Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
in
By
SURESH KUM AR
AUGUST, 2009
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
DHARWAD (K.V.NATIKAR)
August 2009 CHAIRMAN
Approved by :
Chairman : ____________________
(K.V.NATIKAR)
Members: 1.___________________
(K.V.NATIKAR)
2.___________________
(L.MANJUNATH)
3.___________________
(GANGA YANAGI)
CONTENTS
Sl.
Chapter Particulars
No.
CERTIFICATE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
1 INTRODUCTION
2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
3 METHODOLOGY
5 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
LIST OF TABLES
Table
Title
No.
5 Extension Participation
Figure
Title
No.
3 Extension Participation
Soybean cultivation in India has gained momentum in oil front with the steady increase
in the area and production. In recent years, it has become an important oilseed crop of our
country, occupying the third place next to groundnut, rapeseed and mustard in area and
production. This crop has a greater potentiality to substitute different oilseeds and pulses to
overcome the shortage of edible oil and protein rich food.
Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Meril] is one of the oldest cultivated crops of the world. The
first record of this crop is available in Chinese literature, where it is mentioned to be one of the
five sacred grains of china. The ancient yogis of Indus valley civilization supplemented their
meatless diet with this bean because of having good quality proteins. The father of the nation
Mahatma Gandhi in the year 1932 initiated soybean movement as a food reformist. Soybean is
known as “Golden bean”, “Miracle crop” etc., because of its several uses. Soybean besides
having high yield potential (30-35qtl/ha), Provides cholesterol free oil (20%) and high quality
protein (40%). It is a versatile crop with innumerable possibilities of improving agriculture and
supporting industry. The soybean protein is rich in Lycine (4-6%) and the oil extracted is edible
one. India is in short supply of proteins and large portion of the population are vegetarians,
under this situation crop like soybean with high protein content and high yield potential became
an important crop in India.
Soybean protein is receiving more attention than any other source of protein today.
Besides, it contains several vitamins, calcium, phosphorous and iron. They are ideally suited for
human beings. Food uses of soybean include beverages; fermented products like soya souce
and yoghurt, cheese analogous like fried and roasted nuts, sarouts etc. Small quantities of
soybean flour are already being used in baked goods, primarily biscuits and in snacks.
Soyaflour is also used in substantial quantity in place of besan in sweets, pappads and similar
products.
Soybean is one of the important grain legume crop grown in most parts of the world for
its several uses as food, feed and beverages. The crop is presently grown on an area of about
91.29 million hectares, mainly in United States (31 per cent), Brazil (26 per cent) and Argentina
(20 per cent). The rest 33 per cent is contributed by China (10 per cent), India (10 per cent) and
Paraguay (3 per cent), with the production of 220 million tonnes and a productivity of 2033 kg
per hectare. Even though soybean was introduced to India in 1880 A.D., hardly it occupied an
area of 8.88 million hectares with production of 9.99 million tonnes and a productivity of 1124
kg per hectare (Anon., 2008).
The area and production of soybean in Karnataka is 0.162 million hectares and 0.154
million metric tonnes, respectively, with an average yield of 718 kg per hectare (Anon., 2008).
In Dharwad district, soybean crop is grown by large number of farmers on an area of 21,646
hectares and with the production of 8,349 tonnes. Due to its characteristics such as short
duration, high yielding potential protein and oil content, good fodder and building soil fertility by
fixing atmospheric nitrogen in the soil, it is becoming popular with the farming community.
As pointed out by Singh (1973), “Key to agricultural development lies in the mind, heart
and hands of farmers”. Farmers are ultimate decision makers about on innovation introduced
into their systems. They are hetrogeneneous and differ in various characteristics like education,
experience in cultivation, farm size, annual income, media participation, extension contact,
participation in extension activities, economic motivation, scientific orientation, etc. Their
receptivity to different agricultural innovativeness will vary depending on their personal, socio-
economic and psychological attributes. Hence, an insight in to these factors is essential.
Keeping this in view, the investigation was designed in Dharwad district of Karnataka
state with following specific objectives.
2. To measure the knowledge level of farmers about the soybean cultivation practices
The study is expected to throw some light on knowledge level, extent of technological
gap in adoption of improved cultivation practices and marketing pattern of the soybean crop.
The findings of this study will provide valuable information to all the private, voluntary and
government agencies for the development of appropriate extension strategies for boosting the
soybean production as well as productivity.
The study also aims to analyse the constraints faced by the farmers in adoption of
recommended cultivation practices of the crop. This will help the concerned authorities to take
the problems of the soybean cultivation to their best satisfaction.
1. The study was confined to two taluks of Dharwad district. Hence, generalisations made
in this study may have to be reinforced by a comprehensive study.
2. The study has the limitation of time and resources usually faced by the student
investigator. However, considerable care and thought was exercised in making the
study as objective and systematic as possible.
3. Part of this study involved investigation of delicate issue relating to certain economic
aspects, on which rural people are usually reluctant to give precise information. The
correctness of responses might, inspite of the best efforts of investigator leave margin
for error to creep in.
2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Review of literature was undertaken keeping in view the variables for the study. It was
rather difficult to find adequate research studies exclusively relating to recommended
practices of soybean cultivation. Therefore, studies related to other crops were also reviewed
and presented covering all aspects of the investigation comprehensively under the following
headings;
Saikrishna (1998) carried out a study on knowledge of paddy cultivation practices and
adoption behavior of Andhra migrant farmers in Raichur district reported that majority of the
respondents (55.33%) belonged to the group of 30-50 years. The respondents below the age
of 30 years were 1.33 and 43.33 per cent of the respondents were found to be more than 50
years of age.
Wase (2001) conducted a study on knowledge and adoption of farmers about Jayanti
chilli cultivation observed that, majority of chilli growers (52.50 %) were in the age group of 36
to 50 years that is middle age category.
Vedamurthy (2002) in his study on arecanut growers in Shimoga district focused that
25.33 per cent of the growers were old aged, 40 per cent of middle aged and 34.66 per cent
were young aged group.
Sunil Kumar (2004) from his study on farmers knowledge and adoption of production
and post-harvest technology in tomato crops of Belgaum of Karnataka state indicated that
majority of the tomato growers (53.30%) belonged to middle age group.
Amol (2006) conducted a study on indigenous technical knowledge about rice
cultivation and bovine health management practices in Konkan region of Maharashtra
reported that, majority of the respondents belonged to middle age group.
It could be inferred form the above studies that majority of the farmers belonged to
middle age group.
2.1.2. Education
Patil (1990) conducted study on a critical analysis of technological gap and
constraints in the adoption of improved rice cultivation practices is Konkan region of
Maharashtra and noticed that more than 55 per cent of paddy growers had studied upto 4th to
th th
10 standard, 22.00 per cent of farmers were educated upto 11 standard and above,
whereas only 5.00 per cent of farmers were illiterate.
Kanavi (2000) in his study on the knowledge and adoption behaviour of sugarcane
growers in Belgaum district of Karnataka found that 30 per cent of the respondents were
illiterates followed by high school (22.00%), middle school (15.33%), primary school
(11.33%), post graduates (9.33%) and 6 per cent in case of graduates.
Sunil Kumar (2004) carried out a study on farmers knowledge and adoption of
production and post-harvest technology in tomato crop of Belgaum district in Karnataka
revealed that, in respect of formal education obtained,14.16 per cent were illiterate, 15.75 per
cent of the respondents had received education upto middle age school, whereas, 22.50 per
cent of them received education up to high school, while the other 10.80 and 10.00 per cent
of the respondents received education upto PUC and graduation level respectively.
From the above review of literature, it could be inferred that majority of the farmers
had better educational level.
Sakharkar et al. (1992) carried out a study on Correlates of knowledge and adoption
behaviour of soybean growers reported that 50 per cent respondents were cultivating
soybean in Nagpur district of Mharashtra from last four to six years. About one fourth of the
farmers had less than three years experience and remaining 27.33 per cent farmers were
cultivating soybean on their farm more than seven years.
Sakharkar et al. (1995) carried out a study on knowledge, fertilizer use pattern and
constraints in the cultivation of soybean by farmers of Nagpur district, Maharashtra reported
that majority of the respondents (67.34%) were cultivating soybean from the last five to eight
years. Fifteen per cent of the cultivators had four years and remaining 18.33 per cent had
more than eight years of experience in the cultivation of soybean crop.
Vinay Kumar (2005) from his study on knowledge and adoption of rose growing
farmers in Karnataka reported that, 53.33 per cent of the respondents belonged to low
experience category followed by medium (45.00%) and high (1.67%) farming experience.
Above review of literature revealed that majority of the farmers belonged to high
farming experience category.
2.1.4 Land holding
Raghuprasad (1992) from his study on innovative proness of improved dairy practices
by dairy practicing women in Bidar district of Karnataka state reported that 86.00 per cent of
the respondents were big land holders followed by small land holders (10.67%) and few
(3.53%) were marginal land holders.
Sakharkar (1995) carried out a study on knowledge, fertilizer use pattern and
constraints in the cultivation of soybean by farmers of Nagpur district, Maharashtra reported
that one third of the soybean growers had land holding of 10.01 to 25 acres followed by
landings of 5.01 to 10 acres. Fourteen per cent of the respondents possessed land of more
than 25 acres.
Raghavendra (2004) in his study on Knowledge and adoption level of post harvest
technologies by Redgram cultivators in Gulbarga district of Karnataka revealed that, majority
of the respondents belonged to medium land holding (48.75%), followed by semi-medium
land holding Category (30%).
Reddy (2005) in the study on knowledge, extent of participation and benefits derived
by participant farmers of the watershed development programme and reported that, 64 per
cent of farmers belonged to semi-medium land holding category, followed by 22 per cent in
medium category, where as 10.67 per cent of them had small land holding and a meager 3.33
per cent of them belonged to big land holding category.
