Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Latin American History in the United States: From Gentlemen Scholars to Academic
Specialists
Author(s): Marshall C. Eakin
Source: The History Teacher, Vol. 31, No. 4 (Aug., 1998), pp. 539-561
Published by: Society for History Education
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/494316
Accessed: 04-05-2018 23:32 UTC
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/494316?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
Society for History Education is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to The History Teacher
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American History in the United States:
From Gentlemen Scholars to Academic Specialists
Marshall C. Eakin
Vanderbilt University
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
540 Marshall C. Eakin
The Beginni
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American History in the United States 541
Professionalization
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
542 Marshall C. Eakin
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American History in the United States 543
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
544 Marshall C. Eakin
Between the 1940s and the early 1960s the field continued to gro
slowly and the number of academically-trained historians of Latin Ameri
expanded. Although Bolton and his students trained ever larger num
of historians as specialists in Latin American history, some of the m
figures of this generation were trained more broadly in the histor
Western Civilization. They approached Latin America as a part of t
process of the expansion of European civilization. The great figures
this generation, in time, became the senior scholars who witnessed
boom in Latin American history after 1959. Born around the time of
First World War or shortly thereafter, this generation did their gra
work in the late forties and early fifties. They were generally in their l
thirties or early forties when the boom began.
Alexander Marchant and Richard Morse are prime examples of so
of the last historians of Latin America trained not as specialists, b
generalists.28 Marchant (1912-1980), born in Rio de Janeiro to child
of Confederate expatriates, did his doctoral work at Johns Hopkins in
1930s under the guidance of Frederic Chapin Lane, an eminent histo
of European expansion. Marchant's chose as his dissertation topic
Portuguese settlement of Brazil because it was a poorly studied part o
process of the "expansion overseas of the peoples of Europe in
sixteenth century."29 When his dissertation appeared as a book in 194
was only the second academic monograph on Brazilian history publis
in the United States, a sure sign of how historical studies on Brazil la
far behind work on Spanish America.30
Richard Morse (b. 1922), another Brazilianist, was also trained broa
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American History in the United States 545
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
546 Marshall C. Eakin
as much as eighty t
years have general
The "Berkeley Sc
demography, anth
(1920-85), who did
pushed the field
The Aztecs Under
in history and ant
work of the Berk
colonialists from
discovery of the
still relied on Span
Aztecs.
This generation also moved economic history increasingly to the
forefront of the field. Perhaps the most influential figure in this area was
Stanley Stein (b. 1920), a Harvard Ph.D. (1951) who worked with Clarence
Haring. In 1957 Stein published two fundamental books on Brazilian
economic history (both rural and urban), The Brazilian Cotton Manufac-
ture and Vassouras: A Brazilian Coffee County, 1850-1900.39 The latter,
in particular, exerted enormous influence on scholars of slavery. Much
like Gibson's Mexico, Stein's Brazil took shape out of the notarial
archives of municipalities, bringing to light in greater detail than ever
before the lives of not only the elites, but also the lower classes.
In many ways the most influential scholar of this generation was
Howard F. Cline (1915-71), another Harvard Ph.D. (1947). Cline was
perhaps the prime organizer and promoter of the field in the United States
in the 1950s and 1960s. As director of the Hispanic Foundation at the
Library of Congress he spearheaded some of the most important projects
in the field, including the first National Directory of Latin Americanists
and the two-volume compilation, Latin American History: Essays on Its
Study and Teaching, 1898-1965.40 Cline was also a key figure in mobiliz-
ing government and foundation funds to support Latin American studies
in the United States
By 1960 Latin American history in the United States had clearly
emerged as a small, but vibrant, field with a number of excellent scholars
producing important works. Since 1955 the Conference on Latin Ameri-
can history had awarded the Herbert Eugene Bolton Prize each year to the
best book published in the field, and graduate programs were in place at
major United States universities including Berkeley, Stanford, Texas,
Duke, Harvard, and Yale. The early sixties, however, would witness a
"boom" in Latin American history (and Latin American studies) funda-
mentally transforming the profession.
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American History in the United States 547
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
548 Marshall C. Eakin
topics-political, e
although the domi
history. In particula
American turned i
peasants, slaves-wr
cal science, econom
Although much o
emphasis on politic
clearly in the direc
history. The shift
John Womack' s Z
his Harvard dissert
book in Latin Am
scholars of other r
especially the rol
peasant rebellions
Probably no other b
many readers.
Although scholars
after 1970 historian
masses-peasants, s
race relations alrea
Frank Tannenbau
(1946).45 Unlike Ta
and harshness of s
United States, prod
Black Nor White:
States (1971), winn
the Caribbean and
workers also began
the 1980s that bot
deserve. Much of t
cross-fertilization
influence was in w
rise of dependency
ence of Marxist th
1970s (although nev
The most influent
States was Stanley
America (1970).49
though to a much s
few practitioners.50
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American History in the United States 549
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
550 Marshall C. Eakin
An important sig
proliferation of co
In addition to the
Review and the A
interdisciplinary j
and the Journal of
formation of Latin
States, the other i
disciplinary journ
American History
subspecialities form
example, Brazilian
the Conference on
Latin America: A G
graphical and histo
Professionaliz
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American History in the United States 551
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
552 Marshall C. Eakin
States academic co
historians in the s
monographs analy
Studies of "mode
theme and promin
United States influ
intellectual curren
less influential in
struggled to salvag
Some of the mos
studies of family,
pean history, fam
ties.65 In the eigh
ested in gender a
subfields within th
much of this work
by scholars in ant
studies.66 Through
tions of the social
range views of hist
An important sign
tion of textbooks,
now support a var
American history,
period,70 the ninete
Griffin's Latin Am
badly in need of a
Latin America in the American Historical Association's Guide to His-
torical Literature (1995), and the massive Cambridge History of Latin
America (1984- ) are sure signs of a field that has achieved maturity.73
Epilog
The field of Latin American history in the United States has come a
very long way since the days of Washington Irving and William Hickling
Prescott. The small club of nineteenth-century gentlemen scholars have
been replaced at the end of the twentieth century by hundreds of profes-
sional historians trained and working primarily in universities. The Ph.D.
