DEA Report of Ancillary BLDG PDF

DETAIL ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
REPORT
FOR
EXISTING UTITY BUILDINGS FOR AURUM SWEATER LTD. AT
PLOT# 249/1, TELIPARA, GAZIPUR CHOWRASTA, GAZIPUR.
NAME OF THE CLIENT

AURUM SWEATER LTD.
Date of Submission: 10.04.2018

Submitted By:
Name of the Submitting Engineer
Engr. Abdul Quddus DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT SOLUTION

B.Sc. Engr. (Civil, BUET), Lane #23, House-#160/B, Ground Floor, New
DOHS, Mohakhali, Dhaka-1212,
DMINB/CE-0231 Mobile: +8801718612966,
MIEB-21384 E-mail: quddus_ce@yahoo.com
Web: www.ddslt.com
Lane #23, House-#160/B, Ground Floor, New DOHS,
Mohakhali, Dhaka-1212,
Mobile: +8801718612966,
E-mail: quddus_ce@yahoo.com
TABLE OF CONTENT
Sl No Description
ABSTRACT
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Scope of Work
3.0 Methodology
4.0 Structural Design Concept and criteria
4.1 Codes and Standards
4.2 Structural Framing System
4.3 Material Data
4.4 General Load Data
4.5 Load Combination
4.6 Design Method
4.7 Method of Analysis
4.8 Engineering software used for design
4.9 Foundation Depth & Type.
5.0 As-Built Drawing
6.0 Input Data
6.1 Static Load Cases
7.0 Structural Feasibility Data
7.1 Foundation feasibility check
7.2 Footing Adequacy check
7.3 Column Feasibility Data
7.4 Beam Feasibility Data
7.5 Slab Feasibility check
7.6 Steel part of Boiler Room
7.7 Steel Stair
8.0 Pictorial Evidence
9.0 Conclusion & Recommendation
Signature Of the Engineer
Attached documents
2
Mobile: +8801718612966,
ABSTRACT OF THE REPORT

Existing utility buildings for aurum sweater ltd. At plot# 249/1, telipara, Gazipur
chowrasta, Gazipur.is owned by Aurum Sweater Ltd. A non-engineered steel shad was situated
at the Boiler, Generator room which is built with brick column.
The Utility buildings were inspected by ACCORD in 6th July 2017 and the following problem has
been observed
1. Insufficient documents for utility buildings.

2. Apparently non-engineered connection (Generator & pump house)
We performed detailed engineering assessment and found that-
 All structural elements as column, beam, footing and slab adequacy has checked.
 All columns are adequate according to PMM ratio as 1.05.
A detailed calculation and analysis has been described in the rest of the report.
3
Mobile: +8801718612966,
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Existing utility buildings for aurum sweater ltd. At plot# 249/1, telipara, Gazipur
chowrasta, Gazipur has been re-analyzed for different loading conditions & different
load combinations accordingly. This report summarizes the analysis and design
related data
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
The design work of this Project has been carried out following the design criteria.
The scope of the work is as follows-
 Arranged As-Built Drawing.
 Determination of strength parameter of material used
 Analysis & comments on existing structure
 Produced retrofitting drawing where required.
3.0 METHODOLOGY
Based on the supplied Architectural Drawing, field measurement, scan report, core
cutting test of existing structure, we “DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT SOLUTION (DDS)”
developed a computer analysis model and carried out complete analysis of the
structure incorporating various design data as per ACCORD. Loading values is
considered by direct supervision of the project. The results obtained from computer
model analysis were checked against relevant specifications and hand calculations.
Finally, the design data is compared with the As Built drawing of this structure. If it is
satisfied then the structure is safe and sound, otherwise additional treatment is
provided for further uses.
4.0 STRUCTURAL DESIGN CONCEPT & CRITERIA
The structural element has been designed and considering the following criteria.
4.1 Codes and Standards
4.1.1 ACCORD Code.