From the above review of literature, it could be inferred that majority of the farmers
belonged to medium land holding category.
2.1.5 Annual income
Malagi (1985) carried out a study on adopters behaviour and value orientation of
adopters and non-adopters of soybean in Kalaghatagi taluk of Dharwad district indicated that
adopters and non-adopters of soybean growers in Kalaghtagi taluka of Dharwad district had
high income (41.46 and 12.00%), medium income (29.34 and 36.00%) and low income group
(29.33 and 52.00%), respectively.
Nagaraj (1996) from his study on knowledge and adoption pattern of improved
cultivation practices of groundnut among farmers of Pavagada taluk in Tumkur district and
found that majority (44.00%) of participant farmers had income between Rs.5000 and
Rs.10,000. Twenty-five per cent of the participant farmers had an income of more than
Rs.10,000 annualy.
Amol (2006) carried out a study on indigenous technical knowledge about rice
cultivation and bovine health management practices in Konkan region of Maharashtra and
reported that, majority of the farmers (85.92%) were in medium income category (Rs.
12,680,00 to Rs. 71,320,000), followed by (4.23%) had low annual income (upto Rs.
12,567.44). While, 9.86 per cent of the respondents had high annual income (Rs. 71,321.00
and above).
The above studies revealed that majority of farmers belonged to medium income
category.
2.1.6 Innovativeness
Reddy (1997) in a study of the entrepreneurial characteristics and farming
performance of rice farmers in Nellore district of Andhra Pradesh reveals that majority 62.00%
of the respondents had medium innovativeness, 20 percent had high and 18 percent had low
innovativeness.
Manjunath (2007) carried out a study on rehabitant farmers in upper Krishna Project
area of Bagalkot district and observed that majority of the respondents (56.25%) were found
in medium innovativeness category, while 27.25 per cent and 16.25 per cent of the
respondents belonged to low and high innovativeness category, respectively.
From the above studies it could be inferred that, majority of the farmers belonged to
medium innovativeness category.
2.1.7 Risk orientation
Rathnisabapathi (1984) carried out a study on knowledge and extent of adoption of
integrated pest management for cotton reported that considerable per cent of the cotton
growers had medium level of risk performance (55.50%), followed by high level (24.20%) and
low level (20.30%).
Bhagyalaxmi et al. (2003) conducted a study on profile of the rural women micro
enterprocessors revealed that majority of the respondents (75.56%) had medium risk
orientation followed by low (15.56%) and high (13.33%) risk orientation categories.
Ninga Reddy (2005) carried out a study on knowledge, extent of participation and
benefits derived by participation farmers of the watershed development programme in
Raichur district of Karnataka state and reported that, 56 percent belonged to medium risk
Orientation category, followed by high 28 percent and low 19.33 percent risk Orientation
categories respectively.
From the above studies it can be concluded that, majority of the farmers had medium
risk bearing capacity.
Sakharkar (1995) carried out a study on knowledge, fertilizer use pattern and
constraints in the cultivation of soybean by farmers of Nagpur district, Maharashtra found that
majority of the soybean farmers (76.33%) had medium level of economic motivation. While,
14.00 and 9.67 per cent of the farmers belonged to low and high economic motivation
categories, respectively.
Siddappa (1999) carried out a Study on knowledge, adoption and marketing pattern
of pomegranate growers in Bagalkot district and reported that, majority of them belonged to
medium level of economic motivation (50.63%) where as, 28.75 and 20.68 percent of the
respondents belonged to high and low economic motivation categories, respectively.
The above studies revealed that, majority of the farmers belonged to medium
economic motivation category.
Sakharkar (1995) carried out a study on knowledge, fertilizer use pattern and
constraints in the cultivation of soybean by farmers of Nagpur district, Maharashtra reported
that one third (35.67%) of the respondents had participated in one or more extension activities
whereas two third (64.33%) of the respondents did not participate in any extension activities.
Further, among those who participated in extension activities, majority of them attended
demonstrations (87.85%), followed by meeting (57.94%), krishimela (24.30-%), exhibition
(15.89%), field days (4.67%) and training programme (1.87%), respectively.
Shashidhara (2004) conducted a study on drip irrigation farmers of Bijapur district and
revealed that, 45.83 per cent of the respondents participated in group meetings, followed by
exhibition (41.66 per cent) and 18.33 per cent of the respondents participated in Krishimela.
Sunil Kumar (2004) from his study on farmers knowledge and adoption of production
and post-harvest technology in tomato crop of Belgaum district in of Karnataka revealed that,
nearly 23.00 per cent of respondents participated regularly in agricultural exhibition followed
by 20.83 per cent in demonstrations. Majority of them never attended in activities like trainings
(66.67%), educational tours (94.17%) and field visits (92.05%).
The above studies revealed that, the majority of the farmers belonged to medium
level of extension participation.
Patil (2008) from his study on constraints analysis of grape exporting farmers to
Maharashtra state reported that more than half of the respondents (59.00%) belonged to
medium marketing orientation category, followed by high (34.00%) and low (7.00%),
respectively.
The above studies revealed that, majority of the farmers belonged to medium market
orientation category.
2.2 Technological gap in adoption of recommended soybean
cultivation practices
Gap in the adoption of recommended practices has been studied all over the country
in various fields of agricultural technology. Studies reviewed to know the extent of
technological gap are presented below:
Pillai and Subramonian (1986) carried out a study on technological gap in integrated
soil conservation practices of Kerala reported that, technological gap was high in agrostologic
practices like planting of grass species such as Congo signal all along the top and sides of
contour bunds. The composite technological gap in integrated soil conservation practices was
found to be 48.37 per cent.
Jaiswal and Duboliya (1994) conducted a study on adoption gap in wheat technology
and observed that, majority of farmers were in medium to high level of adoption gap with
respect to soil treatment, time of sowing, seed treatment, method of sowing, fertilizer
application, irrigation, weed control and plant protection in Surguja district of Madhya
Pradesh.
Patil and Deshmukh (1995) carried out a study on Impact of Training and Visit
System on Rice and reported that there was an overall technological gap of 39.57 per cent in
case of contact farmers and 57.73 per cent in case of potential farmers in respect of selected
practices of paddy cultivation. The gap was highest in case of use of chemical fertilizers for
main field (81.83%), use of chemical fertilizer nursery (50%) and seedbed preparation (40%)
for contact farmers. But the technological gap in case of potential farmers was highest for
plant protection (93.75%), followed by use of chemical fertilizer in main field (89.52%).
Patil (1995) Carried out a study on technological gap in rice cultivation and reported
that, mean technological gap in different cultivation practices of paddy was highest in respect
of application of fertilizers to nursery (88%) followed by seed treatment (81.75%) application
of FYM/Compost to nursery before sowing (79%), application of FYM/compost to main field
(71.15%), use of chemical fertilizers (57.58%) and preparation of raised beds for nursery
(37%).
Tomar and Sharma (2002) conducted yield and technological knowledge gap in
soybean cultivation in grid region of Madhya Pradesh and results showed that, seed yield of
soybean under demonstration plots were higher. It was also indicated that the knowledge gap
was reduced after the demonstrations in respect of all the practices except the plant disease
control.
The above studies revealed that, the highest technological gap was found in seed
treatment, seed inoculation, fertilizer application and plant protection measures.
2.3 Knowledge level of farmers about the soybean cultivation
practices
Malagi (1985) carried out a study on adoption behaviour and value orientation of
adopters of soybean in Kalghatagi taluk of Dharwad District and reported that, 45.31 Per cent
of the adopters had high knowledge and it was reverse in case of non adopters .45.3 per cent
had medium knowledge, while, only, 5.3 per cent of non adopters had high knowledge, 68.00
per cent and 26.7 per cent of them had medium and low knowledge, respectively.
Ingle (1999) carried out a study on Knowledge and adoption of farmers about
soybean cultivation practices and reported that, training is required in the use of the
recommended dose of fertilizers, and plant protection to increase yields per ha.
More et al. (2000) in their study on impact of training of Krishi Vigyan Kendra on
Knowledge and adoption of cotton cultivation practices by farmers in Parabhani and Nanded
districts of Maharashtra revealed that, majority of respondents (62.14%) had Medium level of
knowledge followed by high (27.86%) and low (10.00%) level of Knowledge about cotton
production practices.
Satyanarayana and Punna Rao (2000) conducted a study in West Godavari District of
Andhra Pradesh on knowledge of oil palm growers revealed that, about 60.00 per cent of the
oil palm growers possessed medium knowledge about the recommended technology.
Achuta Raju and Radha Krishnamurthy (2001) conducted a study in Guntur District of
Andhra Pradesh on knowledge level of betel vine growers observed that, 66.67 per cent of
the betel vine growers possessed medium knowledge while 17.50 Per cent and 15.83 per
cent had low and high knowledge about the recommended technologies, respectively.
Gupta et al. (2001) in their study on knowledge of the farmers about improved
cultivation practices of rice in Jammu revealed that, 62.00 per cent of the respondents had
medium level of knowledge followed by 20.67 per cent and 17.33 per cent had high and low
level of knowledge, respectively.
Venkatesh (2002) conducted Knowledge level and adoption behaviour of vegetable
growers with respect to IPM of tomato crop in Kolar district and reported that, equal
percentage of farmers were belonged to low (30.00%), medium (28.67%) and high (41.33%)
knowledge of integrated pest management in tomato crop.
Noorjehan and Ganesan (2004) in their study on Knowledge level of rice farmers on
pest management practices and reported that, majority (90.00%) of paddy growers in Trichy
district of Tamil Nadu had noticed that the respondents had low to medium level of knowledge
on pest management practices in rice. Only 10.00 per cent of them were found to have
higher-level knowledge of pest management practices.
