Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PII: S0002-9378(18)30155-8
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.011
Reference: YMOB 12084
Please cite this article as: Zaki MN, Wing DA, McNulty JA, Comparison of Staples Versus Subcuticular
Suture in Class III Obese Women Undergoing Cesarean: A Randomized Controlled Trial, American
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.011.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
Mary N. Zaki, MD1, Deborah A. Wing, MD, MBA1, Jennifer A. McNulty, MD2
1
University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, 2Miller Children and Women’s Hospital, Long
PT
Beach, CA.
RI
This is an “SMFM Fast-Track” Paper
SC
Trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Trial Registration number: NCT02466776).
U
Funding Source: This study was funded by a grant from the MemorialCare Medical Center
AN
Foundation.
To be presented in oral presentation format on February 1, 2018 at the 37th Annual Meeting of
the Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine; Dallas, Texas held January 29-February 3, 2018. Control
ID #669, Program ID #037.
D
Word Counts:
TE
Corresponding Author:
Mary N. Zaki, MD
c/o Department of Ob-Gyn
C
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
Condensation: In Class III obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, no difference was
found in composite wound outcomes between staples and subcuticular suture skin closure.
Short Title: Skin closure in Class III obese women undergoing cesarean delivery
PT
RI
Implications and Contributions:
A. To assess the rate of wound complications with staples versus subcuticular suture closure in
SC
women with a BMI of ≥ 40 kg/m2 undergoing cesarean delivery.
B. No difference was observed in wound complication rates between staples and subcuticular
U
suture skin closure in women with a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 undergoing cesarean delivery.
AN
C. At this time, optimal skin closure method in obese women with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 undergoing
cesarean delivery remains unknown. More work is needed in this area to help reduce the
M
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
Abstract
Background: Obesity is a risk factor for infectious morbidity and wound complications after
cesarean delivery. There are currently insufficient data to determine optimal skin closure
PT
technique for cesarean delivery, specifically for those women with Class III obesity, defined as a
RI
body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 40 kg/m2.
SC
Objective: To compare stainless steel staples versus subcuticular suture for skin closure for
cesarean delivery in Class III obese women with body mass index of ≥ 40 kg/m2.
U
AN
Study Design: We conducted a randomized controlled trial at two teaching hospitals between
2015 and 2016 in which women with body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2 undergoing cesarean delivery
M
were randomly assigned to stainless steel staples or subcuticular suture skin closure. The primary
D
outcome was composite wound complication defined as superficial or deep separation and
TE
Results: A total of 242 women were enrolled. One hundred and nineteen in the staples group and
C
119 in the subcuticular suture group were analyzed. Maternal demographics and characteristics
AC
were similar in both groups. The composite wound complication frequency was 19.3% in the
staples group and 17.6% in the subcuticular suture group (p=0.74) with an overall wound
complication incidence of 18.5% in the entire study cohort. There were also no differences in the
frequencies of infection, superficial or deep wound separation among the two study groups. In a
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
univariate analysis of predictors of wound complications, only current tobacco use was a
significant predictor of wound complications (RR 4.97 [95% CI 1.37-18.03], p=0.02). Fewer
women with staple closure would choose the same method with a future delivery (p=0.01),
however self-reported pain and concern about wound healing were equal among the two groups.
PT
RI
Conclusion: In Class III obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, there was no difference in
composite wound outcome up to 6 weeks postpartum between those who had staples and those
SC
who had subcuticular suture skin closure.
