Foundation - Note

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2015
Author: File: Pole 7_2_5m_under.rtd

Address: Project: Pole 7_2_5m_under
1 Spread footing: Pole_7 Number: 1

1.1 Basic data
1.1.1 Assumptions
· Geotechnic calculations according to : EN 1997-1:2008

· Concrete calculations according to : EN 1992-1-1/BFS 2011:10 EKS8
· Shape selection : without limits
1.1.2 Geometry:
A = 12,800 (m) a = 3,100 (m)
B = 7,100 (m) b = 3,100 (m)
h1 = 1,500 (m) ex = 0,000 (m)
h2 = 2,600 (m) ey = 0,000 (m)
h4 = 0,000 (m)
d' = 2600,0 (mm)

cnom1 = 60,0 (mm)
cnom2 = 60,0 (mm)
Cover deviations: Cdev = 10,0(mm), Cdur = 0,0(mm)
1.1.3 Materials
· Concrete : C28/35; Characteristic strength = 28,00 MPa

Unit weight = 2501,36 (kG/m3)
Rectangular stress distribution [3.1.7(3)]
· Longitudinal reinforcement : type B500BT Characteristic strength = 500,00
MPa
Ductility class: A
Horizontal branch of the stress-strain diagram
· Transversal reinforcement : type B500BT Characteristic strength = 500,00
MPa
· Additional reinforcement: : type B500BT Characteristic strength = 500,00
MPa
1.1.4 Loads:
Foundation loads:
Case Nature Group N Fx Fy Mx My
Date : 14/01/15 Page : 1

(kN) (kN) (kN) (kN*m) (kN*m)

1.Vind_ice_0 design(Structural) ---- 309,35 -0,57 -189,59 4465,35 -10,64
3.High_wind_0 design(Structural) ---- 247,09 -0,42 -173,10 3697,14 -6,96
9.Vind_ice90 design(Structural) ---- 309,14 -47,58 -101,00 2627,41 -797,52
10.High_wind90 design(Structural) ---- 246,87 -80,21 -59,64 1532,45 -1338,77
11.No_wind_2a design(Structural) ---- 321,95 -0,82 -101,00 2655,27 -16,87
12.unsymice_l design(Structural) ---- 283,75 -459,81 -75,07 1967,99 -11321,33
13.unsymice_h design(Structural) ---- 290,98 274,12 -77,22 2029,27 6865,69
16.lina1 design(Structural) ---- 316,75 22,96 -98,97 2562,69 818,51
17.lina2 design(Structural) ---- 316,75 -23,74 -98,79 2556,19 -837,62
30.evrdstrs design(Structural) ---- 247,57 -0,62 -51,29 1323,29 -11,95
31.no_wind design(Structural) ---- 267,88 -0,63 -54,02 1209,81 -12,42
32.add_arm13 design(Structural) ---- 206,86 24,90 -4,89 197,02 874,60
Backfill loads:
Case Nature Q1
(kN/m2)
1.1.5 Combination list

1/ ULS : 1.Vind_ice_0 N=309,35 Mx=4465,35 My=-10,64 Fx=-0,57 Fy=-189,59
3/ ULS : 3.High_wind_0 N=247,09 Mx=3697,14 My=-6,96 Fx=-0,42 Fy=-173,10
9/ ULS : 9.Vind_ice90 N=309,14 Mx=2627,41 My=-797,52 Fx=-47,58 Fy=-101,00
10/ ULS : 10.High_wind90 N=246,87 Mx=1532,45 My=-1338,77 Fx=-80,21 Fy=-59,64
11/ ULS : 11.No_wind_2a N=321,95 Mx=2655,27 My=-16,87 Fx=-0,82 Fy=-101,00
12/ ULS : 12.unsymice_l N=283,75 Mx=1967,99 My=-11321,33 Fx=-459,81 Fy=-75,07
13/ ULS : 13.unsymice_h N=290,98 Mx=2029,27 My=6865,69 Fx=274,12 Fy=-77,22
16/ ULS : 16.lina1 N=316,75 Mx=2562,69 My=818,51 Fx=22,96 Fy=-98,97
17/ ULS : 17.lina2 N=316,75 Mx=2556,19 My=-837,62 Fx=-23,74 Fy=-98,79
Date : 14/01/15 Page : 2

