DAVID ATTENBOROUGH AND POPULATION REDUCTION EXPOSED -

EUGENICS, PLANNED PARENTHOOD, GEORGIA GUIDESTONES, EVOLUTION,

COMMUNISM

David Attenborough - Humans are plague

on Earth
Humans are a plague on the Earth that need to be
controlled by limiting population growth, according to
Sir David Attenborough.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/earthnews/9815862/Humans-are-plague-on-Earth-
Attenborough.html

The television presenter said that humans are threatening their own existence and that of
other species by using up the world’s resources.
He said the only way to save the planet from famine and species extinction is to limit
human population growth.
“We are a plague on the Earth. It’s coming home to roost over the next 50 years or so. It’s
not just climate change; it’s sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde.
Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the
natural world is doing it for us right now,” he told the Radio Times.
Sir David, who is a patron of the Population Matters, has spoken out before about the
“frightening explosion in human numbers” and the need for investment in sex education
and other voluntary means of limiting population in developing countries.
“We keep putting on programmes about famine in Ethiopia; that’s what’s happening. Too
many people there. They can’t support themselves — and it’s not an inhuman thing to
say. It’s the case. Until humanity manages to sort itself out and get a coordinated view
about the planet it’s going to get worse and worse.”

Sir David Attenborough backs campaign

to limit human population
Sir David Attenborough has said that a "frightening
explosion in human numbers" was behind every threat
to wildlife across the world.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/earthnews/5151747/Sir-David-Attenborough-backs-
campaign-to-limit-human-population.html

In a statement released on the organisation's website, Sir David, 82, said: "I've seen
wildlife under mounting human pressure all over the world and it's not just from human
economy or technology - behind every threat is the frightening explosion in human
numbers.
"I've never seen a problem that wouldn't be easier to solve with fewer people, or harder,
and ultimately impossible, with more.
"That's why I support the OPT, and I wish the environmental NGOs would follow their
lead, and spell out this central problem loud and clear."
The trust, which was founded in 1991, wants the UK population to decrease by not less
than 0.25% a year and has launched a "Stop at Two" pledge to encourage couples to
voluntarily limit the size of their families.