dissertation and the highly specialized academic monograph have be-
come the primary means of entry and success in the field since the 1960s.
While some scholars continue to produce wide-ranging, synthetic or
interpretive works, the principal trend in the profession is toward increas-
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American History in the United States 553
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
554 Marshall C. Eakin
temporally, spatial
from the Caribbea
States has also giv
States.79 Finally, t
derlands has also h
United States and Latin America more fluid.80
Another important factor in the development of the field in the United
States has been the development of graduate degree programs in Latin
American universities and an ever growing flow of scholars across the
region, Latin Americans coming to the United States to study or teach,
and United States historians teaching and doing research in Latin America.
The rapidly growing number of academic historians (especially in large
countries like Brazil and Mexico) has significantly increased the amount
of research being published, and the difficulties of those wishing to keep
up with developments outside their own narrow regional and thematic
focus. These trends, especially the growth of graduate programs in Latin
America, will hasten the trend toward specialization and fragmentation.
The primary benefit of rising numbers of academically-trained histori-
ans across the Americas and greater interaction with United States histo-
rians is increasing cross-fertilization. The old stereotype of two tradi-
tions-the archivally-bound, empiricist United States historian and the
theory-loving, interpretive Latin American historian-is less true now
that it ever was. Latin Americans have become much more empiricist and
United States historians of Latin American less so through a process of
cross-fertilization over the past three decades. In the era of e-mail and the
fax machine this process will surely continue, if not accelerate. The end
result, one hopes, will be a growing community of historians throughout
the hemisphere who are more cosmopolitan and less parochial than their
predecessors, and who will write better history.
Notes
1. These figures have been calculated using Dissertation Abstracts for 1990-95.
The number of Ph.D. programs in history in the United States in 1993 was 124. Paul
Conkin, "Bleak Outlook for Academic History Jobs," AHA Perspectives (April 1993), 10.
2. To trace the development of the field in Latin American and European nations
is an enormous task that is beyond the scope of this essay. For a stimulating essay on the
field since 1960, see Thomas E. Skidmore, "United States Scholarly Writing on Latin
American History, 1960-1995," paper presented at the San Marino Conference on United
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American History in the United States 555
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
556 Marshall C. Eakin
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American History in the United States 557
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
558 Marshall C. Eakin
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American History in the United States 559
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
560 Marshall C. Eakin
1574-1821 (Stanford, C
Women of Mexico City
Ram6n A. Gutidrrez,
Sexuality, and Power i
Press, 1991). See, also,
ed., Latin America and
CT: Greenwood Press,
67. An excellent exam
ers and Chile's Road to
68. Some of the journa
Mexicanos (1985), Cuba
can Review (1992), and
69. The most promine
5th ed., 2 v. (Boston: Ho
History of Latin Amer
Edwin Williamson, The
70. James Lockhart a
Colonial Spanish Amer
Mark A. Burkholder and
Oxford University Pres
71. David Bushnell an
Nineteenth Century (Ne
72. Thomas E. Skidmo
York: Oxford Universit
73. Mark A. Burkhold
America Since 1800," in
Guide to Historical Lite
1198 and 1199-1238; Les
(Cambridge: Cambridg
Covington, ed., Latin A
(Westport, CT: Greenwo
raphy.
74. According to Dissertation Abstracts, the major producers of doctorates in Latin
American history have been Berkeley, UCLA, Florida, Texas, New Mexico, Yale,
Stanford, and Chicago.
75. Eric Van Young, "Recent Anglophone Scholarship on Mexico and Central
America in the Age of Revolution (1750-1850)," Hispanic American Historical Review,
65:4 (November 1985), 725.
76. In fact, the trend that had the most influence on others in the 1970s and 1980s-
dependency theory-originated in Latin America, and had much less resonance among
United States historians.
77. Nancy M. Farriss, Maya Society Under Colonial Rule: The Collective Enter-
prise of Survival (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984); Inga Clendinnen,
Ambivalent Conquests: Maya and Spaniard in Yucatan, 1517-1570 (Cambridge: Cam-
bridge University Press, 1987); James Lockhart, The Nahuas After the Conquest: A Social
and Cultural History of the Indians of Central Mexico, Sixteenth through Eighteenth
Centuries (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992).
78. In Keen's and Williamson's texts include the twenty traditional nations, i.e.,
Brazil, Haiti, and eighteen countries that gained their independence from Spain in the
nineteenth century. Skidmore and Smith include the English-speaking Caribbean. Al-
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Latin American History in the United States 561
This content downloaded from 148.211.148.72 on Fri, 04 May 2018 23:32:55 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms