 6" / 1 nos
Foam ring size 4"
Required supply pressure at Tie-in point 7.0 barg
2.9 Water Spray System

Number of Spray Nozzle for shell 138 nos
Number of Spray Nozzle for roof 66 nos
Proposed spray nozzle model for roof TYCO TYPE D-3, K factor 59,Orifice size NO.28
Proposed spray nozzle model for shell TYCO TYPE D-3, K factor 80.6, Orifice size NO.32
Actual water application rate for shell 2.10 l/min/m2

Actual water application rate for roof 2.00 l/min/m2
Max.Spray angle 125 deg
Outlet working pressure 3 barg
Drencher riser size/qty for shell 10" / 3 nos

Drencher riser size/qty for roof (Proposed spray ring on roof--2 rings) 8" /3 nos
Required supply pressure at Tie-in point 7.70 barg

DOC. NO. :40-F191005-SC-001
2.10 Carbon Steel Internal Floating Roof Design

Quantity of compartment 40
Pontoon weight estimation: 299,384.91 kg
Number of legs 164
Support legs assumed: 2-1/2" Pipe, Sch.80
2.11 Automatic Bleeder Vent ( Vent design based on API standard 2000, 6th edition, Nov 2009)
Required inbreathing (Vacuum Relief) capacity based on API 2000. 32,796.94 m3/hr
Required out-breathing (Pressure Relief) capacity based on API 2000. 22,272.81 m3/hr
Assumed Free Vent Size and Quantity 12"- 16 sets
2.12 Local Load Analysis for Nozzles (API 650 Appendix P)

Nozzle N1, 34" Product Inlet; N6A/B/C/D/E, 34" Mixer nozzles FRmax = 417,838 N
MCmax = 912,028,172.62 N-mm
MLmax = 674,286,359.15 N-mm
3 Shell Plate Design

3.1 Formula for Shell Plate Thickness
(Shell design based on API 650; para 5.6.4;)
Formula for calculating shell thickness = Variable Design Point Method
Where : td = Minimum Initial Thickness Based On Design Stress: in mm.

tt = Minimum Initial Thickness Based On Hydrostatic Stress; in mm.
H = Tank Height From Bottom Of Course Under Consideration To The Top Of Top Angle. in m
D = Tank diameter, in m 68.00 m
G = Design specific gravity 1.00
P= Internal design pressure 0.00 m WC
Sd = Max. allowable design stress, in Mpa
(Refer to API 650 para 5.6.2)
St = Max. allowable hydrostatic, in Mpa
(Refer to API 650 para 5.6.2)
CA = Corrosion allowance ( shell ), in mm 1.50 mm
3.2 Least Permissible Shell Plate Thickness (Requirement Stated in API 650; para. 5.6.1.1. )
tp = 10.00 mm
3.3 Maximum allowable design stress A537 -2 material A573-70 material
Minimum Yield Stress Sy= 415.0 MPa Sy= 290.0 MPa

Minimum Tensile Stress St= 550.0 MPa St= 485.0 MPa
Max. allowable product design stress, Sd= 220.0 MPa Sd= 193.3 MPa
Max. allowable hydrostatic test stress, St = 235.7 MPa St = 207.9 MPa
3.4 Calculations and Results
No. of Width of H (H-0.3)*G Sd St td tt Used Weight

Course Course Material Thickness
(m) (m) (m) (MPa) (MPa) (mm) (mm) (mm) (kg)
1 2.7850 28.00 27.70 220.0 235.7 A537 -2 43.40 39.10 43.50 203,292.2
2 2.7850 25.22 24.92 220.0 235.7 A537 -2 39.20 34.70 39.20 183,185.0
3 2.7850 22.43 22.13 220.0 235.7 A537 -2 33.60 30.00 36.90 172,431.1
4 2.7850 19.65 19.35 193.3 207.9 A573-70 36.90 33.10 36.90 172,431.1
5 2.7850 16.86 16.56 193.3 207.9 A573-70 28.60 25.40 28.60 133,629.5
6 2.7850 14.08 13.78 193.3 207.9 A573-70 24.20 18.50 24.20 113,063.8
7 2.7850 11.29 10.99 193.3 207.9 A573-70 19.50 17.90 19.50 91,098.8
8 2.7850 8.51 8.21 193.3 207.9 A573-70 14.80 12.50 14.80 69,136.9
9 2.7850 5.72 5.42 193.3 207.9 A573-70 10.20 8.20 12.00 56,054.6
10 2.9350 2.94 2.64 193.3 207.9 A573-70 4.30 4.00 12.00 59,073.7
28.00 1,253,397
Note: The width of top course includes 150mm length of top angle.

DOC. NO. :40-F191005-SC-001
4 Top angle, Bottom Plate and Annular Plate
4.1 Top Angle (Required Stated In API 650 Para. 5.1.5.9)
Min. Size of top angle: L-75*75*10
Used Top Angle Size due to 1.5mm CA : L-150*150*12 27.20 kg/m
4.2 Bottom Plate Thickness (Required Stated In API 650 Para. 5.4.1)
tb = Minimum nominal thickness; 6.00 mm
C= Corrosion allowance; 2.00 mm
tB = Bottom plate thickness; 8.00 mm
Used Bottom Plate Thickness : 8.00 mm
4.3 Annular Bottom Plate Thickness (Required Stated In API 650 Para. 5.5.1)
4.3.1 Since the allowable stress used in design for Bottom shell course is in Group VI, so, butt- welded annular bottom plates shall be used.
4.3.2 Calculate the max. stress in the 1st shell course as per table 5-1a Note b, Smax
Sdmax = (td/as-constructed t exclusive of CA)*Sd 219.48 MPa

Stmax = (tt/as-constructed t)*St 211.87 MPa
Smax = greater of product or hydrostatic test stress 219.48 MPa
4.3.4 Calculate the min thickness for annular plate, tAnnular < 220.00 MPa
Since the plate thickness of first shell course is 43.50 mm
So, tAnnular = (Requirement stated in API 650, Table 5-1a) 16.00 mm
CA = Corrosion allowance; 3.00 mm
Annular bottom thickness = tA + CA 19.00 mm
Used Annular Bottom Plate Thickness : 19.00 mm
4.3.5 Calculate the Min. radial width of annular plate, Wa (para 5.5.2)
Min Annular plate-sketch plate lap 60.00 mm
wa1 = the min radial width between the inside of the shell and any lap-welded joint in the remainder of the bottom(para5.5.2) 600.00 mm
wa2 = the min radial width to project outside the shell 100.00 mm
wa3 = calculated as the fomular 215tb/(HG)^0.5 771.99 mm
Where,
tb = thickness of the annular plate 19.00 mm
H = maximum design liquid level 28.00 m
G = design specific gravity of the liquid to be stored 1.00
So, the minimum radial width at any point around the circumference 803.50 mm
5 Top Wind Girder (Calculation in SI unit)
5.1 Combined pressure of wind and vacuum, qc

qw = 0.49 x 10-6 x ( V/190 )2 = 0.0129 kg/cm2
qv = 0 kg/cm2
qc = ( qw + qv ) = 0.0129 kg/cm2
Where,
V= 162 km/h
qv = 0 mm WC.
qw =
qc = Combined pressure
5.2 Equivalent wind velocity

Ve = (qc/0.49*10^-6)^0.5 162.00 km/h
5.3 Wind Girder ( refer to API 650 para 5.9.6 )