The studies on knowledge of farmers on field crops highlighted that; majority of the
farmers had medium level of knowledge.
Vijaykumar (1989) in his study in Malur taluks of Kolar district found that 84.17 per
cent of the potato growers sold their produce through commission agents, while the remaining
15.83 per cent sold their produce through village level traders.
Hanumanaikar (1995) in his study on the sunflower growers in Dharwad district found
that the majority of the respondents (91.50%) market their produce in the regulated market
and through commission agents and few respondents (8.50%) market their produce in the
village itself through traders.
The above studies revealed that, majority of the farmers sold their produce through
commission agents.
Sunilkumar (2004) carried out a study on farmers knowledge and adoption of post
harvest technology in tomato crop of Belgaum district in Karnataka and reported that, majority
of the farmers (75.83%) faced the problem of lack of technical knowledge and guidance about
improved cultivation practices as well as post-harvest technology. Whereas, 65.00 per cent of
the respondents faced the problem of high fluctuation in market price followed by high
transportation cost (62.53%), labour shortage and high wages (55.83%) and lack of irrigation
facilities and power shortage (46.66%).
It is evident from the above reviews that most important problems faced by the
respondents were lack of technical guidance, high cost of inputs and wide price fluctuation.
3. METHODOLOGY
In this chapter, the general typology and description of the research methods and
procedures adopted in the present investigation are explained under the following major
headings:
Accordingly, Kalaghatagi taluk had an area of 6935.14 ha and Dharwad taluk had an
area of 1943 ha under soybean cultivation.
1. Hirehonnali Garag
2. Dhummawada Madhanbavi
3. Mishrikoti Managundi
4. Kurvinkoppa Navalur
5. B.Gudihal Mummigatti
Fig.1. Map showing study area
3.5 Selection of respondents
From each selected villages, fifteen farmers were selected by simple random
sampling procedure. Thus the sample from each taluka was 75 and making a total sample of
150 respondents.
Dharwad district is situated in Northern part of Karnataka state at 74028’ North latitude
0 ’
and 14 31 Eastern latitude. The district comes under the Northern transitional zone. It is
bounded by the Belgaum in the North, Haveri in the South; from North east to South east
bounded by Uttar Kannada district and North West to south west it is bounded by Gadag
district.
Climate
The district has healthy and conducive climate. The monsoon varies from April- May
to September-October with two peaks, one in July and other in September creating two
cropping seasons. The temperature ranges from a maximum of 39 0C to the minimum of 13
0
C.
Soil
The types of soils range from shallow to medium black and red sandy loam soils.
Rainfall
The annual rainfall ranging from 838.5 mm to 1235 mm, which is fairly well distributed
from April-May to September-October.
Irrigation facilities
Only 11.16 per cent of the total cultivable area is under irrigation in the district. The
major irrigation sources are canal (30651 ha).Ponds (257 ha), bore wells (11547 ha) and
other sources (454 ha).
Land utilization
The total geographical area of the district is (427329 ha) and about 77.06 per cent
area under cultivation (325549 ha), 8.24 per cent area under forest (35235 ha), around 3 per
cent under grazing land (3985 ha) and about 22.46 per cent of the area is sown more than
once (182780 ha).
Major crops
The principal crops of the district are soybean, cotton, jowar, potato, groundnut,
paddy and vegetables in kharif season. In Rabi season, major crops grown are rabi jowar,
bengal gram and wheat.
Technological gap has been defined as the proportion of gap in the adoption of
practices recommended and it is expressed in percentage (Ray et. al., 1995). In the present
study technological gap was operationalised on the division in adoption of 12 recommended
Soybean cultivation practices by the farmers and expressed in percentage.
The “Teacher made test” suggested by Anastasi (1961) was employed to measure
the knowledge level of respondents. All the important operations of Soybean cultivation were
listed separately in consultation with the experts. The questions and answers were carefully
framed by referring to the package of practices of the University of Agricultural Sciences,
Dharwad. The answers elicited from the farmers were quantified by giving ‘1’ score to correct
and ‘0’ to wrong answers.
Based on the response obtained, the knowledge level was quantified by using
frequency and percentage.
3.7.3.2 Adoption
All the important operations in Soybean cultivation were listed. A total number of 14
common recommended practices were selected based on the judgment of the specialists.
The proper answers for these items were obtained with the help of package of practice book
and Soybean specialist of the University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad was quantified, by
giving ‘2’ score to full adoption,’1’score to partial adoption and ‘0’score to non- adoption.
Based on the responses obtained, the adoption level was quantified by using
frequency and percentage.
It referred to the chronological age of the respondents in completed years at the time
of investigation. The procedure as followed by Raghavendra (2005) was used to quantify this
variable as
Young 18 – 30
Middle 31 – 50
3.7.4.2 Education
Education Score
Illiterate 0
PUC 4
Graduate 5
Post graduate 6
Low < 10
Medium 10 to 20
High > 20
3.7.4.4 Land holding
It refers to the number of acres of land possessed by the farmers. The criterion
prescribed by the Karnataka Land Reforms Act 38 of 1966 (Part B), 99, 195-96 under section
2(a) 32 as one acre of irrigated or garden land was equivalent to 3 acres of dry land.
3.7.4.7 Innovativeness
This variable was quantified by using the innovativeness scale developed by Feaster
(1968) and as followed by Bhanu (2006) with slight modifications. The scales include eight
statements and were measured with three response category as ‘Agree’, ‘undecided’ and
‘disagree’. For the positive first four statements, a score of 2 was assigned to ‘agree’
response, a score of one for ‘undecided’ and zero score for ‘disagree’ response. The scoring
procedure was reversed in case of negative statements. The summation of the scores
obtained by the respondent for all the eight statements indicated his innovativeness score.
Based on the total scores, the respondents were grouped into three categories by
using mean and standard deviation as a measure of check.
Category Score
It refers to the degree to which a farmer is oriented towards risk and uncertainty and
has courage to face the problems in farming. Risk orientation was measured with the help of
risk orientation scale developed by Supe (1969) and as followed by Amol (2006). This scale
included six items of which first and fifth items were negative and rest four were positive.
These items were rated on a three point continuum namely, agree, undecided and disagree
with weightages of 3, 2 and 1 for positive statements and 1, 2 and 3 for negative items,
respectively.
Based on the total scores, the respondents were grouped into three categories by
using mean and standard deviation as a measure of check.
Sl. No. Category Risk Orientation (Score)
Economic orientation was operationally defined as the degree to which a farmer was
oriented towards profit maximization in farming and the relative value placed by the farmer on
economic ends. The scale developed by Supe (1969) and as followed by Chandrasekhar
(2007) with suitable modification to quantify this variable. The scale consisted of six
statements of which one statement was negative. The responses were obtained on a three
Point continuum with scoring as follows.
Category A UD DA
The maximum score an individual could obtain on this scale was 18 and minimum
score was six.
Based on the total score the respondents were classified into three categories as
follows.
Low 6-9
Medium 10-13
High 14-18
Respondents were asked to indicate when and where they sell their produce. The
responses thus obtained were expressed in frequency and percentage.
2. Illiterate 38 25.33
Primary 28 18.67
Middle school 20 13.33
Education
High school 47 31.33
PUC 13 8.67
Graduate 4 2.67
PG 0 0.00
3. < 10 Years 16 10.66
Farming 10 to 20 Years 88 58.67
experience
> 20 Years 46 30.66
Socio-economic characteristics
60.00
Percentage 50.00
40.00 30.00
30.00
20.00 8.00
10.00
0.00
Young age (18-30 yrs) Middle age (31-50 yrs) Old age (above 50 yrs)
Age
35.00 31.33
30.00 25.33
25.00
Percentage
18.67
20.00
13.33
15.00
8.67
10.00
5.00 2.67
0.00
0.00
Illiterate Primary Middle High PUC Graduate PG
school school
Education
58.67
60.00
50.00
40.00 30.66
Percentage
30.00
20.00 10.66
10.00
0.00
< 10 Years 10 to 20 Years More than 20 Years
Farming experiance
45.00
40.00
35.00
Percentage
30.00
22.67
25.00
16.67
20.00
15.00 10.66
10.00 4.66
5.00
0.00
M arginal f armers (< Small f armers (2.51- Semi-medium f armers M edium farmers Big f armers (> 25
2.5 acres) 5.0 acres) (5.01-10 acres) (10.00-25 acres) acres)
Land holding
54.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
Percentage
28.67
30.00
15.33
20.00
10.00 2.00
0.00
Lo w (upto Rs 17,000) Semi medium (Rs M edium (Rs 43,001– High (abo ve Rs
17,001-34,000) 51,000) 51,000)
Annual iincome
52.00
60.00
50.00
32.67
40.00
Percentage
30.00
15.33
20.00
10.00
0.00
Low Medium High
Innovativeness
Fig.2.Contd…
58.67
60.00
50.00
40.00
Percentage 21.33
30.00 20.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
Low M edium High
Risk orientation
52.00
60.00
50.00
40.00 29.33
Percentage
30.00 18.67
20.00
10.00
0.00
Lo w M edium High
Economic motivation
65.33
70.00
60.00
50.00
Percentage
40.00
22.67
30.00
12.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
Low Medium High
Market orientation
Fig.2. Contd….
Table 2: Innovativeness of the respondents towards individual items
(n=150)
assistance
50.66
48.00
50.00
40.00
Percentage
31.33 30.67
30.00 28.66
25.33
23.34
22.67
19.34 19.34
18.00 18.67
20.00 17.33
14.67
13.33
12.00
10.66
9.33
10.00
0.00
Meetings Demonstrations Training Educational tours Field days Group discussions Field visits Krishimela
programmes
Extension activities
Sl.