U
Keywords: cesarean delivery, Class III obesity, severely obese, skin closure, smoking, staples,
AN
surgical site infections, sutures, tobacco, wound infection, wound separation
M
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
Introduction
Obesity in the American population continues to increase as it has for more than four
decades. In 2014, according to the United States National Center for Health Statistics, 34.4
percent of women aged 20 to 39 years were obese with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2 or
PT
greater.1 Approximately 10% are extremely obese with a BMI exceeding 40 kg/m2.2,3 Given
RI
current rates of cesarean delivery in the United States, more evidence is needed regarding
SC
Obesity is a risk factor for many obstetrical complications, including failed induction,
U
demonstrated an increased risk of infectious morbidity and wound complications after cesarean
AN
delivery in obese compared to non-obese women, with a trend towards higher rates of
complications with increasing degrees of obesity.7-11 While the literature is replete with reports
M
of evidence-based cesarean delivery technique for the general non-obese obstetrical population,
D
the literature is sparse in terms of the optimal intraoperative and post-operative management of
TE
severely obese woman, specifically those with a BMI 40 kg/m2 or higher, undergoing.12
Moreover, there are insufficient data to determine optimal skin closure technique at time of
EP
cesarean delivery in obese patients, especially those women with Class III obesity, which is
Recently, the use of subcuticular suture has been shown to result in improved wound
AC
performed from 1997 to 2014 showed that subcuticular suture resulted in a 49% reduction in
and increased operative time by only seven minutes.16 Two studies from this meta-analysis by
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
Mackeen et al15 and Figueroa et al17 included cohorts of obese women. Mackeen et al included
235 obese women in the suture arm and 238 in the staples arm and demonstrated a 50%
reduction in wound complications with suture closure compared to staples, however, this study
did not include any women with a BMI 40 kg/m2 or higher.17 Figueroa et al similarly enrolled
PT
124 and 141 obese gravida in the suture and staples arm with a mean BMI of 36.8±8.1 and
RI
35.9±8.5 kg/m2, respectively, but it is unclear what percentage of their study cohort had a BMI
40 kg/m2 or higher, and whether increasing degrees of obesity had an effect on the rate of wound
SC
complications.15 Therefore, our study aims to determine the optimal skin closure technique at
time of cesarean delivery specifically in Class III obese women (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2).
U
AN
Materials and Methods
We performed a randomized trial at two sites: The University of California, Irvine (UCI)
M
Medical Center in Orange, California and Miller Children’s and Women’s Hospital in Long
D
Beach, California. The study protocol was IRB approved for enrollment at both sites and was
TE
written informed consent prior to study enrollment. Subjects were recruited from April 2015 to
EP
November 2016.
Women undergoing planned cesarean delivery who were at least 23 weeks gestational
C
age and with a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 were approached for study participation. Women admitted for
AC
induction of labor or in spontaneous labor who met the BMI criteria and had adequate pain
control (pain scale 3 or less on a 1-10 pain scale) were also approached for study participation, in
the event cesarean delivery subsequently occurred. Women with reported hypersensitivity to
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
virus, chronic steroid use or active lupus were excluded. Maternal height and weight at time of
hospital admission was used to calculate BMI with the following formula: weight (kg)/height
(m)2.3
PT
using sequentially numbered, sealed opaque envelopes, which were opened by the obstetrician at
RI
the time of surgery prior to skin preparation. Once randomized, study group allocation was not
blinded. All patients underwent a subcutaneous closure based on previously published literature
SC
showing an advantage of closure with a subcutaneous thickness of 2 centimeters or greater.18 The
type of subcutaneous suture was at the surgeon’s discretion. Either 4-0 vicryl (polyglactin) or 3-
U
0 monocryl (poliglecaprone) were used for skin closure in patients allocated to the subcuticular
AN
suture group. All patients received a single dose of antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin 3 grams
IV prior to skin incision and routine skin preparation with chlorhexidine solution.19 Those with a
M
severe penicillin allergy received standard dose gentamicin and clindamycin also prior to skin
D
incision. The remainder of the surgical technique and postoperative care was at the discretion of
TE
the surgeon. Steri-strips were placed at time of skin closure in the suture group and at time of
Intrapartum and surgical outcomes were collected by the circulating nurse at the time of
surgery using a standardized data collection form. Prior to discharge on post-operative day 3 or
C
4, the wound was evaluated by the study team using an objective wound assessment form which
AC
included erythema, (ranked none, suspect cellulitis, definite cellulitis), drainage (ranked none,
small, moderate or large), induration (ranked none, <2 cm, 2-4 cm, >4 cm), separation,
hematoma, seroma and presence of necrotic tissue. Overall impression was also recorded (no
concerns, infection or separation). For those women randomized to staples closure, time of staple
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
Subjects were seen by the study team 7 to 14 days after hospital discharge for wound
assessment and administration of a satisfaction survey in which women were asked to report
their observations of the wound, overall pain score and satisfaction with wound healing. The
PT
study team was not blinded to group allocation. If a woman missed her follow-up appointment,
RI
the wound assessment and patient survey were completed over the phone and included their
SC
