Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
l
b —
O O o id'—•
i c —*
V,
(i) (ii)
Fig.l
Basic horizontal-transmission-line configuration
-Q
u
-CD-
O-
-6
•22
o -CD-
I ^00
Fig. 3
Equivalent-phase network for electromagnetic effects
If it is desired to work in terms of physical or phase quanti-
O -CD- ties, the 3-phase 4-wire equivalent network shown in Fig. 3
may be employed, whereby
(Z bb - Z a a + Z bc - Zab) - 3(Z bb - Z aa )
a2
( Z b b - Z a a + Z bc - Zab) + 3a(Zbc - Z ab ) di/3)
a (Zbb- z aa + Zbc - Zab) + 3a 2 (Z bc - Z ab )
Zn,
J
01 + ^21
Fig. 2
J
01 + a Z 21 (16)
Symmetrical-component networks for electromagnetic
effects 21
1622 PROC.IEE, Vol. 119, No. 11, NOVEMBER 1972
In summary, a balanced current flowing along an untrans- and, since Ai0, Ai 2 ,X 0 1 ,X 0 2 ,X 2 1 ,and X 20 are relatively
posed line section will induce unbalanced voltage drops. This small, we may write
can be simulated by injecting equivalent-voltage generators
in series with the line-section equivalent network, and the
voltages are evaluated on the basis of the positive-sequence ^ 0 * (-X 0 1 /X 0 0 )Ai 1 = - E 0 / - j X 10 0 (24)
line current. Consequently, if a given line section carries no
positive-sequence current, there can be no equivalent-voltage Ai2 * (-X 2 1 /X 2 2 )Ai 1 = - E 2 / - j X : (25)
22
generators. However, this line section may yet carry nega-
tive- and zero-sequence current components because of the
influence of adjacent untransposed line sections forming a Fig. 5 shows the equivalent-network simulation for these
ring or loop. unbalanced line-charging currents.
2 ELECTROSTATIC UNBALANCE
Fig. 4 shows the line-to-earth and line-to-line capacitances
which characterise the electrostatic field associated with
overhead transmission lines. For long e.h.v. lines, the charg- C
ing current can become a significant portion of the line
Fig.4
Transmission-line capacitances
Fig. 5
Symmetrical-component networks for electrostatic effects
current. Because the capacitive reactance for 160 km of
overhead line is about five times the surge impedance of the
line, the charging power for such a line section is about one-
fifth of the surge-impedance loading, or roughly 200 MVA at
500 kV. The charging currents are defined as
Aia" ia ~ ia'
Ai b = ib - ib' (17)
Aic ic-ic1
vb = - 3 Xab x
bb Xbc (18)
x x
Vc _ ab b c Xbb_
and, in terms of symmetrical components,
L X 02 Ai
o~
oo 01
11 12 Ai x (19)
v
L 2j LX2 0 21 X 22_ Ai
_ 2
E o = - j X o l A i 1 = (X ol /X 11 )V 1 (20)
E 2 = - j X 2 1 A i 1 = (X 21 /X 11 )V 1 (21)
In practice, the line-earth voltages are essentially balanced,
thereby causing unbalanced current components of the form
Fig. 6
0 = X 0 0 A i 0 + X 0 1 A i x + X 0 2 Ai 2 (22)
Symmetrical-component ir networks for combined electro-
0 = X 2 0 Ai 0 + X 2 1 Ai 1 + X 2 2 Ai 2 (23) magnetic and electrostatic effects
PROC.IEE, Vol. 119, No. 11, NOVEMBER 1972 1623
In summary, a balanced line-to-earth voltage on an untrans- source voltages are reasonably well balanced. This will
posed line section will cause unbalanced charging currents cause negative- and zero-sequence currents to flow, which,
to flow. This can be simulated by injecting voltage genera- taken rigorously, would require additional voltage genera-
tors in series with the capacitances in the line-section equi- tors in the equivalent networks. It has been shown,2 J 7 ? 8
valent networks, whose voltages are evaluated on the basis however, that the usual magnitudes of negative- and zero-
of the positive-sequence line voltage. These charging cur- sequence currents, together with the relevant mutual-se-
rents must be added to the load current in the line in order quence impedances, result in insignificant contributions to
to obtain the total unbalanced current flowing in the line the unbalancing forces. Thus, Figs. 2 and 5 are satisfactory
section.
