RESULT-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR TEACHER 1

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: REBECCA D. ALMARIO

Position: Teacher 1
Division: Malabon
Rating Period: June 2016 - March 2017

TO BUILD DURING PLANNING PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness

MFOS KRA Objectives TIMELINE
Per KRA
R 5 4 3 2

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Prepared Lesson Plans
or DLLs complete with:
1 or 2 times found 3 times found with 4 times found with
a. SMART objectives Complete LPs or DLLs with back log during back log during back log during
b. appropriate E
Teaching/ in subject taught regular regular regular
instructional materials June 2016 to checking/teaching checking/teaching checking/teaching
Learning 15%
c. appropriate teaching March 2017
Process (45%)
strategies
d. activities congruent to
objectives
e. assessment parallel to
Submitted 100% Submitted at least 90- Submitted at least Submitted at least
learning objectives
T Lesson Plan/DLLs on 99% of the Lesson 80-89% of the Lesson 70-79% of the Lesson
time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
 II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
b. Updated instructional Completely utilized all
materials June 2016 to E Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
15% factors
c. innovative teaching March 2017
strategies / HOTS

d. appropriate activities

e. congruent assessment Executed the lesson

to learning objectives. 1 lesson behind in a 2 lessons behind in a 3 lessons behind in a
T on time viz-a-viz
quarter quarter quarter
budget of work

All indicators were

III. Maintained daily Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
routine by:

a. Checking the
attendance June 2016 to E without lapses with 1 lapse with 2 lapses with 3 lapses
15%
b. Classroom cleanliness March 2017

c. Classroom
management Submitted daily
d. Students' discipline T routine report 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
monthly
 Completely utilized all
Q Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
factors
I. Assessed students
progress through:

a. Quizzes
b. Class participation / without lapses
1 lapse according to 2 lapses according to 3 lapses according to
Student recitation June 2016 to E accoridng to
10% evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP
Outcomes (30%) c. Quarterly test March 2017 evaluation plan/LP
d. Projects, porfolio,
journals etc.

e. Assignment /
homework / agreements Submitted reports on
T students' assessment 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
quarterly

Conducted all Conducted 3 Conducted 2 Conducted 1

Q
indicators indicators indicators indicator
II. Undertaken activities
to improve performance
indicators through:
100% of the 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
a. remedial teaching beneficiaries were beneficiaries were beneficiaries were benifaciaries were
June 2016 to E
10% given activities to given activities to given activities to given activities to
March 2017
b. enrichment activities improve performance improve performance improve performance improve performance
c. contest

d. tutoring
Submitted reports on
T 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
time

All indicators were

III. Maintains updated Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
students school records
through:

a. Form 138 100% of the students 85% of the students 75% of the students 65% of the students
June 2016 to
b. Form 137 10% E school records were school records were school records were school records were
March 2017
updated updated updated updated
c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status
 c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status Submitted on or Submitted one day
T Submitted 2 days late Submitted 3 days late
before due date late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Initiated regular/
periodic PTA meetings/
conference performance
of the learners through
regular PTA meetings
with the following 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
Community 100% of the parents 90-99% of the parents
documents: June 2016 to E parents attended the parents attended the
Involvement 4% attended the meeting attended the meeting
March 2017 meeting meeting
(10%)
a. attendance of parents
b. minutes of the meeting
c. programs and project
proposals
d. dsicipline agreement
e. classroom recognition
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late
 All indicators were
Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
II. Provide feedback to met
parents on the status of
the learners through
home visitation with the
following documents: 100% of the learners 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
June 2016 to E at risk have been learners at risk have learners at risk have learners at risk have
3%
March 2017 visited been visited been visited been visited
a. home visitation
b. agreement
c. record of attendance
d. documentation
e. academic record Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
III. Establish linkages to
stakeholder to sponsors
projects/ events/
activities with the
Project/s amounting
following documents: Project/s amounting Project/s amounting Project/s amounting
June 2016 to E to 5000 pesos and
3% to 4000 to 4999 pesos to 3000 to 3999 pesos to 2000 to 2999 pesos
March 2017 above
a. project proposal
b. MOU/MOA
c. deed of donations
d. documentation
e. accomplishment report Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

Achieved at least 5% Achieved at least 4% Achieved at least 3% Achieved at least 2%

Q of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out
come come come come
Professional I. Enhance teaching
Growth and learning process through June 2016 to Implemented in the Implemented in the Implemented in the
5% E Approved
Development classroom based action March 2017 Division School Wide classroom
(15%) research
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

II. Enhance teacher Q Attended at least 5 Attended at least 4 Attended at least 3 Attended at least 2
capability through
seminars/ trainings:
 II. Enhance teacher
capability through
seminars/ trainings:

a. TIP Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed

June 2016 to E to co-teachers the 5 to co-teachers the 4 to co-teachers the 3 to co-teachers the 2
b. PLC 5% seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended
March 2017
c. Faculty Meetings

d. Graduate Studies

e. Social Forum Submit report 2 days Submit report3 days Submit report4 days Submit report5 days
T
f. Symposia after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar

III. Manifest All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
professionalism through: met

a. punctulaity/
attendance
June 2016 to
b. dress code 5%
March 2017
c. observing protocol
d. attending Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of
ceremony/retreat T attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least
e. rendering service 5 indicators 4 indicators 3 indicators 2 indicators
beyond official time
Plus Factor

(.5 for each indicator but not exc. 2 points for the total)

1. Rendered the following technical assistance.

a.      provided assistance to co-teachers in improving their teaching competence.

b.      assisted school administrators in planning and managing in-service training.

c.       served as consultant in the preparation of supplementary instructional materials.

2. Conducted action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school/district

3. Subject area coordinator/chairman in district/division.

4. Served as demonstration teacher on innovative teaching techniques, classroom management

SUMMARY OF RATINGS

I. Teaching / Learning process (45%) 1.80 RATING

II. Student Outcomes (30%) 1.30 4.500-5.000

III. Community involvement (10%) 0.33 3.500-4.499

III. Profesional Growth and Developmen 0.50 2.500-3.499

TOTAL 3.93 1.500-2.499

PLUS FACTOR 0.5 Below 1.999

 OVER-ALL RATING 4.43
Descriptive Rating VS

RATEE:

REBECCA D. ALMARIO

CONFORME:

RATER:

ELSIE P. EMERENCIANA, Ed.D.

Principal IV
Name of Rater: ELSIE P. EMERENCIANA
Position: PRINCIPAL IV
Date of Review:

To be Filled during Evaluation

Actual Result Rating Score

1

1 indicator were met 4

5 or more times
found with back log
during regular
4
checking/teaching 4.00 0.60

Submitted at least
60-69% of the Lesson 4
Plan/DLLs on time

1 indicator were met 4

 Utilized 1 indicator 4
4.00 0.60

4 lessons behind in a
quarter
4

1 indicator were met 4

with 4 lapses 4 4.00 0.60

4 days late 4
 Utilized 1 indicator 4

4 lapses according to
evaluation plan/LP
4
4.33 0.43

4 days late 5

Failed to conduct any

of the indicators
4

60-69% of the
benerficiaries were
given activities to
4 3.67 0.37
improve performance

4 days late 3

1 indicators were met 5

50% of the students

school records were 5 5.00 0.50
updated
Submitted 4 or more
days late
5

1 indicators were met 4

60-69% of the
parents attended the 4
meeting 3.67 0.15

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
3
1 indicators were met 3

60-69% of the
learners at risk have 4 3.67 0.11
been visited

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4

1 indicators were met 2

Project/s amounting
to 1999 pesos and 3 2.33 0.07
below

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
2

Achieved at least 1%
of the desired out 3
come

Created action
3 3.00 0.15
research proposal

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
3

Attended at least 1 3
Re-echo / discussed
to co-teachers the 1 3
seminars attended 3.00 0.15

Submit report6 days

after the seminar
3

1 indicator were met 4

4.00 0.20

Submitted proofs of
attendance of at least 4
1 indicators
RATING

Outstanding

Very Satisfactory

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

Poor
 RESULT-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR TEACHER 1
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: MA. ALMA C. WALSH

Position: Teacher 1
Division: Malabon
Rating Period: June 2017 - March 2018

TO BUILD DURING PLANNING PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness

MFOS KRA Objectives TIMELINE
Per KRA
R 5 4 3 2

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Prepared Lesson Plans
or DLLs complete with:
1 or 2 times found 3 times found with 4 times found with
a. SMART objectives Complete LPs or DLLs with back log during back log during back log during
b. appropriate E
Teaching/ in subject taught regular regular regular
instructional materials JUNE 2017- checking/teaching checking/teaching checking/teaching
Learning 15%
c. appropriate teaching MARCH 2018
Process (45%)
strategies
d. activities congruent to
objectives
e. assessment parallel to
Submitted 100% Submitted at least 90- Submitted at least Submitted at least
learning objectives
T Lesson Plan/DLLs on 99% of the Lesson 80-89% of the Lesson 70-79% of the Lesson
time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
 II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
b. Updated instructional Completely utilized all
materials June 2017 to E Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
15% factors
c. innovative teaching March 2018
strategies / HOTS

d. appropriate activities

e. congruent assessment Executed the lesson

to learning objectives. 1 lesson behind in a 2 lessons behind in a 3 lessons behind in a
T on time viz-a-viz
quarter quarter quarter
budget of work

All indicators were

III. Maintained daily Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
routine by:

a. Checking the
attendance June 2017 to E without lapses with 1 lapse with 2 lapses with 3 lapses
15%
b. Classroom cleanliness March 2018

c. Classroom
management Submitted daily
d. Students' discipline T routine report 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
monthly
 Completely utilized all
Q Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
factors
I. Assessed students
progress through:

a. Quizzes
b. Class participation / without lapses
1 lapse according to 2 lapses according to 3 lapses according to
Student recitation June 2017 to E accoridng to
10% evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP
Outcomes (30%) c. Quarterly test March 2018 evaluation plan/LP
d. Projects, porfolio,
journals etc.

e. Assignment /
homework / agreements Submitted reports on
T students' assessment 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
quarterly

Conducted all Conducted 3 Conducted 2 Conducted 1

Q
indicators indicators indicators indicator
II. Undertaken activities
to improve performance
indicators through:
100% of the 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
a. remedial teaching beneficiaries were beneficiaries were beneficiaries were benifaciaries were
June 2017 to E
10% given activities to given activities to given activities to given activities to
March 2018
b. enrichment activities improve performance improve performance improve performance improve performance
c. contest

d. tutoring
Submitted reports on
T 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
time