Attitude to religion and creationism

In a December 2005 interview with Simon Mayo on BBC Radio Five Live, Attenborough
stated that he considers himself an agnostic.[88] When asked whether his observation of
the natural world has given him faith in a creator, he generally responds with some
version of this story, making reference to the Onchocerca volvulus parasitic worm:
"My response is that when Creationists talk about God creating every individual
species as a separate act, they always instance hummingbirds, or orchids,
sunflowers and beautiful things. But I tend to think instead of a parasitic worm
that is boring through the eye of a boy sitting on the bank of a river in West
Africa, [a worm] that's going to make him blind. And [I ask them], 'Are you
telling me that the God you believe in, who you also say is an all-merciful God,
who cares for each one of us individually, are you saying that God created this
worm that can live in no other way than in an innocent child's eyeball? Because
that doesn't seem to me to coincide with a God who's full of mercy'."
This is a theological argument rather than a scientific argument — it is about what a god
supposedly would or would not do rather than about the scientific evidence. It’s ironic
that Attenborough claims that the Intelligent Design Movement is about theology while
evolution is about science, yet his main anti-ID argument is theological rather than
scientific!
Attenborough ignores the Fall, as do most such critics; God did NOT design things this
way, but they became this way after sin entered the world. The ID movement has
problems answering this type of argument because they lack a history, since they refuse
to invoke the Bible with its teaching of the Fall (and Flood).
Though Attenborough is said on some internet references to have been referring to the
Loa Loa sickness, caused by a parasitic nematode filarial worm, this is only very
uncommonly the cause of blindness. It is more known for skin lumps and inflammation as
the parasite moves through the human host’s tissues. The worms can frequently be seen
travelling under the conjunctiva (the thin membrane that covers the eye) but it rarely does
harm there.
He was (or should have been) referring to the related filarial nematode illness
Onchocercosis. Behind trachoma, it is the second commonest infective cause of blindness
in the world. Its non-technical name is actually ‘river blindness’—because the biting
insect that carries it to and from humans breeds around rivers. When it comes to the
clinical facts about this parasitic illness, Attenborough was mistaken in a number of areas
anyway. He could have used other examples of natural evil, of course, and the real
answer for all of them is basically the same—the Genesis Fall. So what did he get wrong?
First, this worm does not live only in the eyeball—in fact it is almost never found there,
but rather in nodules in the skin. It is the microfilaria, one of the larval stages produced
by the mating of male and female worms, which travel to the eyeball (and many other
places, too) and do the damage there. And these microfilaria do not live in the eyeball
either; they die there and it is this dying which causes the problems. Even then it is not
the worm or its larvae, either. Rather, the Wolbachia bacteria, which live symbiotically in
association with this parasite in its several stages, are what does the damage when they
are released at the death of the microfilaria, which triggers a severe immune reaction.
Attenborough is wrong anyway, because the worm doesn't need to bore through a child's
eye. Indeed, if it lands there, it can't even complete its life cycle. But there are numerous
other arguments about pathogens and predators that he could have used.
http://creation.com/why-doesnt-sir-david-attenborough-give-credit-to-god
In 2009 Attenborough stated that the Book of Genesis, by saying that the world was there
for people to dominate, had taught generations that they can "dominate" the environment,
and that this has resulted in the devastation of vast areas of the environment. He further
explained to the science journal Nature,
"That's why Darwinism, and the fact of evolution, is of great importance, because it is
that attitude which has led to the devastation of so much, and we are in the situation that
we are in."
Also in early 2009, the BBC broadcast an Attenborough one-hour special, Charles
Darwin and the Tree of Life. In reference to the programme, Attenborough stated that:
"People write to me that evolution is only a theory. Well, it is not a theory. Evolution is as
solid a historical fact as you could conceive. Evidence from every quarter. What is a
theory is whether natural selection is the mechanism and the only mechanism. That is a
theory. But the historical reality that dinosaurs led to birds and mammals produced
whales, that's not theory."
He strongly opposes creationism and its offshoot "intelligent design", saying that a survey
that found a quarter of science teachers in state schools believe that creationism should be
taught alongside evolution in science lessons was "really terrible".
Attenborough has joined the evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins and other top
scientists in signing a campaign statement coordinated by the British Humanist
Association (BHA). The statement calls for "creationism to be banned from the school
science curriculum and for evolution to be taught more widely in schools
Sir David Attenborough: I want to come back as 'animal with wild sex life'
He said: “People often say, 'What would you like to be if you came back to Earth as an
animal?' Well the answer I give depends on the company I'm with. If it's a bit racy, I
daresay my mind would wander over a range of animals remarkable for the extravagance
of their reproductive techniques.”
He added that he would often tone down his answer. "In more sober company, I normally
find a safer answer. A sloth, I say. It spends most of its time hanging upside from a branch
in a tropical rainforest, dozing."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/5441715/Sir-David-Attenborough-I-want-to-
come-back-as-animal-with-wild-sex-life.html

Interview with ABC(Australia)

AD(Andrew Denton): How should we deal with death?
DA(David Attenborough): Confront it. …
AD: As you have got older has your attitude towards death changed at all?
DA: Oh yes. I think about death every day. I think mainly of the problems I’m
leaving for others, and of the cliché which we all wish—when it comes make it
quick.
AD: Do you have a sense of the after-life?
DA: No.
AD: Does that worry you?
DA: No. I’d be more worried if I thought there was Someone up there with a
profit and loss account in terms of moral behaviour. But I see no evidence of
that.

Attenborough is also a Fellow of the Royal Society

---

Population Matters, formerly known as the Optimum Population Trust,[1] is a think