"1AC
Fig. 7
Elementary single-circuit e.h.v.-loop configuration
11
•a-
c,
•22
CD-
e,,n Z
2'2
•o-
C
2V •22
"00
•a-
-01 •00
in'-
77777
c
o'o' 00
Fig. 8
Paralleled double-circuit configuration
(Clarke) transformation. On this basis, the combination of changing the phase order of a given line section will influence
Figs. 2 and 5 into the network shown in Fig. 6 appears to be the magnitude and phase angle of the associated e 0 and e 2
justified. On this same presumption, a w-network represen- induced voltages. Also, reversing positive-sequence-power
tation in terms of physical line-impedance and admittance flow in a line section will reverse the phase angle of e 0 and
matrices was applied to an analysis of a double-circuit un- e2.
transposed transmission line, 13 and comparison with field It is apparent that the sum of the inphase components of the
tests showed excellent agreement. various e 0 and e2 will cause currents i 0 and i 2 to flow
around the loop, since this is generally the lowest impedance
path. This remains so even if one line section does not
happen to carry a significant amount of positive-sequence
4 SINGLE-CIRCUIT E.H.V. LOOPS current. For that line section,a calculated m 0 = iQ/ilft0T
This method for simulating electromagnetic- and electro- example, would be a very large number. It is unrealistic,
static-unbalance effects offers a relatively simple and effec- then, to consider m0 and m2 factors by themselves as merit
tive means for predicting the performance of an e.h.v. loop figures in such cases, since it is only the current in amperes
consisting of various sections of untransposed lines. Equally, that has any physical significance.
PROC.IEE, Vol. 119, No. 11, NOVEMBER 1972 1625
5 DOUBLE-CIRCUIT LINE SECTION GROSS, E . T . B . , and NELSON, S.W.: 'Electromagnetic
unbalance of untransposed transmission lines. Pt.II—
Fig. 8 illustrates a configuration which is even more com-
Single lines with horizontal conductor arrangement',
plex than that described in Section 4, yet the equivalent-net-
ibid., 1955,PAS-74, pp. 887-893
work technique is equally applicable. An untransposed,
GROSS, E. T. B., DRINNAN, J. H., and JOCHUM, E.: 'Elec-
paralleled, double-circuit transmission-line section is sub-
tromagnetic unbalance of untransposed transmission
ject to current unbalance due to voltages induced within each
circuit as well as between circuits. Therefore, two equiva- lines. Pt.Ill—Double-circuit lines',ibid., 1959,PAS-78,
pp.1362-1372
lent generators are shown in each circuit of the sequence
networks in Fig. 8. HESSE,M.H.: 'Electromagnetic and electrostatic trans-
mission line parameters by digital computer 1 , ibid., 1963,
To establish a benchmark for the validity of the equivalent- PAS-82, pp. 282-291
generator technique, a numerical example has been included HOLLEY, H., COLEMAN, D., and SHIPLEY, R. B.: 'Un-
in Appendix I. The results of a more sophisticated digital- transposed e.h.v.line computations',ibid., 1964,PAS-83,
computer solution, using a complete 77-network representa- pp.291-296
tion, are also given. In the numerical example, line charging HESSE,M.H.: 'Circulating currents in paralleled un-
has been ignored, for the sake of simplicity and because this transposed multicircuit lines. Pt. I—Numerical evalua-
influence was expected to be small when unbalanced currents tion', ibid., 1966, PAS-85, pp. 802-811
can flow in preferred lower-impedance loops. Also, the HESSE, M.H.: 'Circulating currents in paralleled un-
through currents were not calculated and added to the circuit transposed multicircuit lines. Pt. II—Methods for esti-
currents, since these were also expected to be small owing to mating current unbalance',ibid., July 1966, PAS-85, '
the load termination at the end of the line. The good agree- pp.812-820
ment between the computer solution and the simplified slide- PICKETT, M. J., MANNING, H. L., and VAN GEEM, H. N.:
rule solution supports the validity of the simplified approach. 'Near resonant coupling on EHV circuits. Pt.I—Field
investigations', ibid., 1968,PAS-87,pp. 322-325
6 CONCLUSION 10 HESSE,M.H., and WILSON,D.D.: 'Near resonant coup-
ling on EHV circuits. Pt. II—Methods of analysis',ibid.,
Untransposed transmission-line sections lead to unbalanced 1968, PAS-87,pp. 326-333
currents. This problem is aggravated when e.h.v. lines are 11 GROSS, E . T . B . , and WESTON,A.H.: 'Transposition of
closed to form loops, when double-circuit line sections are high-voltage overhead lines and elimination of electro-
electrically paralleled at common busbars, and when series- static unbalance', ibid., 1951, PAS-70, pp. 1837-44
capacitor compensation is applied. 12 GROSS, E . T . B . , and CHIN, WING: 'Electrostatic un-
balance of untransposed single-circuit lines', ibid., 1968,
Various aspects of this problem have been discussed in the
literature, 7 ' 8 and it is apparent that a rigorous analysis is PAS-87,pp. 24-34
complex and usually involves the use of matrix algebra. To 13 HESSE, M.H., and SABATH, J.: 'EHV double-circuit un-
emphasise the physical nature of the problem more clearly, transposed transmission line: analysis and tests',ibid.,
a simplified network approach has been proposed. This 1971, PAS-90,pp. 984-992
should be of help in predicting whether a serious current un-
balance actually exists.