Practices Number Percentage
No.
2. Sowing time
8. Chemical Fertilizer
c) K : 10 kg/acre 82 65.33
80.00
70.00
65.33 65.33
63.33 62.67
60.00 58.67
Percentage
50.00
46.67
44.66
40.00
30.00
25.33
21.33
20.00
10.00
0.00
t
ith
re
ng
l
es
ty
l
if
Zn
ro
ab
ro
en
ar
in
in
33
io
cid
rie
ac
iti
di
nt
nt
ac
oe
R
at
m
Kh
S.
re
ee
di
va
d/
co
co
n
ic
at
Sp
H
io
J.
ee
Va
ie
pl
w
tre
er
se
st
at
pl
ap
W
d
Pe
th
ul
ap
ea
ed
an
O
oc
of
is
Se
H
be
in
D
m
ed
to
Ti
Se
M
FY
Practices
70.00
60.00
50.00
Percentage
40.00
30.00
18.00
11.34
20.00
10.00
0.00
Low Medium High
Fig.5. Overall knowledge level of soybean Growerrs about recommended cultivation practices
Table 8: Adoption level of soybean growers about recommended cultivation practices
(n=150)
Extent of Adoption
Sl. No. Cultivation practices FA PA NA
80.00
72.67
70.00
60.67
60.00 58.00
53.00
50.33
Percentage
50.00
40.00
30.00
0.00
0.00
t e n t s s s g n s e te s rs g ty g
ha tio en er re re in tio er tim ra er ze in rie in
a m liz su su ed ca iz iliz tili ac oe
lp ul at r ti e i til g d t Va
su oc tre fe e a e a w p l
fe
r i n
Se
e
fe
r
fe
r Sp H
c in c lm m d ap us So
w
al tic
in
ed ed si ro n an ic
of
z
Se as nt tio H YM no m ha
Se po
t
co t e c F ge e op
tio
n
n d ro tro ch ph
a tio ee tp ni of of
ic an of n
pl il ca W l t i o i on
Ap p P io
n
ic
a at
Ap ic
at pl lic
pl ap A pp
p o f
A e
m
Ti
Cultivation practices
60.00
50.00
Percentage
40.00
22.67
30.00
16.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
Low Medium High
b. Radio 14 9.33
c. Personal visit to market 48 32.00
2. Selling
a. Local market at village level 66 46.00
b. APMC 84 56.00
4. Mode of transportation
a. Bullock cart 32 21.33
b. Trucks 49 32.67
c. Tractor 66 44.00
d. Bus 03 2.00
5. Grading
i. Followed 28 18.67
a. Size and shape 12 42.86
6. Storage
i. Followed 82 54.67
a. Gunny bags 72 87.80
10.00
5.00
0.00
News paper Radio Personal visit t o mar ket Relat ives, neighbour s, f riends of
who visit mar ket
Sources of price information
ation
56.00
60.00 46.00
50.00
40.00
Percentage
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
Local market at village level APMC
Selling
74.67
80.00
70.00
60.00
Percentage
50.00 25.33
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
Sale after the harvest if prices are Store for some time and selling the
favorable produce
Time of selling the produce
Percentage
21.33
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
2.00
5.00
0.00
Bullock cart Trucks Tractor Bus
Mode of transportation
56.00
60.00
44.00
50.00
40.00
Percentage
28.00
30.00
16.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
Follow ed Size and shape Shrinked / Not Follow ed
Shrivelled
Grading
60.00 54.67
48.00
45.33
50.00
40.00
Percentage
30.00
20.00
6.67
10.00
0.00
Follow ed Gunny bags Metal bin Not Follow ed
Storage
Fig.8. Contd……
Forty one per cent of the respondents adopted recommended weedicide application. While,
18.00 per cent of them partially adopted and 46.66 per cent of the respondents they never
practicing weedicide application to their field.
It was found that, 48.00 per cent of the respondents were, fully adopted the plant
protection measures followed by 5.33 per cent partially adopted whereas, 48.66 per cent of
the respondents not at all practicing the plant protection measures.
Respondents
Sl. No. Constraints
Number Percentage
77.33
80.00 74.67
70.67
70.00
58.67
60.00
52.67
Percentage
50.00
30.00
24.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
High cost of Shortage of Lack of Non availability of Fluctuation in the Financial Non-availability of Heavy risk due to Lack of timely Non-availability of
inputs labours knowledge about rhizobium,thiram price constraints inputs in time failure of advisory service drought tolerant
disease control and zinc sulphate monsoon rains varieties
Constraints
Farmers of middle age with more farming experience work more efficiently than older
and younger ones. Further, individuals of 31 to 50 years of age feel more family responsibility
than the younger ones.
The results are in line with the findings of Saikrishna (1998), Karpagap (2000), Wase
(2001), Poonam Srivtsa et al. (2004) and Abdad (2006).
5.1.2 Education
It is clear from the Table 1 that, majority of the respondents had high school
education (31.33%) while, 25.33 per cent were illiterate. The other respondents were
educated upto primary school (18.67%), middle school (13.33%), PUC (8.67%) and graduate
(2.67%).
The rural social environment was the major cause for such trend. As the rural people
are still traditional bound they generally do not prefer to send their children to colleges and
they except their children to assist in farm and house hold activities. The distance of higher
study centers from village also might have prevented the parents from providing higher
education to their children.
These findings are in line with the studies of Pandya (1996), Yaligar (1997), Kanvi
(2000), Sunil Kumar (2004) and Amol (2006).
The above mentions findings are in consonance with the findings of Sakharkar
(1995), Nagaraj (1996), Bheemappa (2001), Natikar (2001), and Raghvendra (2004).
5.1.6 Innovativeness
An overall view of innovativeness of the respondents in Table 1 revealed that, 52.00
per cent of the respondents belonged to medium innovativeness category, followed by high
(32.67%) and low (15.33%).
The data presented in the Table 2 on the responses of respondents towards the
individual items indicated that, about 28.66 per cent of the respondents agree to the
statement ‘very much interested in learning new ways of farming’, followed by 40.00 and
31.34 per cent of the respondents said ‘undecided’ and ‘disagree’, respectively.
Whereas, 47.34 per cent of the respondents expressed their disagreement to the
statement i.e., ‘agricultural extension workers gives a talk on improved aspect of agriculture
would you attend’, followed by 34.66 and 18.00 per cent of the respondents said ‘undecided’
and ‘agree’.
While, 68.00 per cent of the respondents said ‘disagree’ to the statement that, ‘if the
government would help you to establish a farm elsewhere, would you move’, followed by
30.67 per cent undecided and 1.33 per cent were agreed.
Majority (57.33%) of the respondents were ‘disagree’ to the statement i.e., ‘do you
want to change in your way of life’, followed by 30.67 and 12.00 per cent of the respondents
said ‘undecided’ and ‘disagree’, respectively.
It is observed that, 24.00 per cent of the respondents ‘agree’ to the statement of ‘rural
youth should try to farm the way his parents did’, followed by undecided (36.00%) and
disagree (40.00%).
About 85.33 per cent of the respondents said ‘disagree’ of the statement i.e., ‘do you
want your sons to be farmer’, followed by undecided (14.67%) and it is interesting to note that
none of the farmers ‘agree’ of this statement.
Further, 10.66 per cent of the respondents ‘agreed’ to the statement of ‘it is better to
enjoy today and let tomorrow take care of itself’, followed by 20.00 and 69.34 per cent of the
respondents said ‘undecided’ and ‘disagree’ to the same statement, respectively.
Whereas, the 22.66 per cent of the respondents ‘agreed’ to the statement of ‘A
man’s fortune is in the hands of god’, followed by 32.00 and 45.35 per cent of the
respondents said undecided and disagree, respectively.
The possible reason for this kind of results may be due to the fact that, majority of the
farmers are middle aged, educated upto high school, medium land holding (10-25 acres) high
income (Rs.51000/year) so, all these factors might have influenced to know more and more
about recent technologies in order to earn more and hence majority belonged to medium
innovativeness category.
The findings of the present study are in conformity with the findings reported by
Reddy (1997), Ganghi (2002), Shashidhar (2004), Suresh (2004) and Ninga Reddy (2005).
The data in Table 3 reveals that, the risk orientation of the respondents towards the
individual items and indicated that, about 45.34 per cent of the respondents said ‘agree’ to the
statement of ‘growing to large number of crops mainly helps to avoid higher risk involved in
growing one or two crops’, followed by ‘undecided’(30.00%) and ‘disagree’ (24.66%).
While, 37.34 per cent ‘agreed’ to the statement of ‘A farmer should rather take more
of chance in making big profits than to be content with a smaller but less risky profits’,
followed by ‘undecided’ (22.66%) and ‘disagree’(40.00%).
Whereas, 41.34 per cent of the respondents expressed their ‘agreement’ to the
statement of ‘a farmer who is willing to take greater risk than the average farmer usually does
better financially’, followed by ‘undecided’ (32.00%) and ‘disagree’(26.66%).
Further, 32.00 per cent of the respondents, ‘agreed’ to the statement of ‘it is good for
a farmer to take risk when he know his chance of success is fairly high followed by
‘disagree’(37.54%) and ‘undecided’(30.66%).
While, the 24.00 per cent of the respondents, ‘agreed’ to the statement of ‘it is better
for a farmer not to try new farming methods unless most others have used them successfully’,
followed by 44.66 and 31.34 per cent of the respondents said ‘undecided’ and ‘disagree’ to
the same statement, respectively.
About 32.00 per cent of the respondents said ‘agree’ to the statement of ‘trying of
entirely new methods in farming involves risk but, it is worthy followed by 28.00 and 40.00 pr
cent of the respondents said ‘undecided’ and ‘disagree’, respectively.