contacted by telephone between 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively and evaluated with a standardized
questionnaire to determine if they had required additional care for wound complications. Lastly,
U
records from the two delivery hospitals were reviewed to identify any hospital admissions or
AN
emergency department visits for wound complications. Women were considered lost to follow-
Wound separations were identified as either superficial (less than 0.5 cm deep and only
D
involving the dermis layer) or deep (greater than 0.5 cm in depth and requiring packing or re-
TE
closure) resulting from hematoma or seroma. Wound infections were those meeting the CDC
definition of surgical site infections and requiring antibiotic therapy.21 The wound complication
EP
composite included infection and any wound separation. The primary outcome of our study was
the composite wound complication rate up to 6 weeks postpartum among Class III obese women
C
receiving staples or subcuticular suture skin closure. The incidence of wound complications in
AC
Class III obese women has been reported to be as high as 30% in those with a BMI of 50 kg/m2.5
Therefore, we assumed a wound complication rate of 25% in the Class III obese women who
receive staple closure. We aimed to reduce this by 60% to a rate of 10% in the suture closure
group, applied a beta-error of 0.20, and therefore needed 110 in each group for a total of 220
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
women. To account for a 10% lost to follow-up rate, we enrolled an additional 22 women, for a
with procedure were compared between the two study groups using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact
PT
test for categorical variables and independent t-test for continuous variables. Relative risk with
RI
95% confidence intervals for wound complication was determined using generalized linear
model (GLM) procedure with binomial logistic regression specified and robust covariance
SC
estimator. All tests were considered significant at the .05 level. Analyses were performed using
U
AN
Results
A total of 594 women were approached and screened for study participation between
M
April 2015 and November 2016. One-hundred, seventy-four declined to participate, 66 delivered
D
vaginally prior to consenting and 21 did not qualify. There were 333 women who agreed to
TE
participate and were consented, of whom 91 ultimately delivered vaginally. A total of 242
women were randomized to staples (n=121) or suture (n=121) skin closure. In the suture group,
EP
two patients were lost to follow-up, while in the staples group one patient was lost to follow-up
and one was withdrawn due to failure to follow study protocol. This resulted in a final cohort of
C
The baseline characteristics were similar among the two groups (Table 1). The mean BMI
was 45.1 ± 4.4 kg/m2 in the staples group and 46.2 ± 5.5 in the suture group. More than half of
the women in each group self-identified as Hispanic and greater than 50 percent in each group
underwent a pre-labor, repeat cesarean delivery. The incidence of gestational and pre-gestational
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
diabetes was similar in each group and the occurrence of chorioamnionitis was also not different
between the two groups. The mean operative time was 12 minutes longer in the suture group
(55.8 ± 26.0 vs. 43.4 ± 21.9 minutes, p<0.001). There were no other differences in surgical or
delivery outcomes (Table 2). Among the 119 patients who had staple skin closure, staple removal
PT
occurred on the day of hospital discharge (post-operative day 3 or 4) in 73.7%. Of the 26.3% of
RI
women who had staple removal after discharge, the median post-operative day of staple removal
was six.
SC
There were no significant differences in early wound complications between the two
groups at time of hospital discharge (Table 3). There were seven superficial wound separations in
U
the staples group and three in the suture group (p=0.19). A deep separation occurred in one
AN
patient in the staples group and two patients in the suture group (p=0.50). There was no
M
difference in wound complications based on time of staple removal with wound complications
rates of 17.2% in those who had their staples removed at time of discharge and 25.8% in those
D
composite wound complication rate was 12.6% (15/119) in the staple group and 13.4% (16/119)
EP
in the suture group, p=0.85 (Table 3). There were no additional wound complications occurring
after the 7 to 14-day wound inspection visit. Therefore, the total composite wound complication
C
frequency was 19.3% in the staple group and 17.6% in the suture group (p=0.74) yielding an
AC
overall wound complication rate of 18.5% in the entire study cohort. Of those who had a wound
complication diagnosed at the 2-week wound check visit and who had 6-week follow-up
outcomes available, 12 out of 15 patients in the staples group had achieved complete healing,
while 11 out of 12 patients in the suture group had achieved complete healing.
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
Using a standardized patient satisfaction survey at the 7 to 14 day wound check visit, we
found no significant difference in pain score between the two groups, p=0.71 (Table 4). There
was also no difference in women’s satisfaction with the appearance of their wound as well as
their concern about wound healing, p=0.99 and 0.22, respectively. However, when women were
PT
asked if they would choose the same closure again, those women who had staple closure were
RI
significantly less likely to desire the same closure method in future deliveries, p=0.01. The
presence of any wound complication influenced overall satisfaction; women with no wound
SC
complication (N=187) had a median satisfaction score of 10 [IQR 9.0-10.0], on a 10-point scale,
and those with a wound complication had a median satisfaction score of 9.0 [IQR 7.5-10.0],
U
p<0.001. Satisfaction also differed if women had a superficial wound separation (N=23, median
AN
satisfaction score 10.0 [IQR 9.0-10.0]) compared to those who experienced a deep wound
tobacco use was found to be a significant predictor of wound complications in this severely
TE
obese patient population (RR 4.97 [95% CI 1.37-18.03], p=0.02) (Table 5).