The required min section modulus of wind girder shall be determined by the following equation
Z=D^2*H2/17*(Ve/190)^2

DOC. NO. :40-F191005-SC-001
Where,
Z = Section modulus 5,536.68 cm3
D = Norminal diameter of tank 68.00 m
H2 = Height of tank shell 28.00 m
Ve = Height of tank
Wind
shell
velocity 162.00 km/h
L2
L4 Y1
Y0
t2
Y2
L1
Y3
Y2
Y3
Y0
Y1
L3 t1
G2 G1
5.4 Wind Girder Data

Universal Beam Moment of Inertia (W10, 10x4x28.28 kg/m) = 178.00 cm4
Thickness of Shell t1 = 12.00 mm
Thickness of Girder Deck Plate t2 = 8.00 mm
Length of Shell L1 = 396.00 mm
Distance of Shell to Universal Beam L2 = 1300.00 mm
Distance of Universal Beam to End of Girder Deck Plate L3 = 8.00 mm
Distance of universal Beam Y-Y Axis L4 = 0.00 mm
Calculation for Area

Area of Shell Plate A1 = 47.52 cm2
Area of Girder Deck Plate A2 = 103.36 cm2
Area of Universal Beam A3 = 36.3 cm2
Total Effective Cross-Sectional Area SA = 187.18 cm2
Calculation for Centroid

Centroid of Shell Plate to Internal of Shell e1 = 0.60 cm
Centroid of Girder Deck Plate to Internal of Shell e2 = 65.80 cm
Centroid of Universal Beam to Internal of Shell e3 = 131.2 cm
Centroid of Combine Area to Internal of Shell G1 = 61.93 cm
Centroid of Combine Area to Center of Universal Beam G2 = 69.27 cm
Calculation for Section Modulus

4
Moment Inertia for Shell Plate about Yo-Yo Axis = 178,749.15 cm
Moment Inertia for Girder Deck Plate about Yo-Yo Axis = 141,357.71 cm4
Moment Inertia for Universal Beam about Yo-Yo Axis = 174,298.73 cm4
Actual Section Modulus of Wind Girder Za = 7,137.43 cm3
Since, Za > Z So, Provided wind Girder size is satisfactary.
Therefore, top wind girder shall be located 1100mm below the top of the top angle.
6 Stability Check of Shell Against Wind and Vacuum Pressure

6.1 Combined Pressure of Wind and Vacuum;
qW = 6.25 * 10 -6 * V2 0.01 kg/cm2

qV = 0.00 kg/cm2

DOC. NO. :40-F191005-SC-001
qC = qW + qV 0.01 kg/cm2
Where :
V= Design wind velocity 45.00 m/s
2
qW = Wind pressure, kg/cm
2
qV = Vacuum pressure, kg/cm
qC = Combined pressure, kg/cm2
6.2 Equivalent Wind Velocity

Ve = (qc /6.25*10^-6)^0.5 45.00 m/s
6.3 Allowable Height of Given Unstiffened Shell (Ref. API 650 11th edition para 5.9.7.1)
The maximum height of unstiffened shell, in meters shall not exceed,
H1 = 9.47*t*(t/D)^1.5*(190/ Ve)^2 8.30 m
Where :
H1 = Maximum height of unstiffened shell; in m.
t= Thickness of the top shell course, 12.00 mm
D= Tank diameter; in m. 68.00 m
Ve = Equivalent Wind Velocity 162.0 km/h.
6.4 Total Transposed Height

The actual width W of each shell course shall be changed into a transposed width Wtr
of each shell course having the top shell thickness, by the following relationship.
Wtr = W*Sqrt ((Ttop/Tactual)5)
SHELL W Ttop Tactual Wtr

COURSE (m) (mm) (mm) (m)
1 2.7850 10.50 42.00 0.0870
2 2.7850 10.50 37.70 0.1140
3 2.7850 10.50 35.40 0.1334
4 2.7850 10.50 35.40 0.1334
5 2.7850 10.50 27.10 0.2602
6 2.7850 10.50 22.70 0.4053
7 2.7850 10.50 18.00 0.7238
8 2.7850 10.50 13.30 1.5423
9 2.7850 10.50 10.50 2.7850
10 1.8350 10.50 10.50 1.8350
Sum Wtr 8.020 m
Wtr < H1 Therefore, intermediate wind girder is NOT REQUIRED.
7 Overturning Stability Check
7.1 Mw = Overturning moment about the shell to bottom joint from horizontal and vertical wind pressure
( Ref. API 650 para.5.11.1 )
Wind uplift load Fwr
Fp
D/2
Hr
b
Rr
Fws
H
WDL
H/2

DOC. NO. :40-F191005-SC-001
Mw = Fws x H/2 + F wr x D/2 14,592,773.9 kg-m

Where:
D= Tank diameter 68.00 m
H= Tank height from bottom of course under consideration to the
top of top angle: in m. 28.00 m
V= Wind velocity 45.00 m/sec.
Ps = Wind pressure for cylindrical surface 62.52 kg/m2
Pr = Wind pressure for conical surface 104.69 kg/m2
Hr = Dome roof height 9.11 m
Equivalent wind load
a) For shell, Fws = Ps x As 119,038.71 kg

b) For roof, Fwr = Pr x Ar 380,183.29 kg
Projected area of shell , 1,904.00 m²
Horizontal Projected area of dome roof , 3,631.68 m²
Projected area of dome roof , 418.87 m²
b= Height of the centroid of roof projected area 3.67 m
&= Half angle of roof curvature 30.00 deg
7.2 Mpi = Moment about the shell to bottom joint from design internal pressure
Mpi = P*A*D/2 0.0E+00 kg-m
Where:
P= Design internal pressure 0.00 kg/m²
7.3 MDL = Moment about the shell to bottom joint from the weight of the shell.
MDL = Ws * D/2 4.3E+07 kg-m
Where:
Ws = Total weight of the shell courses 1.3E+06 kg
7.4 MF = Moment about the shell-to-bottom plate joint from liquid weight
MF = WL*π*D*D/2 2.8E+07 kg-m
tb = Bottom plate thickness less corrosion allowance or the first course 6.00 mm
shell plate thickness less corrosion allowance, whichever is thinner.
Fby = Minimum specified yield strength of annular bottom plate 415.00 Mpa
H= Design liquid height 28.00 m
w L= Circumferential loading of contents along shell to bottom joint = 59*tb*(Fby*H)^0.5 38,159.82 N/m
3,889.89 kg/m
7.5 Overturning Stability for Unanchored Tank ( Per API 650 Para 5.11)
Unanchored tank shall satisfy all of the following criteria

1) 0.6*Mw+Mpi < MDL/1.5+MDLR
8,755,664.33 < 30,160,630.80 Tank is stable, Anchor Bolts are Not Required
2) Mw + 0.4*Mpi < (M DL + MF)/2+MDLR

3) Mws + 0.4*Mpi < M DL/1.5+MDLR

7.6 MDLR = Moment about the shell to bottom joint from the norminal weight of the roof plate plus any attached structural
MDLR = (Wr + Wstr) * D/2 1,751,556.82 kg-m
Where:
Wr = Total weight of the roof plate 46,087.00 kg
Wstru = Total weight of the roof structural 5,429.38 kg
7.7 Resistance to Sliding