All indicators were

III. Maintains updated Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
students school records
through:

a. Form 138 100% of the students 85% of the students 75% of the students 65% of the students
June 2017 to
b. Form 137 10% E school records were school records were school records were school records were
March 2018
updated updated updated updated
c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status
 c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status Submitted on or Submitted one day
T Submitted 2 days late Submitted 3 days late
before due date late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Initiated regular/
periodic PTA meetings/
conference performance
of the learners through
regular PTA meetings
with the following 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
Community 100% of the parents 90-99% of the parents
documents: June 2017 to E parents attended the parents attended the
Involvement 4% attended the meeting attended the meeting
March 2018 meeting meeting
(10%)
a. attendance of parents
b. minutes of the meeting
c. programs and project
proposals
d. dsicipline agreement
e. classroom recognition
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late
 All indicators were
Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
II. Provide feedback to met
parents on the status of
the learners through
home visitation with the
following documents: 100% of the learners 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
June 2017 to E at risk have been learners at risk have learners at risk have learners at risk have
3%
March 2018 visited been visited been visited been visited
a. home visitation
b. agreement
c. record of attendance
d. documentation
e. academic record Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
III. Establish linkages to
stakeholder to sponsors
projects/ events/
activities with the
Project/s amounting
following documents: Project/s amounting Project/s amounting Project/s amounting
June 2016 to E to 5000 pesos and
3% to 4000 to 4999 pesos to 3000 to 3999 pesos to 2000 to 2999 pesos
March 2017 above
a. project proposal
b. MOU/MOA
c. deed of donations
d. documentation
e. accomplishment report Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

Achieved at least 5% Achieved at least 4% Achieved at least 3% Achieved at least 2%

Q of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out
come come come come
Professional I. Enhance teaching
Growth and learning process through June 2017 to Implemented in the Implemented in the Implemented in the
5% E Approved
Development classroom based action March 2018 Division School Wide classroom
(15%) research
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

II. Enhance teacher Q Attended at least 5 Attended at least 4 Attended at least 3 Attended at least 2
capability through
seminars/ trainings:
 II. Enhance teacher
capability through
seminars/ trainings:

a. TIP Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed

June 2017 to E to co-teachers the 5 to co-teachers the 4 to co-teachers the 3 to co-teachers the 2
b. PLC 5% seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended
March 2018
c. Faculty Meetings

d. Graduate Studies

e. Social Forum Submit report 2 days Submit report3 days Submit report4 days Submit report5 days
T
f. Symposia after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar

III. Manifest All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
professionalism through: met

a. punctulaity/
attendance
June 2017 to
b. dress code 5%
March 2018
c. observing protocol
d. attending Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of
ceremony/retreat T attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least
e. rendering service 5 indicators 4 indicators 3 indicators 2 indicators
beyond official time
Plus Factor

(.5 for each indicator but not exc. 2 points for the total)

1. Rendered the following technical assistance.

a.      provided assistance to co-teachers in improving their teaching competence.

b.      assisted school administrators in planning and managing in-service training.

c.       served as consultant in the preparation of supplementary instructional materials.

2. Conducted action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school/district

3. Subject area coordinator/chairman in district/division.

4. Served as demonstration teacher on innovative teaching techniques, classroom management

SUMMARY OF RATINGS

I. Teaching / Learning process (45%) 2.00 RATING

II. Student Outcomes (30%) 1.23 4.500-5.000

III. Community involvement (10%) 0.38 3.500-4.499

III. Profesional Growth and Developmen 0.47 2.500-3.499

TOTAL 4.04 1.500-2.499

PLUS FACTOR Below 1.999

 OVER-ALL RATING 4.04
Descriptive Rating VS

RATEE:

MA. ALMA C. WALSH

CONFORME:

RATER:

RHONNEL FLORES

MAPEH COORDINATOR
Name of Rater: RHONNEL FLORES
Position: MAPEH COORDINATOR
Date of Review:

To be Filled during Evaluation

Actual Result Rating Score

1

1 indicator were met 5

5 or more times
found with back log
during regular
4
checking/teaching 4.00 0.60

Submitted at least
60-69% of the Lesson 3
Plan/DLLs on time

1 indicator were met 5

 Utilized 1 indicator 5
5.00 0.75

4 lessons behind in a
quarter
5

1 indicator were met 5

with 4 lapses 4 4.33 0.65

4 days late 4
 Utilized 1 indicator 5

4 lapses according to
evaluation plan/LP
4
4.67 0.47

4 days late 5

Failed to conduct any

of the indicators
4

60-69% of the
benerficiaries were
given activities to
3 3.33 0.33
improve performance

4 days late 3

1 indicators were met 4

50% of the students

school records were 4 4.33 0.43
updated
Submitted 4 or more
days late
5

1 indicators were met 3

60-69% of the
parents attended the 3
meeting 3.00 0.12

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
3
1 indicators were met 5

60-69% of the
learners at risk have 5 4.67 0.14
been visited

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4

1 indicators were met 4

Project/s amounting
to 1999 pesos and 5 4.00 0.12
below

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
3

Achieved at least 1%
of the desired out 3
come

Created action
3 3.00 0.15
research proposal

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
3

Attended at least 1 3
Re-echo / discussed
to co-teachers the 1 2
seminars attended 2.33 0.12

Submit report6 days

after the seminar
2

1 indicator were met 4

4.00 0.20

Submitted proofs of
attendance of at least 4
1 indicators
RATING

Outstanding

Very Satisfactory

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

Poor
 RESULT-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR TEACHER 1
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: MELANIE C. DO-ONG

Position: Teacher 1
Division: Malabon
Rating Period: June 2016 - March 2017

TO BUILD DURING PLANNING PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness

MFOS KRA Objectives TIMELINE
Per KRA
R 5 4 3 2

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Prepared Lesson Plans
or DLLs complete with:
1 or 2 times found 3 times found with 4 times found with
a. SMART objectives Complete LPs or DLLs with back log during back log during back log during
b. appropriate E
Teaching/ in subject taught regular regular regular
instructional materials June 2016 to checking/teaching checking/teaching checking/teaching
Learning 15%
c. appropriate teaching March 2017
Process (45%)
strategies
d. activities congruent to
objectives
e. assessment parallel to
Submitted 100% Submitted at least 90- Submitted at least Submitted at least
learning objectives
T Lesson Plan/DLLs on 99% of the Lesson 80-89% of the Lesson 70-79% of the Lesson
time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
 II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
b. Updated instructional Completely utilized all
materials June 2016 to E Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
15% factors
c. innovative teaching March 2017
strategies / HOTS

d. appropriate activities

e. congruent assessment Executed the lesson

to learning objectives. 1 lesson behind in a 2 lessons behind in a 3 lessons behind in a
T on time viz-a-viz
quarter quarter quarter
budget of work

All indicators were

III. Maintained daily Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
routine by:

a. Checking the
attendance June 2016 to E without lapses with 1 lapse with 2 lapses with 3 lapses
15%
b. Classroom cleanliness March 2017

c. Classroom
management Submitted daily
d. Students' discipline T routine report 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
monthly
 Completely utilized all
Q Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
factors
I. Assessed students
progress through:

a. Quizzes
b. Class participation / without lapses
1 lapse according to 2 lapses according to 3 lapses according to
Student recitation June 2016 to E accoridng to
10% evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP
Outcomes (30%) c. Quarterly test March 2017 evaluation plan/LP
d. Projects, porfolio,
journals etc.

e. Assignment /
homework / agreements Submitted reports on
T students' assessment 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
quarterly

Conducted all Conducted 3 Conducted 2 Conducted 1

Q
indicators indicators indicators indicator
II. Undertaken activities
to improve performance
indicators through:
100% of the 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
a. remedial teaching beneficiaries were beneficiaries were beneficiaries were benifaciaries were
June 2016 to E
10% given activities to given activities to given activities to given activities to
March 2017
b. enrichment activities improve performance improve performance improve performance improve performance
c. contest

d. tutoring
Submitted reports on
T 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
time

All indicators were

III. Maintains updated Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
students school records
through:

a. Form 138 100% of the students 85% of the students 75% of the students 65% of the students
June 2016 to
b. Form 137 10% E school records were school records were school records were school records were
March 2017
updated updated updated updated
c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status
 c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status Submitted on or Submitted one day
T Submitted 2 days late Submitted 3 days late
before due date late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Initiated regular/
periodic PTA meetings/
conference performance
of the learners through
regular PTA meetings
with the following 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
Community 100% of the parents 90-99% of the parents
documents: June 2016 to E parents attended the parents attended the
Involvement 4% attended the meeting attended the meeting
March 2017 meeting meeting
(10%)
a. attendance of parents
b. minutes of the meeting
c. programs and project
proposals
d. dsicipline agreement
e. classroom recognition
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late
 All indicators were
Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
II. Provide feedback to met
parents on the status of
the learners through
home visitation with the
following documents: 100% of the learners 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
June 2016 to E at risk have been learners at risk have learners at risk have learners at risk have
3%
March 2017 visited been visited been visited been visited
a. home visitation
b. agreement
c. record of attendance
d. documentation
e. academic record Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
III. Establish linkages to
stakeholder to sponsors
projects/ events/
activities with the
Project/s amounting
following documents: Project/s amounting Project/s amounting Project/s amounting
June 2016 to E to 5000 pesos and
3% to 4000 to 4999 pesos to 3000 to 3999 pesos to 2000 to 2999 pesos
March 2017 above
a. project proposal
b. MOU/MOA
c. deed of donations
d. documentation
e. accomplishment report Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

Achieved at least 5% Achieved at least 4% Achieved at least 3% Achieved at least 2%

Q of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out
come come come come
Professional I. Enhance teaching
Growth and learning process through June 2016 to Implemented in the Implemented in the Implemented in the
5% E Approved
Development classroom based action March 2017 Division School Wide classroom
(15%) research
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

II. Enhance teacher Q Attended at least 5 Attended at least 4 Attended at least 3 Attended at least 2
capability through
seminars/ trainings:
 II. Enhance teacher
capability through
seminars/ trainings:

a. TIP Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed

June 2016 to E to co-teachers the 5 to co-teachers the 4 to co-teachers the 3 to co-teachers the 2
b. PLC 5% seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended
March 2017
c. Faculty Meetings

d. Graduate Studies

e. Social Forum Submit report 2 days Submit report3 days Submit report4 days Submit report5 days
T
f. Symposia after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar

III. Manifest All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
professionalism through: met

a. punctulaity/
attendance
June 2016 to
b. dress code 5%
March 2017
c. observing protocol
d. attending Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of
ceremony/retreat T attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least
e. rendering service 5 indicators 4 indicators 3 indicators 2 indicators
beyond official time
Plus Factor

(.5 for each indicator but not exc. 2 points for the total)

1. Rendered the following technical assistance.

a.      provided assistance to co-teachers in improving their teaching competence.

b.      assisted school administrators in planning and managing in-service training.

c.       served as consultant in the preparation of supplementary instructional materials.

2. Conducted action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school/district

3. Subject area coordinator/chairman in district/division.

4. Served as demonstration teacher on innovative teaching techniques, classroom management

SUMMARY OF RATINGS

I. Teaching / Learning process (45%) 1.85 RATING

II. Student Outcomes (30%) 1.20 4.500-5.000

III. Community involvement (10%) 0.31 3.500-4.499

III. Profesional Growth and Developmen 0.57 2.500-3.499

TOTAL 3.93 1.500-2.499

PLUS FACTOR Below 1.999

 OVER-ALL RATING 3.93
Descriptive Rating VS

RATEE:

MELANIE C. DO-ONG

CONFORME:

RATER:

ELSIE P. EMERENCIANA, Ed. D.