8 APPENDDC
This simplified approach is related directly to elementary
network analysis employing equivalent generators for r e - The following numerical example serves to illustrate the
presenting the electromagnetic and electrostatically induced effectiveness of the proposed simplified method. A section
voltages. The equivalent generator voltages, in turn, are of untransposed double-circuit transmission line is con-
directly related to readily available transmission-line im- sidered, illustrated in Fig. 8, where one circuit has 70%
pedances and the positive-sequence current loading of the series-capacitor compensation. The symmetrical-component
line under any given operating conditions. impedance matrix for the uncompensated line is given in
Table 1.
Comparison with a more sophisticated digital-computer
analysis shows that the simplified approach is, in itself, Assuming that ix and i'x are of the order of ten times larger
than the remaining symmetrical-component currents, and
quite satisfactory for predicting the actual magnitudes and neglecting products of small terms, we obtain
phase angles of the unbalanced currents.
AV0 * 0 * Z o o i o + Z 0 0 . i 0 , + Z Q ^ + Z 0 1 . i l t (26)
7 REFERENCES
1 GROSS, E. T. B.: 'Unbalances of untransposed overhead AV0- * 0 - Z o - O i o + Z o V i o . + ZQ V ! + ZQV (27)
lines', J. Franklin Inst., 1952,254, pp. 487-497
2 GROSS, E . T . B . , and HESSE,M.H.: 'Electromagnetic AV2 * 0 « Z 2 2 i 2 + Zaiij. + Z 2 1 . i 1 . (28)
unbalance of untransposed transmission lines',Trans.
Am.Inst. Elec.Eng., 1953,PAS-72,pp. 1323-1336 AV2< « 0 * Z 2 . 2 d 2 . + Z a - ^ + Zg (29)
TABLE 1
SYMMETRICAL-COMPONENT IMPEDANCES
0
0-30912
2-13833 2
-0-02427 -0-04856
-0-01401 0-02804 1
e 2 t l = (0-000589 - j 0-00188)iL
Because of the significant Zoo> = Z o i o term, we have,for the
zero sequence, e 2 V = (-0-037400 + j 0-02160)iL (47)
e 2 - = (-0-036811 + j 001972)i L « 0-0415i f ./151-8 o
z
oo z oo' Z
01 Z
Ol'
(32)
z , e 0 1 = (0-00171-j 0-0130)iL
o'o z o V Z
0'l Z
0'l'
e 0 1 . = (0-0450 - j 0-0465)iL (48)
and e 0 = (0-04671 - j 0-0595)iL - 0-0757/-51-9 0
-ZoVio.= Zo
'°'ZoO'(Zoli1 oo + Zo'o'
J 3-91/80-9°
A
z
o'o' z oo ( Z , i + Z , , i , ) = 0-03205iI/-130-2° (51)
o 1 1 o 1 1 (36)
and the respective unbalance factors are
m
o = W i l = l'3i oc /(0-3i L ) = 13-9% (52)
e0 =
m
o ' = - i o c / i i ' = - l - 3 i o c / i L = 4-17% (53)
(37)
m2 = W i i = l-3i2C/(0-3iL) = 30-0% (54)
e 0 . = (-k 33 Z
Z0 1 o^Hi + (-k 3 Z 0 1 . i i I =
(55)
1*2' = - 2 c / i - l - 3 i 2 C / i L = 9-02%
(38)
To assess the quality of the simplified method in predicting
According to Table 1, we have current unbalances, a rigorous digital-computer solution to
the problem was obtained. Both line impedances and line
Z charging were represented by a matrix ir section. For pur-
2'2' = z i V = 0-02321 + j 0-59576 (39) poses of comparison, unbalances at both sending and receiv-
ing ends of the line (digital-computer solution) are shown in
so that, with 70% series-capacitor compensation, we have Table 2.
Z
2'2' = z i V = 0-02321 + j 0-17873 (40) TABLE 2
Z o V = 0-30912 + j 1-72130 (41) UNBALANCES AT ENDS OF LINE
k k - = Q.7575/-1O-740 (43)