4.1.2 American Concrete Institute (ACI318-99)
4.1.3 American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM)
4
Mobile: +8801718612966,
4.2 Structural Framing System
Selection of structural system depends on the building layout, column spacing, floor
height, maintenance requirement and available construction method. For this building
this parameter are given below-
 Structural Parameters
For Guard Room:
 Height of structure= 9'-5"

 Length= 15'-2", Width= 9'-5"
 No of story= 01
 Type of the Structure= Regular
 Type of Diaphragm= Rigid
For Compressor Room:

 Length= 21'-0", Width= 10'-0"
 No of story= 01
For Sub-Station Room:

 Length= 26'-0", Width= 20'-4"
For Boiler Room:

 Length= 39'-5", Width= 19'-1"
According to the detailing of as-built, it can be said that the framing is maintained IMRF.
So Intermediate Moment Resisting Frame System (IMRF) has been adopted for this
project. (Ref. BNBC, Part-6, Sec1.3
5
Mobile: +8801718612966,
4.3 Material Data
Concrete strength (fceq) 1500 psi (Minimum concrete strength has been adopted)
Yield strength of steel:
Yield strength of steel is 40ksi (Minimum yield strength for reinforcement bar)
4.4 General Load Data

Dead Load:
Dead load is the vertical load due to the self-weight of the permanent structural and non-structural
component of a building, e.g. Foundation, column, beam, walls, ceilings, permanent partitions and
fixed service equipment’s.
Unit weight of materials and the calculation of design dead loads are according to section-2.2,
Chapter-2, part-6, BNBC-Page6-22
Live Load:
Live load is the load superimposed by the use or occupancy of the building not including the
environmental loads such as wind load, rain load, earthquake load or dead load. (Ref. BNBC, Part-
6, Chapter-2, Sec-2.3.2)
But it should be not less than the minimum floor live load. (Ref. BNBC, Part-6, Chapter-2, Sec-
2.3.3)
Detail dead load (excluding structure self-weight) & live load on various floor levels are given below
as per different uses of the floor.
Wind Load:
The calculation of wind load confirms the sub-clause 2.4, Chapter 2, Part-6 of BNBC. The following
equation has been used to calculate sustained wind pressure of the structure.
Pz=CgCpCcCiCzVb2 [BNBC, 2.4.6.2, 2.4.6.3 Page-6-33, 6-34]
Wind load was applied in two orthogonal directions X and Y.
The following parameters are considered
1. Design wind speed = 215 km/hr
2. Exposure Type = A
3. Importance factor, I = 1.0
Earth quake Load:

As per specifications of BNBC, Part-6, Chapter-2, section-2.5.51, Equivalent Static Force Method
can be applied to calculate the earth quake force of this structure.
6
Mobile: +8801718612966,
Design Base Shear, V=ZICW/R (Ref. Sec2.5.6.1, Chapter-2, Part-6, BNBC)

Where,
1. Seismic Zone coefficient factor, Z=0.15 for Zone-02
(Ref.Table6.2.22 Sec2.5.6.1, Chap.-2, Part-6, BNBC)
2. Importance factor, I = 1.0
(Ref. Table 6.2.23 Sec2.5.6.1, Chap.-2, Part-6, BNBC)
3. Numerical Co-efficient, C=0.030
4. Response Modification factor, R=5
(Ref. Table 6.2.24 Sec2.5.6.2, Chap.-2, Part-6, BNBC)
Earth quake load was applied in two orthogonal directions X & Y.
4.5 Load Combination:
R.C.C structural member will be designed to have strength not less than the required to
resist the most unfavorable effect of the combination of the factored loads shown below.
1. 1.4DL
2. 1.2DL+1.6LL
3. 1.05DL+1.25LL+1.0W
4. 1.05DL+1.25LL+1.0EQ
For foundation, following load combination was considered
1. DL+LL
2. DL+LL+WL or EQ
33% Overstressing allowed when DL+LL+WL or EQ load governs.
Ref. BNBC, Part-6, Chap-3, Sec.-3.7.2.4
4.6 Design Method
Reinforcement concrete structure has been designed with Ultimate Strength Design (USD)
method has been adopted. Special provision for seismic design, Chapter 21 of ACI 38-99
and BNBC has been adopted.
4.7. Method of Analysis

Computer 3 Dimensional (3D) Model Analysis by ETABS 9.7.0 & STAAD PRO.
4.8. Engineering software used for design:

PCA Column, ACECOMS, Gear-2003.
7
Mobile: +8801718612966,
4.9 Foundation depth & foundation Type.
The allowable bearing capacity of soil at 4'-0" depth from existing ground level is considered
as per as-built drawings for all utility buildings.
Type of the foundation: Shallow Foundation (Individual column footing)
5.0 AS-BUILT DRAWING
As-Built drawing has been prepared on the basis of scan report, site investigation &
construction history. Detailed As-Built drawing has been provided in attached file.
6.0 INPUT DATA
6.1 Static Load Case
Load Case Type