Fw = Wind load on tank =(PS*As)+(Pr*Ar) 162,888.21 kg

DOC. NO. :40-F191005-SC-001
8 Summary of tank erection weight
Weight of tank shell 1,253,341.5 kg

Weight of tank bottom 229,413.13 kg
Weight of tank roof 46,087.00 kg
Weight of IFR/EFR/Rolling ladder 301,334.91 kg
Weight of top angle 5,823.51 kg
Weight of roof structurals 0.00 kg
Weight of top wind girder 8,536.96 kg
Weight of tank intermediate Stiffener 0.00 kg
Weight of spiral stairway 3,137.40 kg
Weight of roof cir. platform & platform to centre 3,029.38 kg
Weight of tank shell nozzles 3,500.00 kg
Weight of tank roof nozzles 2,400.00 kg
Weight of air foam system 4,398.80 kg
Weight of water spray system 4,928.00 kg
Weight of others, anchor bolts & jack-up barcket 0.00 kg
Weight of water for hydro. Test purpose 102,510,253.99 Kg
Total weight 1,865,930.58 kg
Ff = Maximum allowable sliding friction = 0.4 ( W + Wmin liquid) 746,372.23 kg
Since Ff > 162,888.21 (Fw) No Anchorage Needed to Resist Sliding .
9 Stability of Shell Against Earth Quake Load (API 650 Appendix E)

9.1 Design Condition
D = Tank diameter 68.00 m
Ht = Tank height 28.00 m
H = Total liquid height 26.80 m
G = Specific gravity 1.00
Sp= Design peak ground acceleration parameter 0.150
9.2 Design Loads

Wp = Total weight of the tank contents based on deisgn SG 953,824,726.09 N
Wi = Effective impulsive weight of the liquid
When, D/H ≥ 1.333 Wi= tanh(0.866D/H) /(0.866(D/H))*Wp
D/H < 1.333 Wi= (1.0-0.218*D/H)*Wp
Where: 0.866*D/H = 2.20
D/H = 2.54 > 1.333 Wi = 423,501,161.91 N
Wc = Effective convective weight of the liquid 3.67*H/D = 1.45 Wc = 498,177,812.97 N
Ws = Total weight of tank shell and appurtenances Ws = 12,496,266.22 N
Wr = Total weight of fixed tank roof Wr = 504,860.50 N
Wf = Weight of the tank bottom Wf = 2,248,248.70 N
Ai = Impulsive design response spectrum acceleration coefficient
Ai = 2.5QFaS0(I/Rwi) Ai = 0.11
Q = Scaling factor from the MCE to the design level spectral accelerations 0.67
Fa = Acceleration based site coefficient (at 0.2s period) Table E-1 1.50
S0 = Mapped, max. considered earthquake, 5% damped, spectral response

Acceleration parameter at 0s 0.4Ss 0.15
Ss = 2.5*Sp = 0.375 S1 = 1.25*Sp = 0.1875 Site class: D
I = Importance factor coefficient set by seismic use group Table E-5Group I 1.00
Rwi = Force reduction factor for the impulsive mode Table E-4 3.50
Ac = Convective design response spectrum acceleration coefficient = 0.01

DOC. NO. :40-F191005-SC-001
When Tc = 9.06 > TL = 4.00

Ac = 2.5KQFaS0(I/Rwc)(Ts/Tc) (Tc <TL)
Otherwise Ac = 2.5KQFaS0(I/Rwi)(TsTL/Tc2) (Tc >TL)
Ts = FvS1/FaSs = 0.70
Tc = 1.8 Ks*SQRT(D) = 9.06
TL = = 4.00
Ks = 0.578/SQRT(tanh(3.68H/D)) 3.68*H/D = 1.45 0.61
K= = 1.50
Fv = Velocity based site coefficient (at 1.0s period) Table E-2 2.10
Rwc = Force reduction factor for the convective mode Table E-4 2.00
Vi = Design base shear due to impulsive component from effective
Weight of tank and contents 47,008,986.14 N
Vi = Ai(Ws+Wr+Wf+Wi)
Vc = Design base shear due to the convective component of
the effective sloshing weight 4,774,394.37 N
Vc = AcWc
V = Total design base shear V = SQRT(Vi2+Vc2) 47,250,816.07 N
9.3 Moment Arms

Xi = Height from the bottom of the tank shell to the center of action of lateral seismic Xi = 10.05
force related to impulsive liquid force
When D/H ≥ 1.333 Xi = 0.375 H

When D/H < 1.333 Xi = (0.5-0.094*D/H)*H
Since D/H = 2.54 > 1.333
Xc = Height from the bottom of the tank shell to the center of action of lateral seismic Xc = 15.33
force related to convective liquid force
Xc =(1.0-(cosh(3.67H/D)-1)/(3.67H/D*sinh(3.67H/D)))*H
Where: 3.67*H/D = 1.45

sinh(3.67H/D) = 2.006
cosh(3.67H/D)= 2.242
Xs = Height from the bottom of the tank shell to the shell's C.G. Xs = 14.00 m
Xr = Height from the Bottom of the tank shell to the roof and roof
appurtenances C.G. Xr = 31.67 m
Xis = Height from the bottom of the tank shell to the center of action of Xis = 26.83 m
lateral seismic force related to impulsive liquid force for slab
When D/H ≥ 1.333 Xis = 0.375 (1.0+1.333((0.866D/H)/tanh(0.866D/H)-1))*H

When D/H < 1.333 Xis = (0.5+0.060D/H)*H
Where: D/H = 2.54 > 1.333
tanh(0.866D/H)= 0.98
Xcs = Height from the bottom of the tank shell to the center of action of Xcs = 23.99 m
lateral seismic force related to convective liquid force for slab
Xcs =(1.0-(cosh(3.67H/D)-1.937)/(3.67H/D*sinh(3.67H/D)))*H
Where:
3.67*H/D = 1.45
cosh(3.67H/D)-1.937 = 0.305
9.4 Overturning Moment

Mrw = Ringwall moment acts at the base of the tank shell perimeter

DOC. NO. :40-F191005-SC-001
2 2
Mrw = SQRT((Ai*(WiXi+WsXs+WrXr)) +(Ac*(WcXc)) ) Mrw = 482,067,991.21 N-m
Ms = Slab moment (used for pile cap and pie cap design)
2 2
Ms = SQRT((Ai*(WiXis+WsXs+WrXr)) +(Ac*(WcXcs)) ) Ms = 1,242,967,027.24 N-m
9.5 Resistance to Design Loads

J= Anchorage ratio = Mrw/(D2*(wt(1-0.4Av)+wa-0.4wint)) J= 0.52
< 0.785, Tank is Self Anchored
wt = Tank and roof weight acting at base of shell Wt = Ws/(PI()*D)+w rs 60,858.63 N/m
wrs = Roof load acting on the tank shell Wrs = Wr/PI()*D 2,363.27 N/m
wint = Calculated design uplift load due to product pressure per unit circumferential length 0.00 N/m
Av = Vertical earthquake acceleration coefficient 0.14
wa = Resisting force of tank contents per unit length of circumference 144,126.71 N/m
Wa = Min (99ta(FyHGe)^0.5 or 201.1 HDGe)
Since,
201.1 HDGe = 361,299.16
99ta(FyHGe)^0.5 = 144,126.71
ta = Thickness of the bottom plate under the shell extanding at least the distance L, less corrosion allowance 17.00 mm
L= 0.01723ta(Fy/(H*Ge))^0.5 = 0.97 m
Fy = min. specified yield strength of bottom annulus 290.00 Mpa
Ge = Effective specific gravity including vertical seismic effects 0.94
Ge = G(1-0.4Av)
9.6 Max. Longitudinal Shell Membrane Compression Stress

