Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region IV - B MIMAROPA
DIVISION OF MARINDUQUE
District of Mogpog
MOGPOG NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH
Capayang, Mogpog, Marinduque

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REV

June 2016 - March 2017

Name of Employee: GEMMA J. JANDUSAY

Position: Teacher I
School: MOGPOG NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE H

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING

KEY RESULT WEIGHT

MAJOR FINAL AREAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER PERFORMANCE INDIC
OUTPUTS
(KRAs) KRA

5
Manage school resources in
accordance with Deped 4
policies and accounting rules 10%
and regulations and other 3
pertinent guideline.
2
1

School 5
Leadership,
Management Utilize funds for approved 4
and Operation school programs and projects 5%
(20%) as reflected in the SIP/AIP. 3
2
1
5
Prepare financial
reports/liquidation reports and 4
submit/communicate the same 5% 3
to higher education authorities 2
and other education partners.
1
5
4
Attain 75% MPS in NAT 15% 3
2
1
5
Instructional Monitor attendance of students 4
Leadership regularly and attain/maintain 10% 3
(40%) zero drop-out rate. 2
1
5

Improve instructional
15%
leadership practices.
 Leadership
(40%)

4
Improve instructional
15% 3
leadership practices.
2
1
5
Provide clinical supervision to 4
teachers for the improvement 10% 3
of teaching-learning outcomes 2
1
Provision of 5
Quality Basic
Education
4
Human Create a school-based
Resource professional learning 10% 3
Management community.
and 2
Development
(25%) 1

4
Organize and conducts
5%
INSETS/GAD Training. 3

1
5
4
Encourage stakeholders to
3
create safe, healthy and child-
10%
Parents friendly school environment for
2
Involvement student.
and
Community 1
Partnership 5
(15%)
Meet parents regularly to 4
confer/inform about school
5% 3
accomplishment and students
progress. 2
1
Attain five of the following: 5
1. Serve as resource speaker at
4
least in the District level.
2. Serve as chairman in any
3
working technical committees.

3. Conducts one income

Plus Factor generating project properly 2
implemented with documentation. 5%
5%
4. Conducts an action
research/innovation.
1

5.Organize/maintain one socio-

cultural group.
 6. Publish article in national
circulation.
7. Acquire title of school site.

TOTAL (Excluding Plus Factor) 100% OVER - ALL RATING OF AS

Plus Factor 5% ADJECTIVAL RATI

Adjectival Rating Scale

Outstanding 4.500 5.000
Very Satisfactory 3.500 4.499
Satisfactory 2.500 3.499
Unsatisfactory 1.500 2.499
Poor 1.000 1.499
 Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region IV - B MIMAROPA
DIVISION OF MARINDUQUE
District of Mogpog
OG NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH SCHOOL
Capayang, Mogpog, Marinduque

ANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

June 2016 - March 2017

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

UP DURING PLANNING TOB FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

ACTUAL
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RESULTS RATING
Q E T
with clear financial management system for the school supported by evidences
such as reports, account logs, database system.
with clear financial and resource management system but one or more
requirements were missing
4 4 5 4.33
with clear financial and resource management system but 2 reports or requirements
were lacking
financial management system and reporting were in its initial stages
no financial report
with clear financial management system for the school supported by evidences
such as reports, account logs, database system.
with clear financial and resource management system but one or more
requirements were missing
4 5 4 4.33
with clear financial and resource management system but 2 reports or requirements
were lacking
financial management system and reporting were in its initial stages
no financial report
submitted required reports five days or more before the set deadlines
submitted required reports four days before the set deadlines
submitted required reports three days before the set deadlines 4 4 4 4.00
submitted required reports two days before the set deadlines
submitted required reports on the set deadlines
Attained 75% and above NAT MPS per subject area
Attained 65%-74% of NAT MPS per subject area.
Attained 55%-64% of NAT MPS per subject area. 2 2 2 2.00
Attained 44%-54% of NAT MPS per subject area.
Attained 45% or below of NAT MPS per subject area.
zero drop-out
1%-3% drop-out
4%-6% drop-out 4 3 4 3.67
7%-9% drop-out
10%-above drop-out rate
100% fully implemented and functional instructional and supervisory plan

3 3 4 3.33
84%-99% implemented and functional instructional and supervisory plan
68%-83% implemented and functional instructional and supervisory plan 3 3 4 3.33
52%-67 implemented and functional instructional and supervisory plan.
51%-below implemented and functional instructional and supervisory plan
100% of the teachers are observed and given clinical assistance
84%-99% of the teachers are observed and given clinical assistance
68%-83% of the teachers are observed and given clinical assistance 3 3 3 3.00
52%-67 of the teachers are observed and given clinical assistance
51%-below of the teachers are observed and given clinical assistance
100% of the NCBTS-TSNA of teachers were consolidated and provided with an
action plan fully documented
84%-99% of the NCBTS-TSNA of teachers were consolidated and provided with
an action plan fully documented
68%-83% of the NCBTS-TSNA of teachers were consolidated and provided with
an action plan fully documented
2 2 2 2.00
52%-67 of the NCBTS-TSNA of teachers were consolidated and provided with an
action plan fully documented
51%-below of the NCBTS-TSNA of teachers were consolidated and provided with
an action plan fully documented
Conducted at least 4 INSET/GAD with 100% attendance of participants properly
documented
Conducted at least 3 INSET/GAD with 100% attendance of participants properly
documented
Conducted at least 2 INSET/GAD with 100% attendance of participants properly 3 4 3 3.33
documented
Conducted at least 1 INSET/GAD with 100% attendance of participants properly
documented
no training conducted
initiate/collaborate with stakeholders to put up a tangible project fully documented.
has stakeholders partnership/mobilization plan complete with reports.
has mobilization plan and occasionally meets stakeholders in meetings and
activities but some elements are not enough resources raised
2 2 4 2.67
has mobilization plan and occasionally meets stakeholders but not resulting to
resources generated and evidences are missing
has no mobilization plan and seldom meets with stakeholders but not resulting to
resources generated and evidences missing.
4 meetings attended and conducted within the school year with documentation.
3 meetings attended and conducted within the school year with documentation.
2 meetings attended and conducted within the school year with documentation. 3 5 3 3.67
1 meeting attended and conducted within the school year with documentation.
conducted meetings but not documented
Attained 5 indicators with documents
Attained 4 indicators with documents

Attained 3 indicators with documents

Attained 2 indicators with documents

3 3 3 3.00

Attained 1 indicator with documents

OVER - ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT 3.28

ADJECTIVAL RATING Satisfactory

Ratee: Rater:

School Head Public School District Supervisor

UP DURING EVALUATION

SCORE

0.43

0.22

0.20

0.30

0.37

0.50
0.50

0.30

0.20

0.17

0.27

0.18

0.15
 3.28

atisfactory

Rater:

chool District Supervisor

 Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region IV - B MIMAROPA
DIVISION OF MARINDUQUE
District of Torrijos
NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Matuyatuya, Torrrijos, Marinduque

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (

JUNE 2016-2017

Name of Employee: HECTOR

P.REYES
Position: MASTER TEACHER I
School: MATUYATUYA NHS

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING

KEY RESULT WEIGHT

MAJOR FINAL AREAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER PERFORMANCE INDICATO
OUTPUTS
(KRAs) KRA
5
Write lesson plans/logs based 4
on the standards-based 2% 3
curriculum guides daily. 2
1
Facilitate learning through the 5
use of written/computerized 4
lesson plans, modules, 3
teaching guides, and other 14%
learning resources with the 2
adequate and updated 1
instructional materials.

Teaching 5
Learning Initiate discipline of students 4
Process (20%) including classroom rules, 2% 3
guidelines and individual and
group task. 2
1

5
Monitor attendance, diversity
appreciation, safe, positive and 4
motivating environment, over-
all physical atmosphere, 2% 3
cleanliness, and orderliness of
classrooms including proper 2
waste disposal.
1

Monitor, evaluate and maintain

pupil’s/student’s progress
through
 Monitor, evaluate and maintain
pupil’s/student’s progress
through

*Assessment for Learning

(Formative)
8%
*Assessment as Learning 5

(Reflective) 4
*Assessment of Learning 3
(Summative) 2
*Periodic Test 1
5
Conduct 4
remediation/enrichment
8% 3
programs to improve
performance indicators 2
1

Maintain pupil’s/students
3% 3
school records

Attain the required GSA for

20% 3
Grade level and learning areas

Students' 5
Learning
Outcomes 4
(60%) Initiate improvements in
4%
instructional programs 3

2
1
5

4
Provision of Lead in the preparation of
Quality Basic 3%
instructional materials.
Education
Provision of Lead in the preparation of
Quality Basic 3%
instructional materials. 3
Education
2
1
5

Serve as demonstrator 4
teacher, facilitator or resource
speaker at the school level and 4% 3
or provided mentoring services
to demonstration teachers. 2