Principal IV
Name of Rater: REBECCA D. ALMARIO
Position: MATHEMATICS COORDINATOR
Date of Review:

To be Filled during Evaluation

Actual Result Rating Score

1

1 indicator were met 4

5 or more times
found with back log
during regular
4
checking/teaching 4.00 0.60

Submitted at least
60-69% of the Lesson 4
Plan/DLLs on time

1 indicator were met 4

 Utilized 1 indicator 4
4.00 0.60

4 lessons behind in a
quarter
4

1 indicator were met 5

with 4 lapses 4 4.33 0.65

4 days late 4
 Utilized 1 indicator 4

4 lapses according to
evaluation plan/LP
4
4.00 0.40

4 days late 4

Failed to conduct any

of the indicators
3

60-69% of the
benerficiaries were
given activities to
3 3.00 0.30
improve performance

4 days late 3

1 indicators were met 5

50% of the students

school records were 5 5.00 0.50
updated
Submitted 4 or more
days late
5

1 indicators were met 4

60-69% of the
parents attended the 4
meeting 4.00 0.16

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4
1 indicators were met 4

60-69% of the
learners at risk have 4 4.00 0.12
been visited

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4

1 indicators were met 1

Project/s amounting
to 1999 pesos and 1 1.00 0.03
below

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
1

Achieved at least 1%
of the desired out 3
come

Created action
3 3.00 0.15
research proposal

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
3

Attended at least 1 4
Re-echo / discussed
to co-teachers the 1 3
seminars attended 3.33 0.17

Submit report6 days

after the seminar
3

1 indicator were met 5

5.00 0.25

Submitted proofs of
attendance of at least 5
1 indicators
RATING

Outstanding

Very Satisfactory

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

Poor
 RESULT-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR TEACHER 1
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: MARY JOYCE A. GAZO

Position: Teacher 1
Division: Malabon
Rating Period: June 2016 - March 2017

TO BUILD DURING PLANNING PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness

MFOS KRA Objectives TIMELINE
Per KRA
R 5 4 3 2

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Prepared Lesson Plans
or DLLs complete with:
1 or 2 times found 3 times found with 4 times found with
a. SMART objectives Complete LPs or DLLs with back log during back log during back log during
b. appropriate E
Teaching/ in subject taught regular regular regular
instructional materials June 2016 to checking/teaching checking/teaching checking/teaching
Learning 15%
c. appropriate teaching March 2017
Process (45%)
strategies
d. activities congruent to
objectives
e. assessment parallel to
Submitted 100% Submitted at least 90- Submitted at least Submitted at least
learning objectives
T Lesson Plan/DLLs on 99% of the Lesson 80-89% of the Lesson 70-79% of the Lesson
time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
 II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
b. Updated instructional Completely utilized all
materials June 2016 to E Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
15% factors
c. innovative teaching March 2017
strategies / HOTS

d. appropriate activities

e. congruent assessment Executed the lesson

to learning objectives. 1 lesson behind in a 2 lessons behind in a 3 lessons behind in a
T on time viz-a-viz
quarter quarter quarter
budget of work

All indicators were

III. Maintained daily Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
routine by:

a. Checking the
attendance June 2016 to E without lapses with 1 lapse with 2 lapses with 3 lapses
15%
b. Classroom cleanliness March 2017

c. Classroom
management Submitted daily
d. Students' discipline T routine report 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
monthly
 Completely utilized all
Q Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
factors
I. Assessed students
progress through:

a. Quizzes
b. Class participation / without lapses
1 lapse according to 2 lapses according to 3 lapses according to
Student recitation June 2016 to E accoridng to
10% evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP
Outcomes (30%) c. Quarterly test March 2017 evaluation plan/LP
d. Projects, porfolio,
journals etc.

e. Assignment /
homework / agreements Submitted reports on
T students' assessment 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
quarterly

Conducted all Conducted 3 Conducted 2 Conducted 1

Q
indicators indicators indicators indicator
II. Undertaken activities
to improve performance
indicators through:
100% of the 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
a. remedial teaching beneficiaries were beneficiaries were beneficiaries were benifaciaries were
June 2016 to E
10% given activities to given activities to given activities to given activities to
March 2017
b. enrichment activities improve performance improve performance improve performance improve performance
c. contest

d. tutoring
Submitted reports on
T 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
time

All indicators were

III. Maintains updated Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
students school records
through:

a. Form 138 100% of the students 85% of the students 75% of the students 65% of the students
June 2016 to
b. Form 137 10% E school records were school records were school records were school records were
March 2017
updated updated updated updated
c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status
 c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status Submitted on or Submitted one day
T Submitted 2 days late Submitted 3 days late
before due date late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Initiated regular/
periodic PTA meetings/
conference performance
of the learners through
regular PTA meetings
with the following 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
Community 100% of the parents 90-99% of the parents
documents: June 2016 to E parents attended the parents attended the
Involvement 4% attended the meeting attended the meeting
March 2017 meeting meeting
(10%)
a. attendance of parents
b. minutes of the meeting
c. programs and project
proposals
d. dsicipline agreement
e. classroom recognition
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late
 All indicators were
Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
II. Provide feedback to met
parents on the status of
the learners through
home visitation with the
following documents: 100% of the learners 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
June 2016 to E at risk have been learners at risk have learners at risk have learners at risk have
3%
March 2017 visited been visited been visited been visited
a. home visitation
b. agreement
c. record of attendance
d. documentation
e. academic record Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
III. Establish linkages to
stakeholder to sponsors
projects/ events/
activities with the
Project/s amounting
following documents: Project/s amounting Project/s amounting Project/s amounting
June 2016 to E to 5000 pesos and
3% to 4000 to 4999 pesos to 3000 to 3999 pesos to 2000 to 2999 pesos
March 2017 above
a. project proposal
b. MOU/MOA
c. deed of donations
d. documentation
e. accomplishment report Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

Achieved at least 5% Achieved at least 4% Achieved at least 3% Achieved at least 2%

Q of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out
come come come come
Professional I. Enhance teaching
Growth and learning process through June 2016 to Implemented in the Implemented in the Implemented in the
5% E Approved
Development classroom based action March 2017 Division School Wide classroom
(15%) research
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

II. Enhance teacher Q Attended at least 5 Attended at least 4 Attended at least 3 Attended at least 2
capability through
seminars/ trainings:
 II. Enhance teacher
capability through
seminars/ trainings:

a. TIP Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed

June 2016 to E to co-teachers the 5 to co-teachers the 4 to co-teachers the 3 to co-teachers the 2
b. PLC 5% seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended
March 2017
c. Faculty Meetings

d. Graduate Studies

e. Social Forum Submit report 2 days Submit report3 days Submit report4 days Submit report5 days
T
f. Symposia after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar

III. Manifest All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
professionalism through: met

a. punctulaity/
attendance
June 2016 to
b. dress code 5%
March 2017
c. observing protocol
d. attending Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of
ceremony/retreat T attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least
e. rendering service 5 indicators 4 indicators 3 indicators 2 indicators
beyond official time
Plus Factor

(.5 for each indicator but not exc. 2 points for the total)

1. Rendered the following technical assistance.

a.      provided assistance to co-teachers in improving their teaching competence.

b.      assisted school administrators in planning and managing in-service training.

c.       served as consultant in the preparation of supplementary instructional materials.

2. Conducted action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school/district

3. Subject area coordinator/chairman in district/division.

4. Served as demonstration teacher on innovative teaching techniques, classroom management

SUMMARY OF RATINGS

I. Teaching / Learning process (45%) 1.80 RATING

II. Student Outcomes (30%) 1.37 4.500-5.000

III. Community involvement (10%) 0.27 3.500-4.499

III. Profesional Growth and Developmen 0.45 2.500-3.499

TOTAL 3.88 1.500-2.499

PLUS FACTOR 0.5 Below 1.999

 OVER-ALL RATING 4.39
Descriptive Rating VS

RATEE:

MARY JOYCE A. GAZO

CONFORME:

RATER:

ELSIE P. EMERENCIANA, Ed. D.

Principal IV
Name of Rater: REBECCA D. ALMARIO
Position: MATHEMATICS COORDINATOR
Date of Review:

To be Filled during Evaluation

Actual Result Rating Score

1

1 indicator were met 4

5 or more times
found with back log
during regular
4
checking/teaching 4.00 0.60

Submitted at least
60-69% of the Lesson 4
Plan/DLLs on time

1 indicator were met 4

 Utilized 1 indicator 4
4.00 0.60

4 lessons behind in a
quarter
4

1 indicator were met 4

with 4 lapses 4 4.00 0.60

4 days late 4
 Utilized 1 indicator 5

4 lapses according to
evaluation plan/LP
4
4.67 0.47

4 days late 5

Failed to conduct any

of the indicators
4

60-69% of the
benerficiaries were
given activities to
4 4.00 0.40
improve performance

4 days late 4

1 indicators were met 5

50% of the students

school records were 5 5.00 0.50
updated
Submitted 4 or more
days late
5

1 indicators were met 4

60-69% of the
parents attended the 3
meeting 3.67 0.15

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4
1 indicators were met 3

60-69% of the
learners at risk have 3 3.00 0.09
been visited

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
3

1 indicators were met 1

Project/s amounting
to 1999 pesos and 1 1.00 0.03
below

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
1

Achieved at least 1%
of the desired out 3
come

Created action
3 3.00 0.15
research proposal

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
3

Attended at least 1 3
Re-echo / discussed
to co-teachers the 1 3
seminars attended 3.00 0.15

Submit report6 days

after the seminar
3

1 indicator were met 3

3.00 0.15

Submitted proofs of
attendance of at least 3
1 indicators
RATING

Outstanding

Very Satisfactory

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

Poor
 RESULT-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR TEACHER 1
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: JEANLYN MAGNO TURLA

Position: Teacher 1
Division: Malabon
Rating Period: June 2016 - March 2017

TO BUILD DURING PLANNING PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness

MFOS KRA Objectives TIMELINE
Per KRA
R 5 4 3 2

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Prepared Lesson Plans
or DLLs complete with:
1 or 2 times found 3 times found with 4 times found with
a. SMART objectives Complete LPs or DLLs with back log during back log during back log during
b. appropriate E
Teaching/ in subject taught regular regular regular
instructional materials June 2016 to checking/teaching checking/teaching checking/teaching
Learning 15%
c. appropriate teaching March 2017
Process (45%)
strategies
d. activities congruent to
objectives
e. assessment parallel to
Submitted 100% Submitted at least 90- Submitted at least Submitted at least
learning objectives
T Lesson Plan/DLLs on 99% of the Lesson 80-89% of the Lesson 70-79% of the Lesson
time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
 II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
b. Updated instructional Completely utilized all
materials June 2016 to E Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
15% factors
c. innovative teaching March 2017
strategies / HOTS

d. appropriate activities

e. congruent assessment Executed the lesson

to learning objectives. 1 lesson behind in a 2 lessons behind in a 3 lessons behind in a
T on time viz-a-viz
quarter quarter quarter
budget of work