DEAD DEAD
LIVE LIVE
WINDX WIND
WINDY WIND
EQX QUQKE
EQY QUAKE
7.0 STRUCTURAL FEASIBILITY DATA
7.1 Foundation Feasibility check:
Soil Bearing Capacity Calculation:

Calculation for Allowable soil pressure form unconfined compression test
According to Tarzaghi’s equation,
qult = CNcSc + γDf Nq + 0.5γBNγSγ
here,
Nγ= 0, for clay soil
C= q/2 q= 18.87 psi (Avg. unconfined compression strength from Soil test report)
=18.87/2 = 9.435 psi or 1.35 ksf
γ= 122.5 psf or 0.1225 ksf.
Sc= 1.3 for Square footing
Nc= 5.7 for Φ= 0º
Df= 4'-0"
Nq= 1.0 for Φ= 0º
8
Mobile: +8801718612966,
qult = 1.35 X 5.7 X 1.3 + 0.1225 X 4.0 X 1

= 10.5 ksf.
Allowable soil pressure, qa= qult / FS (Factor of Safety= 2.5)

= 10.5 / 2.5
= 4.2 ksf.
7.2 Footing Adequacy Check:

For Guard Room,
Figure: Footing Lay-out point label (FEM Model)
Table: Bearing Capacity Check
Allowable Bearing Capacity of soil , qa=2.1 tsf (FOS=2.5)
Service Load Area of footing Current

Point Footing ID. Remarks
(DL+LL) Kip sqft FOS
1 F1 14.5 16 8.28 ADEQUATE
2 F1 14.5 16 8.28 ADEQUATE
3 F1 14.5 16 8.28 ADEQUATE
4 F1 14.5 16 8.28 ADEQUATE
The bearing capacity is adequate against the all footing load.

9
Mobile: +8801718612966,
For Compressor Room,

1 F1 19.4 16 6.19 ADEQUATE

2 F1 17.5 16 6.86 ADEQUATE
3 F1 17.5 16 6.86 ADEQUATE
4 F1 19.4 16 6.19 ADEQUATE
10
Mobile: +8801718612966,
For Sub-station Room,

1 F1 22.4 16 5.36 ADEQUATE

2 F1 23.02 16 5.22 ADEQUATE
3 F1 36.04 16 3.33 ADEQUATE
4 F1 18.43 16 6.52 ADEQUATE
5 F1 18.25 16 6.58 ADEQUATE
6 F1 36.85 16 3.26 ADEQUATE
11
Mobile: +8801718612966,
7.3 Column Feasibility Check:
GUARD ROOM (PMM RATIO):

Concrete Design 1 - Column Summary Data - ACI 318-99
Story ColLine SecID PMMCombo PMMRatio
ROOF C1 C12X12 ACC5 0.336
GF C1 C15X15 ACC5 0.094
GF C2 C15X15 ACC5 0.094
GF C3 C15X15 ACC6 0.094
GF C4 C15X15 ACC6 0.094
Columns are adequate based on allowable PMM ratio as 1.05.
COMPRESSOR ROOM (PMM RATIO):

GF C1 C15X15 ACC5 0.119
GF C2 C15X15 ACC5 0.109
GF C3 C15X15 ACC6 0.109
GF C4 C15X15 ACC6 0.119
SUB-STATION ROOM (PMM RATIO):

STORY2 C1 C12X12 ACC6 0.554
12
Mobile: +8801718612966,

7.4 Beam Feasibility check:

GUARD ROOM:
Figure: Beam lay-out at roof
Maximum area of required positive rebar= 0.05 in2

Provided positive rebar area= 0.93 in2
So, the beam is OK.
Maximum area of required negative rebar= 0.3 in2

Provided negative rebar area= 1.55 in2
So, the beam is OK.
13
Mobile: +8801718612966,
COMPRESSOR ROOM:
Figure: Beam lay-out at roof

So, the beam is OK.

So, the beam is OK.
SUB-STATION ROOM:
14
Mobile: +8801718612966,

So, the beam is OK.