EP
Comment
Improvement in surgical techniques for cesarean delivery given its prevalence in the
C
United States and globally is imperative.12 Additionally, with the rising rates of obesity,
AC
evaluation of optimal skin closure technique at time of cesarean delivery is warranted. The
primary outcome of this study was composite wound complication in Class III obese women
undergoing cesarean delivery. We did not find a difference between staples and suture skin
closure, presumably due to an overall lower wound complication rate than originally anticipated
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
at the time of study development. Secondary outcomes were significant for a preference for
suture closure in future pregnancies in women who received sutures in the current pregnancy,
and an increase in total operative time by 12 minutes in those receiving sutures. While small, this
increase in operative time nevertheless represented a 27% increase in patients undergoing suture
PT
skin closure which is similar to previously published studies, and is of importance as we look
RI
toward standardized and value-based medicine.13,14,16,20,21,24,25
Several recent trials and subsequent meta-analyses comparing wound outcomes with
SC
staple versus subcuticular sutures demonstrate a reduction in wound complications with
subcuticular suture skin closure.14-18 One of our authors previously reported on 1147 obese
U
women with BMI of 30 kg/m2 or greater undergoing cesarean delivery with staples or
AN
subcuticular suture for wound closure.22 The mean BMI in the staples group was 40.6 kg/m2 and
36.1 kg/m2 in the suture group. They found an overall wound complication rate of 15.5% with a
M
22% wound complication rate in the staples group and 9.7% in the suture group. Our overall
D
wound complication rate was similar at 18.5% despite the fact that enrollment in the current
TE
study was limited only to women with class III obesity. We anticipated finding superiority with
suture closure, however, due to a low frequency of wound complications, this was not seen.
EP
More women expressed a preference for suture closure in future pregnancies if they were
assigned to sutures during the current pregnancy, a finding that is interesting in assessing overall
C
patient cesarean experience and satisfaction with their care. These findings are in agreement with
AC
previously published studies, including one by Basha et al. who found lower satisfaction in
women with wound complications but no difference in satisfaction scores between the staple and
suture groups once they controlled for wound separation.25-28 Figueroa et al. also found no
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
difference in pain scores, cosmetic outcome as defined by the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation
The strengths of our study include its prospective approach and a very high follow-up
rate. We chose to randomize patients with broad inclusion criteria at two centers with different
PT
patient and provider characteristics. One is a community based, academic affiliated hospital with
RI
a diverse group of private physicians while the other is a university hospital where all patients are
cared for directly by resident physicians. Additionally, we designed this study so that each
SC
woman enrolled would have two visual wound inspections by trained research personnel. Only
three women (1.2%) in our investigation were lost to follow-up. We ensured that no wound
U
complications were missed by placing an additional telephone call and conducting a chart review
AN
at 6 to 8 weeks postpartum.
A potential limitation is the timing of staple removal was not standardized. Indication for
M
delayed staple removal was also a measure that was not collected. This could have created bias
D
and affected our results if staples were left in place longer for those wounds which appeared
TE
concerning at time of discharge. Additionally, physicians were allowed to use either of the suture
types already in widespread use at the two hospitals for skin closure (4-0 vicryl and 3-0
EP
monocryl). While a recent study by Tuuli et al did not demonstrate a difference in wound
outcomes between vicryl and monocryl suture closure in the general non-obese population, there
C
is a potential that the variation of suture type could have confounded our results.29 Although the
AC
study team was not blinded to closure method at the time of wound assessment, a detailed,
standardized wound assessment tool was utilized to allow for an objective assessment of each
wound. Nevertheless, there remains the potential for bias in wound assessment. Because our
anticipated wound complication rate was lower than planned, our study was under-powered to
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
detect differences in wound complication frequencies between patients with staples compared to
suture skin closure. The wound complication rate and effect size was computed based on
previously mentioned studies by Alanis et al. and Zaki et al.5,22 However, this may have been an
over-estimation because as this study was nearing completion, a study by Smid et al. was
PT
published using the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit Cesarean Registry and found a lower wound
RI
complication rate in the extremely obese (14%), likely reflective of improved standardization of
peri-operative management of this high-risk population. 5,11,22 Another explanation could also be
SC
the Hawthorne effect where both patients and providers may have been more vigilant with the
U
complications overall.23 A post-hoc sample size calculation demonstrated that to detect a
AN
significant difference with a wound complication rate of 18.5%, we would have needed to enroll
a total of 436 women to demonstrate a 50% reduction or 284 women to detect a 60% reduction in
M
subcuticular suture in obese women with a body mass index of 40 kg/m2 or higher undergoing
cesarean delivery. No difference in composite wound complication was detected between women
EP
undergoing staples compared to subcuticular suture skin closure. At this time, a definite
conclusion cannot be drawn regarding superiority of one method of skin closure over the other in
C
the severely obese population. Future directions include larger trials that are more generalizable
AC
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
Acknowledgements: We are grateful for the support of the Long Beach MemorialCare Fund for
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
References
PT
1. National Center for Health Statistics. Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth:
RI
Accessed on April 20, 2017.