All indicators were

III. Maintained daily Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
routine by:

a. Checking the
attendance June 2016 to E without lapses with 1 lapse with 2 lapses with 3 lapses
15%
b. Classroom cleanliness March 2017

c. Classroom
management Submitted daily
d. Students' discipline T routine report 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
monthly
 Completely utilized all
Q Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
factors
I. Assessed students
progress through:

a. Quizzes
b. Class participation / without lapses
1 lapse according to 2 lapses according to 3 lapses according to
Student recitation June 2016 to E accoridng to
10% evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP
Outcomes (30%) c. Quarterly test March 2017 evaluation plan/LP
d. Projects, porfolio,
journals etc.

e. Assignment /
homework / agreements Submitted reports on
T students' assessment 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
quarterly

Conducted all Conducted 3 Conducted 2 Conducted 1

Q
indicators indicators indicators indicator
II. Undertaken activities
to improve performance
indicators through:
100% of the 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
a. remedial teaching beneficiaries were beneficiaries were beneficiaries were benifaciaries were
June 2016 to E
10% given activities to given activities to given activities to given activities to
March 2017
b. enrichment activities improve performance improve performance improve performance improve performance
c. contest

d. tutoring
Submitted reports on
T 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
time

All indicators were

III. Maintains updated Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
students school records
through:

a. Form 138 100% of the students 85% of the students 75% of the students 65% of the students
June 2016 to
b. Form 137 10% E school records were school records were school records were school records were
March 2017
updated updated updated updated
c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status
 c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status Submitted on or Submitted one day
T Submitted 2 days late Submitted 3 days late
before due date late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Initiated regular/
periodic PTA meetings/
conference performance
of the learners through
regular PTA meetings
with the following 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
Community 100% of the parents 90-99% of the parents
documents: June 2016 to E parents attended the parents attended the
Involvement 4% attended the meeting attended the meeting
March 2017 meeting meeting
(10%)
a. attendance of parents
b. minutes of the meeting
c. programs and project
proposals
d. dsicipline agreement
e. classroom recognition
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late
 All indicators were
Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
II. Provide feedback to met
parents on the status of
the learners through
home visitation with the
following documents: 100% of the learners 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
June 2016 to E at risk have been learners at risk have learners at risk have learners at risk have
3%
March 2017 visited been visited been visited been visited
a. home visitation
b. agreement
c. record of attendance
d. documentation
e. academic record Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
III. Establish linkages to
stakeholder to sponsors
projects/ events/
activities with the
Project/s amounting
following documents: Project/s amounting Project/s amounting Project/s amounting
June 2016 to E to 5000 pesos and
3% to 4000 to 4999 pesos to 3000 to 3999 pesos to 2000 to 2999 pesos
March 2017 above
a. project proposal
b. MOU/MOA
c. deed of donations
d. documentation
e. accomplishment report Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

Achieved at least 5% Achieved at least 4% Achieved at least 3% Achieved at least 2%

Q of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out
come come come come
Professional I. Enhance teaching
Growth and learning process through June 2016 to Implemented in the Implemented in the Implemented in the
5% E Approved
Development classroom based action March 2017 Division School Wide classroom
(15%) research
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

II. Enhance teacher Q Attended at least 5 Attended at least 4 Attended at least 3 Attended at least 2
capability through
seminars/ trainings:
 II. Enhance teacher
capability through
seminars/ trainings:

a. TIP Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed

June 2016 to E to co-teachers the 5 to co-teachers the 4 to co-teachers the 3 to co-teachers the 2
b. PLC 5% seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended
March 2017
c. Faculty Meetings

d. Graduate Studies

e. Social Forum Submit report 2 days Submit report3 days Submit report4 days Submit report5 days
T
f. Symposia after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar

III. Manifest All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
professionalism through: met

a. punctulaity/
attendance
June 2016 to
b. dress code 5%
March 2017
c. observing protocol
d. attending Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of
ceremony/retreat T attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least
e. rendering service 5 indicators 4 indicators 3 indicators 2 indicators
beyond official time
Plus Factor

(.5 for each indicator but not exc. 2 points for the total)

1. Rendered the following technical assistance.

a.      provided assistance to co-teachers in improving their teaching competence.

b.      assisted school administrators in planning and managing in-service training.

c.       served as consultant in the preparation of supplementary instructional materials.

2. Conducted action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school/district

3. Subject area coordinator/chairman in district/division.

4. Served as demonstration teacher on innovative teaching techniques, classroom management

SUMMARY OF RATINGS

I. Teaching / Learning process (45%) 1.90 RATING

II. Student Outcomes (30%) 1.37 4.500-5.000

III. Community involvement (10%) 0.33 3.500-4.499

III. Profesional Growth and Development (15%) 0.45 2.500-3.499

TOTAL 4.05 1.500-2.499

PLUS FACTOR Below 1.999

 OVER-ALL RATING 4.05
Descriptive Rating VS

RATEE:

JEANLYN M. TURLA

CONFORME:

RATER:

ELSIE P. EMERENCIANA, Ed. D.

Principal IV
Name of Rater: REBECCA D. ALMARIO
Position: MATHEMATICS COORDINATOR
Date of Review:

To be Filled during Evaluation

Actual Result Rating Score

1

1 indicator were met 5

5 or more times
found with back log
during regular
4
checking/teaching 4.33 0.65

Submitted at least
60-69% of the Lesson 4
Plan/DLLs on time

1 indicator were met 4

 Utilized 1 indicator 4
4.00 0.60

4 lessons behind in a
quarter
4

1 indicator were met 5

with 4 lapses 4 4.33 0.65

4 days late 4
 Utilized 1 indicator 5

4 lapses according to
evaluation plan/LP
4
4.67 0.47

4 days late 5

Failed to conduct any

of the indicators
4

60-69% of the
benerficiaries were
given activities to
4 4.00 0.40
improve performance

4 days late 4

1 indicators were met 5

50% of the students

school records were 5 5.00 0.50
updated
Submitted 4 or more
days late
5

1 indicators were met 4

60-69% of the
parents attended the 3
meeting 4.00 0.16

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
5
1 indicators were met 3

60-69% of the
learners at risk have 5 4.00 0.12
been visited

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4

1 indicators were met 2

Project/s amounting
to 1999 pesos and 1 1.67 0.05
below

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
2

Achieved at least 1%
of the desired out 3
come

Created action
3 3.00 0.15
research proposal

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
3

Attended at least 1 3
Re-echo / discussed
to co-teachers the 1 3
seminars attended 3.00 0.15

Submit report6 days

after the seminar
3

1 indicator were met 3

3.00 0.15

Submitted proofs of
attendance of at least 3
1 indicators
RATING

Outstanding

Very Satisfactory

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

Poor
 RESULT-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR TEACHER 1
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: NOAH ANNE S. MILLAN

Position: Teacher 1
Division: Malabon
Rating Period: June 2016 - March 2017

TO BUILD DURING PLANNING PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness

MFOS KRA Objectives TIMELINE
Per KRA
R 5 4 3 2

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Prepared Lesson Plans
or DLLs complete with:
1 or 2 times found 3 times found with 4 times found with
a. SMART objectives Complete LPs or DLLs with back log during back log during back log during
b. appropriate E
Teaching/ in subject taught regular regular regular
instructional materials June 2016 to checking/teaching checking/teaching checking/teaching
Learning 15%
c. appropriate teaching March 2017
Process (45%)
strategies
d. activities congruent to
objectives
e. assessment parallel to
Submitted 100% Submitted at least 90- Submitted at least Submitted at least
learning objectives
T Lesson Plan/DLLs on 99% of the Lesson 80-89% of the Lesson 70-79% of the Lesson
time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
 II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
b. Updated instructional Completely utilized all
materials June 2016 to E Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
15% factors
c. innovative teaching March 2017
strategies / HOTS

d. appropriate activities

e. congruent assessment Executed the lesson

to learning objectives. 1 lesson behind in a 2 lessons behind in a 3 lessons behind in a
T on time viz-a-viz
quarter quarter quarter
budget of work

All indicators were

III. Maintained daily Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
routine by:

a. Checking the
attendance June 2016 to E without lapses with 1 lapse with 2 lapses with 3 lapses
15%
b. Classroom cleanliness March 2017

c. Classroom
management Submitted daily
d. Students' discipline T routine report 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
monthly
 Completely utilized all
Q Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
factors
I. Assessed students
progress through:

a. Quizzes
b. Class participation / without lapses
1 lapse according to 2 lapses according to 3 lapses according to
Student recitation June 2016 to E accoridng to
10% evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP
Outcomes (30%) c. Quarterly test March 2017 evaluation plan/LP
d. Projects, porfolio,
journals etc.

e. Assignment /
homework / agreements Submitted reports on
T students' assessment 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
quarterly

Conducted all Conducted 3 Conducted 2 Conducted 1

Q
indicators indicators indicators indicator
II. Undertaken activities
to improve performance
indicators through:
100% of the 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
a. remedial teaching beneficiaries were beneficiaries were beneficiaries were benifaciaries were
June 2016 to E
10% given activities to given activities to given activities to given activities to
March 2017
b. enrichment activities improve performance improve performance improve performance improve performance
c. contest

d. tutoring
Submitted reports on
T 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
time

All indicators were

III. Maintains updated Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
students school records
through:

a. Form 138 100% of the students 85% of the students 75% of the students 65% of the students
June 2016 to
b. Form 137 10% E school records were school records were school records were school records were
March 2017
updated updated updated updated
c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status
 c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status Submitted on or Submitted one day
T Submitted 2 days late Submitted 3 days late
before due date late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Initiated regular/
periodic PTA meetings/
conference performance
of the learners through
regular PTA meetings
with the following 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
Community 100% of the parents 90-99% of the parents
documents: June 2016 to E parents attended the parents attended the
Involvement 4% attended the meeting attended the meeting
March 2017 meeting meeting
(10%)
a. attendance of parents
b. minutes of the meeting
c. programs and project
proposals
d. dsicipline agreement
e. classroom recognition
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late
 All indicators were
Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
II. Provide feedback to met
parents on the status of
the learners through
home visitation with the
following documents: 100% of the learners 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
June 2016 to E at risk have been learners at risk have learners at risk have learners at risk have
3%
March 2017 visited been visited been visited been visited
a. home visitation
b. agreement
c. record of attendance
d. documentation
e. academic record Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
III. Establish linkages to
stakeholder to sponsors
projects/ events/
activities with the
Project/s amounting
following documents: Project/s amounting Project/s amounting Project/s amounting
June 2016 to E to 5000 pesos and
3% to 4000 to 4999 pesos to 3000 to 3999 pesos to 2000 to 2999 pesos
March 2017 above
a. project proposal
b. MOU/MOA
c. deed of donations
d. documentation
e. accomplishment report Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

Achieved at least 5% Achieved at least 4% Achieved at least 3% Achieved at least 2%

Q of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out
come come come come
Professional I. Enhance teaching
Growth and learning process through June 2016 to Implemented in the Implemented in the Implemented in the
5% E Approved
Development classroom based action March 2017 Division School Wide classroom
(15%) research
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

II. Enhance teacher Q Attended at least 5 Attended at least 4 Attended at least 3 Attended at least 2
capability through
seminars/ trainings:
 II. Enhance teacher
capability through
seminars/ trainings:

a. TIP Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed

June 2016 to E to co-teachers the 5 to co-teachers the 4 to co-teachers the 3 to co-teachers the 2
b. PLC 5% seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended
March 2017
c. Faculty Meetings

d. Graduate Studies

e. Social Forum Submit report 2 days Submit report3 days Submit report4 days Submit report5 days
T
f. Symposia after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar

III. Manifest All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
professionalism through: met

a. punctulaity/
attendance
June 2016 to
b. dress code 5%
March 2017
c. observing protocol
d. attending Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of
ceremony/retreat T attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least
e. rendering service 5 indicators 4 indicators 3 indicators 2 indicators
beyond official time
Plus Factor

(.5 for each indicator but not exc. 2 points for the total)

1. Rendered the following technical assistance.

a.      provided assistance to co-teachers in improving their teaching competence.

b.      assisted school administrators in planning and managing in-service training.

c.       served as consultant in the preparation of supplementary instructional materials.

