Tena Koe Mr Little,

I wrote to you on the 16 April 2018 requesting a hui with yourself to

discuss significant Human Rights and Criminal acts committed by the
Crown through its Family Court “FC”. As such I am yet to receive a
response.

Not surprisingly, I have previously emailed members of the Labour

Party, whilst in opposition, regarding these matters and those emails
also went unanswered including emails to the Current PM.

As such, it was the Labour led FC which first failed my tamaahine and I
when it used institutional racism and or racial profiling and or its hate of
those who whakapapa to Maori as the basis of its decision to award a
protection order against myself yet the Labour led FC refused to award
the same under almost identical false allegations to the same white
european female against her former white european partner only 9
months earlier.

Since that time there have been a number of decisions made in the FC
regarding my tamaahine and I that are outside the law, such as the two
vastly different orders for contact that were given for the two children
from the same family unit, which, as shown in the attachments I
previously sent you was as follows:

The white european child being afforded the following privileges for
contact and or rights with his white European father, whom has been
accused of DV including aggressive and or abusive behavior, stalking,
intimidating, harassing and the sexual molestation of his own child:

- shared care contact with his father and his fathers family until school
age

- an allowance for contact at christmas since birth

- an allowance for contact on the childs birthday since birth

- an allowance for four overnight contact visits per fortnight since school
age reached

- an allowance for other contact during the week

 2

- an allowance for contact by phone

- an allowance for the fathers involvement in the childs schooling

- an allowance for the fathers involvement in the childs sporting interests

- an allowance for shared care during school holidays

- an allowance for week long contact where the child and father can
holiday where desired

with the part maori child being afforded the following privileges for
contact and or rights with myself, her Maori father, having been accused
of DV including aggressive and or abusive behaviour, stalking,
intimidating, harassing and psychological abuse which saw a protection
order issued:

- no contact with her Matua Tane and his whanau from the age of 2
months 17 days until the age of 3 years 9 months, contact which
continued for 7 months until October 2010 when the order for contact
was abandoned by all with the FC refusing to allow further court time to
address significant unresolved care, protection and criminal issues
relevant to the aforementioned proceedings

- an allowance for contact on the childs 4th birthday only

- an allowance for 1 overnight contact visit per fortnight until the order
would lapse due to the child becoming an adult or dying

- an allowance for 1 evening meal on a Thursday

- no allowance for contact at christmas since birth

- no allowance for contact by phone

- no allowance for the fathers involvement in the childs schooling

- no allowance for the fathers involvement in the childs sporting interests

 3

- no allowance for shared care during school holidays

- no allowance for week long contact where the child and father can
holiday where desired

- no allowance for an increase in contact time as the Matua Tane -

Tamaahine bond flourished and strengthened as it did, with my
Tamaahine wanting more contact with myself/our whanau

with said vastly different orders providing two children from the same
family unit in a similar position vastly different rights and opportunities
with said orders clearly demonstrating that the Crown clearly treats
Maori as a people who’s tamariki are better off having less rights and
opportunities including as little as possible to do with their Maori
whanau, as well as demonstrating that if allegations of domestic violence
are made against a person of Maori descent they will be treated the
same as a convicted child abuser and murderer with the aforementioned
contact order for the child of Maori descent being the same as that
awarded to convicted child abuser and murderer and Maori descendent
Tania Witika, with the Crown clearly displaying its default Judicial setting
of “all Maori are dangerous violent black nigger scum and shall be
treated as such regardless of what evidence says otherwise”.

I have canvassed the National led government heavily and in 12 years

the Crown is yet to demonstrate that the decisions made in the FC
regarding my tamaahine and I were within the scope of the law and or in
the best interests of our tamaahine.

It must be noted that although the appointments to Minister of Justice

“MFJ” may change the responsibilities have varied little in the last 12
years and as such, it is the responsibility of any MFJ to ensure that the
Crown is providing a Justice system that, among other things, is:

color blind, in that the Justice system will not use skin color as the basis
of any decisions it makes,

ethnically neutral, in that the Justice system will not use the ethnical
origins as the basis of any decisions it makes,
 4

acting within the confines of the Law, in that any decisions it makes are
based on law and lawful facts, not on the personal opinions of the
members of the NZ Judiciary presiding over the respective cases,

enforcing and protecting the legal rights and or human rights of those
that come before it regardless of skin color, ethnical origins and or the
personal feelings of the members of the NZ Judiciary presiding over the
respective cases.

As such, MFJ is duty bound to act when they are notified of criminal acts
committed by the Crown within its Justice system and should the need to
make a legislation change or to introduce new legislation arise then that
is the responsibility of MFJ. Whilst I am aware that MFJ cannot comment
on legal proceedings I am aware there are other actions that can be
taken by MFJ to determine if decisions made by the Crown in its Justice
system are lawful and just or not.

Therefore, I put it to you Mr Little, the wilful ignorance as demonstrated

by the previous Labour led government as well as the National led
government, whereby a point blank refusal to acknowledge the Criminal
acts and the Human Rights breaches committed by the Crown against
myself, my whanau, our tamaahine and our people should be seen by
Maori for what it is - an act of aggression and a further act of war against
Tangata Whenua, our tikanga and our whakapapa.

Further Mr Little, I notice your recent disgust at people protesting outside

Judges homes and cant help but realise that you, like all MFJ that have
gone before you, have no real understanding of the trauma and ongoing
and sometimes unbearable distress that these Judges cause mostly due
to their incapability and or willingness to act within the confines of our
laws. For 12 years I have had to carry a burden that wasnt mine to carry
and that is that as a Maori the crown considers me to be a lesser person
than the white european father who was also before the FC at the same
time as I was with the same ex partner and that my tamaahine just
doesnt deserve the same rights and opportunities afforded to her white
european brother by the same Judge due entirely to her being of Maori
descent. These Judges get to see their Children and their grandkids as
they please such as on birthdays and xmas’s, a privilege and a right the
white european brother to my tamaahine enjoys but a privilege and a
 5

right we will never know. They get to see them play sport and or go to
their school to be involved with their education, another privilege and
right that the Crown believes my tamaahine shouldnt have.

Your comments re supporting a law change to prevent protesting outside

Judges homes shows that the current government will place the
protection of corrupt Judges over the protection of the rights of the
people who journey through Aotearoa’s pathetic attempt at a Justice
system. Most people I discuss this issue with believe that protecting the
rights of all parents and all children takes precedent over protecting
Judges like Von Dadelszen or Boshier or Callinicos or Ryan who make a
career in the NZ Judiciary by basing their decisions on matters outside
the law such as those already mentioned and quite simply put, all
parents regardless of ethnical origins should take your action as a
declaration of war against parents, families and their rights that are
enshrined in National and International Laws.

Good day, Mr Little.