SC
2. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Fegal KM. Prevalence of
U
3. World Health Organization (WHO). Obesity and Overweight Fact Sheet, No 311. June
AN
2016. Available at http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/, Accessed May
8, 2017.
M
4. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Mathews TJ. National Vital
5. Alanis MC, Villers MS, Law TL, Steadman EM, Robinson CJ. Complications of
TE
2010;203(3):271.e1-271.e7.
6. Conner SN, Verticchio JC, Tuuli MG, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Maternal
C
Apr;31(4):299-304.
7. Robinson HE, O’Connell CM, Joseph KS, Lynne McLeod N. Maternal outcomes in
8. Kabiru W, Raynor BD. Obstetric outcomes associated with increase in BMI category
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
10. Myles TD, Gooch J, Santolaya J. Obesity as an independent risk factor for infectious
PT
11. Smid MC, Kearney MS, Stamilio DM. Extreme Obesity and Postcesarean Wound
RI
Complications in the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit Cesarean Registry. Am J
SC
12. Dahlke JD, Mendez-Figueroa H, Rouse DJ, Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP.
14. Tuuli MG, Rampersad RM, Carbone JF, Stamilio D, Macones GA, Odibo AO. Staples
TE
compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic
15. Figueroa D, Jauk VC, Szychowski JM, Surgical staples compared with subcuticular
suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet
C
16. Mackeen AD, Schuster M, Berghella V. Sutures versus staples for skin closure after
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
17. Mackeen AD, Khalifeh A, Fleisher J. Suture compared with staple skin closure
Jun;123(6):1169-75.
18. Naumann RW, Hauth JC, Owen J, Hodgkins PM, Lincoln T. Subcutaneous Tissue
PT
Approximation in Relation to Wound Disruption After Cesarean Delivery in Obese
RI
Women. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:412-6.
19. Swank ML, Wing DA, Nicolau DP, McNulty JA. Increased 3-fram cefazolin dosing for
SC
cesarean delivery prophylaxis in obese women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015
Sep;213(3):415.e1-8.
U
20. The Joint Commission’s Implementation Guide for NPSG.07.05.01 on Surgical Site
AN
Infections: The SSI Change Project.
https://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/Implementation_Guide_for_NPSG_SSI.pdf
M
21. Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, et al for the Healthcare Infection Control
TE
Practices Advisory Committee. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for
the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. Published online May 03,
EP
2017.
22. Zaki MN, Truong M, Pyra M, Kominiarek MA, Irwin T. Wound complications in obese
C
23. McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne DR. Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect:
New concepts are needed to study research participation effects. Journal of Clinical
Epidemiology. 2014;67(3):267-277.
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
24. Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay, et al. A randomized study comparing skin closure
25. Basha SL, Rochon ML, Quinones JN, Coassolo KM, Rust OA, Smulian JC. Randomized
controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin
PT
closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203(285): e1–e8.
RI
26. Mackeen AD, Khalifeh A, Fleisher J, Han C, Leiby B, Bergella V. Pain associated with
cesarean delivery skin closure: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015
SC
Oct;126(4):702-7.
27. Aabakke AJM, Krebs L, Pipper CB, Secher NJ. Subcuticular suture compared with
U
staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet
AN
Gynecol 2013;122:878-84.