2. Conducted action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school/district

3. Subject area coordinator/chairman in district/division.

4. Served as demonstration teacher on innovative teaching techniques, classroom management

SUMMARY OF RATINGS

I. Teaching / Learning process (45%) 1.80 RATING

II. Student Outcomes (30%) 1.23 4.500-5.000

III. Community involvement (10%) 0.27 3.500-4.499

III. Profesional Growth and Developmen 0.38 2.500-3.499

TOTAL 3.69 1.500-2.499

PLUS FACTOR 0.167 Below 1.999

 OVER-ALL RATING 3.86
Descriptive Rating VS

RATEE:

NOAH ANNE S. MILLAN

CONFORME:

RATER:

ELSIE P. EMERENCIANA, Ed. D.

Principal IV
Name of Rater: REBECCA D. ALMARIO
Position: MATHEMATICS COORDINATOR
Date of Review:

To be Filled during Evaluation

Actual Result Rating Score

1

1 indicator were met 4

5 or more times
found with back log
during regular
4
checking/teaching 4.00 0.60

Submitted at least
60-69% of the Lesson 4
Plan/DLLs on time

1 indicator were met 4

 Utilized 1 indicator 5
4.33 0.65

4 lessons behind in a
quarter
4

1 indicator were met 4

with 4 lapses 4 3.67 0.55

4 days late 3
 Utilized 1 indicator 5

4 lapses according to
evaluation plan/LP
4
4.33 0.43

4 days late 4

Failed to conduct any

of the indicators
4

60-69% of the
benerficiaries were
given activities to
3 3.67 0.37
improve performance

4 days late 4

1 indicators were met 5

50% of the students

school records were 4 4.33 0.43
updated
Submitted 4 or more
days late
4

1 indicators were met 3

60-69% of the
parents attended the 3
meeting 3.33 0.13

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4
1 indicators were met 3

60-69% of the
learners at risk have 4 3.67 0.11
been visited

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4

1 indicators were met 1

Project/s amounting
to 1999 pesos and 1 1.00 0.03
below

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
1

Achieved at least 1%
of the desired out 3
come

Created action
3 3.00 0.15
research proposal

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
3

Attended at least 1 3
Re-echo / discussed
to co-teachers the 1 1
seminars attended 1.67 0.08

Submit report6 days

after the seminar
1

1 indicator were met 3

3.00 0.15

Submitted proofs of
attendance of at least 3
1 indicators
RATING

Outstanding

Very Satisfactory

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

Poor
 RESULT-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR TEACHER 1
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: MARK ANTHONY B. MADRID

Position: Teacher 1
Division: Malabon
Rating Period: June 2016 - March 2017

TO BUILD DURING PLANNING PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness

MFOS KRA Objectives TIMELINE
Per KRA
R 5 4 3 2

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Prepared Lesson Plans
or DLLs complete with:
1 or 2 times found 3 times found with 4 times found with
a. SMART objectives Complete LPs or DLLs with back log during back log during back log during
b. appropriate E
Teaching/ in subject taught regular regular regular
instructional materials June 2016 to checking/teaching checking/teaching checking/teaching
Learning 15%
c. appropriate teaching March 2017
Process (45%)
strategies
d. activities congruent to
objectives
e. assessment parallel to
Submitted 100% Submitted at least 90- Submitted at least Submitted at least
learning objectives
T Lesson Plan/DLLs on 99% of the Lesson 80-89% of the Lesson 70-79% of the Lesson
time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
 II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
b. Updated instructional Completely utilized all
materials June 2016 to E Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
15% factors
c. innovative teaching March 2017
strategies / HOTS

d. appropriate activities

e. congruent assessment Executed the lesson

to learning objectives. 1 lesson behind in a 2 lessons behind in a 3 lessons behind in a
T on time viz-a-viz
quarter quarter quarter
budget of work

All indicators were

III. Maintained daily Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
routine by:

a. Checking the
attendance June 2016 to E without lapses with 1 lapse with 2 lapses with 3 lapses
15%
b. Classroom cleanliness March 2017

c. Classroom
management Submitted daily
d. Students' discipline T routine report 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
monthly
 Completely utilized all
Q Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
factors
I. Assessed students
progress through:

a. Quizzes
b. Class participation / without lapses
1 lapse according to 2 lapses according to 3 lapses according to
Student recitation June 2016 to E accoridng to
10% evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP
Outcomes (30%) c. Quarterly test March 2017 evaluation plan/LP
d. Projects, porfolio,
journals etc.

e. Assignment /
homework / agreements Submitted reports on
T students' assessment 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
quarterly

Conducted all Conducted 3 Conducted 2 Conducted 1

Q
indicators indicators indicators indicator
II. Undertaken activities
to improve performance
indicators through:
100% of the 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
a. remedial teaching beneficiaries were beneficiaries were beneficiaries were benifaciaries were
June 2016 to E
10% given activities to given activities to given activities to given activities to
March 2017
b. enrichment activities improve performance improve performance improve performance improve performance
c. contest

d. tutoring
Submitted reports on
T 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
time

All indicators were

III. Maintains updated Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
students school records
through:

a. Form 138 100% of the students 85% of the students 75% of the students 65% of the students
June 2016 to
b. Form 137 10% E school records were school records were school records were school records were
March 2017
updated updated updated updated
c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status
 c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status Submitted on or Submitted one day
T Submitted 2 days late Submitted 3 days late
before due date late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Initiated regular/
periodic PTA meetings/
conference performance
of the learners through
regular PTA meetings
with the following 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
Community 100% of the parents 90-99% of the parents
documents: June 2016 to E parents attended the parents attended the
Involvement 4% attended the meeting attended the meeting
March 2017 meeting meeting
(10%)
a. attendance of parents
b. minutes of the meeting
c. programs and project
proposals
d. dsicipline agreement
e. classroom recognition
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late
 All indicators were
Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
II. Provide feedback to met
parents on the status of
the learners through
home visitation with the
following documents: 100% of the learners 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
June 2016 to E at risk have been learners at risk have learners at risk have learners at risk have
3%
March 2017 visited been visited been visited been visited
a. home visitation
b. agreement
c. record of attendance
d. documentation
e. academic record Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
III. Establish linkages to
stakeholder to sponsors
projects/ events/
activities with the
Project/s amounting
following documents: Project/s amounting Project/s amounting Project/s amounting
June 2016 to E to 5000 pesos and
3% to 4000 to 4999 pesos to 3000 to 3999 pesos to 2000 to 2999 pesos
March 2017 above
a. project proposal
b. MOU/MOA
c. deed of donations
d. documentation
e. accomplishment report Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

Achieved at least 5% Achieved at least 4% Achieved at least 3% Achieved at least 2%

Q of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out
come come come come
Professional I. Enhance teaching
Growth and learning process through June 2016 to Implemented in the Implemented in the Implemented in the
5% E Approved
Development classroom based action March 2017 Division School Wide classroom
(15%) research
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

II. Enhance teacher Q Attended at least 5 Attended at least 4 Attended at least 3 Attended at least 2
capability through
seminars/ trainings:
 II. Enhance teacher
capability through
seminars/ trainings:

a. TIP Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed

June 2016 to E to co-teachers the 5 to co-teachers the 4 to co-teachers the 3 to co-teachers the 2
b. PLC 5% seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended
March 2017
c. Faculty Meetings

d. Graduate Studies

e. Social Forum Submit report 2 days Submit report3 days Submit report4 days Submit report5 days
T
f. Symposia after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar

III. Manifest All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
professionalism through: met

a. punctulaity/
attendance
June 2016 to
b. dress code 5%
March 2017
c. observing protocol
d. attending Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of
ceremony/retreat T attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least
e. rendering service 5 indicators 4 indicators 3 indicators 2 indicators
beyond official time
Plus Factor

(.5 for each indicator but not exc. 2 points for the total)

1. Rendered the following technical assistance.

a.      provided assistance to co-teachers in improving their teaching competence.

b.      assisted school administrators in planning and managing in-service training.

c.       served as consultant in the preparation of supplementary instructional materials.

2. Conducted action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school/district

3. Subject area coordinator/chairman in district/division.

4. Served as demonstration teacher on innovative teaching techniques, classroom management

SUMMARY OF RATINGS

I. Teaching / Learning process (45%) 1.80 RATING

II. Student Outcomes (30%) 1.23 4.500-5.000

III. Community involvement (10%) 0.42 3.500-4.499

III. Profesional Growth and Developmen 0.57 2.500-3.499

TOTAL 4.02 1.500-2.499

PLUS FACTOR Below 1.999

 OVER-ALL RATING 4.02
Descriptive Rating VS

RATEE:

MARK ANTHONY B. MADRID

CONFORME:

RATER:

ELSIE P. EMERENCIANA, Ed. D.