The reason for this kind of result might be that, risk bearing capacity of an individual
depends upon the personal, psychological, socio-economic characteristics. The individual
with medium education, more farming experience and more land holding, more income might
have exhibited medium and low risk orientation.
The finding are in accordance with the finding of Guptha (1999), Budhal (2002),
Bhagyalaxmi et al. (2003),Suresh (2004), Shashidhar (2004) and Ninga Reddy (2005).
5.1.8 Economic motivation
The data presented in table 1 indicates that 52 per cent of the respondents belonged
to medium economic motivation category followed by high (29.33%) and low (18.67%)
economic motivation category.
The data in Table 4 revealed the economic motivation of soybean growers. About
65.33 per cent of the farmers said ‘agree’ to the statement of ‘a farmer should work towards
more yield and economic profit’, followed by ‘undecided’ (30.00%) and ‘disagree’(4.66%).
Whereas, 41.33 per cent of the respondents expressed their agreement to the
statement of ‘the most successful farmer is one who makes more profits’, followed by
‘undecided’ (25.33%) and ‘disagree’ (33.33%).
While, 45.34 per cent of the respondents said ‘agree’ to the statement of ‘a farmer
should grow cash crops to increase monetary profits in comparison to growing food crops for
home consumption’, followed by ‘undecided’ (32.00%) and ‘disagree’ (22.66%).
About 30.66 per cent of the respondents expressed their agreement to the statement
of ‘the farmer should try the new farming ideas which may earn him more money’, followed by
28.00 and 41.34 per cent of the respondents said ‘undecided’ and ‘disagree’ respectively.
Further, 29.34 per cent of the respondents said ‘agree’ to the statement of ‘it is
difficult for the farmer’s children to make good start unless he provides them with economic
assistance’, followed by ‘undecided’ (46.00%) and ‘disagree’ (24.66%).
While, 27.34 per cent of the farmers said ‘agree’ to the statement of ‘a farmer must
earn his living but the most important thing in life cannot be defined in economic terms’
followed by, 28.00 and 44.66 per cent of the respondents said ‘undecided’ and ‘disagree’ to
the same statement respectively.
The possible reason may be that as majority of them belonged to high income group
and more land holdings and innovativeness nature might have made them to earn more. It is
quit natural that, individual with capabilities would like to earn more and improve his standard
of living.
The findings are in accordance with the finding of Chandran (1997), Siddappa (1999),
Natikar (2001), Deepak (2003), Sandesh (2004) and Raghavendra (2005).
It is clear from the result that, the majority (28.66%) of the respondents participated
occasionally in demonstration. Whereas 48.00 per cent of the respondents never participated
and 23.34 per cent of the respondents participated regularly.
Further, it can be observed that, the 25.33 per cent of the respondents occasionally
participated in training programme, whereas 60.00 and 14.67 per cent never and regularly
participated, respectively.
Regarding educational tours the results indicated that 59.34 per cent of the
respondents never participated, whereas 31.33 per cent occasionally participated and 9.33
per cent regularly participated.
With respect to field days was observed that, 65.33 percent of the respondents Never
participated in field days, whereas, 22.67 occasionally participated and 12.00 per cent
regularly participated respectively.
A perusal of Table 6 revealed that 18.00 per cent of the respondents participated
occasionally, in group discussion, whereas 62.66 per cent never participated and 19.34 per
cent of the respondents participated regularly.
In case of field visits, the majority of the respondents (69.34%) never participated in
field visit, while, 17.33 per cent participated occasionally and 13.33 per cent of them regularly
visited.
Regarding Krishimela it was observed that, 50.66 per cent of the respondents
participated regularly, whereas 30.67 per cent of the respondents never visited Krishimela
and 18.67 per cent of them visited occasionally.
It could be observed from the findings that there is a variety of response from the
respondents which may be due to lack of awareness about extension activities conducted in
the area and attending other works which is more important than attending the extension
activities.
The results are in accordance with the findings of Angadi (1999), Sakharkar (1995),
Venkataramulu (2003), Sunil Kumar (2004) and Thiranjan Gowda (2005).
The findings of the present study are in conformity with the findings reported by
Yaligar (1997), More et al. (2000), Sophiasathyavati (2001) and Noorjehan and Ganesan
(2004).
Regarding other recommended cultivation practices, 98.00 per cent and 88.00 per
cent of the respondents had knowledge of about FYM application and spacing. Whereas, with
regard to chemical fertilizers 88.00 per cent of them had knowledge about application of
nitrogenous fertilizers followed by phosphorus (96.00%), potash (65.33%) and zinc sulphate
(25.33%).
These findings are in consonance with the findings of Hanumanaikar (1995), Yaligar
(1997), Borkar et al. (2000) and Venkataramulu (2003).
Further, 90.67 per cent of respondents had knowledge about correct time of
application at the time of sowing.
In case of inter cultural operation i.e., two times hoeing and two time hand weeding,
the respondents had knowledge about 98.67 and 89.33 per cent, respectively.
Majorities (63.33%) of the respondents had knowledge about weed control; followed
by pest control (58.67%) and disease control (62.67%).
Apart from this, majority of the respondents had high school education (31.33%)
while, 25.33 per cent were illiterate. The other respondents were educated upto primary
school (18.67%), middle school (13.33%), PUC (8.67%) and graduate (2.67%).
More than half number of the respondents had 10 to 20 years farming experience.
This might be contributing factors for majority of the respondents to possess medium level of
knowledge about the recommended practices of soybean cultivation.
These findings were in conformity with the findings of the study conducted by
Hanumanikar (1995) and Yaligar (1997), who reported that most of the farmers had medium
level of knowledge about the recommended cultivation practices of crops studied.
A perusal of Table 8 indicates that 96.00, 86.67 and 85.33 per cent of the
respondents had adopted the recommended variety, sowing time and spacing. It was found
that 13.33 per cent of the respondents were partially adopted i.e., (early sowing) these
respondents thought that early sowing prevents the attack of leaf spot (Kunkuma roga)
disease and it helps to increase the yield level.
The reasons for adoption of these practices as recommended are the simplicity and
low cost of the practices which can be practiced by making use of mere knowledge and their
own resources without reliance on any external agency. Further, farmers as a result of their
farming experience have themselves realized the usefulness of these practices.
Majority 80.67 per cent and 80.66 per cent of respondents were adopted
recommended seed rate and FYM application. The reason for adoption of these practices
might be that, most of the respondents were convinced about the profitability of the crop as it
is a cash crop, hence, they are assured of good returns on investment through FYM and
seeds. Whereas, 14.00 per cent of the respondents were partially adopting the actual
recommended practices i.e., they applied more than the recommended seed rate. This might
be due to use of seed drill for sowing which requires more seeds than normal hand dibbling
(putting seeds through labour). It was interesting to note that 19.33 per cent of the
respondents were partially adopted the FYM to their field, the possible reason might be that
high cost and non-availability of the FYM.
It was observed that 60.67 and 72.67 pre cent of the respondents did not treat and
inoculate the seeds before sowing it may be due to of lack of knowledge and also the non-
availability of thiram and rhizobium culture in the village. Only 39.33 per cent of the
respondents treated seeds as they had purchased certified seeds. Twenty seven per cent of
the respondents inoculated seeds before sowing as they had purchased rhizobium culture on
subsidy rate from state department of agriculture.
The data pertaining to use of chemical fertilizer and time of application of chemical
fertilizers depicted in Table 8 revealed that, an equal per cent (86.66%) of the respondents
applied nitrogenous and phosphatic fertilizers. Whereas, only 37.33 per cent of the
respondents applied potassic fertilizer. More than half (53.33%) of the respondents did not
apply potassic fertilizer. This might be due to the fact that the respondents apply only
‘Diammonium phosphate’ fertilizer (DAP) to the crop.
Few farmers add single fertilizers to obtain the correct dosage that is recommended
for application. This is also evident by the result that only 4.00, 5.33 and 8.00 per cent
partially applied nitrogenous, phosphatic and potassic fertilizer. Lack of knowledge regarding
the advantage of applying recommended dose of chemical fertilizer may be other reason for
such type of result.
With regard to adoption of zinc sulphate, only 12.00 per cent of them had applied and
that too as per recommendation. Whereas, a large majority (88.00%) of the respondents did
not apply zinc sulphate. Most of the soybean cultivators did not know the importance of
applying zinc sulphate and few farmers expressed the high cost and non-availability of zinc
sulphate locally as the reasons for non-adoption.
With regard to the time of application of chemical fertilizer, it was noticed that
(83.33%) of the respondents apply chemical fertilizer in correct time and ten per cent of the
soybean growers were partially adopted chemical fertilizers either before sowing or at the
time of sowing. Six per cent of the respondents did not apply chemical fertilizer, it may be due
to lack of knowledge about timely application of chemical fertilizer.
Regarding weedicide application 41.33 per cent of the respondents were followed the
recommended weedicide application and only 12.00 per cent of the respondents were
partially adopted these practices. Whereas, 46.66 per cent of the respondents were not at all
practicing any weedicide application to their field, this may be due to lack of knowledge about
weedicide use and high cost.
Forty eight per cent of the respondents followed plant protection measures whereas
5.33 per cent of the respondents followed partially. The major reason attributed for taking up
plant protection measures was as bacterial leaf spot disease was a severe problem in recent
years. In order to control this disease the respondents took up Dithaenium-45 and Agromycin
spray.
The findings of the present study are in consonance with the Yaligar (1997), Dubolia
and Jaiswal (2000), Vedamurthy (2002) and Raghavendra (2004).
Fifty three per cent of technological gap was observed in weedicide application.
Whereas, 50.33 per cent technological gap was found in plant protection measures. The
reason could be lack of knowledge and guidance regarding the safe use of the chemicals.
And also a large majority did not know about integrated pest management.