σc = Max. longitudinal shell compression stress 4.69 Mpa
2
σc = (wt(1+0.4*Av)+1.273Mrw/D )/(1000*ts) J<0.785 4.69 Mpa
σc = ((wt(1+0.4*Av)+wa)/(0.607-0.18667*J^2.3)-wa)/(1000*ts) J>0.785 5.34 Mpa
ts = Thickness of bottom shell course, less corrosion allowance 42.00 mm

Pf = Overturning bearing pressure
Pf = Wt(1+0.4Av)+1.273/D 2*Mrw 197,005.71 N/m
9.7 Sliding Resistance

Vs = Friction between tank bottom and foundation or subgrade
Vs = m(Ws+Wr+Wf+Wp)(1.0-0.4Av) 365,767,328.87 N
(m = 0.4 friction coefficient) > V, Tank is stable
Therefore, tank is safe at seismic zone 2A with SUG I and site class D, Anchoring is not needed.
10 Loads on Foundations
10.1 Peripheral loads:
Dead Loads
Shell (as built) 12,282,746.7 N
Roof plate 451,652.62 N
Top angle/Compression ring 57,070.37 N
Weight of roof structurals 0.00 N
Intermediate stiffeners 0.00 N
Accessories, Access 209,657.04 N
Totally dead loads, 13,001,126.7 N

Linear Peripheral Load 60,858.6 N/m
Live Load, 3,757,183.65 N

DOC. NO. :40-F191005-SC-001
Wind Load,
Overturning Moment 143,009,184.05 N-m
2 2 1/2
Design base shear due to Seismic (Refer to para 7.2 above) V=(Vi +Vc ) N
Tank empty: Vi=Ai(Ws+Wr+Wf)= 1,633,861.65 N
Operating condition: Vi=Ai(Ws+Wr+Wf+Wi) 47,008,986.14 N

Hydrotest condition: Vi=Ai(Ws+Wr+Wf+Wih) 38,966,482.76 N
10.2 Central Loads:

Bottom Dead Load 619.07 N/m2
Product (Specified gravity= 0.88 ) 231,123.20 N/m2
Water Test 276,621.34 N/m2
10.3 Maximal Vertical Loads on Foundations
Linear Peripheral Load Central Loads

Items
N/m N/m2
Test 60,858.63 277,240.40
Operating 78,446.12 231,742.27
Operating + Wind 117,824.35 231,742.27
10.4 Maximal Shear Load and Wind Moment on Foundation
Shear Load (Due to wind and Seismic) Wind Moment

Items
N N-m
Empty condition 9,938,596.56 143,009,184.05
Operating condition 52,143,191.72 143,009,184.05
Hydrotest Condition 44,150,261.74 143,009,184.05
11 Foam System

q = Foam solution application rate 12.20 l/min/m2
N = Number of foam chambers 9
A = Exposed product surface area 127.0 m2
Q = Required foam solution discharge capacity (15% extra capacity added in as per Client's requirement) 1,782.5 l/min
qi = Minimum foam solution rate per chamber 198.1 l/min
qd = Design foam solution rate per chamber 200.0 l/min
Select ANGUS TPS50 (2"/4") or equivalent
Foam chamber capacity Work at 3.5 barg. 200.0 l/min
11.2 Hydraulic Calculation

pm = Friction resistance in bars per meter of pipe pm = 6.05*Qm1.85/(C1.85*dm4.87)*105 bar/m
Qm = Flow rate, l/min
C = Friction loss coefficent, C = 120
dm = Pipe internal diameter, mm
q = Flow increment to be added at a specific location
Q = Summation of flow at a specific location
Pt = Total required pressure at tie-in point with piping system
Pe = Pressure due to elevation difference between indicated points
Pf = Pressure loss due to friction between points indicated in location column
L = Length of pipe
F = Fittings equivalent length
T = Total equivalent pipe length
E90 = 90° standard elbow

DOC. NO. :40-F191005-SC-001
E45 = 45° standard elbow

ET = Tee
ER = Reducer
Frictio
Flow Rate Pipe Size Equivalent pipe
Location Pipe Fittings (m) n loss Pressure sum (bar) Remarks
l/min (mm) length (m)
(bar/m
1,800.0 Q 6"Std L 24.0 2.346 Pe
154.1 1 x 4"ET F 8.50 0.065 Pf
1 x 4"/3"ER T 32.47 0.0020
4" Std 5 x 4" ET L 107.8 0.000 Pe
Tie-in point 900.0 q1 102.3 F 10.23 0.483 Pf
with piping T 117.98 0.0041
2" Std L 4.5 0.441 Pe
49.2 1x 4"/3" ER F 8.18 0.113 Pf
Req'd pressure at
200.0 q2 4x E45 T 12.68 0.0089 3.500 Pr
inlet
6.950 Pt
Therefore, min. required supply pressure at tie-in point is 7.0 barg
12 Water Spray System

2
qr = Water application rate table D.1 of IP 6 2.00 l/min/m
q1 = Actual water application rate for shell 2.10 l/min/m2
q2 = Actual water application rate for roof 2.00 l/min/m2
Do = Diameter of Shell spray ring 70.20 m
N = Number of blocks for shell ring 3
H1 = Height of shell 28.00 m
H2 = Height of roof 9.11 m
12.2 Cooling Area

S1 = Area for shell = PI()*Do*H1 = 5,981.59 m2
S2 = Area for roof = 2*PI()*Di*H2 = 3,892.42 m2
12.3 Required Flow Capacity (15% extra capacity need to be considered as per Client's requirement)
Q1 = Flow capacity for shell spray ring = q1*S1 = 14,445.55 l/min

Q2 = Flow capacity for roof spray ring = q2*S2 = 8,952.58 l/min
12.4 Actual Flow Capacity
Spray nozzle (at operation pressure of 3.0 barg)

Required Discharge q
Location Type Used QTY of nozzle
(l/min)
TYCO TYPE D-3, K factor 59,Orifice size
Shell Ring 102.2 144
NO.28
TYCO TYPE D-3, K factor 80.6, Orifice size
Roof Ring NO.32
139.6 72
Actual flow capacity
Qa1 = Actual flow capacity for shell spray ring = 14,752.12 l/min
Qa2 = Actual flow capacity for roof spray ring = 10,069.40 l/min
Total flow capacity

Qtol = Total flow capacity = 24,821.52 l/min
= 0.41 m3/sec
12.5 Piping size

Assuming flow velocity in the spray water riser pipeline, V = 3.0 m/sec
Assuming flow velocity in the spray water ring pipeline, V = 3.5 m/sec
d = pipe diameter