So, the beam is OK.
7.5. Slab Adequacy Check:
Guard Room
CAPACITY CALCULATION OF TWO WAY SLAB
Panel Size
Short Span (A) 14.167 feet
Long Span(B) 8.42 feet
m 1.68
Beta 0.594339
Thick ness 5 inch
Thickness req 3.0116 inch
So Thickness OK
Material Data
fy 60000 psi
f'c 1500 psi
Load Data
Floor Finish 25 Psf
Other Dead 0 Psf
Total Dead 87.5 Psf Coefficients (Case 1)
Liveload 30 Psf Posative Negative
Factored Load 173.5 Psf Cadl 0.071 Ca 0
Call 0.071 Cb 0
Cbdl 0.01325
Cbll 0.01325
15
Mobile: +8801718612966,
As req (Sq
Moments(Kip ft) d (Inch) Inch/feet) As Provided Feasibility
+MaDL 1.247 (Sq Inch/ feet)
+MaLL 0.427
+Ma(Total) 2.472 3.75 As+(short) 0.143 As+(short) 0.33 Ok
+MbDL 0.082
+MbLL 0.028
+Mb(Total) 0.163 3.25 As+(Long) 0.010 As+(Long) 0.264 Ok
-Ma 0.000 3.75 As-(short) 0.000 As-(short) 0.66 Ok
-Mb 0.000 3.25 As-(Long) 0.000 As-(Long) 0.528 Ok
So Slab is ok in thickness and reinforcement
Compressor room
ONE WAY SIMPLY SUPPORTED SLAB
Short Span= 9 ft MOMENT CALC.

Long Span= 20 ft
Thickness (req.)= 5.4 inch Midspan, +M= 0.6 kips-ft
Thickness (pro.)= 5 inch Support, -M= 1.2 kips-ft
LOAD
Floor Finish= 25 psf Max. RHO= 0.0078
self wt= 62.5 psf
Other Dead= 0 psf Area (req.)= 0.04 in2 at midspan
Live Load= 30 psf Area (pro.)= 0.4 in2 at midspan
Total Load= 117.5 psf Area (req.)= 0.27 in2 at support
Factored Load= 182.125 psf Area (pro.)= 0.6 in2 at support
f'c 1.5 ksi
fy= 60 ksi OKAY for midspan reinforcement
(d-a/2)= 3.75 inch OKAY for support reinforcement
Assume,a= 1 inch
16
Mobile: +8801718612966,
Sub-station Room
CAPACITY CALCULATION OF TWO WAY SLAB
Panel Size
Short Span (A) 14 feet
Long Span(B) 18.58 feet
m 0.75
Beta 1.327143
Thick ness 5 inch
Thickness req 4.344 inch
So Thickness OK
Material Data
fy 60000 psi
f'c 1500 psi
Load Data
Floor Finish 25 Psf
Other Dead 0 Psf
Total Dead 87.5 Psf Coefficients (Case 6)
Liveload 30 Psf Positive Negative
Factored Load 173.5 Psf Cadl 0.048 Ca 0.088
Call 0.055 Cb 0
Cbdl 0.012
Cbll 0.016
As req (Sq
Moments(Kip ft) d (Inch) Inch/feet) As Provided Feasibility
+MaDL 0.823 (Sq Inch/ feet)
+MaLL 0.323
+Ma(Total) 1.702 3.75 As+(short) 0.096 As+(short) 0.33 Ok
+MbDL 0.362
+MbLL 0.166
+Mb(Total) 0.789 3.25 As+(Long) 0.050 As+(Long) 0.264 Ok
-Ma 2.993 3.75 As-(short) 0.176 As-(short) 0.66 Ok
-Mb 0.000 3.25 As-(Long) 0.000 As-(Long) 0.528 Ok
So Slab is ok in thickness and reinforcement
17
Mobile: +8801718612966,
7.6 Steel part of Boiler room:

BEFORE RETROFITTING:
Fig: Unity Check of Boiler room
AFTER RETROFITTING:
Fig: Unity Check of Boiler Room
18
Mobile: +8801718612966,
It has been observed that some steel columns and rafter as well as some truss members meet
beyond the allowable ratio. So, It is needed of retrofitting.
Details of retrofitting has been added in CAD Drawings.
7.7. Steel Stair

Pictorial view of steel stair:
Fig: Steel Stair of roof position
Unity Check for steel stair:
19
Mobile: +8801718612966,
It is observed that there is no need of retrofitting work.