tank, and campaign group expressing what it describes as population concern regarding
impacts of population growth on long term sustainability, quality of life and the natural
environment, specifically natural resources, climate change, and biodiversity.
Summary of aims
The organisation's stated intermediate aims are: improved provision of family planning
and sex education; better education and rights for women and the encouragement that
couples voluntarily "have two or fewer" children.
For the UK specifically, it further advocates greater effort to reduce the high rates of
teenage pregnancy and unintended pregnancy and for immigration to be brought into
balance with emigration.
Policy goals
(a paraphrase of Population Matters' 'Full policy goals' is as follows):
Population Matters "recommend that the following should be taken into
consideration":[13]
1, an acknowledgement of population growth as one of the factors that increases
damage to the environment in a way that reduces everyone’s share of natural
resources;
2, the achievement of a stable and ethically acceptable transition to a sustainable
population;
3, an acknowledgement that an overall number of carbon emitters increases with
all population growth;&
4, an improved provision of family planning and sex education;
5, an empowerment of women both generally and specifically in relation to
decisions concerning family size;
6, a support of developing countries towards sustainable development and
population stabilisation;
7, an official acknowledgement that it's in the interest of all to stabilise our
numbers and then to reduce them by voluntary means to a sustainable level;
8, a reduction in unplanned pregnancies supported by better sexual health and
relationships education, and by a well funded contraceptive services for all people
including adolescents;
9, a minimisation of one country's dependence on the resources of other countries
which, in the case of high population, high consumption countries, would be
partly achieved through the country's limitation of its immigration rate to the level
of its emigration rate;
10, a local meeting of labour demands in high population nations rejecting a case
of more young people being required to care of an increasing elderly population
so as to avoiding an ecological pyramid in which each generation impoverishes
the next;
11, individuals considering how many children they have within tax and benefits
systems that balance reproductive rights with social responsibilities;
12, a high level of focus being given to a population policy implementation by
senior politicians.
STATEMENTS BY POPULATION MATTERS
"Couples making decisions about family size do so in the belief that it is a matter for
them and their personal preferences alone."
And you are saying it's not a matter for them and their preferences alone??
A Population Matters briefing paper rejoiced that: "A non-existent person has no
environmental footprint; the emission saving is instant and total."
 That's because they're dead....

Patrons of Population Matters include:

David Attenborough
Jane Goodall
Jane Goodall - Overpopulation in the Developing World
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6JLvIxdbjQ&feature=fvw
(skip playing that clip)
Sir Crispin Tickell
Crispin Tickell said that we should be pursuing policies that would reduce the UK's
population to 20 million – a third of its current level.(64 million)
In his earlier broadcast, Sir Crispin remarked: "Someone has said that constantly
increasing growth is the doctrine of the cancer cell. You just get out of control."
This metaphor, in effect describing the birth of children as like a metastasising tumour, is
truly disgusting. Who, though, was that "someone" Sir Crispin airily quoted? His name is
Paul Ehrlich and he is a patron, along with Tickell and Sir Jonathon Porritt, among
others, of the Optimum Population Trust(Population Matters), an organisation that
campaigns tirelessly for an organised reduction in human life.
Paul Ehrlich
Mr Ehrlich is the godfather of the environmentalist human reduction movement. Almost
40 years ago he wrote a book called The Population Bomb, which asserted that so many
people would die as a direct result of starvation due to overpopulation that the world
would, by 1985, be able to support only 1.5 billion humans. Mr Ehrlich also claimed that
about 65 million of the victims would have died of hunger in his own country, the United
States of America. As for Great Britain, Ehrlich declared that he would "take even
money" that none of its inhabitants "would exist in the year 2000".
In Population Bomb he wrote, "We must have population control at home, hopefully
through a system of incentives and penalties, but by compulsion if voluntary methods
fail. We must use our political power to push other countries into programs which
combine agricultural development and population control."
Voluntary measures he has supported include the easiest possible availability of birth
control and abortion.
In the report Optimum Human Population Size that Paul Ehrlich contributed to they said:
"To us it seems reasonable to assume that, until cultures and technology change
radically, the optimum number of people to exist simultaneously in the vicinity of 1.5 to 2
billion people." (at that time world population levels were at 5.5 billion, now they are at 7
billion, that means a reduction of 5 BILLION PEOPLE!)
He still thinks that governments should discourage people from having more than two
children, suggesting, for example a higher tax rate for larger families
WHO INFLUENCED POPULATION MATTERS?
The organisation makes note of its UK predecessors: The Malthusian League (1877)
The Malthusian League was a British organisation which advocated the practice of
contraception and the education of the public about the importance of family planning. It
was established in 1877 and was dissolved in 1927. The organisation was secular,
utilitarian, individualistic, and "above all malthusian." [1] The organisation maintained
that it was concerned about the poverty of the British working class and held that over-
population was the chief cause of poverty.
The Malthusian League forms part of the society within Aldous Huxley's novel Brave
New World
The Rev. Thomas Robert Malthus (13 February 1766 – 29 December 1834) was an
English cleric and scholar, influential in the fields of political economy and demography.
His An Essay on the Principle of Population observed that sooner or later population will
be checked by famine and disease, leading to what is known as a Malthusian catastrophe
ANNIE BESANT
For many years Besant was a friend of the National Secular Society's leader, Charles
Bradlaugh. Bradlaugh, a former soldier, had long been separated from his wife; Besant
lived with him and his daughters, and they worked together on many projects. He was an
atheist and a republican; he was also trying to get elected as Member of Parliament (MP)
for Northampton.
Besant and Bradlaugh became household names in 1877 when they published a book by
the American birth-control campaigner Charles Knowlton. It claimed that working-class
families could never be happy until they were able to decide how many children they
wanted. It suggested ways to limit the size of their families. The Knowlton book was
highly controversial, and was vigorously opposed by the Church. Besant and Bradlaugh
proclaimed in the National Reformer:
We intend to publish nothing we do not think we can morally defend. All that we
publish we shall defend.[10]
The pair were arrested and put on trial for publishing the Knowlton book. They were
found guilty, but released pending appeal. As well as great opposition, Besant and
Bradlaugh also received a great deal of support in the Liberal press. Arguments raged
back and forth in the letters and comment columns as well as in the courtroom. Besant
was instrumental in founding the Malthusian League during the trial, which would go on
to advocate for the abolition of penalties for the promotion of contraception.[11] For a
time, it looked as though they would be sent to prison. The case was thrown out finally
only on a technical point, the charges not having been properly drawn up.
BESANT'S BELIEFS
In 1890 Besant met Helena Blavatsky and over the next few years her interest in
theosophy grew while her interest in secular matters waned. She became a member of the
Theosophical Society and a prominent lecturer on the subject. As part of her theosophy-
related work, she travelled to India. In 1898 she helped establish the Central Hindu
College and in 1922 she helped establish the Hyderabad (Sind) National Collegiate Board
in Mumbai, India.[2][3] In 1902, she established the first overseas Lodge of the
International Order of Co-Freemasonry, Le Droit Humain. Over the next few years she
established lodges in many parts of the British Empire. In 1907 she became president of
the Theosophical Society, whose international headquarters were in Adyar, Madras
"Against the teachings of eternal torture, of the vicarious atonement, of the infallibility of
the Bible, I leveled all the strength of my brain and tongue, and I exposed the history of
the Christian Church with unsparing hand, its persecutions, its religious wars, its
cruelties, its oppressions. (Annie Besant, An Autobiography Chapter VII).
---
One proponent of Malthusianism was the novelist Harriet Martineau whose circle of
acquaintances included Charles Darwin, and the ideas of Malthus were a significant
influence on the inception of Darwin's theory of evolution. Darwin was impressed by the
idea that population growth would eventually lead to more organisms than could possibly
survive in any given environment, leading him to theorise that organisms with a relative
advantage in the struggle for survival and reproduction would be able to pass their
characteristics on to further generations. Proponents of Malthusianism were in turn
influenced by Darwin's ideas, both schools coming to heavily influence the field of
eugenics. Henry Fairfield Osborn, Jr. advocated "humane birth selection through humane
birth control" in order to avoid a Malthusian catastrophe by eliminating the "unfit"
EUGENICS
Eugenics is a set of beliefs and practices which aims at improving the genetic quality of
the human population. It is a social philosophy advocating the improvement of human
genetic traits through the promotion of higher rates of sexual reproduction for people
with desired traits (positive eugenics), or reduced rates of sexual reproduction and
sterilization of people with less-desired or undesired traits (negative eugenics), or both.
While eugenic principles have been practiced as far back in world history as Ancient
Greece, the modern history of eugenics began in the early 20th century when a popular
eugenics movement emerged in Britain[8] and spread to many countries, including the
United States and most European countries. In this period, eugenic ideas were espoused
across the political spectrum. Consequently, many countries adopted eugenic policies
meant to improve the genetic stock of their countries. Such programs often included both
"positive" measures, such as encouraging individuals deemed particularly "fit" to
reproduce, and "negative" measures such as marriage prohibitions and forced sterilization
of people deemed unfit for reproduction. People deemed unfit to reproduce often
included people with mental or physical disabilities, people who scored in the low ranges
of different IQ tests, criminals and deviants, and members of disfavored minority groups.
The eugenics movement became negatively associated with Nazi Germany and the
Holocaust—the murder by the German state of approximately 12 million people—when
many of the defendants at the Nuremberg trials attempted to justify their human rights
abuses by claiming there was little difference between the Nazi eugenics programs and
the US eugenics programs.[9] In the decades following World War II, with the institution
of human rights, many countries gradually abandoned eugenics policies, although some
Western countries, among them Sweden and the US, continued to carry out forced
sterilizations for several decades.
A major critique of eugenics policies is that regardless of whether "negative" or
"positive" policies are used, they are vulnerable to abuse because the criteria of selection
are determined by whichever group is in political power. Furthermore, negative eugenics
in particular is considered by many to be a violation of basic human rights, which include
the right to reproduction.
In his Essay on the Principle of Population, Malthus calls for increased mortality among
the poor:
"All the children born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population
to this level, must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the deaths
of grown persons… To act consistently therefore, we should facilitate, instead of
foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations of nature in producing
this mortality; and if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of
famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we
compel nature to use. Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we
should encourage contrary habits. In our towns we should make the streets
narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague.
In the country, we should build our villages near stagnant pools, and particularly
encourage settlements in all marshy and unwholesome situations. "(Book IV,
Chap. V)
David Attenborough on overpopulation - praises Malthus and wants
government intervention and support of abortion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRPmLWYbUqA
( Play from beginning to 2:32 and 10:15 - 11:04)
----
https://overpopulationisamyth.com/
Play episode 1, 2, 3,(skip 4), 5, 6

