Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
FACTORIAL FUNCTIONS
Email: ejiswonders@gmail.com
1. Introduction
When we talk about factorials, it is easily recognized by students in higher
schools. Factorials have many functions in combinatorics. It can be used in binomial
distribution, special functions and many more. In this study, we shall see that factorial
has special types, instead of just an integer. We shall see them one after the other, and
relate them with existing theories.
1.1. Subfactorials
The subfactorial of an integer 𝑛 is the number of permutations of the set
{1,2, … , 𝑛} that fix no element [3]. It is given as
𝑛
(−1)𝑖
! 𝑛 = 𝑛! ∑ . (1.1)
𝑖!
𝑖=0
The proof of this formula is given in [10]. It is also termed derangement used by Euler
[10].
1.2. Superfactorials
The superfactorial of 𝑛 [3] is given by
𝑛
𝑆𝑓 (𝑛) = ∏ 𝑘! . (1.2)
𝑘=1
1.3. The Barnes G – Function
The Barnes G – function [2] is defined as
𝑛−1
𝐺 (𝑛 + 1) = ∏ 𝑘! . (1.3)
𝑘=1
1.4. The Hyperfactorials
For a positive integer 𝑛, the Hyperfactorial 𝐻(𝑛) is the number [1]
𝑛
𝐻 (𝑛 ) = ∏ 𝑘 𝑘 (1.4)
𝑘=1
𝐾 (𝑛 ) = ∏ 𝑘 𝑘 . (1.5)
𝑘=1
2. Methodology
In this session we see how we can related the special factorial functions defined
above.
2.1. Relationship between the K-Function and Hyperfactorial
3. Main Results
We have seen various relationships between the special factorial functions. Next is
to see how we can derive new functions through the relationships.
3.1. Expressions for the Superfactorial, subfactorial, hyperfactorial, K – Function,
Barnes G – Function, and the gamma Function.
We start from (2.5), we have
1
𝐻 (𝑛 + 1)𝐺(𝑛 + 1) 𝑛 !𝑛
( )
𝛤 𝑛+1 = [ ] = . (3.1)
(𝑛 + 1)(𝑛+1) (−1)𝑖
∑𝑛𝑖=1
𝑖!
From (3.1) we have the subfactorial function as
1 𝑛
𝐻 (𝑛 + 1)𝐺(𝑛 + 1) 𝑛 (−1)𝑖
!𝑛 = [ ] ∑ . (3.2)
(𝑛 + 1)(𝑛+1) 𝑖!
𝑖=1
Let,
𝑛+1 𝑛−1 𝑘
(3.5) becomes
[ΦH + ΦF ] − 𝑙𝑜𝑔(𝑛 + 1)
𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑆𝑓 (𝑛) = (3.6)
𝑛
Taking exponential to both sides, (3.6) becomes (3.7) given as
[ΦH + ΦG ] − 𝑙𝑜𝑔(𝑛 + 1) .
𝑆𝑓 (𝑛) = 𝑒𝑥𝑝 [ ] . (3.7)
𝑛
Let’s denote 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑆𝑓 (𝑛) by ΦSf , then we can get ΦH from (2.15), as
(3.8) is the log form of the hyperfactorial function. And we can get the hyperfactorial
function by taking exponential to both sides. This is given as
𝐻 (𝑛 + 1) = (𝑛 + 1)𝑛+1 𝐻 (𝑛)
we have
𝑒𝑥𝑝(𝑛ΦSf − ΦG + 𝑙𝑜𝑔(𝑛 + 1))
𝐻 (𝑛 ) = (3.10)
(𝑛 + 1)𝑛+1
(3.10) is an expression for the hyperfactorial function of 𝑛. We can as well find the 𝐾
function from equation (2.1), which is
Also, in the same way, we look for the Barnes 𝐺 – function of 𝑛. Solving (3.8)
algebraically we have
This is the log expression of the Barnes G – Function. To get the expression for the
Barnes G – Function, we take exponential to both side of equation (3.12). Thus,
In relation to the special factorial functions, we can now get the gamma function using
equation (3.3), (3.9), and (3.12) we have
ΦH + ΦG − 𝑙𝑜𝑔(𝑛 + 1)
𝑒𝑥𝑝 [ ]
𝑛
Γ (𝑛 + 1) = .
exp(𝑛ΦSf − ΦH + 𝑙𝑜𝑔(𝑛 + 1))
ΦH + ΦG − 𝑙𝑜𝑔(𝑛 + 1)
= 𝑒𝑥𝑝 [ – (exp(𝑛ΦSf − ΦH + 𝑙𝑜𝑔(𝑛 + 1)) ]
𝑛
(3.14) helps us the know that the gamma function can be expressed as the exponential
function of the special factorial (Hyperfactorial, superfactorial, and the banes G –
function). But, Γ(𝑛 + 1) = 𝑛Γ(𝑛).
Thus,
𝐸𝑘 (𝑛) = ∏ 𝑒 𝑘 . (3.17)
𝑘=1
Taking natural log to both sides of (3.17), we then have
𝑛
𝑛(𝑛 + 1)
𝑙𝑜𝑔𝐸𝑘 (𝑛) = ∑ 𝑘 = = Φ Ek . (3.18)
2
𝑘=1
(3.18) is the log form of the exponential factorial (3.17). Thus, the sum of the first 𝑛
natural numbers can be expressed as the log of the exponential factorials.
1
𝑛 𝑘
1
𝐻𝐹 (𝑛) = ∏ ( ) . (3.19)
𝑘
𝑘=1
Thus,
𝑛
1
𝐻𝐹 (𝑛) = 𝑒𝑥𝑝 [− ∑ 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑘 ] = exp(ΦH ). (3.21)
𝑘 F
𝑘=1
The fractional hyperfactorial function can also be written as the root factorial function
given as
𝑛
Thus we have
𝑛
1
𝑅𝑡 = 𝑒𝑥𝑝 ∑ 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑘. (3.24)
𝑘
𝑘=1
Hence, we say that the fractional hyperfactorial function is also a root function. But in
the case of equation (3.21) and (3.34), the reciprocal of the root function is the fractional
hyperfactorial function.
4. Conclusion
We have seen so far that the formulas obtained from the relationship between some
special factorial function. And we noticed that they are most in an exponential form. We
have seen that factorial does not end in an integer type. Also, there are more to come. The
formulas created should be tested further, moderated and be used by Mathematicians,
researchers and scientists.
REFERENCES
[3] Christian A., Grant C. (2013) Wilson Theorems for double-, hyper-, sub- and
super – factorials.
[4] Florian C (1929) History of mathematical notations vol. 2, The open Court
Publishing company, 1929.
[5] Elan S. (2006) An exploration of the Riemann Zeta function and its
application to the number theory of prime number distribution.
[6] Arkady A. (2014) Limits of Lalescu kind sequences with p-Hyperfactorial and
Superfactorial.
[7] Percy A.M. (2005) Combinatory Analysis, vol. 2, Cambridge University press,
1916; reprinted by Chelsea, New York, 1960.