Fertilizer management calls for greater attention as the results showed greater
technological gap especially in case of potassic and zinc sulphate application. Application of
the major nutrients showed a greater bias for nitrogen and phosphorous and hence lesser
technological gap. Farmers tend to apply ‘Diammonium phosphate’ fertilizer only to the crop
as Diammonium phosphate, supply the nutrients nitrogen and phosphorous to crop.
Application of only DAP fertilizer was prime cause for technological gap in respect of major
fertilizers application.
Whereas, (12.67%) of the technical gap was found in using the recommended seed
rate. This might be due to that, these respondents used seed drill for sowing which requires
more seeds than normal hand dibbling. The technological gap in case of sowing time
(13.33%) because the respondents thought that early sowing prevents the attack of leaf spot
disease and it helps to increase the yield level.
The findings further focused that the practice of applying farm yard manure and
spacing had a technological gap of 15.00 and 9.33 per cent, respectively. This brings to
inference that very less per cent of technological gap was found in these practices. The
reason for this kind of result may be that most of the respondents were convinced about the
profitability and practicability of using FYM.
These findings have similarity with the findings of Mahawar et al. (1995), Nikhade et
al. (1997), Kapse and Pimprikar (2000) and Tomar and Sharma (2002).
Thus, it indicated that majority of respondents had adopted simple practices. There
were another two groups of respondents who had adopted most of the practices and who did
not adopt even simple practices.
More than half of the respondents (56.00%) expressed that they sold their produce in
APMC the reason might be due to immediate cash payment and the fair price obtained as it is
a government agency. Whereas, 46.00 per cent of the respondents soled their produce in
local market at the village level, because of they might have taken loan or inputs on credit
basis with local traders.
About 74.67 per cent of the respondents reported that, they sell their produce
immediately after the harvest if the prices are favorable. While, 25.33 per cent of the
respondents store their produce for some time to get better price if the prices are less at the
time of harvest.
It could be seen from the Table 11 that, majority of the farmers had transported their
produce to market by using tractor (44.00%), followed by truck (32.67%), tempo (13.33%) and
by bus (2.00%). One of the contributing reason could be that as majority of the respondents
were medium land holders and they hire the tractor for ploughing and for transportation of
agricultural goods.
Where as 81.67 per cent of the respondents did not follow grading while only 18.33
per cent of them followed grading of their produce. The probable reason might be the lack of
knowledge, illiteracy and lack of grading facility amongst those who followed grading 57.14
per cent of the respondents graded based on size and shape and remaining 42.86 per cent of
the respondents graded based on shrinked / shriveled grains. The possible reason might be
that, the graded produce usually get good price.
Further, Majority of the respondents (54.67%) had followed storage of their produce
and remaining 45.33 per cent of the respondents not stored their produce. However, 87.80
per cent of the farmers stored in gunny bag and 12.20 per cent of the farmers stored in metal
bins. The sole reason for these findings might be lack of knowledge, illiteracy, damage during
the storage period, lack of storage facilities and also immediate need of money. The important
reasons for storing the produce by a few farmers were for getting good prices, for seed
purposes and for own consumption.
Because of these reasons the farmers are not getting the remunerative prices.
Normally there will be low price at the time of harvesting the produce due to glut in the
market. There is a need to train the farmers on scientific storage methods and the storage
facilities available. In this aspect establishment of warehouses even at taluka and hobli level
will facilitate the farmers to store their produce till they get good price.
The findings are in accordance with Hanumnaikar (1995), Mitrannanavar (1997) and
Nijagonda (2000).
The next important constraint faced by soybean growers was shortage of labour
(85.33%). It is generally felt at the time of sowing and harvesting stages. The time available
for sowing is very much limited as no such operations are advised beyond 45 days. It is still
severe in under rainfed conditions as it has to be harvested simultaneously.
Seventy seven per cent of the respondents faced ‘lack of knowledge about disease
control’ since many years the soybean crop was severely affected by bacterial leaf spot
(Kunkuma roga) disease many farmers expressed that once disease enters into their field the
next morning whole field is going to be affected and so, it reduces more than half of the yield.
The other constraint faced by the seventy five per cent of the respondents was rhizobium,
thiram and zinc sulphate are not locally available. They have the feeling that only Department
of Agriculture supply these inputs on subsidy basis, more over, the corporations and agro
kendras are mainly confined to the taluka head quarters or town ships, thus, depriving easy
accessibility for interior villagers. Therefore, even though they are convinced about the merits
of these inputs but they could not adopt these because of non-availability.
The other constraint faced by farmers was ‘price fluctuation in the market’ (70.67%).
The farmers expressed that there was lot of variation in the prices that prevail at the
beginning of the season and that prevail at the time of harvesting. Since, there is no firm
assurance of price in the initial stages, the farmers naturally hesitate to adopt recommended
practices which involves additional investment. Thus the government should think of
announcing the price based on actual cost of cultivation well in advance of the season in
order to enable the farmers to plant properly and adopt the recommended practices.
The other constraint faced by farmers was the ‘financial constraints’ (58.67%)
because most of the respondents belonged to medium and semi-medium land holding
category.
Whereas, 37.33 per cent of the respondents expressed the problem of ‘heavy risk
due to failure of monsoon rains’ it is quite genuine and is beyond human control. However, it
is a challenge to the scientists to evolve drought tolerant high yielding varieties, which would
certainly mitigate the inadequacy and uncertainty of rainfall.
These findings are in line with the constraints reported by Hanumanaikar (1995),
Yaligar (1997), Mutkule et al. (2001) and Sunil Kumar (2004).
6. SUMMARY AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Agriculture is the back bone of India and an important sector in Indian economy and
about 70-75 percent of the working population depends on agriculture for their livelihood. In
order to feed the millions and provide raw-materials for industry, agricultural production
should be increased. Soybean is an important crop which contains 20 per cent oil and 40 per
cent protein. It is a versatile crop with innumerable possibilities of improving agriculture and
supporting industries. The soybean protein is rich in lysine and oil which can be used as
edible oil. Soybean is often called the ‘cow of china’ because of its 4000 years history as the
main source of protein for Chinese. India is in short of proteins and large portion of the
population are vegetarians, under this situation crop like soybean with high protein content
and high yield potential may become increasingly important crop in India.
Soybean is not only a very cheap source of edible oil but it is a high quality protein
rich food for man and livestock. It is proved as a boon to the large population of children in
India suffering from acute protein malnutrition. Soybean being the rich source of protein,
agriculture scientists should evolve high yielding varieties and improve productivity. Efforts
need to be concentrated on establishment of processing units for soybean. The availability of
such facilities leads to profitable cultivation of soybean. It is therefore, felt necessary to study
the knowledge level and extent of technological gap of recommended practices by the
farmers and also to study the marketing pattern. Keeping the above facts in view, the present
study was undertaken with the following specific objectives.
The present study was conducted in the year 2008-09 in Dharwad district of
Karnataka state. The district was selected purposively because soybean is the principal crop
of Dharwad district. Further, no research study has been conducted in Dharwad district on
technological gap in soybean cultivation practices.Dharwad district consists of five taluks,
keeping maximum area under soybean cultivation as criteria viz., Kalaghatagi and Dharwad
taluks were selected. From the two taluks, villages having maximum area under soybean
cultivation were listed in descending order in consultation with the state department of
agriculture. From list, the first five villages having maximum area were selected from each
taluk. From each selected villages, fifteen farmers were selected by simple random sampling
procedure. Thus the sample from each taluka was 75 making a total sample of 150
respondents. The dependent variables selected for the study were technological gap and
knowledge level, while, age, education, size of land holding, experience in soybean cultivation
practices, annual income, extension participation, innovativeness, risk orientation and
economic motivation were the independent variables selected for the study.
A schedule was developed to collect the information in the light of objectives of the
study. Package of practices recommended jointly by University of Agricultural Sciences,
Dharwad and Karnataka State Department of Agriculture for the cultivation of soybean crop
was considered for the study. The Data collected were tabulated and analysed by using
suitable statistical tools.
Most of the respondents (70.00%) had medium level of knowledge about recommended
soybean cultivation practices.
Majority of the respondents (86.67%) had knowledge about recommended varieties and
93.33 per cent of them adopted it while 94.67 per cent had knowledge about sowing time
and 86.67 per cent of them adopted it.
Majority of the respondents (89.33%) had knowledge about seed rate and 80.67 percent
adopted it.
About 89.33, 98.00 and 88.00 per cent of the respondents had knowledge about use of
recommended seed rate, FYM and spacing and 80.67, 80.66 and 85.33 percent of
respondents adopted, respectively.
About 63.33 per cent farmers had knowledge about weed control and also 46.90 and
52.00 per cent, respectively had knowledge about pest and disease control of which
41.33 per cent adopted weed control while 48.00 of the respondents adopted the plant
protection measures to control pest and diseases.
More than fifty per cent of the respondents had knowledge about the use of chemical
fertilizers.
Cent per cent of the respondents had adopted the hoeing practices
There was poor adoption in case of seed treatment (39.33%) and seed inoculation
(27.33%).
Majority of the respondents had high school education (31.33%) while, 25.33 per cent
were illiterate.
More than fifty per cent of the respondents were cultivating soybean from the last 10-20
years.
More than half of the respondents (54.00%) had high annual income (>Rs. 51,000/year).
Fifty two per cent of the respondents were found to have medium level of innovativeness,
while, 58.67 percent of them belonged to medium level of risk orientation.
More than half of the respondents (52.00%) were found to have medium level of
economic motivation, while, 65.33 percent of them belonged to medium level of market
orientation.
Half of the respondents (50.66%) regularly participated in Krishimela, while 23.34 per
cent of respondents participated in demonstrations.