DOC. NO. :40-F191005-SC-001
Ø20,000
RR2a
Ø7,000 4"
RR3a RR2b
RR3b
RR1b
4" RR1a 6"
9,110
1,300
6"
600
3
8" RS 6"
1,100
2
RS
8"
(1,100) 8" RS1
28,000
10" 6"
6"
6"
23,974
6"
6"
6"
10"
10"
LS3 10"
2,326
(350) LS2
LS1
ID 68,000
3
PIPELINE Q (m /sec) d (mm) PIPE SIZE di (mm) MATERIAL
LS1 0.082 186.5 10"SCH20 260.4 API 5L Gr.B
LS2 0.082 186.5 10"SCH20 260.4 API 5L Gr.B
LS3 0.082 186.5 10"SCH20 260.4 API 5L Gr.B
RS1 0.041 122.1 8"STD 202.7 API 5L Gr.B
RS2 0.041 122.1 8"STD 202.7 API 5L Gr.B
RS3 0.041 122.1 8"STD 202.7 API 5L Gr.B
LR1 0.056 154.1 6"STD 154.1 API 5L Gr.B
LR2 0.056 154.1 6"STD 154.1 API 5L Gr.B
LR3 0.056 154.1 6"STD 154.1 API 5L Gr.B
RR1 0.028 100.9 4"STD 102.3 API 5L Gr.B
RR2 0.028 100.9 4"STD 102.3 API 5L Gr.B
RR3 0.028 100.9 4"STD 102.3 API 5L Gr.B
12.6 Friction losses

Elevation head losses:
h1 = Head loss from tie-in point to ring R1,2,3,4 = 23.97 m
h2 = Head loss from tie-in point to ring R5 = 35.28 m
Pipe friction losses Hf: (based on Hazen and Willians formular and assume C = 120 )
1.85 4.87
Hf = 1.2*Q *L/(100*d )
Q = Flow capacity in pipe, l/min
L = Pipe length incl. equivalent length of fittings, m
d = Pipe inside diameter, cm
PIPELINE PIPE LENGTH FITTING EQUIV.lgth TOTAL LENGTH (L) Q (l/min) d (cm) Hf (m)
LS1 61.72 17.00 78.72 4,917.37 26.04 0.82 10" 90%%D E
LS2 135.23 26.20 161.43 4,917.37 26.04 1.67

LS3 61.72 17.00 78.72 4,917.37 26.04 0.82
RS1 36.77 6.00 42.77 2,458.69 20.27 0.42
RS2 36.77 6.00 42.77 2,458.69 20.27 0.42
RS3 36.77 6.00 42.77 2,458.69 20.27 0.42
LR1 135.65 10.60 146.25 3,356.47 15.41 9.62
LR2 209.16 16.10 225.26 3,356.47 15.41 14.81
LR3 135.65 10.60 146.25 3,356.47 15.41 9.62
RR1 10.47 8.18 18.66 1,678.23 10.23 2.50
RR2 20.94 9.82 30.76 1,678.23 10.23 4.13
RR3 10.47 8.18 18.66 1,678.23 10.23 2.50
Head loss for shell spray piping 25.20 m = 2.467 barg + 3.0 barg
= 5.467 barg
Head loss for roof spray piping 47.41 m = 4.640 barg + 3.0 barg
= 7.640 barg
Therefore, min. required supply pressure at tie-in point is 7.70 barg

DOC. NO. :40-F191005-SC-001
13 Carbon Steel Internal Floating Roof Design
13.1 Buoyancy and stability of floating roof

Pontoon volume: (considering any two compartments and the single deck plate are damaged)
Q1 = PI()/4*(D12-D22)*h1-PI()/12*(D12+D1*D2+D22)*(h2+h5)+PI()/4*D22*(h2+h5) = 632.935 m3
Where,
D1 = Rim diameter = 67.600 m
D2 = Center ring diameter = 56.400 m
h1 = Rim height = 0.750 m
h2 = Height above center ring, refer to sketch = 0.195 m
h3 = Center height above deck = 0.250 m
h4 = Center height below deck = 0.150 m
h5 = Height below center ring, refer to sketch = 0.155 m
n = Quantity of compartment = 40
Volume of single compartment:

Q2 = Q1/n = 15.823 m3
When two compartments are damaged, total efective volume shall be

Q3 = Q1-2*Q2 601.288 m3
Compare roof dead load (W1) with pontoon buoyancy (W2) on 0.65 specific gravety liquid:
W1 = = 299,385 kg
W2 = 0.65*Q3*1000 = 390,837 kg
The pontoon buoyancy on 0.65 S.G. liquid meets requirement, as W2 > W1
Thus the pontoon is sufficient in size
Effective volume of the roof with no damage shall be

Q4 = PI()/4*D12*(h2+h3)+PI()/4*(D12-D22)*(h4+h5)-PI()/12*(D12+D1*D2+D2 2)*h5+PI()/4*D22*h5 = 1847.834 m3
Compare twice the dead load (W 3) with pontoon buoyancy (W4) on 0.65specific gravety liquid:
W3 = 2*W1 = 598,770 kg
W4 = 0.65*Q4*1000 = 1,201,092 kg
The pontoon buoyancy on 0.65S.G. liquid meets requirement, as W4 > W3
Thus the pontoon is sufficient in size
Calculate liquid level when all compartments and single deck are undamaged:
for SG = 0.65 liquid, the liquid level x above deck is:
x= = -0.018 m
13.2 Pontoon weight estimation:

D1
Deck 6 tk 119,727.65 kg
D2
Cover 6 tk 53,943.58 kg
Bottom 6 tk 53,943.58 kg
h2
Rim plate 6 tk 7,952.15 kg

Center ring 20 tk 11,405.45 kg
h3
Compartment plate 6 tk 6,119.23 kg

h1
h4
Pontoon Frame and stiffener L65x65x6 5.92 kg/m; 13,377.56 kg

CH75x40x5 6.92 kg/m
h5
Set plate FB6x65x 3.06 kg/m 563.04 kg

Compression ring FB125x12 11.8 tk 2,047.04 kg
Deck reinforcing angle L150x75x7 10.7 kg/m 4,033.80 kg
Legs 12,281.81 kg
Vent, MH and draings 2,300.00 kg
Seal 10,690.00 kg
Others 1,000.00 kg
TOTAL 299,384.91 kg

DOC. NO. :40-F191005-SC-001
13.3 Leg support design

Support legs assumed: 2-1/2" Pipe, Sch.80 A= 0.0015 m2
Number of legs N= 164
Leg legth L= 2.800 m
Radius of gyration of the leg r= 0.023 m
Roof dead load Df = 299,385 kg
Live load, uniform Lf1 = 219,608.70 kg
Live load, point Lf2 = 224.26 kg
Design external pressure Pfe = 87,806.27 kg
So, Design load act each leg

Ld = Df+max(Lf1, Lf2, Pfe) Ld = 518,994 kg
Compression stress
Fcs = Ld/(N*A) = 218.04 kg/cm2
Allowable axial compression stress , Fa = 729.65 kg/cm2
Fa =((1-(kl/r)^2/2Cc^2))*Fy/(5/3+3*(kl/r)/(8Cc)-(kl/r)^3/(8Cc^3)) = 10.38 Ksi