30/ ULS : 30.evrdstrs N=247,57 Mx=1323,29 My=-11,95 Fx=-0,62 Fy=-51,29

31/ ULS : 31.no_wind N=267,88 Mx=1209,81 My=-12,42 Fx=-0,63 Fy=-54,02
32/ ULS : 32.add_arm13 N=206,86 Mx=197,02 My=874,60 Fx=24,90 Fy=-4,89
33/* ULS : 1.Vind_ice_0 N=309,35 Mx=4465,35 My=-10,64 Fx=-0,57 Fy=-189,59
35/* ULS : 3.High_wind_0 N=247,09 Mx=3697,14 My=-6,96 Fx=-0,42 Fy=-173,10
41/* ULS : 9.Vind_ice90 N=309,14 Mx=2627,41 My=-797,52 Fx=-47,58 Fy=-101,00
42/* ULS : 10.High_wind90 N=246,87 Mx=1532,45 My=-1338,77 Fx=-80,21 Fy=-59,64
43/* ULS : 11.No_wind_2a N=321,95 Mx=2655,27 My=-16,87 Fx=-0,82 Fy=-101,00
44/* ULS : 12.unsymice_l N=283,75 Mx=1967,99 My=-11321,33 Fx=-459,81 Fy=-75,07
45/* ULS : 13.unsymice_h N=290,98 Mx=2029,27 My=6865,69 Fx=274,12 Fy=-77,22
48/* ULS : 16.lina1 N=316,75 Mx=2562,69 My=818,51 Fx=22,96 Fy=-98,97
49/* ULS : 17.lina2 N=316,75 Mx=2556,19 My=-837,62 Fx=-23,74 Fy=-98,79
62/* ULS : 30.evrdstrs N=247,57 Mx=1323,29 My=-11,95 Fx=-0,62 Fy=-51,29
63/* ULS : 31.no_wind N=267,88 Mx=1209,81 My=-12,42 Fx=-0,63 Fy=-54,02
64/* ULS : 32.add_arm13 N=206,86 Mx=197,02 My=874,60 Fx=24,90 Fy=-4,89
1.2 Geotechnical design
1.2.1 Assumptions
· Cohesion reduction coefficient: 0,00

· Smooth precast foundation 6.5.3(10)
· Sliding with soil pressure considered: for X and Y directions
· Design approach: 3
A1 + M2 + R3
gf' = 1,25
gc' = 1,25
gcu = 1,40
gqu = 1,40
gg = 1,00
gR,v = 1,00
gR,h = 1,00
1.2.2 Soil:
Soil level: N1 = 0,000 (m)

Column pier level: Na = 1,600 (m)
Minimum reference level: Nf = -2,500 (m)
Water level: N max. = 0,000 (m) N min. = -1,000 (m)
Date : 14/01/15 Page : 3
Gravel
• Soil level: 0.000 (m)
• Unit weight: 1937.46 (kG/m3)
• Unit weight of solid:2702.25 (kG/m3)
• Internal friction angle: 38.0 (Deg)
• Cohesion: 0.00 (MPa)
1.2.3 Limit states
Stress calculations
Soil type under foundation: not layered

Design combination ULS : 12.unsymice_l N=283,75 Mx=1967,99 My=-
11321,33 Fx=-459,81 Fy=-75,07
Load factors: 1.35 * Foundation weight
1.35 * Soil weight
1.00 * Archimedes pressure
Calculation results: On the foundation level
Weight of foundation and soil over it: Gr = 5223,80 (kN)
Design load:
Nr = 5507,55 (kN) Mx = 2275,78 (kN*m) My = -13206,55 (kN*m)
Load eccentricity:
eB = -2,398 (m) eL = -0,413 (m)
Equivalent foundation dimensions:
B' = B - 2|eB| = 6,274 (m)
L' = L - 2|eL| = 8,004 (m)
Foundation depth: Dmin = 2,500 (m)
Allowable stress calculation method: Analytical
Coefficients of load capacity:

Ng = 27.74
Nc = 35.51
Nq = 23.19
Inclination factors:
ig = 0.81
ic = 0.88
iq = 0.88
Shape coefficient:
sg = 0.76
sc = 1.43
sq = 1.42
Factors of foundation base inclination:
bg = 1.00
bc = 1.00
bq = 1.00
Soil profile parameters:
C = 0.00 (MPa)
f = 0,66
g = 1220.48 (kG/m3)
qu = 1,51 (MPa)
Design soil pressure:
Date : 14/01/15 Page : 4
qlim = qu / gf = 1.51 (MPa)

gf = 1,00
Stress in soil: qref = 0.15 (MPa)

Safety factor: qlim / qref = 9.836 > 1
Uplift
Uplift in ULS
Design combination ULS : 12.unsymice_l N=283,75 Mx=1967,99 My=-
11321,33 Fx=-459,81 Fy=-75,07
1.00 * Soil weight
Contact area: s = 0,33
slim = 0,33
Sliding
Design combination ULS : 32.add_arm13 N=206,86 Mx=197,02 My=874,60

Fx=24,90 Fy=-4,89
1.00 * Soil weight
Design load:
Nr = 3204,44 (kN)Mx = 217,07 (kN*m) My = 976,69 (kN*m)
Equivalent foundation dimensions: A_ = 12,800 (m) B_ = 7,100 (m)
Sliding area: 90,880 (m2)
Foundation/soil friction coefficient: tan(dd) = 0,38
Cohesion: cu = 0.00 (MPa)
Soil pressure considered:
Hx = 24,90 (kN) Hy = -4,89 (kN)
Ppx = -468,86 (kN) Ppy = 845,27 (kN)
Pax = 26,53 (kN) Pay = -47,83 (kN)
Sliding force value Hd = 0,00 (kN)
Value of force preventing foundation sliding:
- On the foundation level: Rd = 1213,61 (kN)
Stabilility for sliding: ¥
Rotation
About OX axis
Design combination ULS : 1.Vind_ice_0 N=309,35 Mx=4465,35 My=-10,64
Fx=-0,57 Fy=-189,59
1.00 * Soil weight
Design load:
Nr = 3306,93 (kN)Mx = 5242,67 (kN*m) My = -12,98 (kN*m)
Stability moment: Mstab = 11739,59 (kN*m)
Rotation moment: Mrenv = 5242,67 (kN*m)
Date : 14/01/15 Page : 5

Stability for rotation: 2.239 > 1
About OY axis
Design combination: ULS : 12.unsymice_l N=283,75 Mx=1967,99 My=-
11321,33 Fx=-459,81 Fy=-75,07
1.00 * Soil weight
Design load:
Nr = 3281,33 (kN)Mx = 2275,78 (kN*m) My = -13206,55 (kN*m)
Stability moment: Mstab = 21000,50 (kN*m)
Rotation moment: Mrenv = 13206,55 (kN*m)
Stability for rotation: 1.59 > 1
1.3 RC design
1.3.1 Assumptions
· Exposure : XC2
· Structure class : S1
1.3.2 Analysis of punching and shear
Punching
Design combination ULS : 12.unsymice_l N=283,75 Mx=1967,99 My=-11321,33 Fx=-

459,81 Fy=-75,07
1.23 * Soil weight
Design load:
Nr = 5704,84 (kN) Mx = 2275,78 (kN*m) My = -13206,55 (kN*m)
Length of critical circumference: 23,182 (m)
Punching force: 382,46 (kN)
Section effective height heff = 1,430 (m)
Reinforcement ratio: r = 0.14 %
Shear stress: 0,49 (MPa)
Admissible shear stress: 0,50 (MPa)
Safety factor: 1.022 > 1
1.3.3 Required reinforcement
Spread footing:
bottom:
ULS : 12.unsymice_l N=283,75 Mx=1967,99 My=-11321,33 Fx=-459,81 Fy=-75,07

My = 5926,69 (kN*m) Asx = 20,57 (cm2/m)
ULS : 1.Vind_ice_0 N=309,35 Mx=4465,35 My=-10,64 Fx=-0,57 Fy=-189,59
Date : 14/01/15 Page : 6

Mx = 1833,62 (kN*m) Asy = 20,57 (cm2/m)
As min = 20,57 (cm2/m)
top:
ULS : 12.unsymice_l N=283,75 Mx=1967,99 My=-11321,33 Fx=-459,81 Fy=-75,07

My = -3929,68 (kN*m) A'sx = 20,57 (cm2/m)
ULS : 1.Vind_ice_0 N=309,35 Mx=4465,35 My=-10,64 Fx=-0,57 Fy=-189,59

