Aachen Gambit

N N
Database: 31-XII-2010 (4,399,153 games)
Report: 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 b4 (4 games)
ECO: B00v [Nimzowitsch Defence: Aachen Gambit]
Generated by Scid 4.2.2, 2011.02.15

rZblkans
opo0opop
0Z0Z0Z0Z
Z0ZPZ0Z0
0m0O0Z0Z
Z0Z0Z0Z0
POPZ0OPO
SNAQJBMR
0.1 Statistics and History
0.1.1 Statistics
1 1
Games 1:0 :
2 2
0:1 Score
All report games 4 2 0 2 50.0%

0.1.2 Oldest games

1: 0:1(55) Tegzes – Brandics, 1998 4
2: 0:1(41) Lynch Seth – Brokvam Roy, 1999 3
3: 1:0(11) Bradley Michael – Gag Poh Teo William, 1999 1
4: 1:0(14) Preuss Marco – Krafft Holger Thorsten, 2001 2

0.1.3 Newest games

1: 1:0(14) Preuss Marco – Krafft Holger Thorsten, 2001 2
2: 0:1(41) Lynch Seth – Brokvam Roy, 1999 3
3: 1:0(11) Bradley Michael – Gag Poh Teo William, 1999 1
4: 0:1(55) Tegzes – Brandics, 1998 4

0.1.4 Current popularity

Year 1800-99 1900-49 1950-69 1970-79 1980-89 1990-99 2000-09
Once every X games — — — — — 531559 1923931
Frequency in all years: once every 1099788 games
In the 10 years to today: once every 0 games (no change from all years)
In the 5 years to today: once every 0 games (no change from all years)
In the 1 year to today: once every 0 games (no change from all years)
0.1.5 Most frequent players (White)
1: 1 1998 0% Tegzes, Laszlo 4
2: 1 1999 100% Bradley Michael 1
3: 1 1999 0% Lynch Seth 3
4: 1 2001 100% Preuss Marco 2

0.1.6 Most frequent players (Black)

1: 1 1998 100% Brandics, Jozsef 4
2: 1 1999 0% Gag Poh Teo William 1
3: 1 1999 100% Brokvam Roy 3
4: 1 2001 0% Krafft Holger Thorsten 2

0.2 Ratings and Performance

0.2.1 Average ratings and performance
White rating: 0 (0 games); White performance: 0 (0% vs 0)
Black rating: 0 (0 games); Black performance: 0 (0% vs 0)

0.2.2 Games with highest average rating

1: 0:1(55) Tegzes – Brandics, 1998 4
2: 0:1(41) Lynch Seth – Brokvam Roy, 1999 3
3: 1:0(14) Preuss Marco – Krafft Holger Thorsten, 2001 2
4: 1:0(11) Bradley Michael – Gag Poh Teo William, 1999 1

0.3 Result Trends

0.3.1 Result lengths and frequencies
Score Game length Frequency
1:0 12 : 12 0:1 1:0 1 1
:
2 2
0:1
Report games 50.0% 12 0 48 50.0% 0.0% 50.0%
All games 53.9% 39 35 40 38.6% 30.5% 30.7%

0.3.2 Shortest wins (White)

1: 1:0(11) Bradley Michael – Gag Poh Teo William, 1999 1
2: 1:0(14) Preuss Marco – Krafft Holger Thorsten, 2001 2

0.3.3 Shortest wins (Black)

1: 0:1(41) Lynch Seth – Brokvam Roy, 1999 3
2: 0:1(55) Tegzes – Brandics, 1998 4
0.4 Moves and Themes
0.4.1 Move orders reaching the report position

N N
There was only one move order reaching this position:
1: 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 b4 (4)

0.4.2 Moves from the report position

Move ECO Frequency Score µElo Perf µYear % Draws

B
1 c3 1: 25.0% 0.0% 1998 0%

B
2 b5+ 1: 25.0% 100.0% 1999 0%

B
3 e3 1: 25.0% 0.0% 1999 0%
4 c4 1: 25.0% 100.0% 2001 0%
Total 4: 100.0% 50.0% 1999 0%

0.4.3 Positional Themes

Frequency of themes in the first 20 moves of each game:
Same-side castling: 25% White Isolated Queen Pawn: 0%
Opposite castling: 0% Black Isolated Queen Pawn: 0%
Kingside pawn storm: 50% White Pawn on 5/6/7th rank: 75%
Queens exchanged: 75% Black Pawn on 2/3/4th rank: 0%
Only one side has Bishop pair: 0% Open c/d/e file: 0%

0.4.4 Endgames

R Q QR
Material at the end of each game:

p BN R BN Q BN QR BN
Report games 0% 25% 0% 25% 0% 0% 0% 50%
All games 3% 9% 9% 25% 2% 4% 4% 43%
 0.5 Theory Table
N N
1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 b4: +2 =0 –2 (2/4: 50%)
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
B B N Ne5 Qa4+ N
B Q N Qf5 Kd8 N
1 b5+ xd7+ c4 a3 f3 c3 1: 100%
d7 xd7 c6 a6 cxd5 c51
B N B B N Qxg4 Qe4 Q
N B N N Q Rd8 R
2 c4 c3 d3 xf5 xd5 xd5 1: 100%
f6 f5 g4 xd5 xd5 h5 xd52
B B N N Nf3 Q
N N N Bd6 Ng4 Q
3 e3 c4 e2 OO d2 fxe3 d2 1: 0%
xd5 c6 gf6 e6 xe3 c73
N B N Nc4 Nxd6+ Q
N B B Nge7 Qxd6 N
4 c3 f3 d3 OO bd2 e2 1: 0%
xd5 c6 g4 e6 d6 g64

1
1:0 Bradley Michael – Gag Poh Teo William,
1999.
2
B R B
12. h3 e5 13.dxe5 xe5+ 14. e3 1:0 Preuss
Marco – Krafft Holger Thorsten, 2001.
3
N N Q B Q
B Q R B N
12. f4 xe3 13. xe3 xf4 14. f2 OO

B Q Q K Q
15. d3 b5 16. h4 h6 17. ae1 b7 18. e5
g5 19. h5 c5 20.dxc5 xc5+ 21. h1 c7
0:1(41) Lynch Seth – Brokvam Roy, 1999.
4
B Q Q N B
R N K N N
12. xg6 hxg6 13. e5 xe5 14. xe5 f5

B B B
15. e1 f6 16. c4 d7 17. e3 g5 18. xd5
cxd5 19.f4 gxf4 20. xf4 g5 21. g3 e4
0:1(55) Tegzes – Brandics, 1998.