THE GEORGIA GUIDESTONES

The ten guides for a new Age of Reason are as follows:
1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
2. Guide reproduction wisely – improving fitness and diversity.
3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
4. Rule passion – faith – tradition – and all things with tempered reason.
5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
9. Prize truth – beauty – love – seeking harmony with the infinite.
10. Be not a cancer on the earth – Leave room for nature – Leave room for nature.
As you can see, the guidelines call for a drastic reduction of the world population, the
adoption of new a world language, the creation of a world court and a vague allusions to
eugenics. In other words, a blueprint for a New World Order.
Since the monument’s erection on March 22, 1980, numerous authors and researchers
have attempted to interpret the rationale behind these ten guidelines. Do they truly consist
of a blueprint for a New World Order? Are they simply rules to apply in case of a major
catastrophe? The best place to get an accurate answer is to ask the authors of the rules
themselves. However, since they have chosen to remain anonymous, it is impossible to
do so. They did, however, leave an all-important statement, which has been overlooked
by nearly all researchers of the Guidestones. This astonishing text, which describes their
motives in great detail, can only be found in The Georgia Guidestone Guidebook, a
pamphlet produced by the Granite Company, which produced the monument. Right from
the start, it is obvious that the authors of the monument do seek the creation of a New
World Order. This is not a “conspiracy theory” or hypothesis. It is written in clear and
unequivocal terms:
---
“In 1980, as these stones were being raised, the most pressing world problem was the
need to control human numbers. In recent centuries technology and abundant fuels have
made possible a multiplication of humanity far beyond what is prudent or long
sustainable. Now we can foresee the impending exhaustion of those energy sources and
the depletion of world reserves of many vital raw materials.
“Controlling our reproduction is urgently needed. It will require major changes in our
attitudes and customs. Unfortunately, the inertia of human custom can be extreme. This is
especially true when those for whom custom is a dominant force are uninformed of the
need for change.
“Nearly every nation is now overpopulated in terms of a perpetual balance with nature.
We are like a fleet of overcrowded lifeboats confronted with an approaching tempest. In
the United States of America we are seriously overtaxing our resources to maintain our
present population in the existing state of prosperity. We are destroying our farmland and
we have grown dangerously dependent upon external sources for oil, metals and other
nonrenewable resources. Nations such as Japan, Holland and Haiti are even more
seriously overpopulated and, therefore, in greater jeopardy.
“In these circumstances, reproduction is no longer exclusively a personal matter.
Society must have a voice and some power of direction in regulating this vital
function. The wishes of human couples are important, but not paramount. The
interests of present society and the welfare of future generations must be given
increasing consideration as we develop mechanisms to bring rational control to our
childbearing.
(…)
“Irresponsible childbearing must be discouraged by legal and social pressures.
Couples who cannot provide a decent income and support for a child should not
produce children to be a burden for their neighbors. Bringing unneeded children
into an overcrowded lifeboat is evil. It is unjust to those children. It is harmful for
the other occupants and all living things. Society should not encourage or subsidize
such behavior.
“Knowledge and techniques for regulating human reproduction are now in
existence. Moral and political leaders throughout the world have a grave
responsibility to make this knowledge and these techniques generally available. This
could be done with a fraction of the funds which the world now devotes to military
purpose. In the long run, diverting funds into this channel could do more than anything
else to reduce the tensions which lead to war.
“A diverse and prosperous world population in perpetual balance with global resources
will be the cornerstone for a rational world order. People of good will in all nations must
work to establish that balance."
http://vigilantcitizen.com/sinistersites/sinister-sites-the-georgia-guidestones/

---
A columnist on The Times, Melanie Reid, argued that we should look to the People's
Republic of China for appropriate remedies. Referring to China's "one child" policy,
Ms Reid wrote that:
"I rather admire the Chinese. They recognised a huge problem and did something about
it. It was dreadfully crude but it has prevented the births of 400 million people."
The Times is a British daily national newspaper based in London. It began in 1785 under
the title The Daily Universal Register and became The Times on 1 January 1788. The
Times and its sister paper The Sunday Times (founded in 1821) are published by Times
Newspapers, since 1981 a subsidiary of News UK, itself wholly owned by the News
Corp group headed by Rupert Murdoch (Knight of St. Gregory)
Melanie Haber is an award-winning Times journalist.

As that great student of Communist China, Jonathan Mirsky, retorted: "The male-female
birth rate in China now is between 115 and 118 males to 100 women. The results? Rape,
abduction (of females for brides) and female infanticide. Why would anyone admire this,
crude or not?"
CHINA AND POPULATION CONTROL
The one child policy, is a part of the family planning policy,[1] was a population
control policy of China which was introduced between 1978 and 198
The policy was enforced at the provincial level through fines that were imposed based on
the income of the family and other factors. "Population and Family Planning
Commissions" exist at every level of government to raise awareness and carry out
registration and inspection work.[8]
The policy was introduced in 1978 and enacted/implemented as a temporary measure[9]
on September 18, 1980[3] to curb a then-surging population and limit the demands for
water and other resources[9] as well as to alleviate social, economic and environmental
problems in China.[10] Demographers are not clear how much reduction happened solely
because of the policy.[11][12][13][14]
The Chinese government says that 400 million births were prevented[15] although the
validity of this claim is in doubt. A report in Newsweek, for example, questions the
cause/effect claimed by China: "...some demographers claim China’s population growth
would have flattened out even without it—the draconian rule left emotional, social and
economic scars the country and its citizens will be dealing with for years."[
On 29 October 2015, Xinhua, China's state news agency, reported a change in the
existing law to a two-child policy, citing a statement from the Communist Party of China,
[19][20][21][22] however it would take effect only when it is ratified in the annual
session of National People's Congress in March 2016
UNITED STATES AND UNITED NATIONS SUPPORT OF CHINA'S ONE CHILD
POLICY
Following on the heels of the elimination of the Mexico City Policy, President Obama
has confirmed that the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), which helped instigate,
perpetuate and enforce China's coercive one-child policy, will again receive taxpayer
dollars.
Appended to the statement announcing the end of the Mexico City Policy, Obama said:
"In addition, I look forward to working with Congress to restore U.S. financial support
for the U.N. Population Fund.
"By resuming funding to UNFPA, the U.S. will be joining 180 other donor nations
working collaboratively to reduce poverty, improve the health of women and children,
prevent HIV/AIDS and provide family planning assistance to women in 154 countries."
The move came as no surprise as Obama has spoken out in favor of UNFPA funding in
the past.
President Bush halted funding for UNFPA when it was discovered by an independent
investigation in 2001, and confirmed by a U.S. State Department investigation in 2002,
that the UN group supported restrictive laws and coercive population control tactics in
China, including forced abortion and sterilization.
"The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) has decided to continue to provide
financial and technical assistance to the Chinese birth limitation program under the
direction of China's National Population and Family Planning Commission," read a 2006
statement from U.S. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack.
It continued: "The U.S. opposition to this program is a matter of principle. It is not
directed at UNFPA as an institution. Rather, it is based on the strong opposition of the
United States to human rights abuses associated with coercive birth limitation regimes."
The statement, however, was recently erased from the State Department website.
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SUPPORT OF CHINA'S ONE CHILD POLICY AND
FORCED ABORTION
As Republican-controlled House considered a successful measure to eliminate UNFPA’s
$39 million budget, Planned Parenthood issued a press release claiming the bill would
“harm women around the world.” (Emphasis in original.)
UNFPA also donated $1.6 million to International Planned Parenthood Federation in
2010. Planned Parenthood is IPPF’s U.S. “member association.”
The organization has not announced plans to return the money nor to withdraw from
UNFPA.
Planned Parenthood official Norman Fleischmann in a letter to the Napa Valley Register
commended Beijing’s “One Child Policy”, stating in calling for the same in the U.S.,
“China’s ‘one child’ policy… is a start… the world is doomed to strangle among the coils
of pitiless exponential growth.” The faith-based Catholic Herald was cited by Live
Action News another official having quoted, “[T]he Chinese government has the best
interests of its people at heart.” Lucy Lefever, the piece’s author, reported in 2012 the
International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) has operated for decades in China.
Its Chinese branch, IFPF, was granted full-membership in 1983. The IFPF’s constitution
states specifically its mission is to “… assist the government in maintaining a low
birthrate.” A fuller detail from its mission statement contains the following:
"Based on the need of the masses, CFPA shall endeavor to improve its service and
capacity, and organize and advocate the masses to have less children, be well-off,
healthy, and civilized.
[Objective] a. To implement the policies, laws, and regulations on national population
and family planning, and promote the masses’ awareness on family planning."

Read more at http://politichicks.com/2015/07/planned-parenthood-eugenics-organ-

harvesting-under-chinas-one-child-policy/

HENRY KISSINGER
“Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third
world, because the US economy will require large and increasing amounts of
minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries”.
– Henry Kissinger
“World population needs to be decreased by 50%”.
– Henry Kissinger
“Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac,” and “The elderly are useless eaters”.
– Henry Kissinger

PRINCE PHILIP, DUKE OF EDINBURGH

"HUMAN POPULATION IS REACHING 'PLAGUE PROPORTIONS'"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=taoHk_enqWA
In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to
contribute something to solve overpopulation.
— Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, Reported by Deutsche Press Agentur (August
1988)
"Human population growth is probably the single most serious long-term threat to
survival. We're in for a major disaster if it isn't curbed—not just for the natural world, but
for the human world. The more people there are, the more resources they'll consume, the
more pollution they'll create, the more fighting they will do. We have no option. If it isn't
controlled voluntarily, it will be controlled involuntarily by an increase in disease,
starvation and war."
— Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, People magazine (1981)
"What has been described as the "balance of nature" is simply nature's system of self-
limitation. Fertility and breeding success create the surpluses after allowing for the
replacement of the losses. Predation, climatic variation, disease, starvation—and in the
case of the inappropriately named Homo sapiens, wars and terrorism—are the principal
means by which population numbers are kept under some sort of control. Viewed
dispassionately, it must be obvious that the world's human population has grown to such a
size that it is threatening its own habitat; and it has already succeeded in causing the
extinction of large numbers of wild plant and animal species. "
— Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, Down to Earth (1988)
TED TURNER
POPULATION NEEDS TO BE REDUCED, SHOULD ONLY BE ALLOWED TO
HAVE 1 OR 2 CHILDREN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9w-nMyzP8o

Turner had to answer for his history of provocative statements, and made a few new ones,
when members of the website WeAreChange.org caught up with him on camera late last
month.
One individual asked the CNN founder what his goal was for world population.
“I think two billion is about right,” Turner said as he walked briskly away. In October, the
number of people in the world reached seven billion.
Before disappearing around the corner Turner said he hoped to eliminate five billion
people through the “one child family.”
The interviewer responded, “One child policy.”
Turner answered, “For 100 years.”

DAVID ROCKEFELLER ON MAO ZEDONG

“Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded, not only in
producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering a high morale
and community propose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's
leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.” (David
Rockefeller, New York Times, 1973.)