Mx = -1080,38 (kN*m) A'sy = 20,57 (cm2/m)
As min = 20,57 (cm2/m)
Column pier:
Longitudinal reinforcement A = 192,20 (cm2) A min. = 192,20 (cm2)
A = 2 * (Asx + Asy)
Asx = 59,83 (cm2) Asy = 36,27 (cm2)
1.3.4 Provided reinforcement
Spread footing:
Bottom:
Along X axis:
47 B500BT 20 l = 12,680 (m) e = 1*-3,210 + 46*0,140
Along Y axis:
84 B500BT 20 l = 6,980 (m) e = 1*-6,215 + 83*0,150
Top:
Along X axis:
47 B500BT 20 l = 12,680 (m) e = 1*-3,210 + 46*0,140
Along Y axis:
84 B500BT 20 l = 6,980 (m) e = 1*-6,215 + 83*0,150
Pier
Longitudinal reinforcement
Along X axis:
14 B500BT 25 l = 4,276 (m) e = 1*-1,099 + 6*0,366
Along Y axis:
28 B500BT 25 l = 4,276 (m) e = 1*-1,466 + 13*0,225
Transversal reinforcement
13 B500BT 12 l = 12,155 (m) e = 1*1,628 + 12*0,200
2 Material survey:
· Concrete volume = 161,306 (m3)
· Formwork = 91,940 (m2)
· Steel B500BT
· Total weight = 6665,95 (kG)
· Density = 41,33 (kG/m3)
Date : 14/01/15 Page : 7

· Average diameter = 19,9 (mm)

· Survey according to diameters:
Diameter Length Number:

(m)
12 12,155 13
20 6,980 168
20 12,680 94
25 4,276 42
Date : 14/01/15 Page : 8

Foundation - Note

Încărcat de

Informații document

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Foundation - Note

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2015

Author: File: Pole 7_2_5m_under.rtd

1 Spread footing: Pole_7 Number: 1

· Geotechnic calculations according to : EN 1997-1:2008

d' = 2600,0 (mm)

· Concrete : C28/35; Characteristic strength = 28,00 MPa

Date : 14/01/15 Page : 1

(kN) (kN) (kN) (kN*m) (kN*m)

1.1.5 Combination list

Date : 14/01/15 Page : 2

30/ ULS : 30.evrdstrs N=247,57 Mx=1323,29 My=-11,95 Fx=-0,62 Fy=-51,29

1.2 Geotechnical design

· Cohesion reduction coefficient: 0,00

Soil level: N1 = 0,000 (m)

1.2.3 Limit states

Soil type under foundation: not layered

Allowable stress calculation method: Analytical

Coefficients of load capacity:

qlim = qu / gf = 1.51 (MPa)

Stress in soil: qref = 0.15 (MPa)

Design combination ULS : 32.add_arm13 N=206,86 Mx=197,02 My=874,60

Date : 14/01/15 Page : 5

Stability for rotation: 2.239 > 1

1.3.2 Analysis of punching and shear

Design combination ULS : 12.unsymice_l N=283,75 Mx=1967,99 My=-11321,33 Fx=-

1.3.3 Required reinforcement

ULS : 12.unsymice_l N=283,75 Mx=1967,99 My=-11321,33 Fx=-459,81 Fy=-75,07

ULS : 1.Vind_ice_0 N=309,35 Mx=4465,35 My=-10,64 Fx=-0,57 Fy=-189,59

Date : 14/01/15 Page : 6

Mx = 1833,62 (kN*m) Asy = 20,57 (cm2/m)

As min = 20,57 (cm2/m)

ULS : 12.unsymice_l N=283,75 Mx=1967,99 My=-11321,33 Fx=-459,81 Fy=-75,07

ULS : 1.Vind_ice_0 N=309,35 Mx=4465,35 My=-10,64 Fx=-0,57 Fy=-189,59

As min = 20,57 (cm2/m)

1.3.4 Provided reinforcement

Date : 14/01/15 Page : 7

· Average diameter = 19,9 (mm)

Diameter Length Number:

Date : 14/01/15 Page : 8

S-ar putea să vă placă și

(kN) (kN) (kN) (kNm) (kNm)