Principal IV
Name of Rater: REBECCA D. ALMARIO
Position: MATHEMATICS COORDINATOR
Date of Review:

To be Filled during Evaluation

Actual Result Rating Score

1

1 indicator were met 4

5 or more times
found with back log
during regular
4
checking/teaching 4.00 0.60

Submitted at least
60-69% of the Lesson 4
Plan/DLLs on time

1 indicator were met 4

 Utilized 1 indicator 4
4.00 0.60

4 lessons behind in a
quarter
4

1 indicator were met 4

with 4 lapses 4 4.00 0.60

4 days late 4
 Utilized 1 indicator 4

4 lapses according to
evaluation plan/LP
4
4.00 0.40

4 days late 4

Failed to conduct any

of the indicators
4

60-69% of the
benerficiaries were
given activities to
4 4.33 0.43
improve performance

4 days late 5

1 indicators were met 4

50% of the students

school records were 4 4.00 0.40
updated
Submitted 4 or more
days late
4

1 indicators were met 4

60-69% of the
parents attended the 5
meeting 4.33 0.17

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4
1 indicators were met 4

60-69% of the
learners at risk have 4 4.00 0.12
been visited

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4

1 indicators were met 4

Project/s amounting
to 1999 pesos and 5 4.33 0.13
below

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4

Achieved at least 1%
of the desired out 4
come

Created action
4 4.00 0.20
research proposal

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4

Attended at least 1 3
Re-echo / discussed
to co-teachers the 1 3
seminars attended 3.33 0.17

Submit report6 days

after the seminar
4

1 indicator were met 4

4.00 0.20

Submitted proofs of
attendance of at least 4
1 indicators
RATING

Outstanding

Very Satisfactory

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

Poor
 RESULT-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR TEACHER 1
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: MICHAEL S. FRONDOZO

Position: Teacher 1
Division: Malabon
Rating Period: June 2016 - March 2017

TO BUILD DURING PLANNING PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness

MFOS KRA Objectives TIMELINE
Per KRA
R 5 4 3 2

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Prepared Lesson Plans
or DLLs complete with:
1 or 2 times found 3 times found with 4 times found with
a. SMART objectives Complete LPs or DLLs with back log during back log during back log during
b. appropriate E
Teaching/ in subject taught regular regular regular
instructional materials June 2016 to checking/teaching checking/teaching checking/teaching
Learning 15%
c. appropriate teaching March 2017
Process (45%)
strategies
d. activities congruent to
objectives
e. assessment parallel to
Submitted 100% Submitted at least 90- Submitted at least Submitted at least
learning objectives
T Lesson Plan/DLLs on 99% of the Lesson 80-89% of the Lesson 70-79% of the Lesson
time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
 II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
b. Updated instructional Completely utilized all
materials June 2016 to E Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
15% factors
c. innovative teaching March 2017
strategies / HOTS

d. appropriate activities

e. congruent assessment Executed the lesson

to learning objectives. 1 lesson behind in a 2 lessons behind in a 3 lessons behind in a
T on time viz-a-viz
quarter quarter quarter
budget of work

All indicators were

III. Maintained daily Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
routine by:

a. Checking the
attendance June 2016 to E without lapses with 1 lapse with 2 lapses with 3 lapses
15%
b. Classroom cleanliness March 2017

c. Classroom
management Submitted daily
d. Students' discipline T routine report 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
monthly
 Completely utilized all
Q Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
factors
I. Assessed students
progress through:

a. Quizzes
b. Class participation / without lapses
1 lapse according to 2 lapses according to 3 lapses according to
Student recitation June 2016 to E accoridng to
10% evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP
Outcomes (30%) c. Quarterly test March 2017 evaluation plan/LP
d. Projects, porfolio,
journals etc.

e. Assignment /
homework / agreements Submitted reports on
T students' assessment 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
quarterly

Conducted all Conducted 3 Conducted 2 Conducted 1

Q
indicators indicators indicators indicator
II. Undertaken activities
to improve performance
indicators through:
100% of the 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
a. remedial teaching beneficiaries were beneficiaries were beneficiaries were benifaciaries were
June 2016 to E
10% given activities to given activities to given activities to given activities to
March 2017
b. enrichment activities improve performance improve performance improve performance improve performance
c. contest

d. tutoring
Submitted reports on
T 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
time

All indicators were

III. Maintains updated Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
students school records
through:

a. Form 138 100% of the students 85% of the students 75% of the students 65% of the students
June 2016 to
b. Form 137 10% E school records were school records were school records were school records were
March 2017
updated updated updated updated
c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status
 c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status Submitted on or Submitted one day
T Submitted 2 days late Submitted 3 days late
before due date late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Initiated regular/
periodic PTA meetings/
conference performance
of the learners through
regular PTA meetings
with the following 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
Community 100% of the parents 90-99% of the parents
documents: June 2016 to E parents attended the parents attended the
Involvement 4% attended the meeting attended the meeting
March 2017 meeting meeting
(10%)
a. attendance of parents
b. minutes of the meeting
c. programs and project
proposals
d. dsicipline agreement
e. classroom recognition
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late
 All indicators were
Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
II. Provide feedback to met
parents on the status of
the learners through
home visitation with the
following documents: 100% of the learners 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
June 2016 to E at risk have been learners at risk have learners at risk have learners at risk have
3%
March 2017 visited been visited been visited been visited
a. home visitation
b. agreement
c. record of attendance
d. documentation
e. academic record Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
III. Establish linkages to
stakeholder to sponsors
projects/ events/
activities with the
Project/s amounting
following documents: Project/s amounting Project/s amounting Project/s amounting
June 2016 to E to 5000 pesos and
3% to 4000 to 4999 pesos to 3000 to 3999 pesos to 2000 to 2999 pesos
March 2017 above
a. project proposal
b. MOU/MOA
c. deed of donations
d. documentation
e. accomplishment report Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

Achieved at least 5% Achieved at least 4% Achieved at least 3% Achieved at least 2%

Q of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out
come come come come
Professional I. Enhance teaching
Growth and learning process through June 2016 to Implemented in the Implemented in the Implemented in the
5% E Approved
Development classroom based action March 2017 Division School Wide classroom
(15%) research
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

II. Enhance teacher Q Attended at least 5 Attended at least 4 Attended at least 3 Attended at least 2
capability through
seminars/ trainings:
 II. Enhance teacher
capability through
seminars/ trainings:

a. TIP Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed

June 2016 to E to co-teachers the 5 to co-teachers the 4 to co-teachers the 3 to co-teachers the 2
b. PLC 5% seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended
March 2017
c. Faculty Meetings

d. Graduate Studies

e. Social Forum Submit report 2 days Submit report3 days Submit report4 days Submit report5 days
T
f. Symposia after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar

III. Manifest All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
professionalism through: met

a. punctulaity/
attendance
June 2016 to
b. dress code 5%
March 2017
c. observing protocol
d. attending Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of
ceremony/retreat T attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least
e. rendering service 5 indicators 4 indicators 3 indicators 2 indicators
beyond official time
Plus Factor

(.5 for each indicator but not exc. 2 points for the total)

1. Rendered the following technical assistance.

a.      provided assistance to co-teachers in improving their teaching competence.

b.      assisted school administrators in planning and managing in-service training.

c.       served as consultant in the preparation of supplementary instructional materials.

2. Conducted action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school/district

3. Subject area coordinator/chairman in district/division.

4. Served as demonstration teacher on innovative teaching techniques, classroom management

SUMMARY OF RATINGS

I. Teaching / Learning process (45%) 1.85 RATING

II. Student Outcomes (30%) 1.17 4.500-5.000

III. Community involvement (10%) 0.38 3.500-4.499

III. Profesional Growth and Developmen 0.55 2.500-3.499

TOTAL 3.95 1.500-2.499

PLUS FACTOR Below 1.999

 OVER-ALL RATING 3.95
Descriptive Rating VS

RATEE:

MICHAEL S. FRONDOZO
CONFORME:

RATER:

ELSIE P. EMERENCIANA, Ed. D.

Principal IV
Name of Rater: REBECCA D. ALMARIO
Position: MATHEMATICS COORDINATOR
Date of Review:

To be Filled during Evaluation

Actual Result Rating Score

1

1 indicator were met 5

5 or more times
found with back log
during regular
4
checking/teaching 4.33 0.65

Submitted at least
60-69% of the Lesson 4
Plan/DLLs on time

1 indicator were met 4

 Utilized 1 indicator 4
4.00 0.60

4 lessons behind in a
quarter
4

1 indicator were met 4

with 4 lapses 4 4.00 0.60

4 days late 4
 Utilized 1 indicator 4

4 lapses according to
evaluation plan/LP
4
4.00 0.40

4 days late 4

Failed to conduct any

of the indicators
4

60-69% of the
benerficiaries were
given activities to
4 4.00 0.40
improve performance

4 days late 4

1 indicators were met 4

50% of the students

school records were 3 3.67 0.37
updated
Submitted 4 or more
days late
4

1 indicators were met 4

60-69% of the
parents attended the 4
meeting 4.00 0.16

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4
1 indicators were met 4

60-69% of the
learners at risk have 4 4.00 0.12
been visited

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4

1 indicators were met 4

Project/s amounting
to 1999 pesos and 3 3.33 0.10
below

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
3

Achieved at least 1%
of the desired out 4
come

Created action
4 4.00 0.20
research proposal

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4

Attended at least 1 3
Re-echo / discussed
to co-teachers the 1 3
seminars attended 3.00 0.15

Submit report6 days

after the seminar
3

1 indicator were met 4

4.00 0.20

Submitted proofs of
attendance of at least 4
1 indicators
RATING

Outstanding

Very Satisfactory

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

Poor
 RESULT-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR TEACHER 1
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: BOBBY L. ASUNCION

Position: Teacher 1
Division: Malabon
Rating Period: June 2016 - March 2017

TO BUILD DURING PLANNING PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness

MFOS KRA Objectives TIMELINE
Per KRA
R 5 4 3 2

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Prepared Lesson Plans
or DLLs complete with:
1 or 2 times found 3 times found with 4 times found with
a. SMART objectives Complete LPs or DLLs with back log during back log during back log during
b. appropriate E
Teaching/ in subject taught regular regular regular
instructional materials June 2016 to checking/teaching checking/teaching checking/teaching
Learning 15%
c. appropriate teaching March 2017
Process (45%)
strategies
d. activities congruent to
objectives
e. assessment parallel to
Submitted 100% Submitted at least 90- Submitted at least Submitted at least
learning objectives
T Lesson Plan/DLLs on 99% of the Lesson 80-89% of the Lesson 70-79% of the Lesson
time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
 II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
b. Updated instructional Completely utilized all
materials June 2016 to E Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
15% factors
c. innovative teaching March 2017
strategies / HOTS

d. appropriate activities

e. congruent assessment Executed the lesson

to learning objectives. 1 lesson behind in a 2 lessons behind in a 3 lessons behind in a
T on time viz-a-viz
quarter quarter quarter
budget of work

All indicators were

III. Maintained daily Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
routine by:

a. Checking the
attendance June 2016 to E without lapses with 1 lapse with 2 lapses with 3 lapses
15%
b. Classroom cleanliness March 2017

c. Classroom
management Submitted daily
d. Students' discipline T routine report 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
monthly
 Completely utilized all
Q Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
factors
I. Assessed students
progress through:

a. Quizzes
b. Class participation / without lapses
1 lapse according to 2 lapses according to 3 lapses according to
Student recitation June 2016 to E accoridng to
10% evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP
Outcomes (30%) c. Quarterly test March 2017 evaluation plan/LP
d. Projects, porfolio,
journals etc.

e. Assignment /
homework / agreements Submitted reports on
T students' assessment 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
quarterly

Conducted all Conducted 3 Conducted 2 Conducted 1

Q
indicators indicators indicators indicator
II. Undertaken activities
to improve performance
indicators through:
100% of the 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
a. remedial teaching beneficiaries were beneficiaries were beneficiaries were benifaciaries were
June 2016 to E
10% given activities to given activities to given activities to given activities to
March 2017
b. enrichment activities improve performance improve performance improve performance improve performance
c. contest

d. tutoring
Submitted reports on
T 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
time