Hence, Adequate.
8 PICTORIAL EVIDENCE
20
Mobile: +8801718612966,
21
Mobile: +8801718612966,
9.0 CONCLUTION & RECOMMENDATIONS:
 All columns pass according to load combination of ACCORD. All beams are
adequate due to shear & torsion. So beams retrofitting are not required.
 All roof slab is adequate.
 All footing is adequate due to bearing capacity check. So footings retrofitting are not
required
Thanking You
Md. Abdul Quddus

B.Sc Engg. (Civil, BUET)
MIEB-21384, DMINB/CE-0231
CEO & Structural Designer
DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT SOLUTION
Attachments:
1. Soil test report
2. Profile of consulting firm (DDS)
22
Mobile: +8801718612966,
ATTACHMENT 01
OCCUPANCY CERTIFICATE
23
Mobile: +8801718612966,
24
Mobile: +8801718612966,
ATTACHMENT 02
Soil Test Report
25
Mobile: +8801718612966,
ATTACHMENT 03
CORE TEST REPORT
26
Mobile: +8801718612966,
27
Mobile: +8801718612966,
28
Mobile: +8801718612966,
29
Mobile: +8801718612966,
30
Mobile: +8801718612966,
31
Mobile: +8801718612966,
32
Mobile: +8801718612966,
ATTACHMENT 08
Profile of Consulting Firm
33

DEA Report of Ancillary BLDG PDF

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

DEA Report of Ancillary BLDG PDF

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

DETAIL ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT

NAME OF THE CLIENT

Date of Submission: 10.04.2018

Name of the Submitting Engineer

Engr. Abdul Quddus DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT SOLUTION

ABSTRACT OF THE REPORT

1. Insufficient documents for utility buildings.

We performed detailed engineering assessment and found that-

2.0 SCOPE OF WORK

4.0 STRUCTURAL DESIGN CONCEPT & CRITERIA

4.1 Codes and Standards

4.1.1 ACCORD Code.

4.2 Structural Framing System

For Guard Room:

 Height of structure= 9'-5"

For Compressor Room:

 Height of structure= 14'-3"

For Sub-Station Room:

 Height of structure= 12'-5"

For Boiler Room:

 Height of structure= 17'-83"

4.3 Material Data

Yield strength of steel:

4.4 General Load Data

Earth quake Load:

Design Base Shear, V=ZICW/R (Ref. Sec2.5.6.1, Chapter-2, Part-6, BNBC)

Earth quake load was applied in two orthogonal directions X & Y.

4.5 Load Combination:

For foundation, following load combination was considered

4.6 Design Method

4.7. Method of Analysis

4.8. Engineering software used for design:

4.9 Foundation depth & foundation Type.

Type of the foundation: Shallow Foundation (Individual column footing)

5.0 AS-BUILT DRAWING

6.0 INPUT DATA

6.1 Static Load Case

Load Case Type

7.0 STRUCTURAL FEASIBILITY DATA

7.1 Foundation Feasibility check:

Soil Bearing Capacity Calculation:

qult = 1.35 X 5.7 X 1.3 + 0.1225 X 4.0 X 1

Allowable soil pressure, qa= qult / FS (Factor of Safety= 2.5)

7.2 Footing Adequacy Check:

Figure: Footing Lay-out point label (FEM Model)

Table: Bearing Capacity Check

Allowable Bearing Capacity of soil , qa=2.1 tsf (FOS=2.5)

Service Load Area of footing Current

1 F1 14.5 16 8.28 ADEQUATE

2 F1 14.5 16 8.28 ADEQUATE

3 F1 14.5 16 8.28 ADEQUATE

4 F1 14.5 16 8.28 ADEQUATE

The bearing capacity is adequate against the all footing load.

For Compressor Room,

Figure: Footing Lay-out point label (FEM Model)

Table: Bearing Capacity Check

Allowable Bearing Capacity of soil , qa=2.1 tsf (FOS=2.5)

Service Load Area of footing Current

1 F1 19.4 16 6.19 ADEQUATE

The bearing capacity is adequate against the all footing load.

For Sub-station Room,

Figure: Footing Lay-out point label (FEM Model)

Table: Bearing Capacity Check