28. Huppelschoten AG, van Ginderen JC, van den Broek KC, Bouwma AE, Oosterbaan HP.
M
Different ways of subcutaneous tissue and skin closure at cesarean section: a randomized
D
clinical trial on the long-term cosmetic outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
TE
2013;92:916-24.
29. Tuuli MG, Stout MJ, Martin S, Rampersad RM, Cahill AG, Macones GA. Comparison of
EP
suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2016 Oct;215(4):490.e1-5.
C
AC
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
Tables
PT
Characteristics Staples Sutures
(N=119) (N=119)
RI
Maternal age (years) 31.1 ± 5.6 31.4 ± 5.3
Nulliparous 30 (25.2) 31 (26.1)
BMI (kg/m2) 45.1 ± 4.4 46.2 ± 5.5
SC
Race
African American 22 (18.5) 19 (16.0)
Asian 5 (4.2) 10 (8.4)
Caucasian 22 (18.5) 24 (20.2)
U
Hispanic 68 (57.1) 59 (49.6)
Other 2 (1.7) 7 (5.9)
AN
Married/partner 66 (55.9) 69 (59.0)
College graduate 21 (19.4) 23 (20.5)
Private insurance 31 (26.3) 28 (23.7)
M
Diabetes
Pre-gestational 19 (16.0) 19 (16.0)
Gestational 23 (19.3) 18 (15.1)
Hypertension
Pre-gestational 16 (13.4) 9 (7.6)
Gestational 10 (8.4) 12 (10.2)
Preeclampsia 20 (16.8) 13 (11.0)
Other medical comorbidities* 17 (14.3) 20 (16.8)
Tobacco use
Current 3 (2.5) 7 (5.9)
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
PT
RI
Table 2. Surgical, Delivery and Neonatal Outcomes
SC
(N=119) (N=119)
Skin incision
Pfannenstiel 118 (99.2) 114 (95.8) .11
Midline vertical 1 (0.8) 5 (4.2)
U
Surgeon level
Attending/Fellow 67 (56.3) 66 (55.5) .90
AN
Resident 52 (43.7) 53 (44.5)
Assistant level
Attending/Fellow 101 (84.9) 97 (81.5) .49
M
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
PT
Staples Sutures P Staples Sutures P Staples Sutures P
(N=118 (N=119) value (N=119) (N=119) value (N=119) (N=119) value
a
)
RI
Composite wound complication 8 (6.7) 5 (4.2) .38 15 (12.6) 16 (13.4) .85 23 (19.3) 21 (17.6) .74
SC
Infection 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) -- 3 (2.5) 2 (1.7) .65 3 (2.5) 2 (1.7) 65
Superficial separation 7 (5.9) 3 (2.5) .19 11 (9.2) 11 (9.2) .47 15 (12.6) 14 (11.8) .84
Deep separation 1 (0.8) 2 (1.7) .50 3 (2.5) 0 (0) .12 4 (3.4) 2 (1.7) .41
U
Infection + separation 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) -- 1 (0.8) 3 (2.5) .31 1 (0.8) 3 (2.5) .31
AN
6-week outcome of wound N=8 N=5 N=15 N=12
complications
Healed 6 (75.0) 4 (80.0) 1.00 € 12 (80.0) 11 (91.7) .61 € -- -- --
M
Not healed 2 (25.0) 1 (20.0) 3 (20.0) 1 (8.3)
a
3 Outcome recorded in 118 of 119 patients who had staple closure
Data were analyzed with independent t, X2, and € Fisher’s exact tests, where applicable
D
4
5 Data are presented as n (%)
TE
6 P-value <.05 indicates significance
7
8
EP
9
10
11
C
12
AC
13
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Zaki et al.
PT
Would you have same closure again?
Yes 98 (83.1) 108 (93.9) .01
No 20 (16.9) 7 (6.1)
RI
2
16 Data were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U and X tests, where applicable
17 Data are presented as median [interquartile range] or n (%)
18 P-value <.05 indicates significance
SC
19
20
21
22
U
23 Table 5. Predictors of Wound Complications a
24
AN
Relative Risk (95% CI) P value
BMI (>50 vs. <50) 1.66 (0.72-3.85) .24
Any diabetes (any vs. none) 1.70 (0.87-3.32) .12
M
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figures
594 screened
PT
174 (29%) declined to participate
66 NSVDs prior to consent
21 did not qualify for other
RI
reasons
333 consented
SC
91 delivered vaginally
U
242 randomized
AN
M