THE DEMOCIDE UNDER MAO ZEDONG

Can you name the greatest mass murderer of the 20th century? No, it wasn’t Hitler or
Stalin. It was Mao Zedong.
According to the authoritative “Black Book of Communism,” an estimated 65 million
Chinese died as a result of Mao’s repeated, merciless attempts to create a new “socialist”
China. Anyone who got in his way was done away with -- by execution, imprisonment or
forced famine.
For Mao, the No. 1 enemy was the intellectual. The so-called Great Helmsman reveled in
his blood-letting, boasting, “What’s so unusual about Emperor Shih Huang of the China
Dynasty? He had buried alive 460 scholars only, but we have buried alive 46,000
scholars.” Mao was referring to a major “accomplishment” of the Great Cultural
Revolution, which from 1966-1976 transformed China into a great House of Fear.
The most inhumane example of Mao’s contempt for human life came when he ordered
the collectivization of China’s agriculture under the ironic slogan, the “Great Leap
Forward.” A deadly combination of lies about grain production, disastrous farming
methods (profitable tea plantations, for example, were turned into rice fields), and
misdistribution of food produced the worse famine in human history.
Deaths from hunger reached more than 50 percent in some Chinese villages. The total
number of dead from 1959 to 1961 was between 30 million and 40 million -- the
population of California.
Rounding up enemies
Only five years later, when he sensed that revolutionary fervor in China was waning,
Mao proclaimed the Cultural Revolution. Gangs of Red Guards -- young men and women
between 14 and 21 -- roamed the cities targeting revisionists and other enemies of the
state, especially teachers.
Professors were dressed in grotesque clothes and dunce caps, their faces smeared with
ink. They were then forced to get down on all fours and bark like dogs. Some were beaten
to death, some even eaten -- all for the promulgation of Maoism. A reluctant Mao finally
called in the Red Army to put down the marauding Red Guards when they began
attacking Communist Party members, but not before 1 million Chinese died.
All the while, Mao kept expanding the laogai, a system of 1,000 forced labor camps
throughout China. Harry Wu, who spent 19 years in labor camps, has estimated that from
the 1950s through the 1980s, 50 million Chinese passed through the Chinese version of
the Soviet gulag. Twenty million died as a result of the primitive living conditions and
14-hour work days.
Such calculated cruelty exemplified his Al Capone philosophy: “Political power grows
out of the barrel of a gun.”
And yet Mao Zedong remains the most honored figure in the Chinese Communist Party.
At one end of historic Tiananmen Square is Mao’s mausoleum, visited daily by large,
respectful crowds. At the other end of the square is a giant portrait of Mao above the
entrance to the Forbidden City, the favorite site of visitors, Chinese and foreign.

MAO ZEDONG WAS A MARXIST-LENINIST

The Marxism–Leninist worldview promotes atheism as a fundamental tenet. Marxist–

Leninist atheism has its roots in the philosophy of Ludwig Feuerbach, Georg Wilhelm
Friedrich Hegel, Marx, and Lenin. Materialism, the philosophical standpoint that the
universe exists independently of human consciousness consisting of only atoms and
physical forces, is central to the worldview of Marxism–Leninism in the form of
dialectical materialism. Vitaly Ginzburg, a Soviet physicist, wrote that the "Bolshevik
communists were not merely atheists but, according to Lenin's terminology, militant
atheists."Therefore, many Marxist–Leninist states, historically and currently, are also
atheist states. Under these regimes, several religions and their adherents were targeted to
be "stamped out."
Dialectical materialism (sometimes abbreviated diamat) is a philosophy of science and
nature, based on the writings of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, and developed largely in
Russia and the Soviet Union. It was inspired by dialectic and materialist philosophical
traditions. The main idea of dialectical materialism lies in the concept of the
evolution of the natural world and the emergence of new qualities of being at new
stages of evolution.
Vladimir Lenin was an atheist, and believed that socialism was inherently atheistic; he
thus deemed Christian socialism to be a contradiction in terms.[289] He expressed an
attitude of cultural superiority between different nations; at the top was Germany,
followed by Britain and France, and then Finland, with Russia coming beneath them.
Karl Marx rejected religion
In his rejection of all religious thought, Marx considered the contributions of religion
over the centuries to be unimportant and irrelevant to the future of humanity.[16][17] The
autonomy of humanity from the realm of supernatural forces was considered by Marx as
an axiomatic ontological truth that had been developed since ancient times, and he
considered it to have an even more respectable tradition than Christianity. He argued that
religious belief had been invented as a reaction against the suffering and injustice of the
world. In Marx's view, the poor and oppressed were the original creators of religion, and
they used it as a way to reassure themselves that they would have a better life in the
future, after death. Thus, it served as a kind of "opium," or a way to escape the harsh
realities of the world.
"Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering
and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature,
the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium
of the people." - Karl Marx

"But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all

they that hate me love death" - Proverbs 8:36