Majority of them expressed the constraints like high cost of inputs (88.00%), shortage of
labour at sowing time and harvesting time (85.33%), lack of knowledge about control of
diseases (77.33%) and non availability of rhizobium, thiram and zinc sulphate locally
(76.67%).
More than forty per cent (42.67%) of respondents get market information through
relatives, neighbours and friends.
Forty four per cent of the respondents transported their produce by tractor
Only 18.67 per cent of soybean growers were grading their produce.
Forty five per cent of the respondents did not follow storage of produce.
The findings of the current research study have brought out certain points for
consideration and recommendations.
A wide technological gap with respect to seed inoculation with rhizobium culture, seed
treatment with captan or thiram, application of plant protection measures and weedicide
application was observed. Since, these practices are important from the point of
increasing production and net return, it warrants the attention of extension workers and
scientists to intensify their efforts in these areas where wide gap observed and
appropriate educational activities like organising trainings, demonstrations, exhibitions,
field days etc should be undertaken to reduce the technological gap.
More educational efforts are necessary on the part of extension agency to increase the
knowledge of farmers about recommended cultivation practices of soybean and in turn
motivate them for their proper use to obtain higher yields.
The differential rate of adoption of soybean crop among farmers as well as area wise
spread calls for intensification of educational efforts by the extension agencies. It pin
points that the extension agencies should not wait for a technology to take it’s own time
to “trickledown” in a social system, but they should contact farmers belonging to different
category and persue them to adopt the innovations in the shortest possible time.
Financial difficulty was the major hurdle in non adoption of complex and important
practices involving high cost. Therefore crop loan should be made available to the
farmers at right time and also necessary inputs like seeds, fertilizer, rhizobium culture
and plant protection chemicals be arranged in advance and made it available to the
farmers in time in local primary co-operative societies which have direct link with
farmers. The repayment of loan may be made in easy instalments.
It was observed that high income, large land holding, higher educational level would
narrow down the technological gap. Hence, special attention should be given to illiterate
farmers and farmers having low income, small land holdings while educating through
demonstrations and trainings.
Another important problem faced by the growers was severe incidence of bacterial leaf
spot disease. It cause for immediate action from the scientists, breeders and extension
personnel to take note of the situation and to evolve disease resistant high yielding
varieties.
Adapur, S. H., 1989, A study on adoption behaviour of chrysanthemum growers and their
information source utilization pattern in Dharwad district of Karnataka state. M.
Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad, India
Ahire, R. D., 1997, A study on the adoption of improved management practices by gap
growers. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Marathwada Agric. Univ., Parbhani, India
Amol, A. N., 2006, A study on indigenous technical knowledge about rice cultivation and
bovine health management practices in Konkan region of Maharashtra. M. Sc.
(Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad, India
Anastasi, A., 1961, Psychological testing The Mcmillan Co. New York.
Angadi, S. C., 1999, A study on knowledge, adoption and marketing pattern of pomegranate
growers in Bagalkot district in Karnataka state. M. Sc (Agri.) Thesis. Univ. Agric.
Sci., Dharwad, India
Anonymous, 2008, Dharwad District at a Glance 2007-08, District Statistical Office, Dharwad.
Atchutaraju, K. and Radhakrishnamurthy, 2001, Knowledge level of betel vine growers. J. Ext.
Edu., 13(1): 3271-3276.
Babanna, T., 2001, Information source consultancy and training needs of farmers in arecanut
cultivation under Tungabhadra command area in Shimoga district. M. Sc. (Agri.)
Thesis, Univ, Agric. Sci., Dharwad, India
Bhagyalaxmi, K., Gopalkrishna Rao, V. and Sudarshan Reddy, M., 2003, Profile of the rural
women micro enterprocessors. J. Res., Acharya N.G. Ranga Agric. Univ.,
Hyderabad, 31(4): 51-54.
Bhanu, V. L., 2006, Study on aspirations of rural youth and their attitude towards rural
developmental activities in Dharwad district of Karnataka state. M. Sc. (Agri.)
Thesis, Univ. Agic. Sci, Dharwad, India.
Chandra Charan. V., 2005, Profile of sujala watershed project beneficiary farmers in Dharwad
district. M. Sc. (Agri) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci. Dharwad, India
Chandran, B., 1997, A study on knowledge and adoption of farmers cultivating tapioca in
Ernakulam district of Kerala state. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci.,
Dharwad, India
Dharminder Singh and Ravinder Kaur, 2004, Knowledge level of the cotton growers regarding
integrated pest management practices. J. Ext. Edu., 15(2 & 3): 3611-3617.
Dubolia, S. R., and Jaiswal, P.K., 2000, Technological gap of groundnut cultivation among
groundnut growers. Maharashtra J. Agric. Ext., 19: 216-217.
Gandhi, V. R., 2002, Knowledge and adoption behaviour of vegetable growers with respect to
integrated pest management of tomato crop in Kolar district of Karnataka. M.Sc.
(Agri) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad, India
Gupta, A. K. and Srivastava, J. P., 2002, Technological gap in soybean cultivation. Bioved
13(1/2): 145-146.
Gupta, Mankar, D. and Sundaraswamy, B., 2001, Knowledge of the farmers about improved
cultivation practices of rice in Jammu. Maharashtra J. Ext.Edu., 20: 74-76.
Gupta, V., 1999, A study on knowledge and adoption behaviour of rice growers in Jammu
district of Jammu and Kashmir. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad,
India
Ingle, P. O., 1999, Knowledge and adoption of farmers about soybean cultivation practices.
PKV Res. J., 23(1): 59-60.
Jaiswal, D. K., Mishra P. K. and Mishra Anupam., 1987, Adoption gap of recommended wheat
technology among the farmers of Bundelkhand Region. Maharashtra J. Ext.
Edu, 6: 205-06.
Jaiswal, P. K. and Duboliya, S. R., 1994, Adoption gap in wheat technology. Maharashtra J.
Ext. Edu., 13: 63-68.
Jayaprada, B., 2007, Impact of Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank on Agriculture Development
of Beneficiaries in Dharwad district of Karnataka. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ.
Agric. Sci., Dharwad, India
Joshi, O. P., 2003 Future prospective of soybean in India, Soybean Res., 1 : 29-42
Joshi, P. V., 1992, A study on paddy cultivation pattern by Tibetian rehabilitants and their
socio-economic characteristics, Mundgod taluk, Karnataka. M. Sc. (Agri.)
Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad, India
Kadam, R. P., Wangikar, S. D., Pawar, G. S. and Bhosale, P. B., 2005, Knowledge level of
farmers about improved soybean production technology. J. Soil Crops, 15(1):
210-212.
Kanavi, V. P., 2000, A study on the knowledge and adoption behaviour of sugarcane growers
in Belgaum district of Karnataka. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci.,
Dharwad, India
Kapse, P.S., and Pimprikar, Y.K., 2000, Technological gap in summer groundnut cultivation.
Maharashtra J. Agric. Ext., 19:56-59.
Karpagam, C., 2000, A study on knowledge and adoption behaviour of sugarcane growers in
Belgaum district of Karnataka. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ,Agric,Sci., Dharwad,
India
Khin Mar Oo, 2005, Knowldge and adoption of improved dairy management practices by
women dairy farmers in Dharwad district. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci.,
Dharwad, India
Kumar, H. S., 1998, A study on knowledge, adoption and economic performance of banana
growers. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Bangalore, India.
Kumbar, S. V., 1983, A study on adoption behaviour and consultancy pattern of grape
growers of Bijapur district in Karnataka state. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric.
Sci., Bangalore, India
Mahawer, S. K., Punjabi, N. K. and Dashara, P. K., 1995, Technological gap between
beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of schedule caste area research project.
Maharashtra J. Ext. Edu., 14 : 51-64.
Malagi, S. N., 1985, Adopters behaviour and value orientation of adopters and non- adopters
of soybean in Kalaghatagi taluk of Dharwad district. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ.
Agric. Sci., Bangalore, India
Manjunath, L., 1980, Comparative study on knowledge level and adopters behaviour of
trained and untrained farmers in Ghataprabha command area of Karnataka
state. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Bangalore, India
Manjunath, S. K., 2007, A study on re-habitant farmers in upper Krishna project area of
Bagalkot district in Karnataka. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad,
India
More, M.R., Jadhav, S.N. and Penke, M.S., 2000, Impact of training Krishi Vigyan Kendra and
knowledge and adoption of cotton cultivation practices. Maharashtra J. Ext.
Edu., 19: 200.
Mutkule, S. R., Wattamwar, V. T., Narkar, G. S. and Geete, H. M., 2001, Constraints in
adopting chilli technology. Maharashtra J. Ext.Edu., 20 : 85-87.
Nagaraj, K. H., 1996, Knowledge and adoption pattern of improved cultivation practices of
groundnut among farmers of Pavagada taluk in Tumkur district. M. Sc. (Agri.)
Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad, India
Natikar, K. V., 2001, Attitude of use of farm journal of subscriber farmers and their profile – A
critical analysis. Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad.
Nijagonda, 2000, Study on attitude communication and marketing pattern of redgram growers
in Bidar district of Karnataka. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Bangalore,
India
Nikhade, D. M., Bhople, R.S. and Kale, N. M., 1997, Technological gap in cultivation of
redgram, greengram, and Bengal gram in Gulbarga district of Karnataka. Indian
J. Ext. Edu., 33(1-2) : 72-75.
Noorjehan, A. K., Hnif and Ganesan, 2003, Technological gap in adoption of selected Pest
management practices in rice. J. Ext. Res., 5:58.
Pandya, R. D., 1996, Entrepreneurial behaviour of sugarcane growers. J. Ext. Edu., 6 (7):
1299-1301.
Patil, 2008, A study on constraints analysis of grape exporting farmers of Maharashtra. Ph. D.
Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad, India
Patil, H. N. and Deshmukh, M. K., 1995, Impact of Training and Visit System on Rice
Economy. Indian J. Ext. Edu., 31(1-4) : 98-101.
Patil, S.S., 2000, A study on adoption of banana production technology under drip irrigation.
M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Mharashtra Agric. Univ, Parbhani, India
Patil, V. G., 1990, A critical analysis of technological gap and constraints in the adoption of
improved rice cultivation practices is Konkan region, Maharashtra state. Ph. D.
Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad, India
Patil, V.G., 1995, Technological gap in rice cultivation. Maharashtra J. Ext. Edu., 14 : 185-87.
Pillai, Balakrishna, G. and Subramonian, V. S., 1986, Technological gap in integrated soil
Conservation practices of Kerala. Kerala Agric. Res. J., 24(1): 52-55.
Poonam Srivastava, Priyanka Jaiand Prakash Singh., 2004, Mass media effect on Adoption
of Nutrition Practices. Indian J. Nut. Dietics., 44 : 115-117.
Raghavendra, M. R., 2004, Knowledge and adoption level of post harvest technologies by
redgram cultivators in Gulbarga district of Karnataka. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ.
Agric. Sci., Dharwad, India
Raghupathi, D., 1994, Agricultural modernization among farmers in Upper Krishna Project
Area of Karnataka. Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Bangalore India
Raghuprasad, K. P., 1992, A study on innovative proness of improved dairy practicing women
in Bidar district of Karnataka state, M .Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci.,
Dharwad, India
Rathinsabapathi, S., 1987, A study on knowledge and extent of adoption of integrated pest
management for cotton. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Coimbatore,
India
Reddy, N., 2005, A study on knowledge, extent of participation and benefits derived by
participation farmers of the watershed development programme in Raichur
district of Karnataka state. M. Sc. (Agri) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad, India
Reddy, V. P., 1997, A study of the entrepreneurial characteristics and farming performance of
rice farmers in Nellore district of Andhra Pradesh. Ph. D. Thesis, Acharya N. G.
Ranga Agric. Univ., Hyderabad, Inida
Sahukar, V., 1991, Knowledge and adoption behaviour of members and non members of
Karnataka co operative oil-seeds Growers federation regarding groundnut
cultivation practices in Raichur district. A comparative study.
M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad, India
Saikrishna, M., 1998, A study on knowledge of paddy cultivation practices and adoption
behaviour of Andhra migrant farmers in Raichur district. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis,
Univ. Agril, Sci., Dharwad, India
Sakharkar, V. S., 1995, A study on knowledge, fertilizer use pattern and constraints in the
cultivation of soybean by farmers of Nagpur district, Maharashtra.
Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad, India
Sakharkar, V.S., 1995, A study on knowledge, fertilizers use pattern and constraints in the
cultivation of soybean by farmers of Nagpur district, Maharashtra. Ph.D. Thesis,
University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad.
Sakhrka, V. S., Nikhade, D. M. and Bhople, R. S., 1992, Correlates of knowledge and
adoption behaviour of soybean growers. Maharashtra J. Ext. Edu., 11:
212-217.
Sandesh, H.M., 2004, A profile study of Kannada farm magazine readers in Karnataka. M.Sc.
(Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agri. Sci., Dharwad, India
Satyanarayana, G. and Punna Rao, P., 2000, Knowledge of oil palm growers. J. Ext. Edu.,
11(3): 2866-2870.
Shashidhar, D.N., 2004, A study on influencing factors and constraints in drip irrigation by
horticulture farmers of Bijapur district of Karnataka. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ.
Agric. Sci., Dharwad, India
Shivamurthy, G.R., 1991, A study on the knowledge and adoption behaviour of arecanut and
cardamom growers in Shimoga district of Karnataka. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ,
Agric. Sci., Dharwad, India
Siddappa, C.A., 1999, A study on knowledge, adoption and marketing pattern of pomegranate
growers in Bagalkot district. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Bangalore,
India
Singh, M. P., Chauhan, K. N. K. and Amtulawari, S., 1996, Correlates of Knowledge, Attitude
and Risk performance of Farmers towards dry farming technologies,
Maharashtra J. Ext. Edu., 18(1):146-149.
Singh, P. R. and Sharma, P. N., 1998, Adoption of improved paddy technology in Madhya
Pradesh. Agric. Ext. Rev., 10(2): 25-27.
Singh, R. N., 1973, Characteristics of farm innovations associated with the rate of adoptions.
Indian J. Agril. Econ., 24 : 71-78.
Srivastava, S.N. and Singh, R.P., 1990, Identification of constraints of paddy production under
rainfed conditions. Indian J. Ext. Edu., 26(3&4): 77-79.
Sunil Kumar, G. M., 2004, A study on farmers knowledge and adoption of production and
post-harvest technology in tomato crop of Belgaum district in Karnataka. M. Sc.
(Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad, India
Supe, S. V., 1969, Factors related to different degree of rationality in decision making among
farmers, Ph.D. Thesis, IARI, New Delhi.
Thiranjangowda, B. T., 2005, A study on cultivation and marketing pattern of selected cut
flowers in Belgaum district of Karnataka. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci.,
Dharwad, India
Thyagarajan, S. and Vasanthakumar, J., 2000, Constraints to high yield in rice at farm level.
J. Ext. Edu., 11(2) : 2747-2753.
Tomar, L. S. and Sharma, P.B., 2002, Yield and technological knowledge gap in soybean
cultivation in grid region of Madhya Pradesh. JNKVV Res. J., 36 (1/2): 115-117.
Venkataramalu, 2003, A study on the knowledge level adoption and marketing behaviour of
chilli growers in Guntur district of Andhra Pradesh. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ.
Agric. Sci., Dharwad, India
Venkatesh Gandhi, R., 2002, Knowledge level and adoption behaviour of vegetable growers
with respect to IPM of tomato crop in Kolar district. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ.
Agric. Sci., Dharwad, India
Vijaykumar, A. C., 1991, A study on adoption pattern and certain aspects of marketing of
potato by farmers in Malur taluk, Kilar district. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric.
Sci., Dharwad, India
Vinay Kumar, R., 2005, Study on knowledge and adoption of rose growing farmers in
Karnataka. M. Sc. (Agri) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad.
Wase, R. B., 2001, Knowledge and adoption of farmers about Jayanti chilli cultivation. M. Sc.
(Agri.) Thesis, Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyalaya, Akola, India.
INTERVIEW SCHEDULE
Respondent No.:
I) General information
4. Age :
6. Land holding:
1. Dry land
2. Irrigated land
3. Garden land
Total
7. Annual income:
What crops did you grow during previous year please give the details:
Total yield
Area Total Total
Price/ of Total
Season Crops in Yield/acre yield income Price/(qtl) Total Gross Net
(qtl) byproducts income of
acre (qtl) of main expenditure income income
(qtl) Byproduct
product
Kharif
1.
2.
Rabi
1.
2.
Summer
1.
2.
Extent of participation
Sl. no Extension activity
Regular Occasional Never
1. Training programme
2. Demonstration
3. Field day
4. Field visit
5. Extension group
meeting/interaction
6. Agriculture exhibitions
7. Krishi mela
8. Educational tour
9. Innovativeness:
A set of statements representing Innovativeness of farmers are given below. Please state the
degree of your agreement
(A – Agree, UD – Undecided, DA – Dis-Agree about each statement by putting tick () mark against
the concerned item.
Sl.No Statements A UD DA
Response pattern
Sl.No Statements
A UD DA
1. Varieties
a) J.S.335
b) P.K.1029
c) K.H.S.B.2
d) K.B.79
2. Sowing time
a) Kharif : June 15 to Jly end
b) Summer : Middle of Sept to Dec end
c) Rabi : Oct to Nov
3. Spacing in the field
a) Row to Row 30 cm
b) Plant to Plant 10 cm
4. Seed rate (acre)
a) 20 Kg (J.S.335 )
b) 25 Kg (Other variety)
5. Seed treatment
a) Captan or Thiram 3 gm/Kg
b) Vatavax 2 gm/Kg
6. Seed inoculation with
a) Rhizobium culture - 150 gm
7. FYM to be applied/acre
a) 10 cart load/acre or 5 tones/acre
8. Chemical Fertilizer/acre
a) N : 16kg/acre
b) P : 30 kg/acre
c) K : 10 kg/acre
d) Zink sulphate 5 Kg
9. Time of application of fertilizers
Mix all the quantities of FYM/Compost in
soil 3 weeks before sowing. after the land
is ready for sowing apply entire dose of
chemical fertilizers
10. Intercultural operation
Hoeing and hand weeding is done 2
times after 30-40 days interval.
11. Weed control (per acre)
a) What are the common weedicides
i. i) 1 liter of allachlore 50 E.C in 400 liters
of water
ii. ii) 800 ml Chlomazon 50 E.C in 400 liters
of water
iii. iii) 15 gm Chlorimuran 25 E.C in 400
liters of water
12. Pest control
a) What are the common
pest observed
i. Stem fly and pod fly
ii. girdle beetle
iii. Spodoptera,Semilooper and Black headed hairy
catterpiller
iv. Leaf miner
v. Thrips
b) What measures are to be followed to control major
pests
Name of the
Chemicals used Dosage
pest
2ml/lit of water
Prophenophos
Stem fly and
or or
Pod fly
0.6 gm/lit of water
Mithomyl
4kg/acre
Phorate
or
Or 12kg/acre
Girdle beetle
Mobnocrotophos
Spodoptera, 1.25 mi/lit of water
Semilooper or or
and BHH 2 ml/lit of water
Quinalphas
Phosphamedan
Thrips 0.5 ml/lit of water
or Immidachloprid
13. Disease control
5. Financial constraints
7. Shortage of labours