Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Ray Ballou,
BASF, Senior Applications & Development Engineer
Marianne Morgan
BASF, Powertrain Sector Leader
Presentation Outline
Materials
Plain Stamped Steel
Metal-Plastic-Metal (MPM) aka Quiet Steel
Provides sump capacity only
Aluminum Pan Designs
• “Split” Pan
Al upper with a stamped lower pan
Toyota Pan
Why Thermoplastic Oil Pan
Modules?
The Value Proposition…….
Weight Reduction
Windage Tray with cam scraper function
40 to 55%
Cost Reduction Oil Pick up Tube
Piece price
Lowered assembly cost
through integration
Reduction of Secondary
Operations
Welding, painting,
machining
Oil Pan with oil collection
channels
OEM Complexity Reduction -
Fewer parts to manage Chrysler, 5.7L Hemi Oil Pan Module
SOP 2010
Sump Volume Increase Supplier: MAHLE
Greater design freedom Material: BASF Ultramid® B3ZG7 OSI
Thermoplastic Oil Pan
Design Considerations
Oil Pan Specific Design Concerns
Japan, Korea, China and Russia primarily use CaCl2 road salt – more
aggressive than NaCl2, FWD more exposed to curb impact
European light vehicles generally have underbody shields to reduce drag
= improved fuel economy, no to little CaCl2 usage
NA – stone impact is key area of concern. Curb impact has not been an
issue as yet based on higher up in the vehicle
Structural Oil Pan Concern
Powertrain Bending
source: MTZ
Bottom Rear
Bottom Rear Temperature Survey
P221 54L3V Composite Oil Pan Bottom Ctr RH Side
LH Side Test # 004
Rear wall Vehicle P221 311 W887 Bottom Frt
100
90
80
70
Temperature, Celsius
60
50
40
Range of Stabilized Oil temperature
30
Oil_pan_bottom_front Oil_pan_bottom_center
20
Oil_pan_bottom_rear Oil_pan_back_wall
10 Oil_pan_RH_side Oil_pan_LH_side
Dip_stick
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200
Time Time
Design Considerations
“Picking a metal-to-plastic Candidate”
Engine Design – relative to Powertrain bending management
Attachment scheme between engine and transmission
Photoelectric
Barrier for Impactor Oil Pan
Velocity Fixture
Measurement
Pneumatic
Driven Cylinder
Stone Impact Performance
Baseline target development
8 pans of each type at 4 points, no leakage testing
Cracking energy varied – average range – 27 to 38.8 j
Average crack initiation energy – 33 joules
Stone Impact Solution
Waffle Ribs and Ultramid OSI
“Optimized for Stone Impact” Resins
Unique rib pattern with specially formulated impact modified resin
Multiple impact performance
• 1 time impact
• Energy absorption more
location dependent than
waffle ribs
• Requires adequate space to
package
• Adds more weight to part
than waffle rib
Stone Impact Simulation
ULTRASIMtm
BASF ULTRASIM™
• Excellent correlation to
test results
Low Speed Large Stone
Laboratory Tesing
Glancing Impact
Curb impact analysis is
achieved by changing the
boundary conditions
• 165 mm Diameter
• 4kg
• 50km/h
• -30°C
Engine Weight Static Load
Testing
Some Oil Pans must support engine during installation / repair
Test Equipment
Contact angle 0°
Universal testing machine
Static Load Testing
at 0° Crush Angle
• MPM Pan – deforms at 5 KN, part failure
• Plastic Pan deforms @ 5 KN, No cracks – all plastic
deformation!
Side of Vehicle - 2
Similar performance
Driver’s Right Ear - 3
3
1
Plastic – dark green
2
Ford Scorpion 6.7L
Thermoplastic Oil Pan Plug Design
Oil Drain Plug Innovation!
First plastic drain plug
First drain plug with a cam lock design.
Locking
Tabs
Drive interface
22
Commercial Successes!
Serial Production
Engineering Plastic
Oil Pans
Serial Production Engineering
Plastic Oil Pan Applications
2003........... 2008 2009 2010
Daimlar, Actros
Class 8 Truck
1st thermplastic Pan
Material: BASF Ultramid® Resin
MTU BR1600
Material: BASF Ultramid® Resin
Chrysler, 5.7L Hemi
New level of part integration
Unique Oil movement features
Material: BASF Ultramid® Resin
Questions!