TESTING PROGRAM

TARGET CLIENTELE AND LEVEL: Interested individual who wants to be an Ignatian Lawyer; College Graduate

RATIONALE:

GENERAL GOALS: To check the capability in terms of: Critical thinking, Reasoning, Verbal Skills etc. of the
interested applicant

GOAL1:

OBJECTIVES CRITICAL OUTPUT PERSON ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF

ACTIVITIES INDICATORS RESPONSIBLE BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION

 To get interested We use this tool The Law School Center for Schedule of exams
individual to take as one our Qualifying Test Educational P20,000 would be as follows:
up LSQT as their recruitment (LSQT) is to Measurement
stepping stone in program in measure aptitude (CEM)- who checks
enrolling law AdZU Law which are deemed and handle this This will cover October
school. necessary for law battery of test for our the battery of November
course. interested individual. test we January
 Whoever meets purchase in February
the cut-off for the The ff are to be AdZU Testing CEM which March
LSQT can measured: Center- as the includes the April
undergo the medium in shipping fee per
Panel of  Verbal administering the exam and the
Deliberations Reasoning exam in behalf of the purchasing and
thereafter if  Critical CEM and ADZU the honorarium
he/she qualify, Thinking Law. of the staffs. .
he/she can now
enroll in AdZU  Quantitative  We used their
Law. Ability venue, time,
 Figural effort, talents in
Reasoning administering the
LSQT.
The results can be  They send the
identified as battery of test to
follows: CEM for
checking.
Very Poor
Poor AdZU Law – A
Below Average College who handles
Lo Average the results of the Law
High Average School Qualifying
Above Average Test (LSQT).
Superior
Excellent  Who coordinates
with AdZU
Testing Center
with regards to
LSQT Schedules.
 Who sets the
minimum cut-off
to qualify test
takers in Law
School.

Lastly our beloved

School:

Ateneo De
Zamboanga
University- for
having a “Ateneo
Law School” in our
City to help dreamers
to pursue their dream
to become one of the
Ignatian Lawyer.
 TESTING PROGRAM

Target Clientele and Level: Enrolled Law Students; All Levels

Rationale:
General Goals: To be able to know the feedback of the AdZU Law Students with their respective professors in each subject.

Goal 2:

OBJECTIVES CRITICAL OUTPUT PERSON ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF

ACTIVITIES INDICATORS RESPONSBILE BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION

1. To be able to We use and adapt The AdZU Law AdZU Human P2,000 To administer the
know Professors this tool in order Administration do Resource evaluation tool before
teaching method to know the feedback-ing to Development Office each semester ends.
in his respective Professors and the professors. – The tool was To reproduce the Then individual
subject. Students adapted in the said materials. feedback-ing follows
performance with The tool has 4 office. right after tally-ing
2. To be able to regards to their parts; 1 For the
know student’s teaching / subject student AdZU Law Implementation and
feedback with matters. performance. 2- Administration- To improvement can be
regards to their The course itself, 3 administer the tool, done after we see the
professors in lieu To check for the teacher check and give results per professor.
to teaching students’ performance, 4 is feedback to the
method, areas of performance in the essay part that professors. 9914139
improvement, their subject per wherein they can
strengths. se. write areas of
improvement,
3. In the tool the strengths of the
students are also professors.
asked to evaluate
their own selves Results turned to as
with regards to follows:
their effort in the
subject matter Overall
and their performance
performance Strengths, Areas of
improvement,
4. With the
Administration;
to be able to
know the
performance of
the professors
and to know
where we can
improve.