Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Analysis:
Originally we were going to test the durability of our plastic, but we ran into some problems with
our experiment. Instead of hardening like it was supposed to, our products remained a little soft,
sticky, and gooey. This made testing the products a little more difficult. Therefore, we decided to
test how far the substances would stretch until ripping apart. The flour product stretched 10 cm,
while the corn starch product only stretched 6 cm. Therefore, we can assume that the flour plastic
most likely would have been more durable than the corn starch plastic if the experiment had gone
correctly.
Conclusion:
For our experiment we created or attempted to create bio plastic made from corn starch for one
sample, and wheat starch as another sample. We used hydrochloric acid, sodium hydroxide, and
a substitute for propan. We set the four dishes out for two days in direct sunlight as directed.
However, both of our two forms of bio plastic did not turn out as we intended the samples to.
Instead of forming hard plastic that we could strength test, it formed a gooey substance. The “bio
plastic” most similarly took the form of petroleum jelly. After we saw that our plastic did not
turn out as expected, we baked it for six hours hoping it would harden the substance, however
that did not help either. Unable to strength test the “jelly”, we did a stretch test and looked at
which substance stretched the furthest before ripping into two. The wheat starch stretched the
furthest. After looking back at our procedure, we have concluded that either the substitute for the
propan could have affected the hardening of the plastic, and or the thickness that we poured the
substance into the dish could have been too thick (not allowing the plastic to harden fully). If we
were to do this project in the future, we would use the proper form of propan and make sure not
to pour the substance too thick into the curing dishes.