= 729.65 kg/cm2
Or, Fa =12pi()^2E/(23*(kL/r)^2) ( If KL/r >Cc) = 10.49 Ksi

= 737.30 kg/cm2
Cc =(2*pi()^2*E/Fy)^0.5 = 126.1
Where,
Slenderness ratio, Kl/r = 119.3 < 200
Modification factor, K = 1
Steel yield stress, Fy = 36 ksi
Yong modular E= 29000 ksi
The leg supports are satisfactory, as compression stress in legs Fcs < Fa
14 Automatic Bleeder Vent ( Vent design based on API standard 2000, 6th edition, Nov 2009)
14.1 Design Conditions
Tank Diameter D= 68.00 m
Tank Height H= 28.00 m
Tank Capacity C= 101,687.07 m3
Max. filling rate Vpf= 12,000.00 m3/hr
Max. emptying rate Vpe = 12,000.00 m3/hr
Flash point of Fuel Oil <37.5 °C
The latitude of the country which tank located in 25.27 °
Vapor pressure @20-25degC 75.0 kpa
14.2 Required inbreathing (Vacuum Relief) capacity based on API 2000. Vi =Vip + VIT 32,796.94 m3/hr
14.3 Calculation for required venting capacity for oil movement(Liquid discharging capacities), Vip, in m3/hr of free air.
Vip = Vpe 12,000.00 m3/hr
14.4 Calculation for required venting capacity for thermal effect V IT, in m3/hr of free air.
VIT = C*Vtk0.7*Ri 20,796.94 m3/hr
Where,
C= A factor that depends on vapour pressure, average storage temperature and latitude (table 2) 6.50
Vtk= Tank volume 101,687.07 m3
Ri= The reduction factor for insulation
1) No insulation Ri = 1
2) Partially insulated tanks Ri = R inp =Ainp/ATTS *Rin+(1-Ainp/Atts) 1.83
Where,
A TTS = Total tank surface area (shell and roof) 3,892.42 m2
A inp = The insulated surface area of the tank (Assumed2m height from bottom of the 1st shell course) 427.26 m2
R in = Reduction factor for a fully insulated tank [1/(1+h*lin)/λin)] 8.55

DOC. NO. :40-F191005-SC-001
Where,
h, the inside heat-transfer coefficient, in watts/metre-kelvin 4.00 w/(m2.k)
l in, the wall thickness of the insulation, in metres 0.05 m
λin, the thermal conductivity of the insulation, in watts/metre-kelvin (Assumed rockwool insulation material) 0.098 w/(m.k)
3) Fully insulated tanks Ri = Rin 8.55
14.5 Required out-breathing (Pressure Relief) capacity based on API 2000. Vo =Vop + VOT 22,272.81 m3/hr
14.6 Calculation for required venting capacity for oil movement(Liquid filling capacities), Vop, in m3/hr of free air.
(For products stored below 40°C or vapour pressure less than 5.0KPa) Vop =Vpf 12,000.00 m3/hr
14.7 Calculation for required venting capacity for thermal effect V OT, in m3/hr of free air.
VoT = Y*Vtk0.9*Ri 10,272.81 m3/hr
Where,
Y= A factor for the latitude (table 1) 0.32
14.8 Assumed Free Vent Size and Quantity

Assuming: Size 12"
Out breathing capacity; qi = 3,150.00 m3/hr
In breathing capacity; qo = 2,600.00 m3/hr
Number of set to be installed under vacuum condition; Ni = Vi / q i 12.61 set

Number of set to be installed under Pressure condition; No = Vo / q o 7.07 set
Pressure/Vacuum Vent required: 12"- 16 sets

DOC. NO.: 40-F191005-SC-001
15 Local Load Analysis for Nozzles (API 650 Appendix P)
15.1 Nozzle size and Elevation summary
Meet Appendix P Scope for Analysising the

Shell Nozzle No Nozzle size Service EL from tank TOB Legent:
limit loads?
Almost meet the EL specified in

N1 34" Inlet 1231 Yes
table 5-6 TOB- Top of bottom or
N2 24" Re-circulation 1101 EL is higher than Regular type EL Annular plate
N3 12" Stripping outlet 1231 No which specified in API650 table 5-
N4 3" Water draw off 256 6
Almost meet the EL specified in
Yes EL- Elevation
N6A/B/C/D/E 34" Mixer nozzles 1231 table 5-6
N7 8" Spare 401
N8 2" Spare 151
No No external pipe attached.
N9 3" Spare 176
N10A/B/C 30" Manhole 881
15.2 Nozzle N1, 34" Product Inlet; N6A/B/C/D/E, 34" Mixer nozzles
Design Data
Tank Radius R= 34,000 mm
Tank Shell Thickness t= 87.0 mm
Outside radius of opening a= 431.80 mm
Vert distance from opening centerline to tank bottom L= 1,231 mm
Max. allowable filling height H= 26,800.00 mm
Design specified gravity of liquid G= 1.00
o
Design temp minus installation temp ∆T = 85.0 C
Calculate the stiffness coefficients for the nozzle-tank connection:

ratio of R/t R/t = 391
ratio of a/R a/R = 0.013
ratio of L/2a L/2a = 1.425
for the radial load (Figure P-2A/2D) KR/(E*2*a) = 2.61E-03

KR = 447,753 N/mm
3
for the longitudinal moment (Figure P-2B/2E) KL/(E*(2*a) ) = 4.70E-03
KL = 6.02.E+11 N-mm/rad
for the circumferential moment (Figure P-2C/2F) KC/(E*(2*a)3) = 1.27E-02

KC = 1.63.E+12 N-mm/rad
Y
MC = M Y
FL = F Y
R
Z
M
=
L
M
X
2a
MT = M X
FR = FX
Z
XC
XA
XB
Calculate the unrestrained shall deflection and rotation at the nozzle centerline
resulting from the hydrotest head of the full tank
β = 1.285/SQRT(R*t) = 0.00075 mm
β*L = 0.920 rad

(BLACK PEARL PROJECT) PHASE 1 PAGE 19 OF 29 REV.: 2
DOC. NO.: 40-F191005-SC-001
-6 2 -β
W = 9.8*10 *G*H*R /(E*t)*(1-e L*COS(βL)-L/H)+α*R*∆T = 359.295 mm
-6 2 -β
θ = 9.8*10 *G*H*R /(E*t)*{1/H-βe L*[COS(βL)+SIN(βL)]} = -0.045 rad
Perform the analysis of piping flexibility using W, θ, K R, KL and KC as the end

conditions at the nozzle-to-piping connection
XA = a+L = 1,663 mm
XB = a-L = 799 mm
XC = L = 1,231 mm
Determine the allowable loads for the shell opening as below:
Determine the nondimensional quantities: XA /sqrt(Rt) = 0.97

XB /sqrt(Rt) = 0.46
XC /sqrt(Rt) = 0.72
I=λ = a/sqrt(Rt) = 0.25
From figures P-4A and P-4B YL = 4.10 /N-mm

YF = 1.30 /N
YC = 7.80 /N-mm
Construct the load nomograms (sketch below)

0.5
1.0-0.75*XB/(Rt) = 0.65
1.0-0.75*XA/(Rt)0.5 = 0.27
1.0-0.75*XC/(Rt)0.5 = 0.46
FP = P*π*a2 = 146,776 N
λ/(2*YF)(FR/FP) = 6.58E-07 FR
λ/(a*YL)(ML/FP) = 9.66E-10 ML
λ/(a*YC)(MC/FP) = 5.08E-10 MC
For ML = 0 and MC = 0
For FR, it shall be Tension at A controls 6.58E-07 * FR < 0.27
FRmax = 417,838 N
For ML = 0 and FR = 0
For MC, it shall be Tension at C' controls 5.08E-10 * Mc < 0.46
MCmax = 912,028,173 N-mm
For FR = 0 and MC = 0
For ML, it shall be Tension at B controls 9.66E-10 * ML < 0.65
MLmax = 674,286,359 N-mm

