Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
)
MOHAN A. HARIHAR, )
)
Appellant )
) Case No. 17-1381
v. )
)
US BANK, et al )
)
Defendants/Appellees )
)
APPELLANT DISCLOSURE
The gravity of serious legal issues addressed in this Appeal (lower court Docket No. 15-cv-
11880), and in the RELATED Appeal,1 include (but are not limited to): 1.) evidenced
allegations of TREASON under ARTICLE III, Section 3 of the Constitution, and 2.)
Economic Espionage pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1832, which are believed to impact matters of
National Security. The evidenced allegations against referenced officers of the Court
filed with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) against the TEN (10) identified Federal
1
The related Appeal references HARIHAR v. THE UNITED STATES, Appeal No. 17-cv-
2074 (Also, lower court Docket No. 17-cv-11109).
1
(Circuit and District) Court Judges. Therefore, copies of this MOTION are necessarily sent
9. Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief
Program (SIGTARP);
A copy will also be made available to the PUBLIC, as this judiciary’s effort to “promote
public confidence in the impartiality of the judicial process,” has irrefutably been
compromised. By informing the Public, ALL AMERICANS serve here as WITNESS. Parties
are additionally informed for documentation purposes, and out of the Appellant’s continued
2
COMES NOW the Appellant, who necessarily files this MOTION following the June 8, 2018
decision by SCOTUS to grant a timeline extension to the Appellant for filing his Petition for
Writ of Certiorari. On June 14, 2018, this First Circuit Appeals Court acknowledged the
SCOTUS decision, informing all parties by email, Document: 00117301445, Entry ID:
6176899.
more however, is that the Appellees made NO EFFORT to oppose ANY of the Appellant’s
reasons for requesting this extension. This now creates a substantial conflict(s) with their
position here, and AT MINIMUM re-affirms the original FRAUD ON THE COURT CLAIM
pursuant to FRCP 60(b)(3). Also, since Appellees chose not to file any opposition with the
Supreme Court, similarly, they CANNOT be allowed to bring an opposing position here.
As this Court addresses the list of unresolved issues including Judge Barron’s recusal, the
SHOULD finally be UPHELD under FRCP 60(b)(3), in favor of the Appellant – MOHAN
A. HARIHAR, with prejudice. This corrective action SHOULD bring a reversal of judgment,
and by doing so MAY allow for consideration in resolving (at least a portion of) existing judicial
misconduct issues and filing a Petition for Writ of Certiorari may no longer be deemed
necessary.
2
Reference the June 4, 2018 filed RESPONSE to Judge David Barron’s RECUSAL, which
provides a (partial) list of unresolved issues which must be addressed before the Appellant can
appropriately file his Petition for Writ of Certiorari (if it even becomes necessary).
3
The Appellant is grateful for the Court’s efforts to address and initiate the referenced corrective
action(s). For documentation purposes, after sending a copy of this MOTION to the attention of
The President, confirmation of its receipt is attached (See Attachment A) with the filed Court
copy. If there is a question regarding ANY portion of this motion, the Appellant is happy to
provide additional supporting information upon request, in a separate hearing and with the
Mohan A. Harihar
Appellant
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
Mo.harihar@gmail.com
4
Attachment A
5
6
7
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on June 20, 2018 I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court
using the CM/ECF System, which will send notice of such filing to the following registered
CM/ECF users:
Jeffrey B. Loeb
David Glod
David E. Fialkow
Kevin Patrick Polansky
Matthew T. Murphy
Kurt R. McHugh
Jesse M. Boodoo
Mohan A. Harihar
Appellant
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)
Mo.harihar@gmail.com