Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
large (and potentially enormous) place in the entirely on packaging to succeed. If I succumbed to 2
universe…” The book looks like an ambitious this allure, just think about the more malleable
Power Point or (better yet) Keynote presentation, reader.
with each sentence—and almost every word—
meant to jolt and stimulate. Among Peters’s many Are design motivators really just hucksters? Must
quotable truisms, for example, is this message to design-speak really be hyped-up marketing speak?
corporate executives that can’t help but feed a Peters basically says yes. To truly persuade clients
designer’s optimism: “You don’t become ‘design- that design is worth something, designers must
minded’ by opening a checkbook, spending a few exhibit what Tibor Kalman called “the bullshit
hundred thousand dollars on a ‘great designer’— factor”—the gift of doubletalk—which is the point at
and then telling him/her to please ‘do the design which all this motivational hooey gets depressing.
thing.’” While I understand the realities of business—and I
realize that Peters and other motivational gurus
Peters’s collected aphorisms are like “Home Sweet simply want us to do better (or as he says,
Home” samplers for us designers, and his “dramatically alter perspective”), must we build our
rationales for how and why design is essential to credibility on a foundation of hype? Why must the
all facets of corporate culture is so solidly absolute rhetoric be so calculated that it sounds
it is difficult for even this cynic to find ways to disingenuous, even if it is not?
puncture his logic. Even his frequent hyperbole is
indisputable. He clearly loves design and hates Intense repetition of a single idea, phrase or
those who misunderstand it. He wields prose like a doctrine is called brainwashing, and that is exactly
battle-ax against the hordes that encourage what motivational speaking (and writing) is all
mediocrity or worse. about. Motivational speaking, like advertising and
propaganda, is part psychology, part philosophy
Peters believes design makes dreams (or at least and part ideology (religious at times), couched in
“dream products”) come true. As a contraction of any mannerism that sells the big idea. Frankly, I
the term “marketing of dreams” he uses the was taught that brainwashing (a torturous practice
coinage dreamketing. On one of his many bullet- first administered to American prisoners by the
pointed pages peppered throughout the book he Chinese Communists during the Korean War and
explains that dreamketing is: “touching the client’s best illustrated in The Manchurian Candidate) is
dreams,” “the art of telling stories and entreating,” wrong. Of course, every successful motivational
“building the brand around the ‘main dream,’” and self-help author or lecturer is at least tacitly
“building ‘buzz,’ ‘hype,’ a ‘cult.’” Another of his brainwashing their audience, and they exude
many motivational mantras—“Enthusiasm begets hubristic self-confidence to command their
enthusiasm. Technicolor words beget Technicolor listeners or readers long enough to impart their
responses”—seems to define his entire philosophy. wisdom. The uber-guru must satisfy the need of his
So, after reading the 160 pages in but a few short audience to be bettered, if not transformed,
hours, I was convinced that if he were Secretary of through sage advice, convincing promises and
Design for the United States, designers would corrective admonishments. Motivationalism and its
definitely enjoy an elevated status heretofore cousin self-helpism are such a big business these
unknown in this or perhaps any country. In fact, I days because we all want direction and are
was so sincerely motivated that while reading I susceptible to anyone who seems willing and
even punched the air with my fist: “Right on! capable to offer it.
Peters!”
Yet back before design gurus roamed this was
Yet despite that unbriddled surge of excitement, I more or less accomplished through
find something troubling about his motivational apprenticeships. Mentors were teachers and
method. teachers found ways to impart ideas in
demonstrative ways that went beyond aphoristic
You see, Peters’s Design is as much a reservoir of rhetoric alone. A good teacher didn’t resort to the
motivational tropes as it is a bible for the formulas so common in motivational speech and
motivationally needy. It is a stunning example of writing.
what he himself calls buzz, hype and cult, and I
have this nagging feeling that his motivational Sure, people wrote inspirational books—Dale
rhetoric, which reads so convincingly, is powered Carnegie was the pioneer with How to Win Friends
by hubris, fueled by generalization and depends and Influence People in 1937—but the practice
_________________________________________