DOC. NO.: 40-F191005-SC-001
( ? / aYL ) ( ML / FP )
1.0
0.65
- FR' + M L
(compression at A controls)
0.5
+ FR' + ML
1
1 (tension at B controls)
1 1
( ? / 2YF ) ( FR / FP )
- 1.0 - 0.5 0.5 1.0
1
1
1
1 + FR' - M L
(tension at A controls)
- FR' - M L - 0.5
(compression at B controls)
0.27
MC
- 1.0
A
ML
C' C FR
( ? / aYC ) ( MC / FP )
B
1.0
0.46
- FR' + M C + FR' + MC
(compression at C controls) (tension at C' controls)
- FR' + M C 1 + FR' - M C
(compression at C' controls) 1 (tension at C controls)
1
1
( ? / 2YF ) ( FR / FP )
- 1.0 - 0.5 0.5 1.0

ATTACHMENT-1
STRESS CHECKING ON TOP WIND GIRDER WHEN AS WALKWAY BASED ON

Pressure Vessel Handbook, 13th Edtion, by Eugene F. Megyesy
1.0 STRESS CHECKING ON TOP WIND GIRDER BEAM AND SUPPORTS AS WALKWAY
1.1 Basic Informations
Strength of Structural Materials: ASTM A36

2
Yield strength 250 N/mm
2
Tensile strength 400 N/mm
Allowable bending stress 0.66 Sy [S]b = 165.00 N/mm2

Allowable shear stress for 0.40 Sy [S]s = 100.00 N/mm2
Allowable comp stress 0.60 Sy [S]c = 150.00 N/mm2
Allowable bearing stress 0.90 Sy [S]r = 225.00 N/mm2
Load condition
Live load 1.2 kPa 1.2 kN/m2
Concentrate Load 600 kg 5.89 kN
Safety factor 1.25
Distance between beam supports 2,350 mm
Beam support span 1,300 mm
2.0 RING BEAM CHECK
Beam size: W10, 10x4 (254mm x 102mm) 28.28 kg/m

3
Modulus of section: Z= 3.08E+05 mm
Span between beam supports: 2,350 mm
Point load by concentrate load Pc = 5.89 kN

Load by beam weight: Pw = 2.77E-04 kN/mm
Load by live load PL = 7.80E-04 kN/mm

(BLACK PEARL PROJECT) PHASE 1 PAGE 22 OF 29 REV:. 2
ATTACHMENT-1

Bending moment by point load: M Mp = 3,458.03 kN-mm

Bending moment by beam weight : Mw Mw = 191.51 kN-mm
Bending moment by Live Load: ML ML = 538.44 kN-mm
2
Bending stress Sb = 13.60 N/mm
< [S]b
Ring Beam bending checking is passed
3.0 SUPPORT BEAM UNDER WIND GIRDER DECK
Beam size: W14, 14x5 Partial (356mm x 127mm) 39.00 kg/m
Point load at beam end P= 5.89 kN

Live Load PL = 0.00141 kN/mm
Top wind gider distributed load w= 0.0014 kN/mm
Beam support span L= 1,300 mm
Load by Beam weight W= 0.249 kN
Bending moment by point load: Mp Mp = P*x kN-mm

2
Bending moment by distributed load: Md Md = w*x /2 kN-mm
Bending moment by Live load, ML ML = PL*x2/2 kN-mm
3 2
Bending moment by beam weight: Mw Mw = W*x /3/l kN-mm
y = -14.306x3 + 175.64x2 + 806.72x - 983.56
12000.00
Chart Title
10000.00
Mw
8000.00 Mp
Axis Title
6000.00 Md
ML
4000.00
SUM
2000.00
Linear (Mp)
0.00 Poly. (SUM)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
-2000.00

ATTACHMENT-1

The section of supporting beam is variable along its length
x - Distance from free end to shell mm

Mx - Moment at location x, kN-mm
Zx - Modulus of section at location of x, mm3
I - Moments of inertia mm4
Y - Radii of gyration, mm
x Mx Zx S I Y
0.00 0.06 61,479 0.001 1,787,804 29.08
200 1,234.75 63,077 19.58 1,788,242 28.35
400 2,586.16 64,666 39.99 1,788,650 27.66
600 4,056.59 66,212 61.27 1,789,056 27.02
800 5,648.40 67,706 83.43 1,789,461 26.43
1,000 7,363.93 69,160 106.48 1,789,867 25.88
1,100 8,268.83 69,897 118.30 1,790,070 25.61
1,200 9,205.55 70,594 130.40 1,790,272 25.36
1,300 10,174.37 71,314 142.67 1,790,475 25.11
SMax= 142.67 < [S]s = 165.00 N/mm2
So the selected support beam is Satisfactory..
4.0 WELDING SEAM CHECKING
4.1 Welding Seam in Between Ring Beam and Support Beam
Shear force on welding seam Fs = 5.89 kN

Weld leg size W= 6.00 mm
Effective weld throat w= 4.24 mm
Length of weld L= 200 mm
2
Allowable shear stress for weld [S]sw = 85.00 N/mm
2
Shear stress Ss = 6.94 N/mm
< [S]sw
Welding leg size is satisfied
4.2 Welding Seam in Between Support Beam and Tank Shell
Bending moment at fillet weld Mw = 10,174.37 kN-mm

Allowable shear stress for weld [S]bw = 140.25 N/mm2
2
Bending stress Sb = 7.65 N/mm
< [S]bw
Shear force on fillet weld due to P Fs1 = 5.89 kN

Shear force due to wind girder Fs2 = 1.88 kN
Shear force due to support beam Fs3 = 0.25 kN

ATTACHMENT-1


Allowable shear stress for weld [S]sw = 85.00 N/mm2
2
Shear stress Ss = 3.37 N/mm
< [S]sw
2
Allowable stress for combined load: [S]w = 127.50 N/mm
Combined stress S = Sqrt(Sb2+Ss2) S= 8.36 N/mm
2
< [S]w
Therefore, selected welding seam leg size is satisfactory

ATTACHMENT-2
STRESS CHECKING ON TOP WIND GIRDER (WHEN PAINTING TROLLEY USED)

For W-shaped Underhung Monorails Aanalyzed as Simple-Span with / without Overhang
Per AISC 9TH Edition ASD Manual and CMAA Specification No.74 (2004)
1 Beam Select: W10X19 Material, A 36
Member Properties: W10X19

A= 5.62 in^2 d/Af = 6.5
d= 10.2 in Ix = 96 in^4
tw = 0.25 in Sx = 19 in^3
bf = 4.02 in Iy = 4.3 in^4
tf = 0.395 in Sy = 2.1 in^3
k= 0.695 in J= 0.2 in^4
rt = 1.03 in Cw = 104 in^6
Beam Sketch
2 Input:
Design Parameters:
Beam material yield stress Fy = 36.00 ksi