All indicators were

III. Maintains updated Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
students school records
through:

a. Form 138 100% of the students 85% of the students 75% of the students 65% of the students
June 2016 to
b. Form 137 10% E school records were school records were school records were school records were
March 2017
updated updated updated updated
c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status
 c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status Submitted on or Submitted one day
T Submitted 2 days late Submitted 3 days late
before due date late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Initiated regular/
periodic PTA meetings/
conference performance
of the learners through
regular PTA meetings
with the following 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
Community 100% of the parents 90-99% of the parents
documents: June 2016 to E parents attended the parents attended the
Involvement 4% attended the meeting attended the meeting
March 2017 meeting meeting
(10%)
a. attendance of parents
b. minutes of the meeting
c. programs and project
proposals
d. dsicipline agreement
e. classroom recognition
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late
 All indicators were
Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
II. Provide feedback to met
parents on the status of
the learners through
home visitation with the
following documents: 100% of the learners 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
June 2016 to E at risk have been learners at risk have learners at risk have learners at risk have
3%
March 2017 visited been visited been visited been visited
a. home visitation
b. agreement
c. record of attendance
d. documentation
e. academic record Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
III. Establish linkages to
stakeholder to sponsors
projects/ events/
activities with the
Project/s amounting
following documents: Project/s amounting Project/s amounting Project/s amounting
June 2016 to E to 5000 pesos and
3% to 4000 to 4999 pesos to 3000 to 3999 pesos to 2000 to 2999 pesos
March 2017 above
a. project proposal
b. MOU/MOA
c. deed of donations
d. documentation
e. accomplishment report Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

Achieved at least 5% Achieved at least 4% Achieved at least 3% Achieved at least 2%

Q of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out
come come come come
Professional I. Enhance teaching
Growth and learning process through June 2016 to Implemented in the Implemented in the Implemented in the
5% E Approved
Development classroom based action March 2017 Division School Wide classroom
(15%) research
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

II. Enhance teacher Q Attended at least 5 Attended at least 4 Attended at least 3 Attended at least 2
capability through
seminars/ trainings:
 II. Enhance teacher
capability through
seminars/ trainings:

a. TIP Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed

June 2016 to E to co-teachers the 5 to co-teachers the 4 to co-teachers the 3 to co-teachers the 2
b. PLC 5% seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended
March 2017
c. Faculty Meetings

d. Graduate Studies

e. Social Forum Submit report 2 days Submit report3 days Submit report4 days Submit report5 days
T
f. Symposia after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar

III. Manifest All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
professionalism through: met

a. punctulaity/
attendance
June 2016 to
b. dress code 5%
March 2017
c. observing protocol
d. attending Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of
ceremony/retreat T attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least
e. rendering service 5 indicators 4 indicators 3 indicators 2 indicators
beyond official time
Plus Factor

(.5 for each indicator but not exc. 2 points for the total)

1. Rendered the following technical assistance.

a.      provided assistance to co-teachers in improving their teaching competence.

b.      assisted school administrators in planning and managing in-service training.

c.       served as consultant in the preparation of supplementary instructional materials.

2. Conducted action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school/district

3. Subject area coordinator/chairman in district/division.

4. Served as demonstration teacher on innovative teaching techniques, classroom management

SUMMARY OF RATINGS

I. Teaching / Learning process (45%) 1.75 RATING

II. Student Outcomes (30%) 1.30 4.500-5.000

III. Community involvement (10%) 0.29 3.500-4.499

III. Profesional Growth and Developmen 0.53 2.500-3.499

TOTAL 3.87 1.500-2.499

PLUS FACTOR Below 1.999

 OVER-ALL RATING 3.87
Descriptive Rating VS

RATEE:

BOBBY A. ASUNCION
CONFORME:

RATER:

ELSIE P. EMERENCIANA, Ed. D.

Principal IV
Name of Rater: REBECCA D. ALMARIO
Position: MATHEMATICS COORDINATOR
Date of Review:

To be Filled during Evaluation

Actual Result Rating Score

1

1 indicator were met 4

5 or more times
found with back log
during regular
4
checking/teaching 4.00 0.60

Submitted at least
60-69% of the Lesson 4
Plan/DLLs on time

1 indicator were met 4

 Utilized 1 indicator 4
4.00 0.60

4 lessons behind in a
quarter
4

1 indicator were met 4

with 4 lapses 3 3.67 0.55

4 days late 4
 Utilized 1 indicator 4

4 lapses according to
evaluation plan/LP
4
4.33 0.43

4 days late 5

Failed to conduct any

of the indicators
4

60-69% of the
benerficiaries were
given activities to
3 3.67 0.37
improve performance

4 days late 4

1 indicators were met 5

50% of the students

school records were 5 5.00 0.50
updated
Submitted 4 or more
days late
5

1 indicators were met 4

60-69% of the
parents attended the 3
meeting 3.67 0.15

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4
1 indicators were met 4

60-69% of the
learners at risk have 3 3.67 0.11
been visited

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4

1 indicators were met 1

Project/s amounting
to 1999 pesos and 1 1.00 0.03
below

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
1

Achieved at least 1%
of the desired out 3
come

Created action
3 3.00 0.15
research proposal

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
3

Attended at least 1 3
Re-echo / discussed
to co-teachers the 1 2
seminars attended 2.67 0.13

Submit report6 days

after the seminar
3

1 indicator were met 5

5.00 0.25

Submitted proofs of
attendance of at least 5
1 indicators
RATING

Outstanding

Very Satisfactory

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

Poor
 RESULT-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR TEACHER 1
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: Marjoe B. Piedad

Position: Teacher 1
Division: Malabon
Rating Period: June 2016 - March 2017

TO BUILD DURING PLANNING PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness

MFOS KRA Objectives TIMELINE
Per KRA
R 5 4 3 2

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Prepared Lesson Plans
or DLLs complete with:
1 or 2 times found 3 times found with 4 times found with
a. SMART objectives Complete LPs or DLLs with back log during back log during back log during
b. appropriate E
Teaching/ in subject taught regular regular regular
instructional materials June 2016 to checking/teaching checking/teaching checking/teaching
Learning 15%
c. appropriate teaching March 2017
Process (45%)
strategies
d. activities congruent to
objectives
e. assessment parallel to
Submitted 100% Submitted at least 90- Submitted at least Submitted at least
learning objectives
T Lesson Plan/DLLs on 99% of the Lesson 80-89% of the Lesson 70-79% of the Lesson
time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
 II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
b. Updated instructional Completely utilized all
materials June 2016 to E Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
15% factors
c. innovative teaching March 2017
strategies / HOTS

d. appropriate activities

e. congruent assessment Executed the lesson

to learning objectives. 1 lesson behind in a 2 lessons behind in a 3 lessons behind in a
T on time viz-a-viz
quarter quarter quarter
budget of work

All indicators were

III. Maintained daily Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
routine by:

a. Checking the
attendance June 2016 to E without lapses with 1 lapse with 2 lapses with 3 lapses
15%
b. Classroom cleanliness March 2017

c. Classroom
management Submitted daily
d. Students' discipline T routine report 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
monthly
 Completely utilized all
Q Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
factors
I. Assessed students
progress through:

a. Quizzes
b. Class participation / without lapses
1 lapse according to 2 lapses according to 3 lapses according to
Student recitation June 2016 to E accoridng to
10% evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP
Outcomes (30%) c. Quarterly test March 2017 evaluation plan/LP
d. Projects, porfolio,
journals etc.

e. Assignment /
homework / agreements Submitted reports on
T students' assessment 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
quarterly

Conducted all Conducted 3 Conducted 2 Conducted 1

Q
indicators indicators indicators indicator
II. Undertaken activities
to improve performance
indicators through:
100% of the 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
a. remedial teaching beneficiaries were beneficiaries were beneficiaries were benifaciaries were
June 2016 to E
10% given activities to given activities to given activities to given activities to
March 2017
b. enrichment activities improve performance improve performance improve performance improve performance
c. contest

d. tutoring
Submitted reports on
T 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
time

All indicators were

III. Maintains updated Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
students school records
through:

a. Form 138 100% of the students 85% of the students 75% of the students 65% of the students
June 2016 to
b. Form 137 10% E school records were school records were school records were school records were
March 2017
updated updated updated updated
c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status
 c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status Submitted on or Submitted one day
T Submitted 2 days late Submitted 3 days late
before due date late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Initiated regular/
periodic PTA meetings/
conference performance
of the learners through
regular PTA meetings
with the following 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
Community 100% of the parents 90-99% of the parents
documents: June 2016 to E parents attended the parents attended the
Involvement 4% attended the meeting attended the meeting
March 2017 meeting meeting
(10%)
a. attendance of parents
b. minutes of the meeting
c. programs and project
proposals
d. dsicipline agreement
e. classroom recognition
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late
 All indicators were
Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
II. Provide feedback to met
parents on the status of
the learners through
home visitation with the
following documents: 100% of the learners 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
June 2016 to E at risk have been learners at risk have learners at risk have learners at risk have
3%
March 2017 visited been visited been visited been visited
a. home visitation
b. agreement
c. record of attendance
d. documentation
e. academic record Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
III. Establish linkages to
stakeholder to sponsors
projects/ events/
activities with the
Project/s amounting
following documents: Project/s amounting Project/s amounting Project/s amounting
June 2016 to E to 5000 pesos and
3% to 4000 to 4999 pesos to 3000 to 3999 pesos to 2000 to 2999 pesos
March 2017 above
a. project proposal
b. MOU/MOA
c. deed of donations
d. documentation
e. accomplishment report Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

Achieved at least 5% Achieved at least 4% Achieved at least 3% Achieved at least 2%

Q of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out
come come come come
Professional I. Enhance teaching
Growth and learning process through June 2016 to Implemented in the Implemented in the Implemented in the
5% E Approved
Development classroom based action March 2017 Division School Wide classroom
(15%) research
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

II. Enhance teacher Q Attended at least 5 Attended at least 4 Attended at least 3 Attended at least 2
capability through
seminars/ trainings:
 II. Enhance teacher
capability through
seminars/ trainings:

a. TIP Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed

June 2016 to E to co-teachers the 5 to co-teachers the 4 to co-teachers the 3 to co-teachers the 2
b. PLC 5% seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended
March 2017
c. Faculty Meetings

d. Graduate Studies

e. Social Forum Submit report 2 days Submit report3 days Submit report4 days Submit report5 days
T
f. Symposia after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar

III. Manifest All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
professionalism through: met

a. punctulaity/
attendance
June 2016 to
b. dress code 5%
March 2017
c. observing protocol
d. attending Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of
ceremony/retreat T attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least
e. rendering service 5 indicators 4 indicators 3 indicators 2 indicators
beyond official time
Plus Factor

(.5 for each indicator but not exc. 2 points for the total)

1. Rendered the following technical assistance.

a.      provided assistance to co-teachers in improving their teaching competence.

b.      assisted school administrators in planning and managing in-service training.

c.       served as consultant in the preparation of supplementary instructional materials.