Interpret test results and utilize. 3% 3

Initiate projects and programs 4

that will enhance the
curriculum and its delivery to 3%
3
achieve 75% NAT
performance.
2
1
5

4
Conduct mentoring/coaching
activities and prepare 5%
3
instructional material available.

2
1
5

Conduct regular/periodic PTA 3

2%
meetings/conferences

Community
Involvement
(10%)
 5
Community
Involvement 4
(10%)
Visit parents of pupils/students
needing academic 3% 3
monitoring/follow up
2

5
Undertake/initiate 4
projects/events/activities with 4% 3
external funding/sponsorship 2
1

Participate in the planning and 4

implementation of training
5%
programs in school, district and 3
division level.
PROFESSIONA 2
LGROWTH AND
DEVELOPMENT 1
5
Participate in seminars,
workshops, trainings within a 4
5%
year (Division, Regional and
National) 3
2
1

100% OVER - ALL RATING OF ASSES

ADJECTIVAL RATING

Adjectival Rating Scale

Outstanding 4.500 5.000
Very Satisfactory 3.500 4.499
Satisfactory 2.500 3.499
Unsatisfactory 1.500 2.499
Poor 1.000 1.499
 Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region IV - B MIMAROPA
DIVISION OF MARINDUQUE
District of Torrijos
NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Matuyatuya, Torrrijos, Marinduque

MMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR MASTER TEACHERS

JUNE 2016-2017

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review: APRIL 28,2017

UP DURING PLANNING TOB FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

ACTUAL
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RESULTS RATING SCORE
Q E T
200 or more updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
150-199 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
90-149 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way 4 3 5 4.00 0.08
60-89 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
1-59 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
10 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
8 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
6 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
4 5 5 4.67 0.65
4 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
2 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
(Supported with write-up and documentation)
100% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
85%-99% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
70%-84% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed 4 4 4 4.00 0.08
55%-69% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
54% and below of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
100% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last
day of the month
85%-99% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted
every last day of the month
70%-84% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted
every last day of the month
4 4 5 4.33 0.09
55%-69% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted
every last day of the month
54% and below of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and
submitted every last day of the month
Indicators:
1. Test Questions with TOS
2. Class Record (with dates of quizzes, assignments, projects, portfolio,
etc.)
3. Rating sheets
4. List of pupil’s/student’s output like projects, activities done/performed,
etc. 2 2 2 2.00 0.16
All indicators were prepared and submitted two weeks before the scheduled due
time
3 indicators were prepared and submitted one week before the scheduled time
2 indicators were prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
1 indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
no indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date.
100% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
85%-99% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
70%-84% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully 4 4 4 4.00 0.32
55%-69% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
54% and below pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
100% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted before the
scheduled time without error
85%-99% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before
the scheduled time without error
70%-84% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before
the scheduled time with minimal error
4 4 4 4.00 0.12
55%-69% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted one week
after the due time
54% and below of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted two
weeks before the due time
85% and above of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
competency.
82-84% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
competency
79%-81% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
competency
3 4 4 3.67 0.73
76%-78% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
competency
75% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
competency
initiated at least one successful instructional program to 100% of the teachers with
full documentation.
initiated at least one successful instructional program and involved 84%-99% of the
teachers with full documentation.
initiated at least one successful instructional program and involved 63%-83% of the 3 4 4 3.67 0.15
teachers with full documentation.
initiated at least one successful instructional program and involved 52%-62% of the
teachers with full documentation.
no evidence of initiating instructional program.
lead 100% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within a
year with full documentation.
lead 84%-99%% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials
within a year with full documentation.
3 3 3 3.00 0.09
lead 68%-83% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within 3 3 3 3.00 0.09
a year with full documentation.
lead 52%-67% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within
a year with full documentation.
no evidence of leading in preparation of instructional program.
Excellent execution of the lesson plan and excellent mentoring services provided to
the demonstration teacher
Very Satisfactory execution of the lesson plan and Very Satisfactory mentoring
services provided to the demonstration teacher
Satisfactory execution of the lesson plan and Satisfactory mentoring services
provided to the demonstration teacher
4 4 4 4.00 0.16
Fair execution of the lesson plan and Fair mentoring services provided to the
demonstration teacher.
Poor execution of the lesson plan and Poor mentoring services provided to the
demonstration teacher
100% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and
submitted before the scheduled time.
84%-99% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and
submitted before the scheduled time.
68%-83% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and
submitted before the scheduled time. 3 3 2 4.00 0.12
52%-67 of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and
submitted before the scheduled time.
51%-below of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and
submitted before the scheduled time.
Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve
75% in NAT Performance.
Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve
65%-74% in NAT Performance.
Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve 3 3 2 2.67 0.08
55%-64% in NAT Performance.
Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve
54%-below in NAT Performance.
the project or program did not materialized
Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 100% of the teachers and prepared
innovative instructional materials fully documented.
Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 84%-99%% of the teachers and
prepared innovative instructional materials fully documented.
Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 68%-83% of the teachers and prepared 4 3 2 3.00 0.15
innovative instructional materials fully documented.
Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 52%-67% of the teachers and prepared
innovative instructional materials fully documented.
no evidence of mentoring/coaching conducted
100% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements
were fully documented.
84%-99% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
agreements were fully documented.
68%-83% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
agreements were fully documented. 3 4 3 3.33 0.07
52%-67% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
agreements were fully documented.
51%-below of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
agreements were fully documented.
100% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up
supported with documents.
84%-99% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed
up supported with documents.
68%-83% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed
up supported with documents.
2 2 2 2.00 0.06
52%-67 of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed
up supported with documents.
51%-below of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was
followed up supported with documents.
100% of project accomplishment completed were achieved with documentation.
84%-99% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
68%-83% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation. 3 3 3 3.00 0.12
52%-67 of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
51%-below of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
Participated in the planning of at least 1 training program conducted in the division
level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time.
Participated in the planning of at least 2 training programs conducted in the district
level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time.
Participated in the planning of at least 1 training program conducted in the district 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time.
Participated in the planning of at least 2 training program conducted in the school
level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time
No evidence of participation in planning training programs
Attended 3 or more seminars, workshops trainings and echoed to teachers in an
excellent way with documentation
Attended 2 seminars, workshops trainings and echoed to teachers in an excellent
way with documentation 3 3 3 3.00 0.15
Attended 3 or more seminars, workshops trainings but failed to echo to teachers.
Attended 2 seminars, workshops trainings but failed to echo to teachers.
No trainings attended
OVER - ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT 3.58

ADJECTIVAL RATING Very Satisfactory

Ratee: Rater:

HECTOR P. REYES ARMANDO G. QUIJANO

MASTER TECACHER 1 School Head
 Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region IV-MIMAROPA
DIVISION OF MARINDUQUE
District of Torrijos
MATUYATUYA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Matuyatuya, Torrijos, Marinduque

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (

June 2017 - April 2018

Name of Employee: NIKKO

M. TOGADO
Position: TEACHER II
School: MATUYATUYA NHS

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING

KEY RESULT WEIGHT

MAJOR FINAL AREAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
OUTPUTS
(KRAs) KRA
5
Prepare lesson plans and daily
lesson logs of activities 4
including appropriate, 2% 3
adequate and updated 2
instructional materials
1
Facilitate learning through the 5
use of written/computerized 4
lesson plans, modules, 3
teaching guides, and other 14%
learning resources with the 2
adequate and updated 1
instructional materials

Teaching 5
Learning Initiate discipline of students 4
Process (20%) including classroom rules, 2% 3
guidelines and individual and
group task 2
1

5
Monitor attendance, diversity
appreciation, safe, positive and 4
motivating environment, over-
all physical atmosphere, 2% 3
cleanliness, and orderliness of
classrooms including proper 2
waste disposal.
1

Monitor, evaluate and maintain

pupil’s/student’s progress
through
 Monitor, evaluate and maintain
pupil’s/student’s progress
through

*Assessment for Learning

(Formative)
5%
*Assessment as Learning 5

(Reflective) 4
*Assessment of Learning 3
(Summative) 2
*Periodic Test 1
5
Conduct 4
remediation/enrichment
10% 3
programs to improve
performance indicators 2
Students'
1
Learning
Outcomes 5
(60%)
4

Maintain pupil’s/students
5% 3
school records

Attain the required GSA for

Provision of 40% 3
Grade level and learning areas
Quality Basic
Education 2

Conduct regular/periodic PTA

2.5% 3
meetings/conferences

5
Community
Involvement 4
10%
Visit parents of pupils/students
needing academic 2.5%
monitoring/follow up
 Community
Involvement
10%
Visit parents of pupils/students
needing academic 2.5% 3
monitoring/follow up
2