Beam Simple-Span L= 2,350.00 mm 7.71 ft
Unbraced length Lb = 0.00 mm 0.00 ft
Bending Coef Cb = 1.00
Overhang Length L0 = 0.00 mm 0.00 ft
Unbraced Length Lb0 = 0.00 mm 0.00 ft
bending Coef. Cb0 = 1.00
Lifted Load P= 600.00 kg 1.32 kips
Trolley Weight Wt = 1,000.00 kg 2.21 kips
Hoist Weight Wh = 100.00 kg 0.22 kips
Vert.Impact Factor Vi = 15.00 %
Hori,Load Factor HLF = 10.00 %
Total No. of Wheels Nw = 4.00 No
Wheel Spacing S= 2,200.00 mm 7.22 ft
Distance On Flange a= 80.00 mm 0.26 ft
3 Support Reactions (no overhang)

RR (Max) = Pv*(L+S/2)/L+W/1000*L/2 2.12
RL (Min) = Pv*(S/2)/L+W/1000*L/2 1.86
4 Parameters and Coefficients:

Vertical Load Pv = 3.95 kips

ATTACHMENT-2

Load per trolley wheel Pw = 0.99 kips/wheel

Horizontal Load Ph = 0.13 kips
Flange thickness for W-shape ta = 0.40 in

λ= 0.14
Cx0 = -1.82
Cx1 = 0.72
Cz0 = 0.19
Cz1 = 2.13
5 Bending Moment for Simple-Span:

Location of max.moments from
x= 3.85 ft
left end of simple-span
Mx = 7.64 ft-kips
My = 0.26 ft-kips
5.1 Lateral Flange Bending Moment from Torsion for Simple-Span:
Assume Horiz.Load taken at bot. flange e = 5.10 in

at = 34.00
Mt = 0.09 ft-kips
5.1.1 X-axis Stress for Simple-Span:

fbx = 4.88 ksi
Lb/rt = 0.00
Fbx = 23.76 ksi
Stress Ratio, S.R. = 0.205 < 1 O.K.

fbx < Fbx O.K.
5.1.2 Y-axis Stress for Simple-Span:
fby = 1.43 ksi
fwns = 0.96 ksi
fby(Total) = 2.39 ksi
Fby = 27.00 ksi
Stress Ratio, SR = 0.089 < 1 O.K.

fby < Fby O.K.
5.1.3 Comined Stress Ratio for Simple-Span
5.2 Vertical Deflection for Simple-Span;

Pv = 3.75 kips
∆(Max.) = 0.02 in
∆(ratio) = 0.00
∆(allow) = 0.21 in

ATTACHMENT-2


Defl.(max.) = 0.022 < Defl.(allow) = 0.21 O.K.
6 Bottom Flange Bending (Simplified)

Min Effective flange bending
be = 4.74 in
length
am = 1.59 in
Bending Moment of Flange Mf = 1.57 in-kips
Sf = 0.12 in^3
fb = 12.70 ksi
Fb = 27.00 ksi

fb < Fb O.K.
7 Bottom Flange Bending per CMAA specification No. 74(2004)
Local Flange Bending Stress @ Point 0

σx0 = bf -11.50 ksi
σz0 = 1.23 ksi

σx1 = t 4.54 ksi
σz1 = 13.49 ksi

σx2 = 11.50 ksi
σz2 = -1.23 ksi
Resultant Biaxial stress @Point 0

σz = 7.23 ksi
σx = -8.62 ksi
τxz = 0.00 ksi
σt0 = 13.75 ksi
Allowable stress: Fb= 0.66Fy = 23.76 ksi
Stress ratio, SR = 0.579 < 1 O.K.

σt0 < Fb O.K.
σz = 16.43 ksi
σx = 3.40 ksi
τxz = 0.00 ksi
σt1 = 15.02 ksi

σt1 < Fb O.K.

ATTACHMENT-2


σz = 5.39 ksi
σx = 8.62 ksi
τxz = 0.00 ksi
σt2 = 7.54 ksi

σt2 < Fb O.K.


40-F191005-SC-001 R2

Încărcat de

Informații document

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

40-F191005-SC-001 R2

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

CLIENT : PROJECT MANAGER : CONTRACTOR :

DOCUMENT TITLE : DOCUMENT NO. :

1 Tank Design Data 3

2 Summary of Calculation Result 4

3 Shell Plate Design 5

4 Top angle, Bottom Plate, Annular Plate 6

5 Top Wind Girder 6

6 Stability Check of Shell Against Wind and Vacuum Pressure 7

7 Overturning Stability Check 8

8 Summary of tank erection weight 10

9 Stability of Shell Against Earth Quake Load (API 650 Appendix E) 10

12 Water Spray System 14

13 Carbon Steel Internal Floating Roof Design 16

14 Automatic Bleeder Vent 17

15 Nozzle Load Calculation 19

16 ATTACHMENT-1 STRESS CHECKING ON TOP WIND GIRDER WHEN AS WALKWAY 22

1 Tank Design Data

1.4 Design condition

1.6 Design code

PROJECT TITLE :VOPAK HORIZON FUJAIRAH LTD- EPC OF

2 Summary of Calculation Results

2.1 Shell plate thickness

No. of Used Thickness

2.2 Top angle size: L150x150x12 x27.2 kg/m

2.3 Bottom plate thickness: 8 mm

2.4 Top wind girder

2.5 Intermediate wind girder

2.6 Overturning stability check

Ff = Maximum allowable sliding friction

2.8 Foam System

2.9 Water Spray System

Actual water application rate for shell 2.10 l/min/m2

Max.Spray angle 125 deg

Outlet working pressure 3 barg

Drencher riser size/qty for shell 10" / 3 nos

Required supply pressure at Tie-in point 7.70 barg

PROJECT TITLE :VOPAK HORIZON FUJAIRAH LTD- EPC OF

2.10 Carbon Steel Internal Floating Roof Design

2.12 Local Load Analysis for Nozzles (API 650 Appendix P)

3 Shell Plate Design

Where : td = Minimum Initial Thickness Based On Design Stress: in mm.

3.3 Maximum allowable design stress A537 -2 material A573-70 material

Minimum Yield Stress Sy= 415.0 MPa Sy= 290.0 MPa

3.4 Calculations and Results

No. of Width of H (H-0.3)*G Sd St td tt Used Weight

PROJECT TITLE :VOPAK HORIZON FUJAIRAH LTD- EPC OF

4 Top angle, Bottom Plate and Annular Plate

4.1 Top Angle (Required Stated In API 650 Para. 5.1.5.9)

Min. Size of top angle: L-75*75*10

Used Top Angle Size due to 1.5mm CA : L-150*150*12 27.20 kg/m

Sdmax = (td/as-constructed t exclusive of CA)*Sd 219.48 MPa

5 Top Wind Girder (Calculation in SI unit)

5.1 Combined pressure of wind and vacuum, qc

5.2 Equivalent wind velocity

5.3 Wind Girder ( refer to API 650 para 5.9.6 )

PROJECT TITLE :VOPAK HORIZON FUJAIRAH LTD- EPC OF

5.4 Wind Girder Data

Calculation for Area

Calculation for Centroid

Calculation for Section Modulus

Actual Section Modulus of Wind Girder Za = 7,137.43 cm3

Since, Za > Z So, Provided wind Girder size is satisfactary.

6 Stability Check of Shell Against Wind and Vacuum Pressure

qW = 6.25 * 10 -6 * V2 0.01 kg/cm2

Min. Size of top angle: L-757510

Used Top Angle Size due to 1.5mm CA : L-15015012 27.20 kg/m

σc = ((wt(1+0.4Av)+wa)/(0.607-0.18667J^2.3)-wa)/(1000*ts) J>0.785 5.34 Mpa