2. Conducted action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school/district

3. Subject area coordinator/chairman in district/division.

4. Served as demonstration teacher on innovative teaching techniques, classroom management

SUMMARY OF RATINGS

I. Teaching / Learning process (45%) 1.80 RATING

II. Student Outcomes (30%) 1.17 4.500-5.000

III. Community involvement (10%) 0.32 3.500-4.499

III. Profesional Growth and Developmen 0.57 2.500-3.499

TOTAL 3.86 1.500-2.499

PLUS FACTOR Below 1.999

 OVER-ALL RATING 3.86
Descriptive Rating VS

RATEE:

MARJOE B. PIEDAD
CONFORME:

RATER:

ELSIE P. EMERENCIANA, Ed. D.

Principal IV
Name of Rater: REBECCA D.ALMARIO
Position: MATHEMATICS COORDINATOR
Date of Review:

To be Filled during Evaluation

Actual Result Rating Score

1

1 indicator were met 4

5 or more times
found with back log
during regular
4
checking/teaching 4.00 0.60

Submitted at least
60-69% of the Lesson 4
Plan/DLLs on time

1 indicator were met 4

 Utilized 1 indicator 4
4.00 0.60

4 lessons behind in a
quarter
4

1 indicator were met 4

with 4 lapses 4 4.00 0.60

4 days late 4
 Utilized 1 indicator 4

4 lapses according to
evaluation plan/LP
4
4.00 0.40

4 days late 4

Failed to conduct any

of the indicators
4

60-69% of the
benerficiaries were
given activities to
3 3.67 0.37
improve performance

4 days late 4

1 indicators were met 4

50% of the students

school records were 4 4.00 0.40
updated
Submitted 4 or more
days late
4

1 indicators were met 4

60-69% of the
parents attended the 5
meeting 4.33 0.17

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4
1 indicators were met 4

60-69% of the
learners at risk have 4 4.00 0.12
been visited

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4

1 indicators were met 1

Project/s amounting
to 1999 pesos and 1 1.00 0.03
below

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
1

Achieved at least 1%
of the desired out 4
come

Created action
4 3.67 0.18
research proposal

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
3

Attended at least 1 4
Re-echo / discussed
to co-teachers the 1 3
seminars attended 3.67 0.18

Submit report6 days

after the seminar
4

1 indicator were met 4

4.00 0.20

Submitted proofs of
attendance of at least 4
1 indicators
RATING

Outstanding

Very Satisfactory

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

Poor
 RESULT-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR TEACHER 1
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: Ma. Roselyn P. Selga

Position: Teacher 1
Division: Malabon
Rating Period: June 2016 - March 2017

TO BUILD DURING PLANNING PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness

MFOS KRA Objectives TIMELINE
Per KRA
R 5 4 3 2

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Prepared Lesson Plans
or DLLs complete with:
1 or 2 times found 3 times found with 4 times found with
a. SMART objectives Complete LPs or DLLs with back log during back log during back log during
b. appropriate E
Teaching/ in subject taught regular regular regular
instructional materials June 2016 to checking/teaching checking/teaching checking/teaching
Learning 15%
c. appropriate teaching March 2017
Process (45%)
strategies
d. activities congruent to
objectives
e. assessment parallel to
Submitted 100% Submitted at least 90- Submitted at least Submitted at least
learning objectives
T Lesson Plan/DLLs on 99% of the Lesson 80-89% of the Lesson 70-79% of the Lesson
time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time Plan/DLLs on time

All indicators were

Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
 II. Facilitated learning
through:

a. Functional lesson
plan/DLL
b. Updated instructional Completely utilized all
materials June 2016 to E Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
15% factors
c. innovative teaching March 2017
strategies / HOTS

d. appropriate activities

e. congruent assessment Executed the lesson

to learning objectives. 1 lesson behind in a 2 lessons behind in a 3 lessons behind in a
T on time viz-a-viz
quarter quarter quarter
budget of work

All indicators were

III. Maintained daily Q 4indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
routine by:

a. Checking the
attendance June 2016 to E without lapses with 1 lapse with 2 lapses with 3 lapses
15%
b. Classroom cleanliness March 2017

c. Classroom
management Submitted daily
d. Students' discipline T routine report 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
monthly
 Completely utilized all
Q Utilized 4 indicators Utilized 3 indicators Utilized 2 indicators
factors
I. Assessed students
progress through:

a. Quizzes
b. Class participation / without lapses
1 lapse according to 2 lapses according to 3 lapses according to
Student recitation June 2016 to E accoridng to
10% evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP evaluation plan/LP
Outcomes (30%) c. Quarterly test March 2017 evaluation plan/LP
d. Projects, porfolio,
journals etc.

e. Assignment /
homework / agreements Submitted reports on
T students' assessment 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
quarterly

Conducted all Conducted 3 Conducted 2 Conducted 1

Q
indicators indicators indicators indicator
II. Undertaken activities
to improve performance
indicators through:
100% of the 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
a. remedial teaching beneficiaries were beneficiaries were beneficiaries were benifaciaries were
June 2016 to E
10% given activities to given activities to given activities to given activities to
March 2017
b. enrichment activities improve performance improve performance improve performance improve performance
c. contest

d. tutoring
Submitted reports on
T 1 day late 2 days late 3 days late
time

All indicators were

III. Maintains updated Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
students school records
through:

a. Form 138 100% of the students 85% of the students 75% of the students 65% of the students
June 2016 to
b. Form 137 10% E school records were school records were school records were school records were
March 2017
updated updated updated updated
c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status
 c. Class record

d. SF1
e. Nutritional Status Submitted on or Submitted one day
T Submitted 2 days late Submitted 3 days late
before due date late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
I. Initiated regular/
periodic PTA meetings/
conference performance
of the learners through
regular PTA meetings
with the following 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
Community 100% of the parents 90-99% of the parents
documents: June 2016 to E parents attended the parents attended the
Involvement 4% attended the meeting attended the meeting
March 2017 meeting meeting
(10%)
a. attendance of parents
b. minutes of the meeting
c. programs and project
proposals
d. dsicipline agreement
e. classroom recognition
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late
 All indicators were
Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
II. Provide feedback to met
parents on the status of
the learners through
home visitation with the
following documents: 100% of the learners 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the
June 2016 to E at risk have been learners at risk have learners at risk have learners at risk have
3%
March 2017 visited been visited been visited been visited
a. home visitation
b. agreement
c. record of attendance
d. documentation
e. academic record Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
met
III. Establish linkages to
stakeholder to sponsors
projects/ events/
activities with the
Project/s amounting
following documents: Project/s amounting Project/s amounting Project/s amounting
June 2016 to E to 5000 pesos and
3% to 4000 to 4999 pesos to 3000 to 3999 pesos to 2000 to 2999 pesos
March 2017 above
a. project proposal
b. MOU/MOA
c. deed of donations
d. documentation
e. accomplishment report Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

Achieved at least 5% Achieved at least 4% Achieved at least 3% Achieved at least 2%

Q of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out of the desired out
come come come come
Professional I. Enhance teaching
Growth and learning process through June 2016 to Implemented in the Implemented in the Implemented in the
5% E Approved
Development classroom based action March 2017 Division School Wide classroom
(15%) research
Submitted report on Submitted report one Submitted report 2 Submitted report 3
T
or before due date day late days late days late

II. Enhance teacher Q Attended at least 5 Attended at least 4 Attended at least 3 Attended at least 2
capability through
seminars/ trainings:
 II. Enhance teacher
capability through
seminars/ trainings:

a. TIP Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed Re-echo / discussed

June 2016 to E to co-teachers the 5 to co-teachers the 4 to co-teachers the 3 to co-teachers the 2
b. PLC 5% seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended seminars attended
March 2017
c. Faculty Meetings

d. Graduate Studies

e. Social Forum Submit report 2 days Submit report3 days Submit report4 days Submit report5 days
T
f. Symposia after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar after the seminar

III. Manifest All indicators were

Q 4 indicators were met 3 indicators were met 2 indicators were met
professionalism through: met

a. punctulaity/
attendance
June 2016 to
b. dress code 5%
March 2017
c. observing protocol
d. attending Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of Submitted proofs of
ceremony/retreat T attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least attendance of at least
e. rendering service 5 indicators 4 indicators 3 indicators 2 indicators
beyond official time
Plus Factor

(.5 for each indicator but not exc. 2 points for the total)

1. Rendered the following technical assistance.

a.      provided assistance to co-teachers in improving their teaching competence.

b.      assisted school administrators in planning and managing in-service training.

c.       served as consultant in the preparation of supplementary instructional materials.

2. Conducted action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school/district

3. Subject area coordinator/chairman in district/division.

4. Served as demonstration teacher on innovative teaching techniques, classroom management

SUMMARY OF RATINGS

I. Teaching / Learning process (45%) 1.65 RATING

II. Student Outcomes (30%) 1.17 4.500-5.000

III. Community involvement (10%) 0.40 3.500-4.499

III. Profesional Growth and Developmen 0.53 2.500-3.499

TOTAL 3.75 1.500-2.499

PLUS FACTOR Below 1.999

 OVER-ALL RATING 3.75
Descriptive Rating VS

RATEE:

CONFORME:

RATER: FELISA I. SALUD

ELSIE P. EMERENCIANA, Ed.D

Principal
Name of Rater: Felisa I. Salud
Position: English Department Head
Date of Review:

To be Filled during Evaluation

Actual Result Rating Score

1

1 indicator were met 4

5 or more times
found with back log
during regular
3
checking/teaching 3.33 0.50

Submitted at least
60-69% of the Lesson 3
Plan/DLLs on time

1 indicator were met 4

 Utilized 1 indicator 4
4.00 0.60

4 lessons behind in a
quarter
4

1 indicator were met 4

with 4 lapses 3 3.67 0.55

4 days late 4
 Utilized 1 indicator 4

4 lapses according to
evaluation plan/LP
4
4.00 0.40

4 days late 4

Failed to conduct any

of the indicators
4

60-69% of the
benerficiaries were
given activities to
3 3.67 0.37
improve performance

4 days late 4

1 indicators were met 4

50% of the students

school records were 4 4.00 0.40
updated
Submitted 4 or more
days late
4

1 indicators were met 4

60-69% of the
parents attended the 5
meeting 4.33 0.17

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4
1 indicators were met 4

60-69% of the
learners at risk have 4 4.00 0.12
been visited

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4

1 indicators were met 3

Project/s amounting
to 1999 pesos and 4 3.67 0.11
below

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
4

Achieved at least 1%
of the desired out 4
come

Created action
4 3.67 0.18
research proposal

Submitted report 4 or
more days late
3

Attended at least 1 3
Re-echo / discussed
to co-teachers the 1 3
seminars attended 3.33 0.17

Submit report6 days

after the seminar
4

1 indicator were met 4

3.50 0.18

Submitted proofs of
attendance of at least 3
1 indicators
RATING

Outstanding

Very Satisfactory

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

Poor
SOLICITATION FROM DIFFERENT STAKEHOLDERS
DURING CHRISTMAS HOLIDAYS = P P6,530.00

CONFIRMED BY : BOBBY ASUNCION, FACULTY PRESIDENT

MARY JOYCE G. COLINA, TREASURER