Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • ChE 135 Peer Evaluation Pagulong

    Încărcat de

    Joshua Emmanuel Pagulong
    91 vizualizări3 pagini
    This document contains a rubric for peer evaluation of group work. It evaluates members based on their attendance at meetings, ability to carry out tasks, quality of work completed, attitude within the group, and level of cooperation/participation. Members can receive scores between 1-4 in each category, with 4 being "Excellent" and 1 being "Passed". The maximum total score is 20. The rubric then contains an example evaluation where three group members (Noreen Saldo, Fredeve John Pacatang, Kathleen Grande) all received a total score of 20, indicating excellent participation and contribution to the group project.

    Descriere originală:

    Ggg

    Drepturi de autor

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formate disponibile

    XLSX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    This document contains a rubric for peer evaluation of group work. It evaluates members based on their attendance at meetings, ability to carry out tasks, quality of work completed, attitude within the group, and level of cooperation/participation. Members can receive scores between 1-4 in each category, with 4 being "Excellent" and 1 being "Passed". The maximum total score is 20. The rubric then contains an example evaluation where three group members (Noreen Saldo, Fredeve John Pacatang, Kathleen Grande) all received a total score of 20, indicating excellent participation and contribution to the group project.

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca XLSX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    91 vizualizări3 pagini

    ChE 135 Peer Evaluation Pagulong

    Încărcat de

    Joshua Emmanuel Pagulong
    This document contains a rubric for peer evaluation of group work. It evaluates members based on their attendance at meetings, ability to carry out tasks, quality of work completed, attitude within the group, and level of cooperation/participation. Members can receive scores between 1-4 in each category, with 4 being "Excellent" and 1 being "Passed". The maximum total score is 20. The rubric then contains an example evaluation where three group members (Noreen Saldo, Fredeve John Pacatang, Kathleen Grande) all received a total score of 20, indicating excellent participation and contribution to the group project.

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca XLSX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 3

    RUBRIC: PEER EVALUATION

    Excellent Very Good Satisfactory Passed


    Criteria
    4 3 2 1
    Attendance: My groupmate My groupmate My groupmate My groupmate
    Attendance at group attended 100% of the attended 75% of the attended 50% of the attended 25% of the
    meetings. group meetings. group meetings. group meetings. group meetings.
    Responsibility:
    My groupmate My groupmate My groupmate My groupmate
    Ability to carry out
    completed 100% of completed 75% of completed 50% of completed 25% of
    a chosen or assigned
    assigned tasks. assigned tasks. assigned tasks. assigned tasks.
    task.
    My groupmate 75% of the work that 50% of the work that 25% of the work that
    Quality: Complete produced work that my groupmate my groupmate my groupmate
    work that meets met and even produced met the produced met the produced met the
    project exceeded the group's group's standard for group's standard for group's standard for
    requirements. standard for quality. quality. quality. quality.

    My groupmate got My groupmate got My groupmate My groupmate very


    Attitude: Peer along with other along with sometimes did not get seldom got along
    relationship. groupmates at all groupmates most of along with other with the other
    times. the time. groupmates . groupmates.
    My groupmate My groupmate My groupmate only My groupmate only
    regularly participated participated in most occasionally occasionally
    Cooperation: in group discussion group discussions and participated in group participated in group
    Participation in and sometimes shared relevant discussions and but discussions and rarely
    exchange of exceeded information. still contributed contributed relevant
    information. expectations. relevant material/information.
    material/information.

    TOTAL
    Not Met Maximum Score
    0 Score Noreen Saldo Fredeve John Pacatang Kathleen Grande

    My groupmate did
    not attend any group
    meeting.
    4 4 4 4
    My groupmate did
    not complete any
    assigned task.
    4 4 4 4
    My groupmate
    produced
    unacceptable work,
    failed to meet the
    group's standard for
    4 4 4 4
    quality.
    My groupmate did
    not get along with
    other groupmates. 4 3 4 4
    My groupmate failed
    to participate in group
    discussions and failed
    to share relevant
    material/information. 4 4 4 4
    20 19 20 20
    Joshua emmanuel
    Pagulong

    S-ar putea să vă placă și