Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Isaac Sotomayor
Prof. Johnston
History 7A #32194
26 April 2018
Document Interpretation 4: "Hamilton and Jefferson", & The Masters Class
disposition of the United States of America as neutral in regard to the French Revolution. The
belligerent (aggressive) nations would be Great Britain, Austria, Prussia, Sardinia, and the
United Netherlands on one side, and the French on the other. The French having aided The States
in their own Revolution, would have expected and received favorable support from American
citizens. The French Revolution would be known as the “war of all peoples against all kings”, of
which Americans were no stranger to fighting off the rule of a King (Brands 166). The prospect
of neutrality is a challenging one, as America was still in its infancy, thus the more powerful
countries would quickly challenge it (Brands 166). America’s position one shipping would be
“free ships make free goods, which would mean the belligerents would not interfere with these
ships, but the powerful nation would not respect this position and would try to influence America
George Washington’s decision to declare neutrality was one where he understood the
position of the United States as being one of growth. The country was still building upon itself
since the successful revolution and to enter into another war so readily would have been
irresponsible. The opinions of some would be towards a sense of debt to the French, but leaders
such as Hamilton and Jefferson would echo the need to avoid war due to economic reasons
(Brands 167).
Sotomayor 2
George Washington was the first president, but he was also a military leader, albeit not a
very talented one. As a military leader, it would make sense that he would look upon what the
United States would be encumbering itself with on a military scale, but he also had a capable
cabinet and leaders such as Hamilton and Jefferson would surely reinforce his ultimate decision.
The document served its purpose in that it did not forbid citizens from picking a side, but it also
did not support them. If citizens were to involve themselves, it would be them as individuals and