5
Undertake/initiate 4
projects/events/activities with 5% 3
external funding/sponsorship 2
1

4
Conducted action research 2.5%
3

2
1

3
Participated in activities such
2.5%
as teachers' association, etc.
Professional 2
Growth and
Development 1
10%

Produced publications/creative 4
work for school paper/division 2.5%
publication 3
2
1
5
Received special 4
awards/citation/recognition for 2.5% 3
exemplary performance 2
1

TOTAL (Excluding Plus Factor) 100% OVER - ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT

ADJECTIVAL RATING

Adjectival Rating Scale /marcuz rex/

Outstanding 4.500 5.000
Very Satisfactory 3.500 4.499
Satisfactory 2.500 3.499
Unsatisfactory 1.500 2.499
Poor 1.000 1.499
 Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region IV-MIMAROPA
DIVISION OF MARINDUQUE
District of Torrijos
UYATUYA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Matuyatuya, Torrijos, Marinduque

MMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS

June 2017 - April 2018

Name of Rater: ARMANDO G. QUIJANO

Position: HEAD TEACHER III
Date of Review: April/30/2018

NG PLANNING TOB FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

ACTUAL
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RESULTS RATING SCORE
Q E T
200 or more updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
150-199 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
90-149 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way 0.00 0.00
60-89 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
1-59 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
10 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
8 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
6 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
0.00 0.00
4 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
2 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
(Supported with write-up and documentation)
100% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
85%-99% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
70%-84% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed 0.00 0.00
55%-69% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
54% and below of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
100% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last
day of the month
85%-99% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted
every last day of the month
70%-84% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted
every last day of the month
0.00 0.00
55%-69% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted
every last day of the month
54% and below of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and
submitted every last day of the month
Indicators:
1. Test Questions with TOS
2. Class Record (with dates of quizzes, assignments, projects, portfolio,
etc.)
3. Rating sheets
4. List of pupil’s/student’s output like projects, activities done/performed,
etc. 0.00 0.00
All indicators were prepared and submitted two weeks before the scheduled due
time
3 indicators were prepared and submitted one week before the scheduled time
2 indicators were prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
1 indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
no indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date.
100% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
85%-99% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
70%-84% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully 0.00 0.00
55%-69% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
54% and below pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
100% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted before the
scheduled time without error
85%-99% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before
the scheduled time without error
70%-84% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before
the scheduled time with minimal error
0.00 0.00
55%-69% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted one week
after the due time
54% and below of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted two
weeks before the due time
85% and above of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
competency.
82-84% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
competency
79%-81% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
competency
0.00 0.00
76%-78% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
competency
75% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
competency
100% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements
were fully documented.
84%-99% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
agreements were fully documented.
68%-83% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
agreements were fully documented.
0.00 0.00
52%-67% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
agreements were fully documented.
51%-below of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
agreements were fully documented.
100% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up
supported with documents.
84%-99% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed
up supported with documents.

0.00 0.00
 68%-83% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed
up supported with documents.
0.00 0.00
52%-67 of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed
up supported with documents.
51%-below of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was
followed up supported with documents.
100% of project accomplishment completed were achieved with documentation.
84%-99% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
68%-83% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation. 0.00 0.00
52%-67 of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
51%-below of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in the
Division Level Research Conference/Summit
Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in the
District Level Research Conference/Summit
0.00 0.00
Conducted a completed action research but have not presented the result in any
level of research conference/summit
Proposed an action research.
Conceptualize an action research
Attended an aggregate of 48 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division level
and earned 9 units in graduate studies
Attended an aggregate of 48 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division
level.
Attended an aggregate of 24 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division level
and earn 9 units in graduate studies
Attended an aggregate of 24 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division
level.

Attended at aggregate of 24 hours training at least in the District level

0.00 0.00
(Attached certificate of participation and Grades)

Produced publication for school paper and received recognition in the National level

Produced publication for school paper and received recognition in the Regional
level

Produced publication for school paper and received recognition in the Division level
Produced publication for school paper and received recognition in the District level
Produced publication for school paper and received recognition in the School level
Received certificate of recognition in the National level.
Received certificate of recognition in the Regional level
Received certificate of recognition in the Division level 0.00 0.00
Received certificate of recognition in the District level
Received certificate of recognition in the School level
OVER - ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT 0.00

ADJECTIVAL RATING #N/A

arcuz rex/
Ratee: Rater:
NIKKO M. TOGADO ARMANDO G. QUIJANO
TEACHER II School Head
 Transmutation Table

1.000 1.499 Poor

1.500 2.499 Unsatisfactory

2.500 3.499 Satisfactory

3.500 4.499 Very Satisfactory

4.500 5.000 Outstanding